This will allow us to use variant in common_iterator. We do this by introducing a new `__light_array` type that variant uses instead of `std::array`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105597
This patch overhauls the documentation around building libc++
for vendors, and using libc++ for end-users. It also:
- Removes mention of the standalone build, which we've been trying to
get rid of for a long time.
- Removes mention of using a local ABI installation, which we don't do
and is documented as "not recommended".
- Removes mention of the separate libc++filesystem.a library, which isn't
relevant anymore since filesystem support is in the main library.
- Adds mention of the GDB pretty printers and how to use them.
The various design docs have been moved to RST, and the linked blog post
does not apply anymore since libc++ is the default library used by Clang
on Apple platforms.
* indicates whether work has been started or completed
* consolidates content that was split for dependency reasons (iff
everything has been merged)
* makes things a lot more fine-grained
* turns sub-CSVs into lists
* puts links into description section and removes patch column
* adds links to c++draft on occasion
These changes heavily prioritise the the reader of the generated HTML
file, not the source.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103295
P1518 does the following in C++23 but we'll just do it in C++17 as well:
- Stop requiring `Alloc` to be an allocator on some container-adaptor deduction guides
- Stop deducing from `Allocator` on some sequence container constructors
- Stop deducing from `Allocator` on some other container constructors (libc++ already did this)
The affected constructors are the "allocator-extended" versions of
constructors where the non-allocator arguments are already sufficient
to deduce the allocator type. For example,
std::pmr::vector<int> v1;
std::vector v2(v1, std::pmr::new_delete_resource());
std::stack s2(v1, std::pmr::new_delete_resource());
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97742
While the std::allocator<void> specialization was deprecated by
https://wg21.link/p0174#2.2, the *use* of std::allocator<void> by users
was not. The intent was that std::allocator<void> could still be used
in C++17 and C++20, but starting with C++20 (with the removal of the
specialization), std::allocator<void> would use the primary template.
That intent was called out in wg21.link/p0619r4#3.9.
As a result of this patch, _LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_MEMBERS
will also not control whether the explicit specialization is provided or
not. It shouldn't matter, since in C++20, one can simply use the primary
template.
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR50299
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104323
Instead, people should be using CMAKE_POSITION_INDEPENDENT_CODE to control
whether they want to use PIC or not. We should try to avoid reinventing
the wheel whenever CMake natively supports something.
This makes libc++abi consistent with libc++ and libunwind.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103973
Makes the following operations constexpr:
* `std::swap(optional, optional)`
* `optional(optional<U> const&)`
* `optional(optional<U>&&)`
* `~optional()`
* `operator=(nullopt_t)`
* `operator=(U&&)`
* `operator=(optional<U> const&)`
* `operator=(optional<U>&&)`
* `emplace(Args&&...)`
* `emplace(initializer_list<U>, Args&&...)`
* `swap(optional&)`
* `reset()`
P2231 has been accepted by plenary, with the committee recommending
implementers retroactively apply to C++20. It's necessary for us to
implement _`semiregular-box`_ and _`non-propagating-cache`_, both of
which are required for ranges (otherwise we'll need to reimplement
`std::optional` with these members `constexpr`ified).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102119
The post-conditions for the self move assignment of `std::unique_ptr`
were changed. This requires no implementation changes. A test was added
to validate the new post-conditions.
Addresses
- LWG-3455: Incorrect Postconditions on `unique_ptr` move assignment
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103764
This commit finishes moving the <atomic> design documents to the RST
documentation and removes the old documentation. https://libcxx.llvm.org
is already pointing to the new documentation only now, so the removal of
the old documentation is really a NFC.
I went over the old documentation and I don't think we're leaving anything
important behind - I think everything important was mentionned in the RST
documentation anyway.
This also provides some of the scaffolding needed by D102992 and D101729, and mops up after D101730 etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103055
- Fixes paper number P1862 -> P1868. (The title was correct.)
- Marks P1868 as in progress.
- Marks P1892 as in progress.
- Marks LWG-3327 as nothing to do, since the wording change doesn't
impact the code. (Also updated on the general C++20 status page.)
* adds `sized_range` and conformance tests
* moves `disable_sized_range` into namespace `std::ranges`
* removes explicit type parameter
Implements part of P0896 'The One Ranges Proposal'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102434
This fixes a long standing issue where the triple is not always set
consistently in all configurations. This change also moves the
back-deployment Lit features to using the proper target triple
instead of using something ad-hoc.
This will be necessary for using from scratch Lit configuration files
in both normal testing and back-deployment testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102012
`__debug_less` ends up running the comparator up-to-twice per comparison,
because whenever `(x < y)` it goes on to verify that `!(y < x)`.
This breaks the strict "Complexity" guarantees of algorithms like
`inplace_merge`, which we test in the test suite. So, just skip the
complexity assertions in debug mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101677
This patch gets rid of technical debt around std::pointer_safety which,
I claim, is entirely unnecessary. I don't think anybody has used
std::pointer_safety in actual code because we do not implement the
underlying garbage collection support. In fact, P2186 even proposes
removing these facilities entirely from a future C++ version. As such,
I think it's entirely fine to get rid of complex workarounds whose goals
were to avoid breaking the ABI back in 2017.
I'm putting this up both to get reviews and to discuss this proposal for
a breaking change. I think we should be comfortable with making these
tiny breaks if we are confident they won't hurt anyone, which I'm fairly
confident is the case here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100410
