This functionality is used exactly once, and it is trivial to implement
it differently (capture into two distinct variables, and compare for
equality afterwards).
These two functions are doing the same thing, only one of them is
sending the packets immediately and the other "queues" them to be sent
later. The first one is better as in case of errors, the backtrace will
point straight to the place that caused them.
Modify the first method to avoid duplication, and ten standardize on it.
This reapplies 7df4eaaa93/D96202, which was reverted due to issues on
windows. These were caused by problems in the computation of the liblldb
directory, which was fixed by D96779.
The original commit message was:
Our test configuration logic assumes that the tests can be run either
with debugserver or with lldb-server. This is not entirely correct,
since lldb server has two "personalities" (platform server and debug
server) and debugserver is only a replacement for the latter.
A consequence of this is that it's not possible to test the platform
behavior of lldb-server on macos, as it is not possible to get a hold of
the lldb-server binary.
One solution to that would be to duplicate the server configuration
logic to be able to specify both executables. However, that seems
excessively redundant.
A well-behaved lldb should be able to find the debug server on its own,
and testing lldb with a different (lldb-|debug)server does not seem very
useful (even in the out-of-tree debugserver setup, we copy the server
into the build tree to make it appear "real").
Therefore, this patch deletes the configuration altogether and changes
the low-level server retrieval functions to be able to both lldb-server
and debugserver paths. They do this by consulting the "support
executable" directory of the lldb under test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96202
Our test configuration logic assumes that the tests can be run either
with debugserver or with lldb-server. This is not entirely correct,
since lldb server has two "personalities" (platform server and debug
server) and debugserver is only a replacement for the latter.
A consequence of this is that it's not possible to test the platform
behavior of lldb-server on macos, as it is not possible to get a hold of
the lldb-server binary.
One solution to that would be to duplicate the server configuration
logic to be able to specify both executables. However, that seems
excessively redundant.
A well-behaved lldb should be able to find the debug server on its own,
and testing lldb with a different (lldb-|debug)server does not seem very
useful (even in the out-of-tree debugserver setup, we copy the server
into the build tree to make it appear "real").
Therefore, this patch deletes the configuration altogether and changes
the low-level server retrieval functions to be able to both lldb-server
and debugserver paths. They do this by consulting the "support
executable" directory of the lldb under test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96202
The test couldn't find lldb-server as it's path was being overridden by
LLDB_DEBUGSERVER_PATH environment variable (pointing to debugserver).
This test should always use lldb-server, as it tests its platform
capabilities.
There's no need for the environment override, as lldb-server tests
should test the executable they just built, so I just remote the
override capability.
Now that the class does not use a thread, the name is no longer
appropriate. Rename the class to "Server" and make it a long-lived
object (instead of recreating it for every expect_gdbremote_sequence
call). The idea is to make this class a wrapper for all communication
with debug/lldb-server. This will enable some additional cleanups as we
had some duplication between socket_pump non-pump code paths.
Also squeeze in some small improvements:
- use python-level timeouts on sockets instead of the manual select
calls
- use byte arrays instead of strings when working with raw packets
A separate thread is not necessary, as we can do its work on the main
thread, while waiting for the packet to arrive. This makes the code
easier to understand and debug (other simplifications are possible too,
but I'll leave that for separate patches). The new implementation also
avoids busy waiting.
In order to be able to run the debugserver tests against the Rosetta
debugserver, detect the Rosetta run configuration and return the
system Rosetta debugserver.
Summary: Thanks to Hui Huang and reviewers for all the help with this patch!
Reviewers: labath, jfb, clayborg
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: Hui, clayborg, dexonsmith, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61687
llvm-svn: 368776
Summary: lldb-mi has been removed, but there are still a bunch of references in the code base. This patch removes all of them.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jfb
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, ki.stfu, mgorny, abidh, jfb, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64992
llvm-svn: 366590
Summary:
This patch finishes the python3-ification of the lldb-server test suite.
It reverts the partial attempt in r352709 to encode/decode the string
via utf8 before writing to the socket. This wasn't enough because the
gdb-remote protocol can sometimes (but not very often) carry binary
data, and the utf8 codec chokes on that. Instead I add utility functions
to the "seven" module for performing "identity" transformations on the
byte data. This basically drills back the hole in the python type system
that the string/bytes distinction was supposed to plug. That is not
ideal, but was the best solution of the alternatives I could come up
with. The options I considered were:
- make use of the type system to add type safety to the test suite: This
required making a lot of changes to the test suite, since most of the
strings would now become byte objects instead, and it was not even
fully clear to me where to draw the line. One extreme solution would
be to just use byte objects everywhere, as the protocol doesn't
support non-ascii characters anyway. However, this appeared to be:
a) weird, because most of the protocol actually deals with strings,
but we would have to prefix everything with 'b'
b) clunky, because the handling of the bytes objects is sufficiently
different in PY2 and PY3 (e.g. b'a'[0] is a string in PY2, but an
int in PY3).
