This statement level construct takes no clauses and has no associated
statement, and simply labels a number of array elements as valid for
caching. The implementation here is pretty simple, but it is a touch of
a special case for parsing, so the parsing code reflects that.
The 'declare' construct is the first of two 'declaration' level
constructs, so it is legal in any place a declaration is, including as a
statement, which this accomplishes by wrapping it in a DeclStmt. All
clauses on this have a 'same scope' requirement, which this enforces as
declaration context instead, which makes it possible to implement these
as a template.
The 'link' and 'device_resident' clauses are also added, which have some
similar/small restrictions, but are otherwise pretty rote.
This patch implements all of the above.
The atomic construct is a particularly complicated one. The directive
itself is pretty simple, it has 5 options for the 'atomic-clause'.
However, the associated statement is fairly complicated.
'read' accepts:
v = x;
'write' accepts:
x = expr;
'update' (or no clause) accepts:
x++;
x--;
++x;
--x;
x binop= expr;
x = x binop expr;
x = expr binop x;
'capture' accepts either a compound statement, or:
v = x++;
v = x--;
v = ++x;
v = --x;
v = x binop= expr;
v = x = x binop expr;
v = x = expr binop x;
IF 'capture' has a compound statement, it accepts:
{v = x; x binop= expr; }
{x binop= expr; v = x; }
{v = x; x = x binop expr; }
{v = x; x = expr binop x; }
{x = x binop expr ;v = x; }
{x = expr binop x; v = x; }
{v = x; x = expr; }
{v = x; x++; }
{v = x; ++x; }
{x++; v = x; }
{++x; v = x; }
{v = x; x--; }
{v = x; --x; }
{x--; v = x; }
{--x; v = x; }
While these are all quite complicated, there is a significant amount
of similarity between the 'capture' and 'update' lists, so this patch
reuses a lot of the same functions.
This patch implements the entirety of 'atomic', creating a new Sema file
for the sema for it, as it is fairly sizable.
These two clauses just take a 'var-list' and specify where the variables
should be copied from/to. This patch implements the AST nodes for them
and ensures they properly take a var-list.
The 'self' clause is an unfortunately difficult one, as it has a
significantly different meaning between 'update' and the other
constructs. This patch introduces a way for the 'self' clause to work
as both. I considered making this two separate AST nodes (one for
'self' on 'update' and one for the others), however this makes the
automated macros/etc for supporting a clause break.
Instead, 'self' has the ability to act as either a condition or as a
var-list clause. As this is the only one of its kind, it is implemented
all within it. If in the future we have more that work like this, we
should consider rewriting a lot of the macros that we use to make
clauses work, and make them separate ast nodes.
A fairly simple one, only valid on the 'set' construct, this clause
takes an int expression. Most of the work was already done as a part of
parsing, so this patch ends up being a lot of infrastructure.
This is a very simple sema implementation, and just required AST node
plus the existing diagnostics. This patch adds tests and adds the AST
node required, plus enables it for 'init' and 'shutdown' (only!)
These two constructs are very simple and similar, and only support 3
different clauses, two of which are already implemented. This patch
adds AST nodes for both constructs, and leaves the device_num clause
unimplemented, but enables the other two.
The arguments to this are the same as for the 'wait' clause, so this
reuses all of that infrastructure. So all this has to do is support a
pair of clauses that are already implemented (if and async), plus create
an AST node. This patch does so, and adds proper testing.
All 4 of the 'data' constructs have a requirement that at least 1 of a
small list of clauses must appear on the construct. This patch
implements that restriction, and updates all of the tests it takes to
do so.
This is a clause that is only valid on 'host_data' constructs, and
identifies variables which it should use the current device address.
From a Sema perspective, the only thing novel here is mild changes to
how ActOnVar works for this clause, else this is very much like the rest
of the 'var-list' clauses.
'delete' is another clause that has very little compile-time
implication, but needs a full AST that takes a var list. This patch
ipmlements it fully, plus adds sufficient test coverage.
This is another new clause specific to 'exit data' that takes a pointer
argument. This patch implements this the same way we do a few other
clauses (like attach) that have the same restrictions.
These constructs are all very similar and closely related, so this patch
creates the AST nodes for them, serialization, printing/etc.
Additionally the restrictions are all added as tests/todos in the tests,
as those will have to be implemented once we get those clauses implemented.
This didn't end up being properly tested, but 'delete' as a keyword
causes us to not properly recognize it as a clause kind. This patch
correctly adds the work to make sure it is recognized correctly.
