This patch aims to provide correct dwarf unwind information in function
epilogue for X86.
It consists of two parts. The first part inserts CFI instructions that set
appropriate cfa offset and cfa register in emitEpilogue() in
X86FrameLowering. This part is X86 specific.
The second part is platform independent and ensures that:
- CFI instructions do not affect code generation
- Unwind information remains correct when a function is modified by
different passes. This is done in a late pass by analyzing information
about cfa offset and cfa register in BBs and inserting additional CFI
directives where necessary.
Changed CFI instructions so that they:
- are duplicable
- are not counted as instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging
- can be compared as equal
Added CFIInstrInserter pass:
- analyzes each basic block to determine cfa offset and register valid at
its entry and exit
- verifies that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match
incoming values of their successors
- inserts additional CFI directives at basic block beginning to correct the
rule for calculating CFA
Having CFI instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA
calculation rule for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic
block reordering, or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the
blocks have wrong cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block
above them.
CFIInstrInserter is currently run only on X86, but can be used by any target
that implements support for adding CFI instructions in epilogue.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35844
llvm-svn: 317100
Change the map key from DIFile* to the absolute path string. Computing
the absolute path isn't expensive because we already have a map that
caches the full path keyed on DIFile*.
llvm-svn: 317041
Issue found by llvm-isel-fuzzer on OSS fuzz, https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3725
If anyone actually cares about > 64 bit arithmetic, there's a lot more to do in this area. There's a bunch of obviously wrong code in the same function. I don't have the time to fix all of them and am just using this to understand what the workflow for fixing fuzzer cases might look like.
llvm-svn: 316967
Summary:
For reference, see: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-August/116589.html
This patch fleshes out the instruction class hierarchy with respect to atomic and
non-atomic memory intrinsics. With this change, the relevant part of the class
hierarchy becomes:
IntrinsicInst
-> MemIntrinsicBase (methods-only class)
-> MemIntrinsic (non-atomic intrinsics)
-> MemSetInst
-> MemTransferInst
-> MemCpyInst
-> MemMoveInst
-> AtomicMemIntrinsic (atomic intrinsics)
-> AtomicMemSetInst
-> AtomicMemTransferInst
-> AtomicMemCpyInst
-> AtomicMemMoveInst
-> AnyMemIntrinsic (both atomicities)
-> AnyMemSetInst
-> AnyMemTransferInst
-> AnyMemCpyInst
-> AnyMemMoveInst
This involves some class renaming:
ElementUnorderedAtomicMemCpyInst -> AtomicMemCpyInst
ElementUnorderedAtomicMemMoveInst -> AtomicMemMoveInst
ElementUnorderedAtomicMemSetInst -> AtomicMemSetInst
A script for doing this renaming in downstream trees is included below.
An example of where the Any* classes should be used in LLVM is when reasoning
about the effects of an instruction (ex: aliasing).
---
Script for renaming AtomicMem* classes:
PREFIXES="[<,([:space:]]"
CLASSES="MemIntrinsic|MemTransferInst|MemSetInst|MemMoveInst|MemCpyInst"
SUFFIXES="[;)>,[:space:]]"
REGEX="(${PREFIXES})ElementUnorderedAtomic(${CLASSES})(${SUFFIXES})"
REGEX2="visitElementUnorderedAtomic(${CLASSES})"
FILES=$( grep -E "(${REGEX}|${REGEX2})" -r . | tr ':' ' ' | awk '{print $1}' | sort | uniq )
SED_SCRIPT="s~${REGEX}~\1Atomic\2\3~g"
SED_SCRIPT2="s~${REGEX2}~visitAtomic\1~g"
for f in $FILES; do
echo "Processing: $f"
sed -i ".bak" -E "${SED_SCRIPT};${SED_SCRIPT2};${EA_SED_SCRIPT};${EA_SED_SCRIPT2}" $f
done
Reviewers: sanjoy, deadalnix, apilipenko, anna, skatkov, mkazantsev
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: hfinkel, jholewinski, arsenm, sdardis, nhaehnle, JDevlieghere, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38419
llvm-svn: 316950
- Targets that want to support memcmp expansions now return the list of
supported load sizes.
- Expansion codegen does not assume that all power-of-two load sizes
smaller than the max load size are valid. For examples, this is not the
case for x86(32bit)+sse2.
