After D10403, we had FMF in the DAG but disabled by default. Nick reported no crashing errors after some stress testing,
so I enabled them at r243687. However, Escha soon notified us of a bug not covered by any in-tree regression tests:
if we don't propagate the flags, we may fail to CSE DAG nodes because differing FMF causes them to not match. There is
one test case in this patch to prove that point.
This patch hopes to fix or leave a 'TODO' for all of the in-tree places where we create nodes that are FMF-capable. I
did this by putting an assert in SelectionDAG.getNode() to find any FMF-capable node that was being created without FMF
( D11807 ). I then ran all regression tests and test-suite and confirmed that everything passes.
This patch exposes remaining work to get DAG FMF to be fully functional: (1) add the flags to non-binary nodes such as
FCMP, FMA and FNEG; (2) add the flags to intrinsics; (3) use the flags as conditions for transforms rather than the
current global settings.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12095
llvm-svn: 247815
Summary:
The BUILD_VECTOR node will truncate its operators to match the
type. We need to take this into account when constant folding -
we need to perform a truncation before constant folding the elements.
This is because the upper bits can change the result, depending on
the operation type (for example this is the case for min/max).
This change also adds a regression test.
Reviewers: jmolloy
Subscribers: jmolloy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12697
llvm-svn: 247265
Use and check the 'IsFast' optional parameter to TLI.allowsMemoryAccess() any time
we have a merged access candidate. Without this patch, we were generating unaligned
16-byte (SSE) memops for x86 targets where those accesses are slow.
This change was mentioned in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10662 and
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10905
and will help solve PR21711.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12573
llvm-svn: 246771
SETCC is one of those special node types for which operation actions (legality,
etc.) is keyed off of an operand type, not the node's value type. This makes
sense because the value type of a legal SETCC node is determined by its
operands' value type (via the TLI function getSetCCResultType). When the
SDAGBuilder creates SETCC nodes, it either creates them with an MVT::i1 value
type, or directly with the value type provided by TLI.getSetCCResultType.
The first problem being fixed here is that DAGCombine had several places
querying TLI.isOperationLegal on SETCC, but providing the return of
getSetCCResultType, instead of the operand type directly. This does not mean
what the author thought, and "luckily", most in-tree targets have SETCC with
Custom lowering, instead of marking them Legal, so these checks return false
anyway.
The second problem being fixed here is that two of the DAGCombines could create
SETCC nodes with arbitrary (integer) value types; specifically, those that
would simplify:
(setcc a, b, op1) and|or (setcc a, b, op2) -> setcc a, b, op3
(which is possible for some combinations of (op1, op2))
If the operands of the and|or node are actual setcc nodes, then this is not an
issue (because the and|or must share the same type), but, the relevant code in
DAGCombiner::visitANDLike and DAGCombiner::visitORLike actually calls
DAGCombiner::isSetCCEquivalent on each operand, and that function will
recognise setcc-like select_cc nodes with other return types. And, thus, when
creating new SETCC nodes, we need to be careful to respect the value-type
constraint. This is even true before type legalization, because it is quite
possible for the SELECT_CC node to have a legal type that does not happen to
match the corresponding TLI.getSetCCResultType type.
To be explicit, there is nothing that later fixes the value types of SETCC
nodes (if the type is legal, but does not happen to match
TLI.getSetCCResultType). Creating SETCCs with an MVT::i1 value type seems to
work only because, either MVT::i1 is not legal, or it is what
TLI.getSetCCResultType returns if it is legal. Fixing that is a larger change,
however. For the time being, restrict the relevant transformations to produce
only SETCC nodes with a value type matching TLI.getSetCCResultType (or MVT::i1
prior to type legalization).
Fixes PR24636.
llvm-svn: 246507
This was part of D7208 (r227242), but that commit was reverted because it exposed
a bug in AArch64 lowering. I should have that fixed and the rest of the commit
reinstated soon.
llvm-svn: 246493
DAGCombine has a utility wrapper around TLI's getSetCCResultType; use it in the
one place in DAGCombine still directly calling the TLI function. NFC.
llvm-svn: 246482
This code was dead when it was committed in r23665 (Oct 7, 2005), and before it
reaches its 10th anniversary, it really should go. We can always bring it back
if we'd like, but it forms more SETCC nodes, and the way we do legality
checking on SETCC nodes is wrong in a number of places, and removing this means
fewer places to fix. NFC.
llvm-svn: 246466
When combiner AA is enabled, look at stores on the same chain.
Non-aliasing stores are moved to the same chain so the existing
code fails because it expects to find an adajcent store on a consecutive
chain.
Because of how DAGCombiner tries these store combines,
MergeConsecutiveStores doesn't see the correct set of stores on the chain
when it visits the other stores. Each store individually has its chain
fixed before trying to merge consecutive stores, and then tries to merge
stores from that point before the other stores have been processed to
have their chains fixed. To fix this, attempt to use FindBetterChain
on any possibly neighboring stores in visitSTORE.
