It is bad practice to capture by default (via [&] in this case) when
using lambdas, so we should avoid that as much as possible.
This patch fixes that in the getForwardingRegsDefinedByMI
from DwarfDebug module.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79616
We should use explicit type instead of auto type deduction when
the type is so obvious. In addition, we remove ambiguity, since auto
type deduction sometimes is not that intuitive, so that could lead
us to some unwanted behavior.
This patch fixes that in the collectCallSiteParameters() from
DwarfDebug module.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79624
With a fix to uninitialized EndOffset.
DW_OP_call_ref is the only operation that has an operand which depends
on the DWARF format. The patch fixes handling that operation in DWARF64
units.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79501
DW_OP_call_ref is the only operation that has an operand which depends
on the DWARF format. The patch fixes handling that operation in DWARF64
units.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79501
It can be used to avoid passing the begin and end of a range.
This makes the code shorter and it is consistent with another
wrappers we already have.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78016
This is a performance patch that hoists two conditions in DwarfDebug's
validThroughout to avoid a linear-scan of all instructions in a block. We
now exit early if validThrougout will never return true for the variable
location.
The first added clause filters for the two circumstances where
validThroughout will return true. The second added clause should be
identical to the one that's deleted from after the linear-scan.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77639
Summary:
This patch adds support for emission of following DWARFv5 macro forms
in .debug_macro section.
1. DW_MACRO_start_file
2. DW_MACRO_end_file
3. DW_MACRO_define_strp
4. DW_MACRO_undef_strp.
Reviewed By: dblaikie, ikudrin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72828
Record the address of a tail-calling branch instruction within its call
site entry using DW_AT_call_pc. This allows a debugger to determine the
address to use when creating aritificial frames.
This creates an extra attribute + relocation at tail call sites, which
constitute 3-5% of all call sites in xnu/clang respectively.
rdar://60307600
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76336
When compiling
```
struct S {
float w;
};
void f(long w, long b);
void g(struct S s) {
int w = s.w;
f(w, w*4);
}
```
I get Assertion failed: ((!CombinedExpr || CombinedExpr->isValid()) && "Combined debug expression is invalid").
That's because we combine two epxressions that both end in DW_OP_stack_value:
```
(lldb) p Expr->dump()
!DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 32, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 64, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_stack_value)
(lldb) p Param.Expr->dump()
!DIExpression(DW_OP_constu, 4, DW_OP_mul, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 32, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 64, DW_ATE_signed, DW_OP_stack_value)
(lldb) p CombinedExpr->isValid()
(bool) $0 = false
(lldb) p CombinedExpr->dump()
!DIExpression(4097, 32, 5, 4097, 64, 5, 16, 4, 30, 4097, 32, 5, 4097, 64, 5, 159, 159)
```
I believe that in this particular case combining two stack values is
safe, but I didn't want to sink the special handling into
DIExpression::append() because I do want everyone to think about what
they are doing.
Patch by Adrian Prantl.
Fixes PR45181.
rdar://problem/60383095
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76164
This is part of PR44213 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
When importing (system) Clang modules, LLDB needs to know which SDK
(e.g., MacOSX, iPhoneSimulator, ...) they came from. While the sysroot
attribute contains the absolute path to the SDK, this doesn't work
well when the debugger is run on a different machine than the
compiler, and the SDKs are installed in different directories. It thus
makes sense to just store the name of the SDK instead of the absolute
path, so it can be found relative to LLDB.
rdar://problem/51645582
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75646
```
// clang -c -gdwarf-5 a.s -o a.o
.section .init; ret
.text; ret
```
.debug_info contains DW_AT_ranges and llvm-dwarfdump will report
a verification error because .debug_rnglists does not exist (not
implemented).
This patch generates .debug_rnglists for assembly files.
emitListsTableHeaderStart() in DwarfDebug.cpp can be shared with
MCDwarf.cpp. Because CodeGen depends on MC, I move the function to
MCDwarf.cpp
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75375
Summary:
If the describeLoadedValue() hook produced a DIExpression when
describing a instruction, and it was not possible to emit a call site
entry directly (the value operand was not an immediate nor a preserved
register), then that described value could not be inserted into the
worklist, and would instead be dropped, meaning that the parameter's
call site value couldn't be described.
