Fix and rename the broken and confusingly named decorator
skipIfHostIncompatibleWithRemote. The decorator is meant to skip test
which uses the inferior test build system (i.e. to build test inferiors)
to build host binaries (e.g. lldb drivers).
The decorator was broken on macOS, where the host and target platform
report macosx, but the decorator overwrote it with Darwin, resulting in
tests incorrectly being skipped.
The decorator was also missing on a handful of tests that use the
buildDriver helper, which this commit fixes as well.
Switching to modern `unittest` in
5b386158aacac4b41126983a5379d36ed413d0ea needs xfail annotations to be
known prior to test running. In contrast, skipping can happen at any
time, even during test execution.
Thus, `expectedFailureIfFn` inherently doesn't work. Either we eagerly
evaluate the function and use `expectedFailureIf` instead, or we use a
skip annotation to lazily evaluate the function and potentially skip the
test right before it starts.
- For `expectedFailureAndroid`, the intent seems to be that certain
tests _should_ work on android, but don't. Thus, xfail is appropriate,
to ensure the test is re-enabled once those bugs are ever fixed.
- For the other uses in individual tests, those generally seem to be
cases where the test environment doesn't support the setup required by
the test, and so it isn't meaningful to run the test at all. For those,
a drop-in replacement to `skipTestIfFn` works.
The concurrent tests all do a pthread_join at the end, and
concurrent_base.py stops after that pthread_join and sanity checks that
only 1 thread is running. On macOS, after pthread_join() has completed,
there can be an extra thread still running which is completing the
details of that task asynchronously; this causes testsuite failures.
When this happens, we see the second thread is in
```
frame #0: 0x0000000180ce7700 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__ulock_wake + 8
frame #1: 0x0000000180d25ad4 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_joiner_wake + 52
frame #2: 0x0000000180d23c18 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_terminate + 384
frame #3: 0x0000000180d23a98 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_terminate_invoke + 92
frame #4: 0x0000000180d26740 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_exit + 112
frame #5: 0x0000000180d26040 libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_start + 148
```
there are none of the functions from the test file present on this
thread.
In this patch, instead of counting the number of threads, I iterate over
the threads looking for functions from our test file (by name) and only
count threads that have at least one of them.
It's a lower frequency failure than the darwin kernel bug causing an
extra step instruction mach exception when hardware
breakpoint/watchpoints are used, but once I fixed that, this came up as
the next most common failure for these tests.
rdar://110555062
This removes the dependency LLDB API tests have on
lldb/third_party/Python/module/unittest2, and instead uses the standard
one provided by Python.
This does not actually remove the vendored dep yet, nor update the docs.
I'll do both those once this sticks.
Non-trivial changes to call out:
- expected failures (i.e. "bugnumber") don't have a reason anymore, so
those params were removed
- `assertItemsEqual` is now called `assertCountEqual`
- When a test is marked xfail, our copy of unittest2 considers failures
during teardown to be OK, but modern unittest does not. See
TestThreadLocal.py. (Very likely could be a real bug/leak).
- Our copy of unittest2 was patched to print all test results, even ones
that don't happen, e.g. `(5 passes, 0 failures, 1 errors, 0 skipped,
...)`, but standard unittest prints a terser message that omits test
result types that didn't happen, e.g. `OK (skipped=1)`. Our lit
integration parses this stderr and needs to be updated w/ that
expectation.
I tested this w/ `ninja check-lldb-api` on Linux. There's a good chance
non-Linux tests have similar quirks, but I'm not able to uncover those.
debugserver on arm64 devices can manage both Byte Address Select
watchpoints (1-8 bytes) and MASK watchpoints (8 bytes-2 gigabytes). This
adds a SupportedWatchpointTypes key to the QSupported response from
debugserver with a list of these, so lldb can take full advantage of
them when creating larger regions with a single hardware watchpoint.
Also add documentation for this, and two other lldb extensions, to the
lldb-gdb-remote.txt documentation.
Re-enable TestLargeWatchpoint.py on Darwin systems when testing with the
in-tree built debugserver. I can remove the "in-tree built debugserver"
in the future when this new key is handled by an Xcode debugserver.
This patch is the next piece of work in my Large Watchpoint proposal,
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116
This patch breaks a user's watchpoint into one or more
WatchpointResources which reflect what the hardware registers can cover.
This means we can watch objects larger than 8 bytes, and we can watched
unaligned address ranges. On a typical 64-bit target with 4 watchpoint
registers you can watch 32 bytes of memory if the start address is
doubleword aligned.
