Finding operator delete[] is still problematic, without it the extension
is a security hazard, so reverting until the problem with operator
delete[] is figured out.
This reverts the following PRs:
Reland [MS][clang] Add support for vector deleting destructors (llvm#133451)
[MS][clang] Make sure vector deleting dtor calls correct operator delete (llvm#133950)
[MS][clang] Fix crash on deletion of array of pointers (llvm#134088)
[clang] Do not diagnose unused deleted operator delete[] (llvm#134357)
[MS][clang] Error about ambiguous operator delete[] only when required (llvm#135041)
This feature is currently not supported in the compiler.
To facilitate this we emit a stub version of each kernel
function body with different name mangling scheme, and
replaces the respective kernel call-sites appropriately.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/60313
D120566 was an earlier attempt made to upstream a solution
for this issue.
---------
Co-authored-by: anikelal <anikelal@amd.com>
Sometimes a non-array delete is treated as delete[] when input pointer
is pointer to array. With vector deleting destructors support we now
generate a virtual destructor call instead of simple loop over the
elements. This patch adjusts the codepath that generates virtual call to
expect the case of pointer to array.
This introduces a new class 'UnsignedOrNone', which models a lite
version of `std::optional<unsigned>`, but has the same size as
'unsigned'.
This replaces most uses of `std::optional<unsigned>`, and similar
schemes utilizing 'int' and '-1' as sentinel.
Besides the smaller size advantage, this is simpler to serialize, as its
internal representation is a single unsigned int as well.
StringLiteral is used as internal data of EmbedExpr and we directly use
it as an initializer if a single EmbedExpr appears in the initializer
list of a char array. It is fast and convenient, but it is causing
problems when string literal character values are checked because #embed
data values are within a range [0-2^(char width)] but ordinary
StringLiteral is of maybe signed char type.
This PR introduces new kind of StringLiteral to hold binary data coming
from an embedded resource to mitigate these problems. The new kind of
StringLiteral is not assumed to have signed char type. The new kind of
StringLiteral also helps to prevent crashes when trying to find
StringLiteral token locations since these simply do not exist for binary
data.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/119256
`CallExpr::CreateTemporary` was only used to deduce a conversion
sequence from a conversion operator.
We only need a type/value category for that,
so we can use a dummy Expression such as a
`OpaqueValueExpr`.
This simplify the code and avoid partially-formed
`CallExpr` with incorrect invariants (see #130725)
Fixes#130824
There are cases where the assertion legitimately does not hold (e.g.
CallExpr::CreateTemporary()), and there's no readily available way to
tell such cases apart.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/130272
The macro `FUNCTION` is returning the `static` specifier for static
templated functions. It's not the case for MSVC.
See https://godbolt.org/z/KnhWhqs47
Clang-cl is returning:
`__FUNCTION__ static inner::C<class A>::f`
`__FUNCTION__ static inner::C<class A>::f`
for the reproducer.
This patch allows using fpfeatures pragmas with __builtin_convertvector:
- added TrailingObjects with FPOptionsOverride and methods for handling
it to ConvertVectorExpr
- added support for codegen, node dumping, and serialization of
fpfeatures contained in ConvertVectorExpr
This merges the functionality of ResolvedUnexpandedPackExpr into
FunctionParmPackExpr. I also added a test to show that
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/125103 should be fixed with
this. I put the removal of ResolvedUnexpandedPackExpr in its own commit.
Let me know what you think.
Fixes#125103
Implement HLSL Aggregate Splat casting that handles splatting for arrays
and structs, and vectors if splatting from a vec1.
Closes#100609 and Closes#100619
Depends on #118842
This fixes a crash where CallExpr::getBeginLoc() tries to access the
first argument of a CallExpr representing a call to a function with
an explicit object parameter, assuming that a first argument exists
because it's the object argument.
This is the case for non-dependent calls, but for dependent calls
the object argument is part of the callee (the semantic analysis
that separates it out has not been performed yet) and so there may
not be a first argument.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/126720
Implement HLSLElementwiseCast excluding support for splat cases
Do not support casting types that contain bitfields.