Fixes PR34887.
llvm-svn: 316905
Introduce a isConstOrDemandedConstSplat helper function that can recognise a constant splat build vector for at least the demanded elts we care about.
llvm-svn: 316866
For cases where we know the floating point representations match the bitcasted integer equivalent, allow bitcasting to these types.
This is especially useful for the X86 floating point compare results which return all/zero bits but as a floating point type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39289
llvm-svn: 316831
In function DAGCombiner::visitSIGN_EXTEND_INREG, sext can be combined with extload even if sextload is not supported by target, then
if sext is the only user of extload, there is no big difference, no harm no benefit.
if extload has more than one user, the combined sextload may block extload from combining with other zext, causes extra zext instructions generated. As demonstrated by the attached test case.
This patch add the constraint that when sextload is not supported by target, sext can only be combined with extload if it is the only user of extload.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39108
llvm-svn: 316802
Not having the subclass data on an MemIntrinsicSDNodes means it was possible
to try to fold 2 nodes with the same operands but differing MMO flags. This
would trip an assertion when trying to refine the alignment between the 2
MachineMemOperands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38898
llvm-svn: 316737
Summary:
Currently we skip merging when extra moves may be added in the header of switch instead of the case block, if the case block is used as an incoming
block of a PHI. If all the incoming values of the PHIs are non-constants and the destination block is dominated by the switch block then extra moves are likely not added by ISel, so there is no need to skip merging in this case.
Reviewers: efriedma, junbuml, davidxl, hfinkel, qcolombet
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: dberlin, kuhar, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37343
llvm-svn: 316711
Summary:
This seems to be the only place in llvm we directly call qsort. We can replace
this with a call to array_pod_sort. Also minor cleanup of the sorting function.
Reviewers: bkramer, Eugene.Zelenko, rafael
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: efriedma, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39214
llvm-svn: 316671
Summary: Make sure shifts are legal/specified by the legalizerinfo before creating it
Reviewers: qcolombet, dsanders, rovka, t.p.northover
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39264
llvm-svn: 316602
Compute the actual decomposition only after deciding whether to expand
of not. Else, it's easy to make the compiler OOM with:
`memcpy(dst, src, 0xffffffffffffffff);`, which typically happens if
someone mistakenly passes a negative value. Add a test.
This reverts commit f8fc02fbd4ab33383c010d33675acf9763d0bd44.
llvm-svn: 316567
Duplicated code found in three places put into a new static function:
/// Given a Count of resource usage and a Latency value, return true if a
/// SchedBoundary becomes resource limited.
static bool checkResourceLimit(unsigned LFactor, unsigned Count,
unsigned Latency) {
return (int)(Count - (Latency * LFactor)) > (int)LFactor;
}
Review: Florian Hahn, Matthias Braun
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39235
llvm-svn: 316560
This code added in r297930 assumed that it could create
a select with a condition type that is just an integer
bitcast of the selected type. For AMDGPU any vselect is
going to be scalarized (although the vector types are legal),
and all select conditions must be i1 (the same as getSetCCResultType).
This logic doesn't really make sense to me, but there's
never really been a consistent policy in what the select
condition mask type is supposed to be. Try to extend
the logic for skipping the transform for condition types
that aren't setccs. It doesn't seem quite right to me though,
but checking conditions that seem more sensible (like whether the
vselect is going to be expanded) doesn't work since this
seems to depend on that also.
llvm-svn: 316554
Similar to how llvm::salvagDebugInfo hooks into InstCombine, this adds
a hook that can be invoked before an SDNode that is associated with an
SDDbgValue is erased to capture the effect of the deleted node in a
DIExpression.
The motivating example is an SDDebugValue attached to an ADD operation
that gets folded into a LOAD+OFFSET operation.
rdar://problem/32121503
llvm-svn: 316525
This reverts commit r316417, which causes internal compiles to OOM.
I don't unfortunately have a self-contained test case but will follow up
with courbet.
llvm-svn: 316497
This updates the MIRPrinter to include the regclass when printing
virtual register defs, which is already valid syntax for the
parser. That is, given 64 bit %0 and %1 in a "gpr" regbank,
%1(s64) = COPY %0(s64)
would now be written as
%1:gpr(s64) = COPY %0(s64)
While this change alone introduces a bit of redundancy with the
registers block, it allows us to update the tests to be more concise
and understandable and brings us closer to being able to remove the
registers block completely.