Additionally, if the remote stub implements AArch64 MASK style
watchpoints (e.g. debugserver on Darwin), we can watch any power-of-2
size region of memory up to 2GB, aligned to that same size.
I updated the Watchpoint constructor and CommandObjectWatchpoint to
create a CompilerType of Array<UInt8> when the size of the watched
region is greater than pointer-size and we don't have a variable type to
use. For pointer-size and smaller, we can display the watched granule as
an integer value; for larger-than-pointer-size we will display as an
array of bytes.
I have `watchpoint list` now print the WatchpointResources used to
implement the watchpoint.
I added a WatchpointAlgorithm class which has a top-level static method
that takes an enum flag mask WatchpointHardwareFeature and a user
address and size, and returns a vector of WatchpointResources covering
the request. It does not take into account the number of watchpoint
registers the target has, or the number still available for use. Right
now there is only one algorithm, which monitors power-of-2 regions of
memory. For up to pointer-size, this is what Intel hardware supports.
AArch64 Byte Address Select watchpoints can watch any number of
contiguous bytes in a pointer-size memory granule, that is not currently
supported so if you ask to watch bytes 3-5, the algorithm will watch the
entire doubleword (8 bytes). The newly default "modify" style means we
will silently ignore modifications to bytes outside the watched range.
I've temporarily skipped TestLargeWatchpoint.py for all targets. It was
only run on Darwin when using the in-tree debugserver, which was a proxy
for "debugserver supports MASK watchpoints". I'll be adding the
aforementioned feature flag from the stub and enabling full mask
watchpoints when a debugserver with that feature is enabled, and
re-enable this test.
I added a new TestUnalignedLargeWatchpoint.py which only has one test
but it's a great one, watching a 22-byte range that is unaligned and
requires four 8-byte watchpoints to cover.
I also added a unit test, WatchpointAlgorithmsTests, which has a number
of simple tests against WatchpointAlgorithms::PowerOf2Watchpoints. I
think there's interesting possible different approaches to how we cover
these; I note in the unit test that a user requesting a watch on address
0x12e0 of 120 bytes will be covered by two watchpoints today, a
128-bytes at 0x1280 and at 0x1300. But it could be done with a 16-byte
watchpoint at 0x12e0 and a 128-byte at 0x1300, which would have fewer
false positives/private stops. As we try refining this one, it's helpful
to have a collection of tests to make sure things don't regress.
I tested this on arm64 macOS, (genuine) x86_64 macOS, and AArch64
Ubuntu. I have not modifed the Windows process plugins yet, I might try
that as a standalone patch, I'd be making the change blind, but the
necessary changes (see ProcessGDBRemote::EnableWatchpoint) are pretty
small so it might be obvious enough that I can change it and see what
the Windows CI thinks.
There isn't yet a packet (or a qSupported feature query) for the gdb
remote serial protocol stub to communicate its watchpoint capabilities
to lldb. I'll be doing that in a patch right after this is landed,
having debugserver advertise its capability of AArch64 MASK watchpoints,
and have ProcessGDBRemote add eWatchpointHardwareArmMASK to
WatchpointAlgorithms so we can watch larger than 32-byte requests on
Darwin.
I haven't yet tackled WatchpointResource *sharing* by multiple
Watchpoints. This is all part of the goal, especially when we may be
watching a larger memory range than the user requested, if they then add
another watchpoint next to their first request, it may be covered by the
same WatchpointResource (hardware watchpoint register). Also one "read"
watchpoint and one "write" watchpoint on the same memory granule need to
be handled, making the WatchpointResource cover all requests.
As WatchpointResources aren't shared among multiple Watchpoints yet,
there's no handling of running the conditions/commands/etc on multiple
Watchpoints when their shared WatchpointResource is hit. The goal beyond
"large watchpoint" is to unify (much more) the Watchpoint and Breakpoint
behavior and commands. I have a feeling I may be slowly chipping away at
this for a while.
Re-landing this patch after fixing two undefined behaviors in
WatchpointAlgorithms found by UBSan and by failures on different
CI bots.
rdar://108234227
This patch is the next piece of work in my Large Watchpoint proposal,
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116
This patch breaks a user's watchpoint into one or more
WatchpointResources which reflect what the hardware registers can cover.
This means we can watch objects larger than 8 bytes, and we can watched
unaligned address ranges. On a typical 64-bit target with 4 watchpoint
registers you can watch 32 bytes of memory if the start address is
doubleword aligned.