This patch extends the worklist so that each entry has an DIExpression
that is built up when iterating through the instructions.
This allows us to describe instruction chains like this:
$reg0 = mv $fp
$reg0 = add $reg0, offset
call @call_with_offseted_fp
Since DW_OP_LLVM_entry_value operations can't be combined with any other
expression, such call site entries will not be emitted. I have added a
test, dbgcall-site-expr-entry-value.mir, which verifies that we don't
assert or emit broken DWARF in such cases.
Reviewers: djtodoro, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75036
Summary:
This is a preparatory patch for D75036, in which a debug expression is
associated with each parameter register in the worklist. In that patch
the two lambda functions addToWorklist() and finishCallSiteParams() grow
a bit, so move those out to separate functions. This patch also prepares
for each parameter register having their own expression moving the
creation of the DbgValueLoc into finishCallSiteParams().
Reviewers: djtodoro, vsk
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75050
This patch enables the debug entry values feature.
- Remove the (CC1) experimental -femit-debug-entry-values option
- Enable it for x86, arm and aarch64 targets
- Resolve the test failures
- Leave the llc experimental option for targets that do not
support the CallSiteInfo yet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73534
This patch enables the debug entry values feature.
- Remove the (CC1) experimental -femit-debug-entry-values option
- Enable it for x86, arm and aarch64 targets
- Resolve the test failures
- Leave the llc experimental option for targets that do not
support the CallSiteInfo yet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73534
Instructions marked as FrameSetup do not cause requestLabelAfterInsn to
be called and so no such label is generated. Call instructions which
require call site entries to be generated require this label to be
present in order to calculate the return PC offset/address, but the
check for whether the call instruction is marked as FrameSetup was not
present.
Therefore in the case where a call instruction is marked as FrameSetup,
an assertion failure occurs if a call site entry is to be generated.
This is the case with RISC-V's implementation of save/restore via
library calls.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71593
Add the isCandidateForCallSiteEntry predicate to MachineInstr to
determine whether a DWARF call site entry should be created for an
instruction.
For now, it's enough to have any call instruction that doesn't belong to
a blacklisted set of opcodes. For these opcodes, a call site entry isn't
meaningful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74159
Summary:
This patch reorders the emission of debug_str section, so that
string can come after macros.
This is necessary for macro forms like DW_MACRO_define_strp,
which emits macro as a string in debug_str section.
Originally committed in: 1ced28cbe75ff81f35ac2c71e941041eb3afcd00
Reverted in: f75301d16d444d8cb6810d679290df744bc79ec7
(reverted due to tests failing on non-linux/x86 targets, tests have since been
generalized and specialized... since Split DWARF isn't supported on non-elf
targets anyway and we have no way to run on "whatever elf target is available"
so they fail on MacOS without an explicit target triple)
This code was incorrectly emitting extra bytes into arbitrary parts of
the object file when it was meant to be hashing them to compute the DWO
ID.
Follow-up patch(es) will refactor this API somewhat to make such bugs
harder to introduce, hopefully.
and follow-ups.
This reverts commit 1ced28cbe75ff81f35ac2c71e941041eb3afcd00.
This reverts commit 4f281f047457ce3f1870a93253476222314f420b.
This reverts commit 552a8fe12bd1822f48dda2e9e8728a179f82d356.
The test fails on non-Linux.
This code was incorrectly emitting extra bytes into arbitrary parts of
the object file when it was meant to be hashing them to compute the DWO
ID.
Follow-up patch(es) will refactor this API somewhat to make such bugs
harder to introduce, hopefully.
This is a revert-of-revert (i.e. this reverts commit 802bec89, which
itself reverted fa4701e1 and 79daafc9) with a fix folded in. The problem
was that call site tags weren't emitted properly when LTO was enabled
along with split-dwarf. This required a minor fix. I've added a reduced
test case in test/DebugInfo/X86/fission-call-site.ll.
