Implements parts of:
- P0898R3 Standard Library Concepts
- P1754 Rename concepts to standard_case for C++20, while we still can
Reviewed By: ldionne, miscco, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91004
Several subprojects have targets that do the same thing, and they all
follow the same naming convention: llvm-test-depends, clang-test-depends,
lld-test-depends, etc.
This makes libc++ consistent with other LLVM projects.
Thanks to Duncan Exon Smith for noticing and suggesting the change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94499
Contrary to the current visibility macro documentation, it appears that
gcc does handle visibility attribute on extern templates correctly, e.g.
https://godbolt.org/g/EejuV7. We need this so that extern template
instantiations of classes not marked _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS (e.g.
__vector_base_common) are correctly exported with gcc when building with
hidden visibility.
Reviewed By: ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35388
The point of LWG2511 is basically just to make sure that we use
`tuple<Args&&...>` instead of `tuple<Args...>` in a couple of places
inside `scoped_allocator_adaptor` and inside `pair`.
As far as I can tell, this has been true for libc++
since EricWF's D27612 (and maybe even earlier than that).
I accidentally disabled this feature-test macro in my D93830,
due to a rebasing conflict. It had been enabled by my D93815,
and should have remained enabled.
It's still a little confusing because in many cases C++17 and C++20
have different values, and libc++ implements the C++17 behavior but
not the C++20 behavior; 'unimplemented' can't represent that scenario.
Ultimately we probably ought to completely redesign the script to be
in terms of paper numbers, rather than language revisions, and make
it generate the CSV files like "Cxx2aStatusPaperStatus.csv" as well.
Most newly added macros are unimplemented. I've marked a few as implemented,
though, based on my reading of the code; for example I was pretty sure
`__cpp_lib_latch` is implemented since we have `<latch>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93830
* The only exception is that the flag -std=c++2a is still used not to break compatibility with older compilers (clang <= 9, gcc <= 9).
* Bump _LIBCPP_STD_VER for C++20 to 20 and use 21 for the future standard (C++2b).
That's a preparation step to add c++2b support to libc++.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93383
Idea from D92525.
This script globs include/ directory and updates the tests in test/libcxx.
This patch does not generate module.modulemap nor CMakeLists.txt.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92656
The behaviour didn't change since commit 5b08c1742a536f54bd5e270b00ff851cbc7314ef (Recommit <chrono> changes with a couple xtra tests marked to fail on apple's clang.)
* http://wg21.link/lwg3221
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92730
The issue didn't change the behaviour which is tested in libcxx/test/std/input.output/filesystems/class.path/path.member/path.concat.pass.cpp.
The change to use string_view instead of string is not strictly necessary.
<filesystem> was added in commit 998a5c88312066fcc2b2de1358edc76587611354 (Implement <filesystem>).
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92731
These had been waiting on the ability to use `std::copy` from
constexpr code (which in turn had been waiting on the ability to
use `is_constant_evaluated()` to switch between `memmove` and non-`memmove`
implementations of `std::copy`). That work landed a while ago,
so these algorithms can all be constexpr in C++20 now.
Simultaneously, update the tests for the set algorithms.
- Use an element type with "equivalent but not identical" values.
- The custom-comparator tests now pass something different from `operator<`.
- Make the constexpr coverage match the non-constexpr coverage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92255
This implements the std::filesystem parts of P0482 (which is already
marked as in progress), and applies the actions that are suggested
in P1423.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90222
Also:
* Fix header line in all status tables.
* Use C++20 instead of C++2a.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, miscco
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92306
Also, add notes about exporting ABI symbols.
Later, we can add notes about using git-clang-format before sending a patch for review.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92300
This patch updates algorithms in <numeric> to use std::move
based on p0616r0. Moving values instead of copying them
creates huge speed improvements (see the paper for details).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61170
Currently, papers and issues are in separate .csv files (that is easier to update), but I can put them inline.Transforming current html tables into rst are done by the script (attached to the patch FYI but I'll remove it before committing).