Additionally, if the remote stub implements AArch64 MASK style
watchpoints (e.g. debugserver on Darwin), we can watch any power-of-2
size region of memory up to 2GB, aligned to that same size.
I updated the Watchpoint constructor and CommandObjectWatchpoint to
create a CompilerType of Array<UInt8> when the size of the watched
region is greater than pointer-size and we don't have a variable type to
use. For pointer-size and smaller, we can display the watched granule as
an integer value; for larger-than-pointer-size we will display as an
array of bytes.
I have `watchpoint list` now print the WatchpointResources used to
implement the watchpoint.
I added a WatchpointAlgorithm class which has a top-level static method
that takes an enum flag mask WatchpointHardwareFeature and a user
address and size, and returns a vector of WatchpointResources covering
the request. It does not take into account the number of watchpoint
registers the target has, or the number still available for use. Right
now there is only one algorithm, which monitors power-of-2 regions of
memory. For up to pointer-size, this is what Intel hardware supports.
AArch64 Byte Address Select watchpoints can watch any number of
contiguous bytes in a pointer-size memory granule, that is not currently
supported so if you ask to watch bytes 3-5, the algorithm will watch the
entire doubleword (8 bytes). The newly default "modify" style means we
will silently ignore modifications to bytes outside the watched range.
I've temporarily skipped TestLargeWatchpoint.py for all targets. It was
only run on Darwin when using the in-tree debugserver, which was a proxy
for "debugserver supports MASK watchpoints". I'll be adding the
aforementioned feature flag from the stub and enabling full mask
watchpoints when a debugserver with that feature is enabled, and
re-enable this test.
I added a new TestUnalignedLargeWatchpoint.py which only has one test
but it's a great one, watching a 22-byte range that is unaligned and
requires four 8-byte watchpoints to cover.
I also added a unit test, WatchpointAlgorithmsTests, which has a number
of simple tests against WatchpointAlgorithms::PowerOf2Watchpoints. I
think there's interesting possible different approaches to how we cover
these; I note in the unit test that a user requesting a watch on address
0x12e0 of 120 bytes will be covered by two watchpoints today, a
128-bytes at 0x1280 and at 0x1300. But it could be done with a 16-byte
watchpoint at 0x12e0 and a 128-byte at 0x1300, which would have fewer
false positives/private stops. As we try refining this one, it's helpful
to have a collection of tests to make sure things don't regress.
I tested this on arm64 macOS, (genuine) x86_64 macOS, and AArch64
Ubuntu. I have not modifed the Windows process plugins yet, I might try
that as a standalone patch, I'd be making the change blind, but the
necessary changes (see ProcessGDBRemote::EnableWatchpoint) are pretty
small so it might be obvious enough that I can change it and see what
the Windows CI thinks.
There isn't yet a packet (or a qSupported feature query) for the gdb
remote serial protocol stub to communicate its watchpoint capabilities
to lldb. I'll be doing that in a patch right after this is landed,
having debugserver advertise its capability of AArch64 MASK watchpoints,
and have ProcessGDBRemote add eWatchpointHardwareArmMASK to
WatchpointAlgorithms so we can watch larger than 32-byte requests on
Darwin.
I haven't yet tackled WatchpointResource *sharing* by multiple
Watchpoints. This is all part of the goal, especially when we may be
watching a larger memory range than the user requested, if they then add
another watchpoint next to their first request, it may be covered by the
same WatchpointResource (hardware watchpoint register). Also one "read"
watchpoint and one "write" watchpoint on the same memory granule need to
be handled, making the WatchpointResource cover all requests.
As WatchpointResources aren't shared among multiple Watchpoints yet,
there's no handling of running the conditions/commands/etc on multiple
Watchpoints when their shared WatchpointResource is hit. The goal beyond
"large watchpoint" is to unify (much more) the Watchpoint and Breakpoint
behavior and commands. I have a feeling I may be slowly chipping away at
this for a while.
rdar://108234227
The @expectedFailureAll and @skipIf decorators will mark the test case
as xfail/skip if _all_ conditions passed in match, including debug_info.
* If debug_info is not one of the matching conditions, we can
immediately evaluate the check and decide if it should be decorated.
* If debug_info *is* present as a match condition, we need to defer
whether or not to decorate until when the `LLDBTestCaseFactory`
metaclass expands the test case into its potential variants. This is
still early enough that the standard `unittest` framework will recognize
the test as xfail/skip by the time the test actually runs.