Partly closes#100609 and partly closes#100619
This is an implementation of P1061 Structure Bindings Introduce a Pack
without the ability to use packs outside of templates. There is a couple
of ways the AST could have been sliced so let me know what you think.
The only part of this change that I am unsure of is the
serialization/deserialization stuff. I followed the implementation of
other Exprs, but I do not really know how it is tested. Thank you for
your time considering this.
---------
Co-authored-by: Yanzuo Liu <zwuis@outlook.com>
As we create defaul constructors lazily, we should not inherit from the
parent evaluation context.
However, we need to make an exception for lambdas (in particular their
conversion operators, which are also implicitly defined).
As a drive-by, we introduce a generic way to query whether a function is
a member of a lambda.
This fixes a regression introduced by baf6bd3.
Fixes#118000
Re-write the sema and codegen for the atomic_test_and_set and
atomic_clear builtin functions to go via AtomicExpr, like the other
atomic builtins do. This simplifies the code, because AtomicExpr already
handles things like generating code for to dynamically select the memory
ordering, which was duplicated for these builtins. This also fixes a few
crash bugs, one when passing an integer to the pointer argument, and one
when using an array.
This also adds diagnostics for the memory orderings which are not valid
for atomic_clear according to
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fatomic-Builtins.html, which
were missing before.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/111293.
This is a re-land of #120449, modified to allow any non-const pointer
type for the first argument.
The (function) type of the lambda function is null while parsing
trailing return type. The type is filled-in when the lambda body is
entered. So, resolving `__PRETTY_FUNCTION__` before the lambda body is
entered causes the crash.
Fixes#121274.
This reverts commit 81fc3add1e627c23b7270fe2739cdacc09063e54.
This breaks some LLDB tests, e.g.
SymbolFile/DWARF/x86/no_unique_address-with-bitfields.cpp:
lldb: ../llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp:4604: unsigned int clang::FieldDecl::getBitWidthValue() const: Assertion `isa<ConstantExpr>(getBitWidth())' failed.
Save the bitwidth value as a `ConstantExpr` with the value set. Remove
the `ASTContext` parameter from `getBitWidthValue()`, so the latter
simply returns the value from the `ConstantExpr` instead of
constant-evaluating the bitwidth expression every time it is called.
Re-write the sema and codegen for the atomic_test_and_set and
atomic_clear builtin functions to go via AtomicExpr, like the other
atomic builtins do. This simplifies the code, because AtomicExpr already
handles things like generating code for to dynamically select the memory
ordering, which was duplicated for these builtins. This also fixes a few
crash bugs, one when passing an integer to the pointer argument, and one
when using an array.
This also adds diagnostics for the memory orderings which are not valid
for atomic_clear according to
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fatomic-Builtins.html, which
were missing before.
Fixes#111293.
This is a rebase of #95112 with my own feedback apply as @MitalAshok has
been inactive for a while.
It's fairly important this makes clang 20 as it is a blocker for #107451
---
[CWG2813](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2813.html)
prvalue.member_fn(expression-list) now will not materialize a temporary
for prvalue if member_fn is an explicit object member function, and
prvalue will bind directly to the object parameter.
The E1 in E1.static_member is now a discarded-value expression, so if E1
was a call to a [[nodiscard]] function, there will now be a warning.
This also affects C++98 with [[gnu::warn_unused_result]] functions.
This should not affect C where TemporaryMaterializationConversion is a
no-op.
Closes#100314Fixes#100341
---------
Co-authored-by: Mital Ashok <mital@mitalashok.co.uk>
A follow-up to #112289.
When diagnosing an unused return value, if the diagnostic
is triggered by an attribute attached to a type, the type name
is now included in the diagnostic.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sirraide <aeternalmail@gmail.com>
The 'tile' clause shares quite a bit of the rules with 'collapse', so a
followup patch will add those tests/behaviors. This patch deals with
adding the AST node.