Suppose you have 4 32-bit stores that should be merged into 1 vector
store. One store would be visited first, fixing the chain. What happens is
because not all of the store chains have yet been fixed, 2 of the stores
are merged. The other 2 stores later have their chains fixed,
but because the other stores were already merged, they have different
memory types and merging the two different sized stores is not
supported and would be more difficult to handle.
llvm-svn: 246307
Fixes PR24602: r245689 introduced an unguarded use of
SelectionDAG::FoldConstantArithmetic, which returns 0 when it fails
because of opaque (hoisted) constants.
llvm-svn: 246217
The FP16_TO_FP node only uses the bottom 16 bits of its input, so the
following pattern can be optimised by removing the AND:
(FP16_TO_FP (AND op, 0xffff)) -> (FP16_TO_FP op)
This is a common pattern for ARM targets when functions have __fp16
arguments, as they are passed as floats (so that they get passed in the
correct registers), but then bitcast and truncated to ignore the top 16
bits.
llvm-svn: 245832
This is intended to improve code generation for GEPs, as the index value is
shifted by the element size and in GEPs of multi-dimensional arrays the index
of higher dimensions is multiplied by the lower dimension size.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12197
llvm-svn: 245689
We still need to add constant folding of vector comparisons to fold the tests for targets that don't support the respective min/max nodes
I needed to update 2011-12-06-AVXVectorExtractCombine to load a vector instead of using a constant vector to prevent it folding
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12118
llvm-svn: 245503
Check to see if this is a CONCAT_VECTORS of a bunch of EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR operations. If so, and if the EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR vector inputs come from at most two distinct vectors the same size as the result, attempt to turn this into a legal shuffle.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12125
llvm-svn: 245490
This removes the isPow2SDivCheap() query, as it is not currently used in
any meaningful way. isIntDivCheap() no longer relies on a state variable
(as all in-tree target set it to false), but the interface allows querying
based on the type optimization level.
NFC.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12082
llvm-svn: 245430
The current code normalizes select(C0, x, select(C1, x, y)) towards
select(C0|C1, x, y) if the targets prefers that form. This patch adds an
additional rule that if the select(C1, x, y) part already exists in the
function then we want to normalize into the other direction because the
effects of reusing the existing value are bigger than transforming into
the target preferred form.
This addresses regressions following r238793, see also:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150727/290272.html
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11616
llvm-svn: 245350
For cases where we TRUNCATE and then ZERO_EXTEND to a larger size (often from vector legalization), see if we can mask the source data and then ZERO_EXTEND (instead of after a ANY_EXTEND). This can help avoid having to generate a larger mask, and possibly applying it to several sub-vectors.
(zext (truncate x)) -> (zext (and(x, m))
Includes a minor patch to SystemZ to better recognise 8/16-bit zero extension patterns from RISBG bit-extraction code.
This is the first of a number of minor patches to help improve the conversion of byte masks to clear mask shuffles.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11764
llvm-svn: 245160
This commit removes the global manager variable which is responsible for
storing and allocating pseudo source values and instead it introduces a new
manager class named 'PseudoSourceValueManager'. Machine functions now own an
instance of the pseudo source value manager class.
This commit also modifies the 'get...' methods in the 'MachinePointerInfo'
class to construct pseudo source values using the instance of the pseudo
source value manager object from the machine function.
This commit updates calls to the 'get...' methods from the 'MachinePointerInfo'
class in a lot of different files because those calls now need to pass in a
reference to a machine function to those methods.
This change will make it easier to serialize pseudo source values as it will
enable me to transform the mips specific MipsCallEntry PseudoSourceValue
subclass into two target independent subclasses.
Reviewers: Akira Hatanaka
llvm-svn: 244693
Summary:
For example:
s6 = s0*s5;
s2 = s6*s6 + s6;
...
s4 = s6*s3;
We notice that it is possible for s2 is folded to fma (s0, s5, fmul (s6 s6)).
This only happens when Aggressive is true, otherwise hasOneUse() check
already prevents from folding the multiplication with more uses.
Test Plan: test/CodeGen/NVPTX/fma-assoc.ll
Patch by Xuetian Weng
Reviewers: hfinkel, apazos, jingyue, ohsallen, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11855
llvm-svn: 244649
Create wrapper methods in the Function class for the OptimizeForSize and MinSize
attributes. We want to hide the logic of "or'ing" them together when optimizing
just for size (-Os).
Currently, we are not consistent about this and rely on a front-end to always set
OptimizeForSize (-Os) if MinSize (-Oz) is on. Thus, there are 18 FIXME changes here
that should be added as follow-on patches with regression tests.