Note: We generally only print the class in defs, but there is one
exception. If there are uses without any defs whatsoever, we'll print
the class on all uses. I'm not completely convinced this comes up in
meaningful machine IR, but for now the MIRParser and MachineVerifier
both accept that kind of stuff, so we don't want to have a situation
where we can print something we can't parse.
llvm-svn: 316479
Refactor ExpandMemcmp:
- Stop duplicating the logic for computation of the sequence of loads to
generate (thsi was done in three different places), this is now done
only once in MemCmpExpansion::MemCmpExpansion().
- Add a FIXME to expose a bug with the computation of the number of loads
when not all sizes are loadable. For example, on X86-32 + SSE, possible
loads are {16,4,2,1} bytes. The current code considers that all loads
starting at MaxLoadSize are possible. This is not an issue right now as
vector loads are not enabled, so I'm not fixing the issue here to keep
the change as small as possible. I'm going to address this in a
subsequent revision, where I enable vector loads.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34887
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38498
llvm-svn: 316417
Infrastructure designed for padding code with nop instructions in key places such that preformance improvement will be achieved.
The infrastructure is implemented such that the padding is done in the Assembler after the layout is done and all IPs and alignments are known.
This patch by itself in a NFC. Future patches will make use of this infrastructure to implement required policies for code padding.
Reviewers:
aaboud
zvi
craig.topper
gadi.haber
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34393
Change-Id: I92110d0c0a757080a8405636914a93ef6f8ad00e
llvm-svn: 316413
This commit adds optimisation remarks for outlining which fire when a function
is successfully outlined.
To do this, OutlinedFunctions must now contain references to their Candidates.
Since the Candidates must still be sorted and worked on separately, this is
done by working on everything in terms of shared_ptrs to Candidates. This is
good; it means that we can easily move everything to outlining in terms of
the OutlinedFunctions rather than the individual Candidates. This is far more
intuitive than what's currently there!
(Remarks are output when a function is created for some group of Candidates.
In a later commit, all of the outlining logic should be rewritten so that we
loop over OutlinedFunctions rather than over Candidates.)
llvm-svn: 316396
This fixes a bug where we'd crash given code like the test-case from
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30792 . Instead, we let the
offending clobber silently slide through.
This doesn't fully fix said bug, since the assembler will still complain
the moment it sees a crypto/fp/vector op, and we still don't diagnose
calls that require vector regs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39030
llvm-svn: 316374
combineShuffleOfScalars is very conservative about shuffled BUILD_VECTORs that can be combined together.
This patch adds one additional case - if both BUILD_VECTORs represent splats of the same scalar value but with different UNDEF elements, then we should create a single splat BUILD_VECTOR, sharing only the UNDEF elements defined by the shuffle mask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38696
llvm-svn: 316331
This fixes bugzilla 26810
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26810
This is intended to prevent sequences like:
movl %ebp, 8(%esp) # 4-byte Spill
movl %ecx, %ebp
movl %ebx, %ecx
movl %edi, %ebx
movl %edx, %edi
cltd
idivl %esi
movl %edi, %edx
movl %ebx, %edi
movl %ecx, %ebx
movl %ebp, %ecx
movl 16(%esp), %ebp # 4 - byte Reload
Such sequences are created in 2 scenarios:
Scenario #1:
vreg0 is evicted from physreg0 by vreg1
Evictee vreg0 is intended for region splitting with split candidate physreg0 (the reg vreg0 was evicted from)
Region splitting creates a local interval because of interference with the evictor vreg1 (normally region spliiting creates 2 interval, the "by reg" and "by stack" intervals. Local interval created when interference occurs.)
one of the split intervals ends up evicting vreg2 from physreg1
Evictee vreg2 is intended for region splitting with split candidate physreg1
one of the split intervals ends up evicting vreg3 from physreg2 etc.. until someone spills
Scenario #2
vreg0 is evicted from physreg0 by vreg1
vreg2 is evicted from physreg2 by vreg3 etc
Evictee vreg0 is intended for region splitting with split candidate physreg1
Region splitting creates a local interval because of interference with the evictor vreg1
one of the split intervals ends up evicting back original evictor vreg1 from physreg0 (the reg vreg0 was evicted from)
Another evictee vreg2 is intended for region splitting with split candidate physreg1
one of the split intervals ends up evicting vreg3 from physreg2 etc.. until someone spills
As compile time was a concern, I've added a flag to control weather we do cost calculations for local intervals we expect to be created (it's on by default for X86 target, off for the rest).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35816
Change-Id: Id9411ff7bbb845463d289ba2ae97737a1ee7cc39
llvm-svn: 316295