The 'tile' clause takes a series of integer constant expressions, or *.
The asterisk is now represented by a new OpenACCAsteriskSizeExpr node,
else this clause is very similar to others.
* Don't call raw_string_ostream::flush(), which is essentially a no-op.
* Strip unneeded calls to raw_string_ostream::str(), to avoid extra indirection.
HLSL allows implicit conversions to truncate vectors to scalar
pr-values. These conversions are scored as vector truncations and should
warn appropriately.
This change allows forming a truncation cast to a pr-value, but not an
l-value. Truncating a vector to a scalar is performed by loading the
first element of the vector and disregarding the remaining elements.
Fixes#102964
This patch is the frontend implementation of the coroutine elide
improvement project detailed in this discourse post:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/language-extension-for-better-more-deterministic-halo-for-c-coroutines/80044
This patch proposes a C++ struct/class attribute
`[[clang::coro_await_elidable]]`. This notion of await elidable task
gives developers and library authors a certainty that coroutine heap
elision happens in a predictable way.
Originally, after we lower a coroutine to LLVM IR, CoroElide is
responsible for analysis of whether an elision can happen. Take this as
an example:
```
Task foo();
Task bar() {
co_await foo();
}
```
For CoroElide to happen, the ramp function of `foo` must be inlined into
`bar`. This inlining happens after `foo` has been split but `bar` is
usually still a presplit coroutine. If `foo` is indeed a coroutine, the
inlined `coro.id` intrinsics of `foo` is visible within `bar`. CoroElide
then runs an analysis to figure out whether the SSA value of
`coro.begin()` of `foo` gets destroyed before `bar` terminates.
`Task` types are rarely simple enough for the destroy logic of the task
to reference the SSA value from `coro.begin()` directly. Hence, the pass
is very ineffective for even the most trivial C++ Task types. Improving
CoroElide by implementing more powerful analyses is possible, however it
doesn't give us the predictability when we expect elision to happen.
The approach we want to take with this language extension generally
originates from the philosophy that library implementations of `Task`
types has the control over the structured concurrency guarantees we
demand for elision to happen. That is, the lifetime for the callee's
frame is shorter to that of the caller.
The ``[[clang::coro_await_elidable]]`` is a class attribute which can be
applied to a coroutine return type.
When a coroutine function that returns such a type calls another
coroutine function, the compiler performs heap allocation elision when
the following conditions are all met:
- callee coroutine function returns a type that is annotated with
``[[clang::coro_await_elidable]]``.
- In caller coroutine, the return value of the callee is a prvalue that
is immediately `co_await`ed.
From the C++ perspective, it makes sense because we can ensure the
lifetime of elided callee cannot exceed that of the caller if we can
guarantee that the caller coroutine is never destroyed earlier than the
callee coroutine. This is not generally true for any C++ programs.
However, the library that implements `Task` types and executors may
provide this guarantee to the compiler, providing the user with
certainty that HALO will work on their programs.
After this patch, when compiling coroutines that return a type with such
attribute, the frontend checks that the type of the operand of
`co_await` expressions (not `operator co_await`). If it's also
attributed with `[[clang::coro_await_elidable]]`, the FE emits metadata
on the call or invoke instruction as a hint for a later middle end pass
to elide the elision.
The original patch version is
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94693 and as suggested, the
patch is split into frontend and middle end solutions into stacked PRs.
The middle end CoroSplit patch can be found at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99283
The middle end transformation that performs the elide can be found at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99285
Parsing lambdas require pushing a declaration context for the lambda, so
that parameters can be attached to it, before its trailing type is
parsed. DAt that point, partially-parsed lambda don't have a name that
can be computed for then.
This would cause source_location::current() to crash when use in the
decltype of a lambda().
We work around this by producing a source_location for an enclosing
scope in that scenario.
Fixes#67134
HLSL output parameters are denoted with the `inout` and `out` keywords
in the function declaration. When an argument to an output parameter is
constructed a temporary value is constructed for the argument.
