- If the declarator is at the start of a line, and the previous line contained
another declarator and ended with a comma, then that comma was probably a
typo for a semicolon:
int n = 0, m = 1, l = 2, // k = 5;
myImportantFunctionCall(); // oops!
- If removing the parentheses would correctly initialize the object, then
produce a note suggesting that fix.
- Otherwise, if there is a simple initializer we can suggest which performs
value-initialization, then provide a note suggesting a correction to that
initializer.
Sema::Declarator now tracks the location of the comma prior to the declarator in
the declaration, if there is one, to facilitate providing the note. The code to
determine an appropriate initializer from the -Wuninitialized warning has been
factored out to allow use in both that and -Wvexing-parse.
llvm-svn: 148072
explicit template specializations (which represent actual functions somebody wrote).
Along the way, refactor some other code which similarly cares about whether or
not they are looking at a template instantiation.
llvm-svn: 145547
of the function in question when applicable (that is, not for blocks).
Patch by Joerg Sonnenberger with some stylistic tweaks by me.
When discussing this weth Joerg, streaming the decl directly into the
diagnostic didn't work because we have a pointer-to-const, and the
overload doesn't accept such. In order to make my style tweaks to the
patch, I first changed the overload to accept a pointer-to-const, and
then changed the diagnostic printing layer to also use
a pointer-to-const, cleaning up a gross line of code along the way.
llvm-svn: 138854
system flags an error when unlocking a lock which was not held, locking
the same lock twice, having a different lockset on each iteration of a
loop, or going out of scope while still holding a lock. In order to
successfully use the lockset, this patch also makes sure that attribute
arguments are attached correctly for later parsing.
This patch was also worked on by DeLesley Hutchins.
Note: This patch has been reviewed by Chandler Carruth and Jeffrey
Yasskin. Feel free to provide post-commit review comments for a
subsequent patch.
llvm-svn: 138350
AnalysisBasedWarnings Sema layer and out of the Analysis library itself.
This returns the uninitialized values analysis to a more pure form,
allowing its original logic to correctly detect some categories of
definitely uninitialized values. Fixes PR10358 (again).
Thanks to Ted for reviewing and updating this patch after his rewrite of
several portions of this analysis.
llvm-svn: 135748
This is accomplished by forcing the needed expressions for -Wuninitialized to always be CFGElements in the CFG.
This allows us to remove a fair amount of the code for -Wuninitialized.
Some fallout:
- AnalysisBasedWarnings.cpp now specifically toggles the CFGBuilder to create a CFG that is suitable for -Wuninitialized. This
is a layering violation, since the logic for -Wuninitialized is in libAnalysis. This can be fixed with the proper refactoring.
- Some of the source locations for -Wunreachable-code warnings have shifted. While not ideal, this is okay because that analysis
already needs some serious reworking.
llvm-svn: 135480
rather than a computed std::distance(). At some point I had convinced
myself that these two were different; but as far as I can tell on
re-exampination they aren't, and the number of block IDs is actually
just a count of the blocks in the CFG.
While this removes the primary motivation for guarding all of this with
CollectStats, I have a patch coming up that will almost certainly make
it important again.
llvm-svn: 134552
Special detail is added for uninitialized variable analysis as this has
serious performance problems than need to be tracked.
Computing some of this data is expensive, for example walking the CFG to
determine its size. To avoid doing that unless the stats data is going
to be used, we thread a bit into the Sema object to track whether
detailed stats should be collected or not. This bit is used to avoid
computations whereever the computations are likely to be more expensive
than checking the state of the flag. Thus, counters are in some cases
unconditionally updated, but the more expensive (and less frequent)
aggregation steps are skipped.
With this patch, we're able to see that for 'gcc.c':
*** Analysis Based Warnings Stats:
232 functions analyzed (0 w/o CFGs).
7151 CFG blocks built.
30 average CFG blocks per function.
1167 max CFG blocks per function.
163 functions analyzed for uninitialiazed variables
640 variables analyzed.
3 average variables per function.
94 max variables per function.
96409 block visits.
591 average block visits per function.
61546 max block visits per function.
And for the reduced testcase in PR10183:
*** Analysis Based Warnings Stats:
98 functions analyzed (0 w/o CFGs).
8526 CFG blocks built.
87 average CFG blocks per function.
7277 max CFG blocks per function.
68 functions analyzed for uninitialiazed variables
1359 variables analyzed.
19 average variables per function.
1196 max variables per function.
2540494 block visits.
37360 average block visits per function.
2536495 max block visits per function.
That last number is the somewhat scary one that indicates the problem in
PR10183.
llvm-svn: 134494
