(Hopefully, common usage of these pragmas isn't irregular enough to break our current handling. Doug has ideas for a more crazy approach if necessary.)
llvm-svn: 151307
function call (or a comma expression with a function call on its right-hand
side), possibly parenthesized, then the return type is not required to be
complete and a temporary is not bound. Other subexpressions inside a decltype
expression do not get this treatment.
This is implemented by deferring the relevant checks for all calls immediately
within a decltype expression, then, when the expression is fully-parsed,
checking the relevant constraints and stripping off any top-level temporary
binding.
Deferring the completion of the return type exposed a bug in overload
resolution where completion of the argument types was not attempted, which
is also fixed by this change.
llvm-svn: 151117
This is the last piece of N3031 (decltype in weird places) - supporting
the use of decltype in a class ctor's member-initializer-list to
specify the base classes to initialize.
Reviewed by Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 148789
function body. This keeps the brace count accurate to prevent
additional errors. Also, moved the caret from the brace to the function
name.
Code:
class F{ int Foo{ return 1; } };
Fixed error:
parameters.cc:1:14: error: function definition does not declare parameters
class F{ int Foo{ return 1; } };
^
1 error generated.
Old errors:
parameters.cc:1:17: error: function definition does not declare parameters
class F{ int Foo{ return 1; } };
^
parameters.cc:1:30: error: expected ';' after class
class F{ int Foo{ return 1; } };
^
;
parameters.cc:1:31: error: expected external declaration
class F{ int Foo{ return 1; } };
^
3 errors generated.
llvm-svn: 148621
- If the declarator is at the start of a line, and the previous line contained
another declarator and ended with a comma, then that comma was probably a
typo for a semicolon:
int n = 0, m = 1, l = 2, // k = 5;
myImportantFunctionCall(); // oops!
- If removing the parentheses would correctly initialize the object, then
produce a note suggesting that fix.
- Otherwise, if there is a simple initializer we can suggest which performs
value-initialization, then provide a note suggesting a correction to that
initializer.
Sema::Declarator now tracks the location of the comma prior to the declarator in
the declaration, if there is one, to facilitate providing the note. The code to
determine an appropriate initializer from the -Wuninitialized warning has been
factored out to allow use in both that and -Wvexing-parse.
llvm-svn: 148072
- reject definitions of enums within friend declarations
- require 'enum', not 'enum class', for non-declaring references to scoped
enumerations
llvm-svn: 147824
default", make a note of which is used when creating the
initial declaration. Previously, we would wait until later to handle
default/delete as a definition, but this is too late: when adding the
declaration, we already treated the declaration as "user-provided"
when in fact it was merely "user-declared".
Fixes PR10861 and PR10442, along with a bunch of FIXMEs.
llvm-svn: 144011
analysis to separate dependent names from non-dependent names. For
dependent names, we'll behave differently from Visual C++:
- For __if_exists/__if_not_exists at class scope, we'll just warn
and then ignore them.
- For __if_exists/__if_not_exists in statements, we'll treat the
inner statement as a compound statement, which we only instantiate
in templates where the dependent name (after instantiation)
exists. This behavior is different from VC++, but it's as close as
we can get without encroaching ridiculousness.
The latter part (dependent statements) is not yet implemented.
llvm-svn: 142864
the information on to Sema. There's still an incorrectness in the way template instantiation
works now, but that is due to a far larger underlying representational problem.
Also add a test case for various list initialization cases of scalars, which test this
commit as well as the previous one.
llvm-svn: 140460