For `inout` pamameters the argument is initialized via copy-initialization
from the argument lvalue expression to the parameter type. For `out`
parameters the argument is not initialized before the call.
In both cases on return of the function the temporary value is written
back to the argument lvalue expression through an implicit assignment
binary operator with casting as required.
This change introduces a new HLSLOutArgExpr ast node which represents
the output argument behavior. The OutArgExpr has three defined children:
- An OpaqueValueExpr of the argument lvalue expression.
- An OpaqueValueExpr of the copy-initialized parameter.
- A BinaryOpExpr assigning the first with the value of the second.
Fixes#87526
---------
Co-authored-by: Damyan Pepper <damyanp@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: John McCall <rjmccall@gmail.com>
From @vitalybuka's review on
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104889:
- [x] remove unused variable in tests
- [x] rename `post-decr-while` --> `unsigned-post-decr-while`
- [x] split `add-overflow-test` into `add-unsigned-overflow-test` and
`add-signed-overflow-test`
- [x] be more clear about defaults within docs
- [x] add table to docs
Here's a screenshot of the rendered table so you don't have to build the
html docs yourself to inspect the layout:
CCs: @vitalybuka
---------
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka@google.com>
Introduce "-fsanitize-undefined-ignore-overflow-pattern=" which can
be used to disable sanitizer instrumentation for common overflow-dependent
code patterns.
For a wide selection of projects, proper overflow sanitization could
help catch bugs and solve security vulnerabilities. Unfortunately, in
some cases the integer overflow sanitizers are too noisy for their users
and are often left disabled. Providing users with a method to disable
sanitizer instrumentation of common patterns could mean more projects
actually utilize the sanitizers in the first place.
One such project that has opted to not use integer overflow (or
truncation) sanitizers is the Linux Kernel. There has been some
discussion[1] recently concerning mitigation strategies for unexpected
arithmetic overflow. This discussion is still ongoing and a succinct
article[2] accurately sums up the discussion. In summary, many Kernel
developers do not want to introduce more arithmetic wrappers when
most developers understand the code patterns as they are.
Patterns like:
if (base + offset < base) { ... }
or
while (i--) { ... }
or
#define SOME -1UL
are extremely common in a code base like the Linux Kernel. It is
perhaps too much to ask of kernel developers to use arithmetic wrappers
in these cases. For example:
while (wrapping_post_dec(i)) { ... }
which wraps some builtin would not fly. This would incur too many
changes to existing code; the code churn would be too much, at least too
much to justify turning on overflow sanitizers.
Currently, this commit tackles three pervasive idioms:
1. "if (a + b < a)" or some logically-equivalent re-ordering like "if (a > b + a)"
2. "while (i--)" (for unsigned) a post-decrement always overflows here
3. "-1UL, -2UL, etc" negation of unsigned constants will always overflow
The patterns that are excluded can be chosen from the following list:
- add-overflow-test
- post-decr-while
- negated-unsigned-const
These can be enabled with a comma-separated list:
-fsanitize-undefined-ignore-overflow-pattern=add-overflow-test,negated-unsigned-const
"all" or "none" may also be used to specify that all patterns should be
excluded or that none should be.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/202404291502.612E0A10@keescook/
[2] https://lwn.net/Articles/979747/
CCs: @efriedma-quic @kees @jyknight @fmayer @vitalybuka
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
Introduce "-fsanitize-overflow-pattern-exclusion=" which can be used to
disable sanitizer instrumentation for common overflow-dependent code
patterns.
For a wide selection of projects, proper overflow sanitization could
help catch bugs and solve security vulnerabilities. Unfortunately, in
some cases the integer overflow sanitizers are too noisy for their users
and are often left disabled. Providing users with a method to disable
sanitizer instrumentation of common patterns could mean more projects
actually utilize the sanitizers in the first place.