Combined constructs (OpenACC 3.3 section 2.11) are a short-cut for
writing a `loop` construct immediately inside of a `compute` construct.
However, this interaction requires we do additional work to ensure that
we get the semantics between the two correct, as well as diagnostics.
This patch adds the semantic analysis for the constructs (but no
clauses), as well as the AST nodes.
OpenACC restricts the contents of a 'for' loop affected by a 'loop'
construct without a 'seq'. The loop variable must be integer, pointer,
or random-access-iterator, it must monotonically increase/decrease, and
the trip count must be computable at runtime before the function.
This patch tries to implement some of these limitations to the best of
our ability, though it causes us to be perhaps overly restrictive at the
moment. I expect we'll revisit some of these rules/add additional
supported forms of loop-variable and 'monotonically increasing' here,
but the currently enforced rules are heavily inspired by the OMP
implementation here.
The worker clause specifies iterations of the loop/ that are executed in
parallel by distributing the iterations among the multiple works within
a single gang.
The sema rules for this type are simply that it cannot be combined with
a `kernel` construct with a `num_workers` clause, child `loop` clauses
cannot contain a `gang` or `worker` clause, and that the argument is oly
allowed when associated with a `kernel`.
The 'gang' clause is used to specify parallel execution of loops, thus
has some complicated rules depending on the 'loop's associated compute
construct. This patch implements all of those.
The 'tile' clause shares quite a bit of the rules with 'collapse', so a
followup patch will add those tests/behaviors. This patch deals with
adding the AST node.
The 'tile' clause takes a series of integer constant expressions, or *.
The asterisk is now represented by a new OpenACCAsteriskSizeExpr node,
else this clause is very similar to others.
'collapse' makes the 'loop' construct apply to the next N nested loops,
and 'loop' requires all associated loops be 'for' loops (or range-for).
This patch adds this restriction, plus adds a number of infrastructure
changes to permit some of the other restrictions in the future to be
implemented.
'collapse' also requires that there is not any calls to other directives
inside of the collapse region, so this also implements that limitation.
The 'collapse' clause on a 'loop' construct is used to specify how many
nested loops are associated with the 'loop' construct. It takes an
optional 'force' tag, and an integer constant expression as arguments.
There are many other restrictions based on the contents of the loop/etc,
but those are implemented in followup patches, for now, this patch just
adds the AST node and does basic argument checking on the loop-count.
These three clauses are all quite trivial, as they take no parameters.
They are mutually exclusive, and 'seq' has some other exclusives that
are implemented here.
The ONE thing that isn't implemented is 2.9's restriction (line 2010):
'A loop associated with a 'loop' construct that does not have a 'seq'
clause must be written to meet all the following conditions'.
Future clauses will require similar work, so it'll be done as a
followup.
This patch implements the 'loop' construct AST, as well as the basic
appertainment rule. Additionally, it sets up the 'parent' compute
construct, which is necessary for codegen/other diagnostics.
A 'loop' can apply to a for or range-for loop, otherwise it has no other
restrictions (though some of its clauses do).
I discovered while working on something else that we were using the
location of the directive name as the 'beginloc' which caused some
problems in a few places. This patch makes it so our beginloc is the
'#' as we originally designed, and then adds a DirectiveLoc concept to a
construct for use diagnosing the name.
'reduction' has a few restrictions over normal 'var-list' clauses:
1- On parallel, a num_gangs can only have 1 argument when combined with
reduction. These two aren't able to be combined on any other of the
compute constructs however.
2- The vars all must be 'numerical data types' types of some sort, or a
'composite of numerical data types'. A list of types is given in the
standard as a minimum, so we choose 'isScalar', which covers all of
these types and keeps types that are actually numeric. Other compilers
don't seem to implement the 'composite of numerical data types', though
we do.
3- Because of the above restrictions, member-of-composite is not
allowed, so any access via a memberexpr is disallowed. Array-element and
sub-arrays (aka array sections) are both permitted, so long as they meet
the requirements of #2.
This patch implements all of these for compute constructs.
device_type, also spelled as dtype, specifies the applicability of the
clauses following it, and takes a series of identifiers representing the
architectures it applies to. As we don't have a source for the valid
architectures yet, this patch just accepts all.
Semantically, this also limits the list of clauses that can be applied
after the device_type, so this implements that as well.
This reverts commit 06f04b2e27f2586d3db2204ed4e54f8b78fea74e.
