Implement what we currently believe is the mangling scheme for RTTI
data. Tests will be added in a later commit which actually generate
RTTI data.
llvm-svn: 208661
Summary:
Previously, we would generate a single name for all reference
temporaries and allow LLVM to rename them for us. Instead, number the
reference temporaries as we build them in Sema.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3554
llvm-svn: 207776
This can actually be non-zero if you override a function from a virtual
base and you have forced the most_general pointer to member
representation.
llvm-svn: 205727
The MS ABI forces us into catch-22 when it comes to functions which
return types which are local:
- A function is mangled with it's return type.
- A type is mangled with it's surrounding context.
Avoid this by mangling auto and decltype(autp) directly into the
function's return type. Using this mangling has the double advantage of
being compatible with the C++ standard without crashing the compiler.
N.B. For the curious, the MSVC mangling leads to collisions amongst
template functions and either crashes when faced with local types or is
otherwise incapable of returning them.
llvm-svn: 205282
It turns out that the ranges where the '?' <letter> manglings occur are
identical to the ranges of ASCII characters OR'd with 0x80.
Thanks to Richard Smith for the insight!
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 205270
The delta between '\xe1' and '\xc1' is equivalent to the one between 'a'
and 'A'. This allows us to reuse the computation between '\xe1' and
'\xfa' for the '\xc1' to '\xda' case.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 205128
COFF doesn't have mergeable sections so LLVM/clang's normal tactics for
string deduplication will not have any effect.
To remedy this we place each string inside it's own section and mark
the section as IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_ANY. However, we can only do this if the
string has an external name that we can generate from it's contents.
To be compatible with MSVC, we must use their scheme. Otherwise identical
strings in translation units from clang may not be deduplicated with
translation units in MSVC.
This fixes PR18248.
N.B. We will not attempt to do anything with a string literal which is not of
type 'char' or 'wchar_t' because their compiler does not support unicode
string literals as of this date. Further, we avoid doing this if
either -fwritable-strings or -fsanitize=address are present.
This reverts commit r204596.
llvm-svn: 204675
This commit cleans up a few accidents:
- Do not rely on the order in which StringLiteral lays out bytes.
- Use a more efficient mechanism for handling so-called
"special-mappings" when mangling string literals.
- There is no need to allocate a copy of the mangled name.
- Add the test written for r204562.
Thanks to Richard Smith for pointing these out!
llvm-svn: 204586
COFF doesn't have mergeable sections so LLVM/clang's normal tactics for
string deduplication will not have any effect.
To remedy this we place each string inside it's own section and mark
the section as IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_ANY. However, we can only do this if the
string has an external name that we can generate from it's contents.
To be compatible with MSVC, we must use their scheme. Otherwise identical
strings in translation units from clang may not be deduplicated with
translation units in MSVC.
This fixes PR18248.
N.B. We will not attempt to do anything with a string literal which is not of
type 'char' or 'wchar_t' because their compiler does not support unicode
string literals as of this date.
llvm-svn: 204562
If a guard variable will be created for an entity at global scope,
then we cannot rely on the scope depth to disambiguate names for us.
Instead, mangle the entire variable into the guard to ensure it's uniqueness.
llvm-svn: 203151
Initializers and finalizers for static data members have the variable's
access-specifier, storage-class, type and CV-qualifiers mangled in.
llvm-svn: 203145
Use a scheme inspired by the Itanium ABI to properly implement the
mangling of lambdas.
N.B. The incredibly astute observer will notice that we do not generate
external names that are identical, or even compatible with, MSVC.
This is fine because they don't generate names that they can use across
translation units. Technically, we can generate any name we'd like so
long as that name wouldn't conflict with any other and would be stable
across translation units.
This fixes PR15512.
llvm-svn: 202962
Summary:
The MSVC ABI appears to mangle the lexical scope into the names of
statics. Specifically, a counter is incremented whenever a scope is
entered where things can be declared in such a way that an ambiguity can
arise. For example, a class scope inside of a class scope doesn't do
anything interesting because the nested class cannot collide with
another nested class.
There are problems with this scheme:
- It is unreliable. The counter is only incremented when a previously
never encountered scope is entered. There are cases where this will
cause ambiguity amongst declarations that have the same name where one
was introduced in a deep scope while the other was introduced right
after in the previous lexical scope.
- It is wasteful. Statements like: {{{{{{{ static int foo = a; }}}}}}}
will make the mangling of "foo" larger than it need be because the
scope counter has been incremented many times.
Because of these problems, and practical implementation concerns. We
choose not to implement this scheme if the local static or local type
isn't visible. The mangling of these declarations will look very
similar but the numbering will make far more sense, this scheme is
lifted from the Itanium ABI implementation.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, rnk, eli.friedman, cdavis5x
Reviewed By: rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2953
llvm-svn: 202951
We wouldn't recognize variable templates as being templates leading us
to leave the template arguments off of the mangled name. This would
allow two unrelated templates to map to the same mangled name.
N.B. While MSVC doesn't support variable templates as of this date,
this mangling is the most likely thing they will choose to use. Their
demangler can successfully demangle our manglings with the template
arguments shown.
llvm-svn: 202789
Extended qualifiers can appear in many places, refactor the code so it's
more reusable. Add tests in areas where we've increased compatibility.
llvm-svn: 201574
Pointer types in the MSVC ABI are a bit awkward, the width of the
pointer is considered a kind of CVR qualifier.