Original commit message:
This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.
We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.
This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.
As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.
Update #1:
Reland with a fix to create a declaration DIE when the declaration is
missing from the CU's retainedTypes list. The declaration is left out
of the retainedTypes list in two cases:
1) Re-compiling pre-r266445 bitcode (in which declarations weren't added
to the retainedTypes list), and
2) Doing LTO function importing (which doesn't update the retainedTypes
list).
It's possible to handle (1) and (2) by modifying the retainedTypes list
(in AutoUpgrade, or in the LTO importing logic resp.), but I don't see
an advantage to doing it this way, as it would cause more DWARF to be
emitted compared to creating the declaration DIEs lazily.
Update #2:
Fold in a fix for call site tag emission in the split-dwarf + LTO case.
Tested with a stage2 ThinLTO+RelWithDebInfo build of clang, and with a
ReleaseLTO-g build of the test suite.
rdar://46577651, rdar://57855316, rdar://57840415, rdar://58888440
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350
The Version was used only to determine the size of an operand of
DW_OP_call_ref. The size was 4 for all versions apart from 2, but
the DW_OP_call_ref operation was introduced only in DWARF3. Thus,
the code may be simplified and using of Version may be eliminated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73264
Summary:
This fixes PR44118. For cases where we have a chain like this:
R8 = R1 (entry value)
R0 = R8
call @foo R0
the code that emits call site entries using entry values would not
follow that chain, instead emitting a call site entry with R8 as
location rather than R0. Such a case was discovered when originally
adding dbgcall-site-orr-moves.mir. This patch fixes that issue. This is
done by changing the ForwardedRegWorklist set to a map in which the
worklist registers always map to the parameter registers that they
describe.
Another thing this patch fixes is that worklist registers now can
describe more than one parameter register at a time. Such a case
occurred in dbgcall-site-interpretation.mir, resulting in a call site
entry not being emitted for one of the parameters.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73168
Summary:
Since D70431 the describeLoadedValue() hook takes a parameter register,
meaning that it can now be asked to describe any register. This means
that we can drop the difference between explicit and implicit defines
that we previously had in collectCallSiteParameters().
I have not found any case for any upstream targets where a parameter
register is only implicitly defined, and does not overlap with any
explicit defines. I don't know if such a case would even make sense. So
as far as I have tested, this patch should be a non-functional change.
However, this reduces the complexity of the code a bit, and it will
simplify the implementation of an upcoming patch which solves PR44118.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73167
... as well as:
Revert "[DWARF] Defer creating declaration DIEs until we prepare call site info"
This reverts commit fa4701e1979553c2df61698ac1ac212627630442.
This reverts commit 79daafc90308787b52a5d3a7586e82acd5e374b3.
There have been reports of this assert getting hit:
CalleeDIE && "Could not find DIE for call site entry origin
This makes the SectionLabel handling more resilient - specifically for
future PROPELLER work which will have more CU ranges (rather than just
one per function).
Ultimately it might be nice to make this more general/resilient to
arbitrary labels (rather than relying on the labels being created for CU
ranges & then being reused by ranges, loclists, and possibly other
addresses). It's possible that other (non-rnglist/loclist) uses of
addresses will need the addresses to be in SectionLabels earlier (eg:
move the CU.addRange to be done on function begin, rather than function
end, so during function emission they are already populated for other
use).
[this re-applies c0176916a4824812d25a5a22c4ff7c95857b0cd6
with the correct commit message and phabricator link]
This addresses point 1 of PR44213.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
The DW_AT_LLVM_sysroot attribute is used for Clang module debug info,
to allow LLDB to import a Clang module from source. Currently it is
part of each DW_TAG_module, however, it is the same for all modules in
a compile unit. It is more efficient and less ambiguous to store it
once in the DW_TAG_compile_unit.
This should have no effect on DWARF consumers other than LLDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71732
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