- using the latin1 codec (which gives an identity transformation for the
first 256 code points of unicode) instead of the custom
bytes_to_string functions. This almost could work, but it was still
slightly different between python 2 and 3, because in PY2 in would
return a unicode object, which would then cause problems when
combined with regular strings if it contained 8-bit chars.
With this in mind, I think the best solution for the time being is to
just coerce everything into the string type as early as possible, and
have things proceed indentically on both python versions. Once we stop
supporting python3, we can revisit the idea of using bytes objects more
prevasively.
Reviewers: davide, zturner, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58177
llvm-svn: 354106
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
Summary:
On some android targets, a binary can produce additional garbage (e.g. warning messages from the
dynamic linker) on the standard error, which confuses some tests. This relaxes the stderr
expectations for targets known for their chattyness.
Reviewers: tfiala, ovyalov
Subscribers: tberghammer, danalbert, srhines, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19114
llvm-svn: 266326
A number of test cases were failing on big-endian systems simply due to
byte order assumptions in the tests themselves, and no underlying bug
in LLDB.
These two test cases:
tools/lldb-server/lldbgdbserverutils.py
python_api/process/TestProcessAPI.py
actually check for big-endian target byte order, but contain Python errors
in the corresponding code paths.
These test cases:
functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-python-synth/TestDataFormatterPythonSynth.py
functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-smart-array/TestDataFormatterSmartArray.py
functionalities/data-formatter/synthcapping/TestSyntheticCapping.py
lang/cpp/frame-var-anon-unions/TestFrameVariableAnonymousUnions.py
python_api/sbdata/TestSBData.py (first change)
could be fixed to check for big-endian target byte order and update the
expected result strings accordingly. For the two synthetic tests, I've
also updated the source to make sure the fake_a value is always nonzero
on both big- and little-endian platforms.
These test case:
python_api/sbdata/TestSBData.py (second change)
functionalities/memory/cache/TestMemoryCache.py
simply accessed memory with the wrong size, which wasn't noticed on LE
but fails on BE.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18985
llvm-svn: 266315
Summary:
Some tests (Hc_then_Csignal_signals_correct_thread, at least) were sending a "continue" packet in
one expect_gdbremote_sequence invocation, and "expecting" the stop-reply in another call. This
posed a problem, because the were packets were not persisted between the two invocations, and if
the stub was exceptionally fast to respond, the packet would be received in the first invocation
(where it would be ignored) and then the second invocation would fail because it could not find
the packet.
Since doing matching in two invocations seems like a reasonable use of the packet pump, instead
of fixing the test, I make sure the packet_pump supports this usage by making the list of
captured packets persistent.
Reviewers: tfiala
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18140
llvm-svn: 263629
This module was originally intended to be imported by top-level
scripts to be able to find the LLDB packages and third party
libraries. Packages themselves shouldn't need to import it,
because by the time it gets into the package, the top-level
script should have already done this. Indeed, it was just
adding the same values to sys.path multiple times, so this
patch is essentially no functional change.
To make sure it doesn't get re-introduced, we also delete the
`use_lldb_suite` module from `lldbsuite/test`, although the
original copy still remains in `lldb/test`
llvm-svn: 251963
For convenience, we had added the folder that dotest.py was in
to sys.path, so that we could easily write things like
`import lldbutil` from anywhere and any test. This introduces
a subtle problem when using Python's package system, because when
unittest2 imports a particular test suite, the test suite is detached
from the package. Thus, writing "import lldbutil" from dotest imports
it as part of the package, and writing the same line from a test
does a fresh import since the importing module was not part of
the same package.
The real way to fix this is to use absolute imports everywhere. Instead
of writing "import lldbutil", we need to write "import
lldbsuite.test.util". This patch fixes up that and all other similar
cases, and additionally removes the script directory from sys.path
to ensure that this can't happen again.
llvm-svn: 251886
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code
structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number
of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share
Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python
infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with
`test`).
llvm-svn: 251532