Restrict is handled similarly to const and volatile but is mangled after
the pointer width qualifier.
This fixes PR18880.
llvm-svn: 201569
Properly support fields that come from anonymous unions and structs
when used as template arguments for pointer to data member params.
llvm-svn: 200921
Properly determine the inheritance model when dealing with nullptr:
- If a nullptr template argument is being checked against
pointer-to-member parameter, nail down an inheritance model.
N.B. We will chose an inheritance model even if we won't ultimately
choose the template to instantiate! Cooky, right?
- Null pointer-to-datamembers have a virtual base table offset of -1,
not zero. Previously, we chose an offset of 0.
llvm-svn: 200920
Function references always use $1? like function pointers and never $E?
like var decl references. Static methods are mangled like function
pointers.
llvm-svn: 200869
Member pointers are mangled as they would be represented at runtime.
They can be a single integer literal, single decl, or a tuple with some
more numbers tossed in. With Clang today, most of those numbers will be
zero because we reject pointers to members of virtual bases.
This change required moving VTableContextBase ownership from
CodeGenVTables to ASTContext, because mangling now depends on vtable
layout.
I also hoisted the inheritance model helpers up to be inline static
methods of MSInheritanceAttr. This makes the AST code that deals with
member pointers much more readable.
MSVC doesn't appear to have stable manglings of null member pointers:
- Null data memptrs in function templates have a mangling collision with
the first field of a non-polymorphic single inheritance class.
- The mangling of null data memptrs changes if you add casts.
- Large null function memptrs in class templates crash MSVC.
Clang uses the class template mangling for null data memptrs and the
function template mangling for null function memptrs to deal with this.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2695
llvm-svn: 200857
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
llvm-svn: 200082
The MSVC C++ ABI always uses the deduced type in place of auto when
generating external names for variables.
N.B. MSVC doesn't support C++1y's 'operator auto' and this patch will
not give us said functionality.
llvm-svn: 199764
Fix a perennial source of confusion in the clang type system: Declarations and
function prototypes have parameters to which arguments are supplied, so calling
these 'arguments' was a stretch even in C mode, let alone C++ where default
arguments, templates and overloading make the distinction important to get
right.
Readability win across the board, especially in the casting, ADL and
overloading implementations which make a lot more sense at a glance now.
Will keep an eye on the builders and update dependent projects shortly.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 199686
encodes the canonical rules for LLVM's style. I noticed this had drifted
quite a bit when cleaning up LLVM, so wanted to clean up Clang as well.
llvm-svn: 198686
This reverts commit r197184.
Richard Smith brings up some good points, a proper implementation will
require us to mangle unnameable entities compatibly with MSVC.
llvm-svn: 197192
Testing has revealed that large integral constants (i.e. > INT64_MAX)
are always mangled as-if they are negative, even in places where it
would not make sense for them to be negative (like non-type template
parameters of type unsigned long long).
To address this, we change the way we model number mangling: always
mangle as-if our number is an int64_t. This should result in correct
results when we have large unsigned numbers.
N.B. Bizarrely, things that are 32-bit displacements like vbptr offsets
are mangled as-if they are unsigned 32-bit numbers. This is a pretty
egregious waste of space, it would be a 4x savings if we could mangle it
like a signed 32-bit number. Instead, we explicitly cast these
displacements to uint32_t and let the mangler proceed.
llvm-svn: 196771
While testing our ability to mangle large constants (PR18175), I
incidentally discovered that we did not properly mangle enums correctly.
Previously, we would append the width of the enum in bytes after the
type-tag differentiator.
This would mean "enum : short" would be mangled as 'W2' while "enum :
char" would be mangled as 'W1'. Upon testing this with several versions
of MSVC, I found that this did not match their behavior: they always use
'W4'.
N.B. Quick testing uncovered that undname allows different numbers to
follow the 'W' in the following way:
'W0' -> "enum char"
'W1' -> "enum unsigned char"
'W2' -> "enum short"
'W3' -> "enum unsigned short"
'W4' -> "enum"
'W5' -> "enum unsigned int"
'W6' -> "enum long"
'W7' -> "enum unsigned long"
However this scheme appears abandoned, I cannot get MSVC to trigger it.
Furthermore, it's incomplete: it doesn't handle "bool" or "long long".
llvm-svn: 196752
It wasn't possible for an anonymous type to show up inside of function arguments.
However, decltype (which MSVC added support for in 2010) makes this
possible. Further, backrefs to these anonymous types can now be formed.
This fixes PR18022.
N.B. We do not, and very likely _will not_, support MSVC's bug where
subsequent typedefs of anonymous types leak into the linkage name; this
is a gross violation of the ABI. A warning should be introduced to
inform our users of this particular shortcoming.
llvm-svn: 195669
Summary:
RTTI is not yet implemented for the Microsoft C++ ABI and isn't expected
soon. We could easily add the mangling, but the error is what prevents
us from silently miscompiling code that expects RTTI.
Instead, add a new mangleTypeName entry point that simply forwards to
mangleName or mangleType to produce a string that isn't part of the ABI.
Itanium can continue to use RTTI names to avoid unecessary test
breakage.
This also seems like the right design. The fact that TBAA names happen
to be RTTI names is now an implementation detail of the mangler, rather
than part of TBAA.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2153
llvm-svn: 195168
