report a fatal error. This allows us to continue processing the translation
unit. Test case to come on the clang side because we need an inline asm
diagnostics handler in place.
rdar://13446483
llvm-svn: 180873
register-indirect address with an offset of 0.
It used to be that a DBG_VALUE is a register-indirect value if the offset
(operand 1) is nonzero. The new convention is that a DBG_VALUE is
register-indirect if the first operand is a register and the second
operand is an immediate. For plain registers use the combination reg, reg.
rdar://problem/13658587
llvm-svn: 180816
Performing this check unilaterally prevented us from generating FMAs when the incoming IR contained illegal vector types which would eventually be legalized to underlying types that *did* support FMA.
For example, an @llvm.fmuladd on an OpenCL float16 should become a sequence of float4 FMAs, not float4 fmul+fadd's.
NOTE: Because we still call the target-specific profitability hook, individual targets can reinstate the old behavior, if desired, by simply performing the legality check inside their callback hook. They can also perform more sophisticated legality checks, if, for example, some illegal vector types can be productively implemented as FMAs, but not others.
llvm-svn: 177820
Code generation makes some basic assumptions about the IR it's been given. In
particular, if there is only one 'invoke' in the function, then that invoke
won't be going away. However, with the advent of the `llvm.donothing' intrinsic,
those invokes may go away. If all of them go away, the landing pad no longer has
any users. This confuses the back-end, which asserts.
This happens with SjLj exceptions, because that's the model that modifies the IR
based on there being invokes, etc. in the function.
Remove any invokes of `llvm.donothing' during SjLj EH preparation. This will
give us a CFG that the back-end won't be confused about. If all of the invokes
in a function are removed, then the SjLj EH prepare pass won't insert the bogus
code the relies upon the invokes being there.
<rdar://problem/13228754&13316637>
llvm-svn: 176677
- ISD::SHL/SRL/SRA must have either both scalar or both vector operands
but TLI.getShiftAmountTy() so far only return scalar type. As a
result, backend logic assuming that breaks.
- Rename the original TLI.getShiftAmountTy() to
TLI.getScalarShiftAmountTy() and re-define TLI.getShiftAmountTy() to
return target-specificed scalar type or the same vector type as the
1st operand.
- Fix most TICG logic assuming TLI.getShiftAmountTy() a simple scalar
type.
llvm-svn: 176364
SelectionDAGIsel::LowerArguments needs a function, not a basic block. So it
makes sense to pass it the function instead of extracting a basic-block from
the function and then tossing it. This is also more self-documenting (functions
have arguments, BBs don't).
In addition, added comments to a couple of Select* methods.
llvm-svn: 176305
memory intrinsics in the SDAG builder.
When alignment is zero, the lang ref says that *no* alignment
assumptions can be made. This is the exact opposite of the internal API
contracts of the DAG where alignment 0 indicates that the alignment can
be made to be anything desired.
There is another, more explicit alignment that is better suited for the
role of "no alignment at all": an alignment of 1. Map the intrinsic
alignment to this early so that we don't end up generating aligned DAGs.
It is really terrifying that we've never seen this before, but we
suddenly started generating a large number of alignment 0 memcpys due to
the new code to do memcpy-based copying of POD class members. That patch
contains a bug that rounds bitfield alignments down when they are the
first field. This can in turn produce zero alignments.
This fixes weird crashes I've seen in library users of LLVM on 32-bit
hosts, etc.
llvm-svn: 176022
Aside from the question of whether we report a warning or an error when we
can't satisfy a requested stack object alignment, the current implementation
of this is not good. We're not providing any source location in the diagnostics
and the current warning is not connected to any warning group so you can't
control it. We could improve the source location somewhat, but we can do a
much better job if this check is implemented in the front-end, so let's do that
instead. <rdar://problem/13127907>
llvm-svn: 174741
Previously we tried to infer it from the bit width size, with an added
IsIEEE argument for the PPC/IEEE 128-bit case, which had a default
value. This default value allowed bugs to creep in, where it was
inappropriate.
llvm-svn: 173138
- recognize string "{memory}" in the MI generation
- mark as mayload/maystore when there's a memory clobber constraint.
PR14859.
Patch by Krzysztof Parzyszek
llvm-svn: 172228
requirement when creating stack objects in MachineFrameInfo.
Add CreateStackObjectWithMinAlign to throw error when the minimal alignment
can't be achieved and to clamp the alignment when the preferred alignment
can't be achieved. Same is true for CreateVariableSizedObject.
Will not emit error in CreateSpillStackObject or CreateStackObject.
As long as callers of CreateStackObject do not assume the object will be
aligned at the requested alignment, we should not have miscompile since
later optimizations which look at the object's alignment will have the correct
information.
rdar://12713765
llvm-svn: 172027
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
directly.
This is in preparation for removing the use of the 'Attribute' class as a
collection of attributes. That will shift to the AttributeSet class instead.
llvm-svn: 171253
Accordingly, add helper funtions getSimpleValueType (in parallel to
getValueType) in SDValue, SDNode, and TargetLowering.
This is the first, in a series of patches.
This is the second attempt. In the first attempt (r169837), a few
getSimpleVT() were hoisted too far, detected by bootstrap failures.
llvm-svn: 170104
Accordingly, add helper funtions getSimpleValueType (in parallel to
getValueType) in SDValue, SDNode, and TargetLowering.
This is the first, in a series of patches.
llvm-svn: 169837
This shouldn't affect codegen for -O0 compiles as tail call markers are not
emitted in unoptimized compiles. Testing with the external/internal nightly
test suite reveals no change in compile time performance. Testing with -O1,
-O2 and -O3 with fast-isel enabled did not cause any compile-time or
execution-time failures. All tests were performed on my x86 machine.
I'll monitor our arm testers to ensure no regressions occur there.
In an upcoming clang patch I will be marking the objc_autoreleaseReturnValue
and objc_retainAutoreleaseReturnValue as tail calls unconditionally. While
it's theoretically true that this is just an optimization, it's an
optimization that we very much want to happen even at -O0, or else ARC
applications become substantially harder to debug.
Part of rdar://12553082
llvm-svn: 169796
understand target implementation of any_extend / extload, just generate
zero_extend in place of any_extend for liveouts when the target knows the
zero_extend will be implicit (e.g. ARM ldrb / ldrh) or folded (e.g. x86 movz).
rdar://12771555
llvm-svn: 169536
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
