- P1252 ("Ranges Design Cleanup") -- deprecate
`move_iterator::operator->` starting from C++20; add range comparisons
to the `<functional>` synopsis. This restores
`move_iterator::operator->` that was incorrectly deleted in D117656;
it's still defined in the latest draft, see
http://eel.is/c++draft/depr.move.iter.elem. Note that changes to
`*_result` types from 6.1 in the paper are no longer relevant now that
these types are aliases;
- P2106 ("Alternative wording for GB315 and GB316") -- add a few
`*_result` types to the synopsis in `<algorithm>` (some algorithms are
not implemented yet and thus some of the proposal still cannot be
marked as done);
Also mark already done issues as done (or as nothing to do):
- P2091 ("Fixing Issues With Range Access CPOs") was already implemented
(this patch adds tests for some ill-formed cases);
- LWG 3247 ("`ranges::iter_move` should perform ADL-only lookup of
`iter_move`") was already implemented;
- LWG 3300 ("Non-array ssize overload is underconstrained") doesn't
affect the implementation;
- LWG 3335 ("Resolve C++20 NB comments US 273 and GB 274") was already
implemented;
- LWG 3355 ("The memory algorithms should support move-only input
iterators introduced by P1207") was already implemented (except for
testing).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126053
`__GCC_CONSTRUCTIVE_SIZE` and `__GCC_DESTRUCTIVE_SIZE` are available since GCC 12. I'm assuming clang will also implement these for compatability with libstdc++.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: h-vetinari, libcxx-commits, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122276
P0798R8 "Monadic operations for std::optional" has been implemented, so
this LWG issue can be adopted.
During review it was discovered another paper bumped the macro. The
part affecting optional of this paper is done, the variant isn't. The
status page is updated to reflect the current state.
Implements
- LWG 3621 Remove feature-test macro __cpp_lib_monadic_optional
Updates status of
- P2231R1 Missing constexpr in std::optional and std::variant
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125813
This optimizes the __format_arg_store type to allow a more efficient
storage of the basic_format_args.
It stores the data in two arrays:
- A struct with the tag of the exposition only variant's type and the
offset of the element in the data array. Since this array only depends
on the type information it's calculated at compile time and can be
shared by different instances of this class.
- The arguments converted to the types used in the exposition only
variant of basic_format_arg. This means the packed data can be
directly copied to an element of this variant.
The new code uses rvalue reference arguments in preparation for P2418.
The handle class also has some changes to prepare for P2418. The real
changed for P2418 will be done separately, but these parts make it
easier to implement that paper.
Some parts of existing test code are removed since they were no longer
valid after the changes, but new tests have been added.
Implements parts of:
- P2418 Add support for std::generator-like types to std::format
Completes:
- LWG3473 Normative encouragement in non-normative note
Depends on D121138
Reviewed By: #libc, vitaut, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121514
Quite a few C++20 LWG issues/papers related to the One Ranges Proposal
were already effectively implemented (or contain semantic-only wording
changes that don't affect the implementation), mark them as such.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125065
- add zip_view and views::zip for C++23
- added unit tests
- implemented section 5.6 (zip) in P2321R2
I used clang-format to format the files but they look nothing like the rest of the code base. Manually indenting each line to match the styles sounds like an impossible task. Is there any clang-format file which can format it reasonable similar to the rest of the code base so that I can manually format the rest lines that look weird?
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, philnik, var-const
Spies: Mordante, philnik, libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122806
- added views::join adaptor object
- added test for the adaptor object
- fixed some join_view's tests. e.g iter_swap test
- added some negative tests for join_view to test that operations do not exist when constraints aren't met
- added tests that locks down issues that were already addressed in previous change
- LWG3500 `join_view::iterator::operator->()` is bogus
- LWG3313 `join_view::iterator::operator--` is incorrectly constrained
- LWG3517 `join_view::iterator`'s `iter_swap` is underconstrained
- P2328R1 join_view should join all views of ranges
- fixed some issues in join_view and added tests
- LWG3535 `join_view::iterator::iterator_category` and `::iterator_concept` lie
- LWG3474 Nesting ``join_views`` is broken because of CTAD
- added tests for an LWG issue that isn't resolved in the standard yet, but the previous code has workaround.
- LWG3569 Inner iterator not default_initializable
Reviewed By: #libc, var-const
Spies: var-const, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123466
Note that this class was called just `split_view` in the original One
Ranges Proposal and was renamed to `lazy_split_view` by
[P2210](https://wg21.link/p2210).
Co-authored-by: zoecarver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107500
This supersedes and incoroporates content from both D108906 and D54966,
and also some original content.
Co-Authored-by: Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Gonzalo Brito Gadeschi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118938