TestDecorators exhibits the edge cases more thoroughly. With the
exception of `@expectedFailureIf` (added by this commit), all those test
cases pass prior to this commit.
This is a followup to 212a60ec37322f853e91e171b305479b1abff2f2.
This adds support for optionally prefixing any command with `?` and/or
`!`.
- `?` prevents the output of a commands to be printed to the console
unless it fails.
- `!` aborts the dap if the command fails.
They come in handy when programmatically running commands on behalf of
the user without wanting them to know unless they fail, or when a
critical setup is required as part of launchCommands and it's better to
abort on failures than to silently skip.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69238 caused breakage in
VSCode debug console usage -- the user's input is always treated as
commands instead of expressions (the same behavior as if empty command
escape prefix is specified).
The bug is in one overload of `GetString()` which did not respect the
default value of "\`". But more important, I am puzzled to find out why
the regression is not caught by lldb test (testdap_evaluate). Turns out
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69238 specifies
commandEscapePrefix default value in test framework to be "\`" while
VSCode will default not specify any commandEscapePrefix at all. Changing
it to None will fail `testdap_evaluate`. We should align the default
behavior between DAP client and testcase.
This patches fixes the bug in `GetString()` and changed the default
value of commandEscapePrefix in testcases to be None (be consistent with
IDE).
Co-authored-by: jeffreytan81 <jeffreytan@fb.com>
Fix for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/71897
When it comes to test infrastructure the test (TestDAP_variables.py:
test_scopes_variables_setVariable_evaluate_with_descriptive_summaries)
will fail if the variable has a summary along with value.
I just tried to add a summary to a variable before we set a value to the
variable using below expression from “request_setVariable” function.
RunLLDBCommands(llvm::StringRef(), {std::string("type summary add
--summary-string "{sample summary}" (const char **) argv")});
As value has nonnumeric characters where we are trying to convert into
integer, python is throwing an error. We did not see this issue in
upstream as we are not adding summary explicitly, by default we are
getting empty summary & value for all children’s of argv parameter (even
after auto summary).
The test is failing with below error:
ERROR:
test_scopes_variables_setVariable_evaluate_with_descriptive_summaries
(TestDAP_variables.TestDAP_variables)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/llvm/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-dap/variables/TestDAP_variables.py",
line 372, in
test_scopes_variables_setVariable_evaluate_with_descriptive_summaries
enableAutoVariableSummaries=True
File
"/llvm/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-dap/variables/TestDAP_variables.py",
line 266, in do_test_scopes_variables_setVariable_evaluate
argv = self.get_local_as_int("argv")
File
"//llvm/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-dap/lldbdap_testcase.py",
line 199, in get_local_as_int
return int(value, 16)
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: '0x0000000000001234
sample summary'
Config=x86_64-//llvm/llvm-build/bin/clang
Co-authored-by: Santhosh Kumar Ellendula <sellendu@hu-sellendu-hyd.qualcomm.com>
This is partial step toward removing the vendored `unittest2` dep in
favor of the `unittest` library in standard python. One of the large
differences is when xfail decorators are evaluated. With the `unittest2`
vendored dep, this can happen at the moment of calling the test case,
and with LLDB's decorator wrappers, we are passed the test class in the
decorator arg. With the `unittest` framework, this is determined much
earlier; we cannot decide when the test is about to start that we need
to xfail.
Fortunately, almost none of these checks require any state that can't be
determined statically. For this patch, I moved the impl for all the
checks to `lldbplatformutil` and pointed the decorators to that,
removing as many `self` (i.e. test class object) references as possible.
I left wrappers within `TestBase` that forward to `lldbplatformutil` for
convenience, but we should probably remove those later.
The remaining check that can't be moved statically is the check for the
debug info type (e.g. to xfail only for dwarf). Fixing that requires a
different approach, so I will postpone that to the next patch.
When this option gets enabled, descriptions of threads will be generated
using the format provided in the launch configuration instead of
generating it manually in the dap code. This allows lldb-dap to show an
output similar to the one in the CLI.
This is very similar to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71843
When this option gets enabled, descriptions of stack frames will be
generated using the format provided in the launch configuration instead
of simply calling `SBFrame::GetDisplayFunctionName`. This allows
lldb-dap to show an output similar to the one in the CLI.
This is a Linux pseudo register provided by the NT_ARM_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL
register set. It reflects the value passed to prctl
PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL.
https://docs.kernel.org/arch/arm64/memory-tagging-extension.html
The fields are made from the #defines the kernel provides for setting
the value. Its contents are constant so no runtime detection is needed
(once we've decided we have this register in the first place).