This patch is NFC-intended: it just replaces existing direct accesses of the attributes
by the equivalent wrapper call.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11734
llvm-svn: 243994
The XformToShuffleWithZero method currently checks AND masks at the per-lane level for all-one and all-zero constants and attempts to convert them to legal shuffle clear masks.
This patch generalises XformToShuffleWithZero, splitting and checking the sub-lanes of the constants down to the byte level to see if any legal shuffle clear masks are possible. This allows a lot of masks (often from legalization or truncation) to be folded into existing shuffle patterns and removes a lot of constant mask loading.
There are a few examples of poor shuffle lowering that are exposed by this patch that will be cleaned up in future patches (e.g. merging shuffles that are separated by bitcasts, x86 legalized v8i8 zero extension uses PMOVZX+AND+AND instead of AND+PMOVZX, etc.)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11518
llvm-svn: 243831
Making allowableAlignment() more accessible was suggested as a predecessor patch
for D10662, so I've pulled it into TargetLowering. This let's us remove 4 instances
of duplicate logic in LegalizeDAG.
There's a subtle functional change in the implementation: the existing
allowableAlignment() code was using getPrefTypeAlignment() when checking
alignment with the DataLayout and assumed that was fast. In this implementation,
we use getABITypeAlignment() and assume that is fast. See the TODO comment or the
discussion in the Phab review for future improvements in this implementation
(don't use the data layout at all).
There are no regression test changes from this difference, and I'm not sure how to
expose it via a test. I think we actually do want to provide the 'Fast' param when
checking this from DAGCombiner::MergeConsecutiveStores(). Ie, we shouldn't merge
stores if the new stores are not going to be fast. But that change will require
fixing allowsMisalignedMemoryAccess() overrides as noted in D10662.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10905
llvm-svn: 243549
PR24141: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24141
contains a test case where we have duplicate entries in a node's uses() list.
After r241826, we use CombineTo() to delete dead nodes when combining the uses into
reciprocal multiplies, but this fails if we encounter the just-deleted node again in
the list.
The solution in this patch is to not add duplicate entries to the list of users that
we will subsequently iterate over. For the test case, this avoids triggering the
combine divisors logic entirely because there really is only one user of the divisor.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11345
llvm-svn: 243500
This fix was suggested as part of D11345 and is part of fixing PR24141.
With this change, we can avoid walking the uses of a divisor node if the target
doesn't want the combineRepeatedFPDivisors transform in the first place.
There is no NFC-intended other than that.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11531
llvm-svn: 243498
We don't bitcast the UNDEFs - that is done in visitVECTOR_SHUFFLE, and the getValueType should come from the operand's SDValue not the SDNode.
llvm-svn: 242640
The motivation is to allow GatherAllAliases / FindBetterChain
to not give up on dependent loads of a pointer from constant memory.
This is important for AMDGPU, because most loads are pointers
derived from a load of a kernel argument from constant memory.
llvm-svn: 241948
This patch fixes bugs that were exposed by the addition of fast-math-flags in the DAG:
r237046 ( http://reviews.llvm.org/rL237046 ):
1. When replacing a division node, it's not enough to RAUW.
We should call CombineTo() to delete dead nodes and combine again.
2. Because we are changing the DAG, we can't return an empty SDValue
after the transform. As the code comments say:
Visitation implementation - Implement dag node combining for different node types.
The semantics are as follows: Return Value:
SDValue.getNode() == 0 - No change was made
SDValue.getNode() == N - N was replaced, is dead and has been handled.
otherwise - N should be replaced by the returned Operand.
The new test case shows no difference with or without this patch, but it will crash if
we re-apply r237046 or enable FMF via the current -enable-fmf-dag cl::opt.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9893
llvm-svn: 241826
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11040
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241778
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11037
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241776
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, ted, yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11028
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241775
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11017
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241655
Summary:
SelectionDAG itself is not invoking directly the DataLayout in the
TargetMachine, but the "TargetLowering" class is still using it. I'll
address it in a following commit.
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11000
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241618
The code responsible for shl folding in the DAGCombiner was assuming incorrectly that all constants are less than 64 bits. This patch simply changes the way values are compared.
It has been reverted previously because of some problems with comparing APInt with raw uint64_t. That has been fixed/changed with r241204.
llvm-svn: 241254
Summary: This patch fixes the cases of sext/zext constant folding in DAG combiner where constans do not fit 64 bits. The fix simply removes un$
Test Plan: New regression test included.
Reviewers: RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: RKSimon, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10607
llvm-svn: 240991
We had a hack in SDAGBuilder in place to work around this but now we
can avoid that. Call BuildExactSDIV from BuildSDIV so DAGCombiner can
perform this trick automatically.
The added check in DAGCombiner is necessary to prevent exact sdiv by pow2
from regressing as the target-specific pow2 lowering is not aware of
exact bits yet.
This is mostly covered by existing tests. One side effect is that we
get the better lowering for exact vector sdivs now too :)
llvm-svn: 240891
