This rows back on r288120, r291801 and r292110. I apologize in advance
for the churn. All of those revisions where meant to make the wrapping
of RHS expressions more consistent. However, now that they are
consistent, we seem to be a bit too eager.
The reasoning here is that I think it is generally correct that we want
to line-wrap before multiline RHS expressions (or multiline arguments to
a function call). However, if there are only two of such operands or
arguments, there is always a clear vertical separation between them and
the additional line break seems much less desirable.
Somewhat good examples are expressions like:
EXPECT_EQ(2, someLongExpression(
orCall));
llvm-svn: 293752
This only affects expressions inside ${} scopes of template strings.
Here, we want to indent relative to the surrounding template string and
not the surrounding expression. Otherwise, this can create quite a mess.
Before:
var f = `
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa: ${someFunction(
aaaaa + //
bbbb)}`;
After:
var f = `
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa: ${someFunction(
aaaaa + //
bbbb)}`;
llvm-svn: 293636
The main motivation behind this is to cleanup the WhitespaceManager and
make it more extensible for future alignment etc. features.
Specifically, WhitespaceManager has started to copy more and more code
that is already present in FormatToken. Instead, I think it makes more
sense to actually store a reference to each FormatToken for each change.
This has as a consequence led to a change in the calculation of indent
levels. Now, we actually compute them for each Token ahead of time,
which should be more efficient as it removes an unsigned value for the
ParenState, which is used during the combinatorial exploration of the
solution space.
No functional changes intended.
Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29300
llvm-svn: 293616
This had significant negative consequences and I don't have a good
solution for it yet.
Before:
var string =
[
'aaaaaa',
'bbbbbb',
]
.join('+');
After:
var string = [
'aaaaaa',
'bbbbbb',
].join('+');
llvm-svn: 293465
Summary:
This presents a version of the comment reflowing with less mutable state inside
the comment breakable token subclasses. The state has been pushed into the
driving breakProtrudingToken method. For this, the API of BreakableToken is enriched
by the methods getSplitBefore and getLineLengthAfterSplitBefore.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: djasper, klimek, mgorny, cfe-commits, ioeric
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28764
llvm-svn: 293055
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa::
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa::
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
No new test cases, as the existing ones cover this fairly well.
llvm-svn: 292110
Here, the optimization to not line wrap when it would not lead to a
reduction in columns was overwriting and enforced break that we want to
do no matter what.
Before:
int i = someFunction(
aaaaaaa,
0).aaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaa) *
aaaaaaa +
aaaaaaa;
After:
int i = someFunction(aaaaaaa, 0)
.aaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaa) *
aaaaaaa +
aaaaaaa;
llvm-svn: 291974
Specifically, wrap before them if they are multi-line so that we don't
create long hanging indents. This prevents having a lot of code
indented a lot in some cases.
Before:
someFunction(Param, {List1, List2,
List3});
After:
someFunction(Param,
{List1, List2,
List3});
llvm-svn: 291801
Before:
SomeLongLoggingStatementOrMacro() << "Some long text "
<< some_variable << "\n";
Before:
SomeLongLoggingStatementOrMacro()
<< "Some long text " << some_variable << "\n";
Short logging statements are already special cased in a different part
of the code.
llvm-svn: 290094
While C(++) and ObjC are generally formatted the same way and can be
mixed, people might want to choose different styles based on the
language. This patch recognizes .m and .mm files as ObjC and also
implements a very crude detection of whether or not a .h file contains
ObjC code. This can be improved over time.
Also move most of the ObjC tests into their own test file to keep file
size maintainable.
llvm-svn: 289428
Specifically, if the RHS of a comma is a complex binary expression and
spans multiple lines, insert a line break before it. This usually is
often more readable compared to producing a hanging indent. See changes
in FormatTest.cpp for examples.
llvm-svn: 288120
If a call takes a single argument, using AlwaysBreak can lead to lots
of wasted lines and additional indentation without improving the
readability in a significant way.
Before:
caaaaaaaaaaaall(
caaaaaaaaaaaall(
caaaaaaaaaaaall(
caaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaall(aaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaa))));
After:
caaaaaaaaaaaall(caaaaaaaaaaaall(caaaaaaaaaaaall(
caaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaall(aaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaa))));
llvm-svn: 263709
Before:
int i = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ?
/*bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb=*/bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb :
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
After:
int i = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ?
/*bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb=*/bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb :
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccc;
llvm-svn: 259670
After reading the style guides again, they don't actually say how to
pack or not pack array literals. Based on some user reports, array
initializers can unnecessarily get quite long if they contain many
small elements. Array literals with trailing commas are still formatted
one per line so that users have a way to opt out of the packing.
Before:
var array = [
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa,
aaaaaa
];
After:
var array = [
aaaaaa, aaaaaa, aaaaaa, aaaaaa, aaaaaa, aaaaaa, aaaaaa, aaaaaa, aaaaaa,
aaaaaa, aaaaaa
];
llvm-svn: 257615
r257257 change the way clang-format enforces line breaks after a
templated type has been line-wrapped. This was to fix an incorrect line
break if BinPackParameters is set to false. However, it also leads to
an unwanted line break in a different case. Thus, for now, only do this
when BinPackParameters is false. This isn't ideal yet, but helps us
until we have a better solution.
With BinPackParameters:
Before:
void fffffffffff(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,
aaaaaaaaaa> aaaaaaaaaa);
After:
void fffffffffff(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa<aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaa>
aaaaaaaaaa);
llvm-svn: 257325
Before (example is JS, but also applies to C++):
return [
aaaa()
.bbbbbbbb('A'),
aaaa().bbbbbbbb('B'),
aaaa().bbbbbbbb('C'),
];
After:
return [
aaaa().bbbbbbbb('A'),
aaaa().bbbbbbbb('B'),
aaaa().bbbbbbbb('C'),
];
llvm-svn: 257079
r256750 has been leading to an undesired behavior:
aaaaaaaaaa
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
This change increases penalty for wrapping before member accesses that aren't
calls. Thus, this is again formatted as (as it has been before r256750):
aaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa);
llvm-svn: 256830
This changes the behavior of AlwaysBreakAfterDeclarationReturnType
so that it supports breaking after declarations, definitions, or
both.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10370
Reviewed By: Daniel Jasper
llvm-svn: 256046
Specifically, don't wrap between the {} of an empty constructor if the
"}" falls on column 81 and ConstructorInitializerAllOnOneLineOrOnePerLine
is set.
llvm-svn: 251406
Summary:
If this option is set, clang-format will always insert a line wrap, e.g.
before the first parameter of a function call unless all parameters fit
on the same line. This obviates the need to make a decision on the
alignment itself.
Use this style for Google's JavaScript style and add some minor tweaks
to correctly handle nested blocks etc. with it. Don't use this option
for for/while loops.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14104
llvm-svn: 251405
This is a bit of a step back of what we did in r222531, as there are
some corner cases in C++, where this kind of formatting is really bad.
Example:
Before:
virtual aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(std::function<bool()> IsKindWeWant = [&]() {
return true;
}, aaaaa aaaaaaaaa);
After:
virtual aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(std::function<bool()> IsKindWeWant =
[&]() { return true; },
aaaaa aaaaaaaaa);
The block formatting logic in JavaScript will probably go some other changes,
too, and we'll potentially be able to make the rules more consistent again. For
now, this seems to be the best approach for C++.
llvm-svn: 245694