The permitted generated tags is technically a bitfield but at this time
we don't have a way to mark a field as preferring hex formatting.
```
(lldb) register read mte_ctrl
mte_ctrl = 0x000000000007fffb
= (TAGS = 65535, TCF_ASYNC = 0, TCF_SYNC = 1, TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE = 1)
```
(4 bit tags mean 16 possible tags, 16 bit bitfield)
Testing has been added to TestMTECtrlRegister.py, which needed a more
granular way to check for XML support, so I've added hasXMLSupport that
can be used within a test case instead of skipping whole tests if XML
isn't supported.
Same for the core file tests.
SME2 is documented as part of the main SME supplement:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0616/latest/
The one change for debug is this new ZT0 register. This register
contains data to be used with new table lookup instructions.
It's size is always 512 bits (not scalable) and can be
interpreted in many different ways depending on the instructions
that use it.
The kernel has implemented this as a new register set containing
this single register. It always returns register data (with no header,
unlike ZA which does have a header).
https://docs.kernel.org/arch/arm64/sme.html
ZT0 is only active when ZA is active (when SVCR.ZA is 1). In the
inactive state the kernel returns 0s for its contents. Therefore
lldb doesn't need to create 0s like it does for ZA.
However, we will skip restoring the value of ZT0 if we know that
ZA is inactive. As writing to an inactive ZT0 sets SVCR.ZA to 1,
which is not desireable as it would activate ZA also. Whether
SVCR.ZA is set will be determined only by the ZA data we restore.
Due to this, I've added a new save/restore kind SME2. This is easier
than accounting for the variable length ZA in the SME data. We'll only
save an SME2 data block if ZA is active. If it's not we can get fresh
0s back from the kernel for ZT0 anyway so there's nothing for us to
restore.
This new register will only show up if the system has SME2 therefore
the SME set presented to the user may change, and I've had to account
for that in in a few places.
I've referred to it internally as simply "ZT" as the kernel does in
NT_ARM_ZT, but the architecture refers to the specific register as "ZT0"
so that's what you'll see in lldb.
```
(lldb) register read -s 6
Scalable Matrix Extension Registers:
svcr = 0x0000000000000000
svg = 0x0000000000000004
za = {0x00 <...> 0x00}
zt0 = {0x00 <...> 0x00}
```
FEAT_SME_FA64 (smefa64 in Linux cpuinfo) allows the use of the full A64
instruction set while in streaming SVE mode.
See https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0616/latest/ for details.
This means for example if we want to write to the ffr register during or
use floating point registers while in streaming mode, we need this
extension.
I initially was using QEMU which has it by default, and switched to
Arm's FVP which does not. So this change adds a more strict check and
converts most of the tests to use that. It would be possible in some
cases to avoid the offending instructions but it would be a lot of
effort and liable to fail randomly as the C library changes.
It is also my assumption that the majority of systems will have smefa64
as QEMU has chosen to have. If I turn out to be wrong, we can make the
effort to get the tests working without smefa64.
`isAArch64SME` remains for some tests, which are as follows:
* `test_aarch64_dynamic_regset_config` merely checks for the presence of
a register set, which appears for any SME system not just one with
smefa64.
* `test_aarch64_dynamic_regset_config_sme_za_disabled` only needs the ZA
register and does not enter streaming mode.
* `test_sme_not_present` tests for the absence of the SME register set,
so must be skipped if any form of SME is present.
* Various tests in `TestSVERegisters.py` need to know if SME is present
at all to generate an expected SVCR value. Earlier in the callstack
something else checked `isAArch64SMEFA64` already.
* `TestAArch64LinuxTLSRegisters.py` needs to test the `tpidr2` register
if any form of SME is present. msr/mrs instructions are used to do this
and are allowed even if smefa64 is not present.
We've been using the backtick as our escape character, however that
leads to a weird experience on VS Code, because on most hosts, as soon
as you type the backtick on VS Code, the IDE will introduce another
backtick. As changing the default escape character might be out of
question because other plugins might rely on it, we can instead
introduce an option to change this variable upon lldb-vscode
initialization.
FWIW, my users will be using : instead ot the backtick.
There are some uses of "vscode" in
`lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-dap/dap_server.py` where
I'm not sure if it's referring to the adapter or VS Code itself, so
those remain.