One such project that has opted to not use integer overflow (or
truncation) sanitizers is the Linux Kernel. There has been some
discussion[1] recently concerning mitigation strategies for unexpected
arithmetic overflow. This discussion is still ongoing and a succinct
article[2] accurately sums up the discussion. In summary, many Kernel
developers do not want to introduce more arithmetic wrappers when
most developers understand the code patterns as they are.
Patterns like:
if (base + offset < base) { ... }
or
while (i--) { ... }
or
#define SOME -1UL
are extremely common in a code base like the Linux Kernel. It is
perhaps too much to ask of kernel developers to use arithmetic wrappers
in these cases. For example:
while (wrapping_post_dec(i)) { ... }
which wraps some builtin would not fly. This would incur too many
changes to existing code; the code churn would be too much, at least too
much to justify turning on overflow sanitizers.
Currently, this commit tackles three pervasive idioms:
1. "if (a + b < a)" or some logically-equivalent re-ordering like "if (a > b + a)"
2. "while (i--)" (for unsigned) a post-decrement always overflows here
3. "-1UL, -2UL, etc" negation of unsigned constants will always overflow
The patterns that are excluded can be chosen from the following list:
- add-overflow-test
- post-decr-while
- negated-unsigned-const
These can be enabled with a comma-separated list:
-fsanitize-overflow-pattern-exclusion=add-overflow-test,negated-unsigned-const
"all" or "none" may also be used to specify that all patterns should be
excluded or that none should be.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/202404291502.612E0A10@keescook/
[2] https://lwn.net/Articles/979747/
CCs: @efriedma-quic @kees @jyknight @fmayer @vitalybuka
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
This patch makes remaining cases of #embed to emit int type since there
is an agreement to do that for C. C++ is being discussed, but in general
we don't want to produce different types for C and C++.
This commit implements the entirety of the now-accepted [N3017
-Preprocessor
Embed](https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3017.htm) and
its sister C++ paper [p1967](https://wg21.link/p1967). It implements
everything in the specification, and includes an implementation that
drastically improves the time it takes to embed data in specific
scenarios (the initialization of character type arrays). The mechanisms
used to do this are used under the "as-if" rule, and in general when the
system cannot detect it is initializing an array object in a variable
declaration, will generate EmbedExpr AST node which will be expanded by
AST consumers (CodeGen or constant expression evaluators) or expand
embed directive as a comma expression.
This reverts commit
682d461d5a.
---------
Co-authored-by: The Phantom Derpstorm <phdofthehouse@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Ballman <aaron@aaronballman.com>
Co-authored-by: cor3ntin <corentinjabot@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: H. Vetinari <h.vetinari@gmx.com>
Used to implement CWG2191 where `typeid` for a polymorphic glvalue only
becomes potentially-throwing if the `typeid` operand was already
potentially throwing or a `nullptr` check was inserted:
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2191.html
Also change `Expr::hasSideEffects` for `CXXTypeidExpr` to check the
operand for side-effects instead of always reporting that there are
side-effects
Remove `IsDeref` parameter of `CGCXXABI::shouldTypeidBeNullChecked`
because it should never return `true` if `!IsDeref` (we shouldn't add a
null check that wasn't there in the first place)
This commit implements the entirety of the now-accepted [N3017 -
Preprocessor
Embed](https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3017.htm) and
its sister C++ paper [p1967](https://wg21.link/p1967). It implements
everything in the specification, and includes an implementation that
drastically improves the time it takes to embed data in specific
scenarios (the initialization of character type arrays). The mechanisms
used to do this are used under the "as-if" rule, and in general when the
system cannot detect it is initializing an array object in a variable
declaration, will generate EmbedExpr AST node which will be expanded
by AST consumers (CodeGen or constant expression evaluators) or
expand embed directive as a comma expression.
---------
Co-authored-by: Aaron Ballman <aaron@aaronballman.com>
Co-authored-by: cor3ntin <corentinjabot@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: H. Vetinari <h.vetinari@gmx.com>
Co-authored-by: Podchishchaeva, Mariya <mariya.podchishchaeva@intel.com>
