During the discussion on the SG-10 mailinglist regarding the format
feature-test macros voted in during the last plenary it turns out libc++
can't mark the format feature-test macro as implemented.
According to
https://isocpp.org/std/standing-documents/sd-6-sg10-feature-test-recommendations#__cpp_lib_format
the not yet implemented paper
P1361R2 Integration of chrono with text formatting
affects the feature test macro.
Note that P1361R2 doesn't mention the feature-test macro nor is there an
LWG-issue to address the issue. The reporter of the issue didn't recall
where this requirement exactly has been decided.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133271
Adding `[[nodiscard]]` to functions is a conforming extension and done extensively in the MSVC STL.
Reviewed By: ldionne, EricWF, #libc
Spies: #libc_vendors, cjdb, mgrang, jloser, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128267
This defines a new policy for removal of transitive includes.
The goal of the policy it to make it relatively easy to remove
headers when needed, but avoid breaking developers using and
vendors shipping libc++.
The method used is to guard transitive includes based on the
C++ language version. For the upcoming C++23 we can remove
headers when we want, but for other language versions we try
to keep it to a minimum.
In this code the transitive include of `<chrono>` is removed
since D128577 introduces a header cycle between `<format>`
and `<chrono>`. This cycle is indirectly required by the
Standard. Our cycle dependency tool basically is a grep based
tool, so it needs some hints to ignore cycles. With the input
of our transitive include tests we can create a better tool.
However that's out of the scope of this patch.
Note the flag `_LIBCPP_REMOVE_TRANSITIVE_INCLUDES` remains
unchanged. So users can still opt-out of transitives includes
entirely.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132284
Implements:
- LWG3721 Allow an arg-id with a value of zero for width in std-format-spec
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130649
We held off on this before as `LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX` conflicted with it.
Now we return this.
`LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX` is kept as a deprecated way to set
`CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR`. The other `*_LIBDIR_SUFFIX` are just removed
entirely.
I imagine this is too potentially-breaking to make LLVM 15. That's fine.
I have a more minimal version of this in the disto (NixOS) patches for
LLVM 15 (like previous versions). This more expansive version I will
test harder after the release is cut.
Reviewed By: sebastian-ne, ldionne, #libc, #libc_abi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130586
Previously the specification was in a table in paragraph 14 of [container.requirements.general] but it has since been given its own sub section header, 24.2.2.4 [container.opt.reqmts].
This happened in 93ff092d1c
This update also includes misc. other cleanups of the spaceship projects sheet.
Reviewed By: Mordante, avogelsgesang, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131928
The new operator<=> is mapped onto the existing functions
__libcpp_thread_id_equal and __libcpp_thread_id_less. Introducing a
new __libcpp_thread_id_compare_three_way might lead to more efficient
code. Given that we can still introduce __libcpp_thread_id_compare_three_way
later, for this commit I opted to not break ABI. If requested, I will
add __libcpp_thread_id_compare_three_way in a follow-up commit.
Implements part of P1614R2 "The Mothership has Landed"
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131362
D131234 marked the ranges papers as complete, but it didn't set the
feature-test macro.
Reviewed By: ldionne, var-const, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131326
When back-deploying to older platforms, we can still provide assertions,
but we might not be able to provide a great implementation for the verbose
handler. Instead, we can just call ::abort().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131199
The newly-completed papers:
- P0896R4 ("The One Ranges Proposal");
- P1243R4 ("Rangify New Algorithms");
- P1252R2 ("Ranges Design Cleanup");
- P1716R3 ("Range Comparison Algorithms Are Over-Constrained");
- P1871R1 ("Concept traits should be named after concepts");
- P2106R0 ("Alternative wording for GB315 and GB316").
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131234
Also fix `ranges::stable_sort` and `ranges::inplace_merge` to support
proxy iterators now that their internal implementations can correctly
dispatch `rotate`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130758
This paper was accepted during the last plenary and is intended to be
backported to LLVM 15. When backporting the release notes in the branch
should be updated too.
Note the feature-test macro isn't updated since this will change; three
papers have updated the same macro in the same plenary.
Implements:
- P2508R1 Exposing std::basic-format-string
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130643
* `operator<=>` for `iota_view::iterator` was enabled in 8320017b79eb8
* Removed P2405R0 which was not accepted and seems inactive
(https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/1075)
* Added the previously missing `operator==` for `filesystem::space_info`
to the tracking list.
* Updated the "Assignee" for `string_view`, `string` as Mark de Wever
mentioned he is working on them in Discord
* Updated the status of the items for which I sent review requests
yesterday.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130855
