in a bunch of declarations from the PCH file. We're down to loading
very few declarations in Carbon-prefixed "Hello, World!":
*** PCH Statistics:
6/20693 types read (0.028995%)
7/59230 declarations read (0.011818%)
50/44914 identifiers read (0.111324%)
0/32954 statements read (0.000000%)
5/6187 macros read (0.080815%)
llvm-svn: 69825
tentative definitions off to the ASTConsumer at the end of the
translation unit.
Eliminate CodeGen's internal tracking of tentative definitions, and
instead hook into ASTConsumer::CompleteTentativeDefinition. Also,
tweak the definition-deferal logic for C++, where there are no
tentative definitions.
Fixes <rdar://problem/6808352>, and will make it much easier for
precompiled headers to cope with tentative definitions in the future.
llvm-svn: 69681
statements don't end up in the LabelMap so we don't have a quick way
to filter them. We could add state to Sema (a "has vla" and "has
jump" bit) to try to filter this out, but that would be sort of gross
and I'm not convinced it is the best way. Thoughts welcome.
llvm-svn: 69476
specific bad case instead of on the switch. Putting it on the
switch means you don't know what case is the problem. For
example:
scope-check.c:54:3: error: illegal switch case into protected scope
case 2:
^
scope-check.c:53:9: note: jump bypasses initialization of variable length array
int a[x];
^
llvm-svn: 69462
produce better diagnostics, and be more correct in ObjC cases (fixing
rdar://6803963).
An example is that we now diagnose:
int test1(int x) {
goto L;
int a[x];
int b[x];
L:
return sizeof a;
}
with:
scope-check.c:15:3: error: illegal goto into protected scope
goto L;
^
scope-check.c:17:7: note: scope created by variable length array
int b[x];
^
scope-check.c:16:7: note: scope created by variable length array
int a[x];
^
instead of just saying "invalid jump". An ObjC example is:
void test1() {
goto L;
@try {
L: ;
} @finally {
}
}
t.m:6:3: error: illegal goto into protected scope
goto L;
^
t.m:7:3: note: scope created by @try block
@try {
^
There are a whole ton of fixme's for stuff to do, but I believe that this
is a monotonic improvement over what we had.
llvm-svn: 69437
lazy PCH deserialization. Propagate that argument wherever it needs to
be. No functionality change, except that I've tightened up a few PCH
tests in preparation.
llvm-svn: 69406
1. We had logic in sema to decide whether or not to emit the error
based on manually checking whether in a system header file.
2. we were allowing redefinitions of typedefs in class scope in C++
if in header file.
3. there was no way to force typedef redefinitions to be accepted
by the C compiler, which annoys me when stripping linemarkers out
of .i files.
The fix is to split the C++ class typedef redefinition path from the
C path, and change the C path to be a warning that normally maps to
error. This causes it to properly be ignored in system headers,
etc. and gives us a way to control it. Passing
-Wtypedef-redefinition now turns the error into a warning.
One behavior change is that we now diagnose cases where you redefine
a typedef in your .c file that was defined in a header file. This
seems like reasonable behavior, and the diagnostic now indicates that
it can be controlled with -Wtypedef-redefinition.
llvm-svn: 69391
caused by: <rdar://problem/6252084> [sema] jumps into Obj-C exception blocks should be disallowed.
Sema::RecursiveCalcLabelScopes() and Sema::RecursiveCalcJumpScopes() need to pop the ScopeStack within the statement iteration loop (was outside the loop).
Eli, please review (thanks).
llvm-svn: 69165
- Exposed quite a few Sema issues and a CodeGen crash.
- See FIXMEs in test case, and in SemaDecl.cpp (PR3983).
I'm skeptical that __private_extern__ should actually be a storage
class value. I think that __private_extern__ basically amounts to
extern A __attribute__((visibility("hidden")))
and would be better off handled (a) as that, or (b) with an extra bit
in the VarDecl.
llvm-svn: 69020
struct xyz { int y; };
enum abc { ZZZ };
static xyz b;
abc c;
we used to produce:
t2.c:4:8: error: unknown type name 'xyz'
static xyz b;
^
t2.c:5:1: error: unknown type name 'abc'
abc c;
^
we now produce:
t2.c:4:8: error: use of tagged type 'xyz' without 'struct' tag
static xyz b;
^
struct
t2.c:5:1: error: use of tagged type 'abc' without 'enum' tag
abc c;
^
enum
GCC produces the normal:
t2.c:4: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘b’
t2.c:5: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘c’
rdar://6783347
llvm-svn: 68914