Rename lldb-vscode to lldb-dap. This change is largely mechanical. The
following substitutions cover the majority of the changes in this
commit:
s/VSCODE/DAP/
s/VSCode/DAP/
s/vscode/dap/
s/g_vsc/g_dap/
Discourse RFC:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-rename-lldb-vscode-to-lldb-dap/74075/
Split out the assertions that fail on Windows in preparation to
XFAILing them.
Drive-by change:
* Add a missing `self.build()` call in `test_union_in_anon_namespace`
* Fix formatting
* Add expectedFailureWindows decorator
Add a configuration entry for whether LLDB was configured with wide
character support in Editline and use it in a decorator to guard the
UTF-8 prompt test.
PExpect 4.6, when using 'utf-8' throws a TypeError when trying to write
to the log file:
File "llvm-project/lldb/third_party/Python/module/pexpect-4.6/pexpect/spawnbase.py", line 126, in _log
self.logfile.write(s)
TypeError: a bytes-like object is required, not 'str'
This looks like a bug in PExpect to me. Since the log file is only used
for tracing, work around the issue by disabling the log file when
specifying an encoding. This should fix the Debian bot [1] which runs
the test with tracing enabled (-t).
[1] https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/68/builds/59955
Account for Unicode when computing the prompt column width. Previously,
the string length (i.e. number of bytes) rather than the width of the
Glyph was used to compute the cursor position. The result was that the
cursor would be offset to the right when using a prompt containing
Unicode.
This reverts commit 8012518f600bebaa4ed99a57d553eeea25c2d0c9.
The x86 register write test had one that expected "\$rax" so on.
As these patterns were previously regex, the $ had to be escaped.
Now they are just plain strings to this is not needed.
"descriptive summaries" should only be used for small to medium binaries
because of the performance penalty the cause when completing types. I'm
defaulting it to false.
Besides that, the "raw child" for synthetics should be optional as well.
I'm defaulting it to false.
Both options can be set via a launch or attach config, following the
pattern of most settings. javascript extension wrappers can set these
settings on their own as well.
* Assert no completions for tests that should not find completions.
* Remove regex mode from complete_from_to, which was unused.
This exposed bugs in 2 of the tests, target stop-hook and
process unload. These were fixed in previous commits but
couldn't be tested properly until this patch.
These were useful primarily for the Python 2 to 3 transition. Python 2
is no longer supported so these are no longer necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157759
This adds a new flag and lldb runtime command to allow users to manage the behavior of the lldb-vscode evaluate repl request.
When evaluating a repl context this now has runtime managed flag for control how the repl behaviors with the follow values:
* `variable` - the existing behavior, with this mode requests are evaluted in the current frame context as variable expressions. To trigger a lldb command prefix an expression with ` and it will be evaluted as an lldb command.
* `command` - all expressions are evaluated as lldb commands.
* `auto` - An alternative mode that will attempt to determine if the expression is an lldb command or a variable expression. Based off the intepreted results the expression will be evaluted either as a command or an expression.
Additionally, I enabled completions and ensured they work with the new repl expression behavior to provide auto-completes.
This commit includes updates to the tests to verify the new behavior after the previous failures from submitting https://reviews.llvm.org/D154030.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155248
"sme" is just one of many cpuinfo features for SME but it's the
only one we need for testing.
The rest are related to the use of certain instructions and
don't change the register state available.
Reviewed By: omjavaid
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154823
Adds support for a reverse DAP request to startDebugging. The new request can be used to launch child processes from lldb scripts, for example it would be start forward to configure a debug configuration for a server and a client allowing you to launch both processes with a single debug configuraiton.
Reviewed By: wallace, ivanhernandez13
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153447
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
After https://reviews.llvm.org/D147831, lldb-vscode doesn't send a
process event after launch/attach in case of failure. I believe this is
the right interpretation of the spec, because the description of the
event says:
> The event indicates that the debugger has begun debugging a new
> process.
and we haven't started debugging a process if there's no process because
we failed to launch it. This is also supported by the fact that
`request_launch` in vscode.py doesn't wait for the event if passed
`expectFailure=True`. However, this doesn't take into account
*unexpected* launch failures. In that case, `request_launch` will hang
indefinitely waiting for the process event.
This patch changes it so we'll only wait for these events if
`request["success"]` is true, independently of whether any failure was
expected or not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150470
Since 44363f2 various tests have started passing but introduced a
expression evaluation failure in TestDataFormatterSynthVal.py.
This patch marks the expression evaluation part as skipped while rest
of the test passes.
This patch aslo introduces a new helper isAArch64Windows in lldbtest.py.
