from PEP8
(https://peps.python.org/pep-0008/#programming-recommendations):
> Comparisons to singletons like None should always be done with is or
is not, never the equality operators.
Co-authored-by: Eisuke Kawashima <e-kwsm@users.noreply.github.com>
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our
Python code.
Reformatting is done with `black`.
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you
have made changes to a python file, the best way to handle that
is to run git checkout --ours <yourfile> and then reformat it
with black.
If you run into any problems, post to discourse about it and
we will try to help.
RFC Thread below:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150761
Attempt to fix the test failures observed in CI:
* Add Option dependency, which caused BUILD_SHARED_LIBS builds to fail
* Adapt tests that accidentally depended on the host platform: platforms
that don't use an integrated assembler (e.g. AIX) get a different set
of commands from the driver. Most dependency scanner tests can use
-fsyntax-only or -E instead of -c to avoid this, and in the rare case
we want to check -c specifically, set an explicit target so the
behaviour is independent of the host.
Original commit message follows.
---
Instead of trying to "fix" the original driver invocation by appending
arguments to it, split it into multiple commands, and for each -cc1
command use a CompilerInvocation to give precise control over the
invocation.
This change should make it easier to (in the future) canonicalize the
command-line (e.g. to improve hits in something like ccache), apply
optimizations, or start supporting multi-arch builds, which would
require different modules for each arch.
In the long run it may make sense to treat the TU commands as a
dependency graph, each with their own dependencies on modules or earlier
TU commands, but for now they are simply a list that is executed in
order, and the dependencies are simply duplicated. Since we currently
only support single-arch builds, there is no parallelism available in
the execution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132405
Instead of trying to "fix" the original driver invocation by appending
arguments to it, split it into multiple commands, and for each -cc1
command use a CompilerInvocation to give precise control over the
invocation.
This change should make it easier to (in the future) canonicalize the
command-line (e.g. to improve hits in something like ccache), apply
optimizations, or start supporting multi-arch builds, which would
require different modules for each arch.
In the long run it may make sense to treat the TU commands as a
dependency graph, each with their own dependencies on modules or earlier
TU commands, but for now they are simply a list that is executed in
order, and the dependencies are simply duplicated. Since we currently
only support single-arch builds, there is no parallelism available in
the execution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132405
This reverts commit c98833cdaad01787ea70ecdfabb05a7e142a6671.
The test `ClangScanDeps/modules-inferred-explicit-build.m` creates files
in the current directory.
This reapplies commit 95033eb3 that reverted commit 1d9e8e13.
The tests were failing on Windows due to spaces and backslashes in paths not being handled carefully.
This patch adds support for inferred modules to the dependency scanner.
Effectively a cherry-pick of https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/pull/699 authored by @Bigcheese with libclang and other changes omitted.
Contains following changes:
1. [Clang][ScanDeps] Ignore __inferred_module.map dependency.
* This shows up with inferred modules, but it doesn't exist on disk, so don't report it as a dependency.
2. [Clang][ScanDeps] Use the module map a module was inferred from for inferred modules.
Also includes a smoke test that uses clang-scan-deps output to perform an explicit build. There's no intention to duplicate whatever `test/Modules` contains, just to verify the produced command-line does "work" (with very loose definition of work).
Split from D100934.
Reviewed By: dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102495