I'll of course update RST files before committing to match any modifications that may happen in master branch.
This patch moves the status pages in www/ to RST format in docs/.
It also does some other minor changes: fix copyright year and broken comment end, adds substitutions for coherence (and add colors, but that can be removed easily).
It adds as well redirects from old to new status pages.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92076
Implements P1956: On the names of low-level bit manipulation functions.
Users may use older versions of libc++ or other standard libraries with the old names. In order to keep compatibility the old functions are kept, but marked as deprecated.
The patch also adds a new config macro `_LIBCPP_DEPRECATED_MSG`. Do you prefer a this is a separate patch?
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90551
This commit makes it clear that the typeinfo comparison implementation
is automatically selected by default, and that the CMake option only
overrides the value. This has been a source of confusion and bugs ever
since we've introduced complexity in that area, so I'm trying to simplify
it while still allowing for some control on the implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91574
Currently, vendor-specific availability markup is enabled by default.
This means that even when building against trunk libc++, the headers
will by default prevent you from using some features that were not
released in the dylib on your target platform. This is a source of
frustration since people building libc++ from sources are usually not
trying to use some vendor's released dylib.
For that reason, I've been thinking for a long time that availability
annotations should be off by default, which is the primary change that
this commit enables.
In addition, it reworks the implementation to make it easier for new
vendors to add availability annotations for their platform, and it
refreshes the documentation to reflect the current state of the codebase.
Finally, a CMake configuration option is added to control whether
availability annotations should be turned on for the flavor of libc++
being created. The intent is for vendors like Apple to turn it on, and
for the upstream libc++ to leave it off (the default).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90843
This makes us closer to running the test suite on platforms where the
legacy test suite configuration doesn't work.
One notable change after this commit is that the tests will be run with
warnings enabled on GCC too, which wasn't the case before. However,
previous commits should have tweaked the test suite to make sure it
passes with warnings enabled on GCC.
Note that warnings can still be disabled with `--param enable_warnings=False`,
as before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90432
This is a massive revert of the following commits (from most revent to oldest):
2b9b7b5775a1d8fcd7aa5abaa8fc0bc303434f1a.
529ac33197f6408952ae995075ac5e2dc5287e81
28270234f1478047e35879f4ba8838b47edfcc14
69c2087283cf7b17ca75f69daebf4ffc158b754a
b5aa67446e01bd277727b05710a42e69ac41e74b
5d796645d6c8cadeb003715c33e231a8ba05b6de
After checking-in the __config_site change, a lot of things started breaking
due to widespread reliance on various aspects of libc++'s build, notably the
fact that we can include the headers from the source tree, but also reliance
on various "internal" CMake variables used by the runtimes build and compiler-rt.
These were unintended consequences of the change, and after two days, we
still haven't restored all the bots to being green. Instead, now that I
understand what specific areas this will blow up in, I should be able to
chop up the patch into smaller ones that are easier to digest.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D89041 for more details on this adventure.
Prior to this patch, we would generate a fancy <__config> header by
concatenating <__config_site> and <__config>. This complexifies the
build system and also increases the difference between what's tested
and what's actually installed.
This patch removes that complexity and instead simply installs <__config_site>
alongside the libc++ headers. <__config_site> is then included by <__config>,
which is much simpler. Doing this also opens the door to having different
<__config_site> headers depending on the target, which was impossible before.
It does change the workflow for testing header-only changes to libc++.
Previously, we would run `lit` against the headers in libcxx/include.
After this patch, we run it against a fake installation root of the
headers (containing a proper <__config_site> header). This makes use
closer to testing what we actually install, which is good, however it
does mean that we have to update that root before testing header changes.
Thus, we now need to run `ninja check-cxx-deps` before running `lit` by
hand.
This commit was originally applied in 1e46d1aa3 and reverted in eb60c487
because it broke the libc++abi and libunwind test suites. This has now
been fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89041