This reapplies commit c4a9a374749deb5f2a932a7d4ef9321be1b2ae5d.
The build failures were caused by the patch depending on the order of
evaluation of arguments to a function. This reapplication separates out
the capture of one of the values.
This reverts commit c4a9a374749deb5f2a932a7d4ef9321be1b2ae5d.
This and the followup patch keep hitting an assert I wrote on the build
bots in a way that isn't clear. Reverting so I can fix it without a
rush.
device_type, also spelled as dtype, specifies the applicability of the
clauses following it, and takes a series of identifiers representing the
architectures it applies to. As we don't have a source for the valid
architectures yet, this patch just accepts all.
Semantically, this also limits the list of clauses that can be applied
after the device_type, so this implements that as well.
'wait' takes a few int-exprs (well, a series of async-arguments, but
those are effectively just an int-expr), plus a pair of tags. This
patch adds the support for this to the AST, and does the appropriate
semantic analysis for them.
It was discovered while writing the 'wait' clause ast tests that the
'endloc' wasn't set correctly when there was no arguments. This patch
ensures we set it right, and adds an assert to prevent us from messing
it up in the future.
This is a pretty simple clause, it takes an 'async-argument', which
effectively needs to be just parsed as an 'int' argument, since it can
be an arbitrarly integer at runtime (and negative values are legal for
implementation defined values).
This patch also cleans up the async-argument parsing, so 'wait' got some
minor quality-of-life improvements for parsing (both clause and
construct).
These two are very similar to the other 'var-list' variants, except they
require that the type of the variable be a pointer. This patch
implements that restriction.
Like 'copy', these also have alternate names, so this implements that as
well. Additionally, these have an optional tag of either 'readonly' or
'zero' depending on the clause.
Otherwise, this is a pretty rote implementation of the clause, as there
aren't any special rules for it.
Like present, no_create, and first_private, copy is a clause that takes
just a var-list, and follows the same rules as the others.
The one unique part of this clause is that it ALSO supports two
deprecated/backwards-compatibility spellings, so this patch adds them
and implements them.
The private clause is the first that takes a 'var-list', thus this has a
lot of additional work to enable the var-list type. A 'var' is a
traditional variable reference, subscript, member-expression, or
array-section, so checking of these is pretty minor.
Note: This ran into some issues with array-sections (aka sub-arrays)
that will be fixed in a follow-up patch.
num_gangs takes an 'int-expr-list', for 'parallel', and an 'int-expr'
for 'kernels'. This patch changes the parsing to always parse it as an
'int-expr-list', then correct the expression count during Sema. It also
implements the rest of the semantic analysis changes for this clause.
The 'vector_length' clause is semantically identical to the
'num_workers' clause, in that it takes a mandatory single int-expr. This
is implemented identically to it.
`self` clauses on compute constructs take an optional condition
expression. We again limit the implementation to ONLY compute constructs
to ensure we get all the rules correct for others. However, this one
will be particularly complicated, as it takes a `var-list` for `update`,
so when we get to that construct/clause combination, we need to do that
as well.
This patch also furthers uses of the `OpenACCClauses.def` as it became
useful while implementing this (as well as some other minor refactors as
I went through).
Finally, `self` and `if` clauses have an interaction with each other, if
an `if` clause evaluates to `true`, the `self` clause has no effect.
While this is intended and can be used 'meaningfully', we are warning on
this with a very granular warning, so that this edge case will be
noticed by newer users, but can be disabled trivially.
Like with the 'default' clause, this is being applied to only Compute
Constructs for now. The 'if' clause takes a condition expression which
is used as a runtime value.
This is not a particularly complex semantic implementation, as there
isn't much to this clause, other than its interactions with 'self',
which will be managed in the patch to implement that.
As a followup to my previous commits, this is an implementation of a
single clause, in this case the 'default' clause. This implements all
semantic analysis for it on compute clauses, and continues to leave it
rejected for all others (some as 'doesnt appertain', others as 'not
implemented' as appropriate).
This also implements and tests the TreeTransform as requested in the
previous patch.
Now that we have AST nodes for OpenACC Clauses, this patch adds their
creation to Sema and makes the Parser call all the required functions.
This also redoes TreeTransform to work with the clauses/make sure they
are transformed.
Much of this is NFC, since there is no clause we can test this behavior
with. However, there IS one noticable change; we are now no longer
diagnosing that a clause is 'not implemented' unless it there was no
errors parsing its parameters. This is because it cleans up how we
create and diagnose clauses.
