Almost all these changes are conditioned and only apply to the new
x86-64 f128 type configuration, which will be enabled in a follow up
patch. They are required together to make new f128 work. If there is
any error, we should fix or revert them as a whole.
These changes should have no impact to current configurations.
* Relax type legalization checks to accept new f128 type configuration,
whose TypeAction is TypeSoftenFloat, not TypeLegal, but also has
TLI.isTypeLegal true.
* Relax GetSoftenedFloat to return in some cases f128 type SDValue,
which is TLI.isTypeLegal but not "softened" to i128 node.
* Allow customized FABS, FNEG, FCOPYSIGN on new f128 type configuration,
to generate optimized bitwise operators for libm functions.
* Enhance related Lower* functions to handle f128 type.
* Enhance DAGTypeLegalizer::run, SoftenFloatResult, and related functions
to keep new f128 type in register, and convert f128 operators to library calls.
* Fix Combiner, Emitter, Legalizer routines that did not handle f128 type.
* Add ExpandConstant to handle i128 constants, ExpandNode
to handle ISD::Constant node.
* Add one more parameter to getCommonSubClass and firstCommonClass,
to guarantee that returned common sub class will contain the specified
simple value type.
This extra parameter is used by EmitCopyFromReg in InstrEmitter.cpp.
* Fix infinite loop in getTypeLegalizationCost when f128 is the value type.
* Fix printOperand to handle null operand.
* Enhance ISD::BITCAST node to handle f128 constant.
* Expand new f128 type for BR_CC, SELECT_CC, SELECT, SETCC nodes.
* Enhance X86AsmPrinter to emit f128 values in comments.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15134
llvm-svn: 254653
Summary:
Many target lowerings copy-paste the code to test SDValues for known constants.
This code can instead be shared in SelectionDAG.cpp, and reused in the targets.
Reviewers: MatzeB, andreadb, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14945
llvm-svn: 254085
When MergeConsecutiveStores() combines two loads and two stores into
wider loads and stores, the chain users of both of the original loads
must be transfered to the new load, because it may be that a chain
user only depends on one of the loads.
New test case: test/CodeGen/SystemZ/dag-combine-01.ll
Reviewed by James Y Knight.
Bugzilla: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25310#c6
llvm-svn: 253779
Summary:
Don't fold
(zext (and (load x), cst)) -> (and (zextload x), (zext cst))
if
(and (load x) cst)
will match as a zextload already and has additional users.
For example, the following IR:
%load = load i32, i32* %ptr, align 8
%load16 = and i32 %load, 65535
%load64 = zext i32 %load16 to i64
store i32 %load16, i32* %dst1, align 4
store i64 %load64, i64* %dst2, align 8
used to produce the following aarch64 code:
ldr w8, [x0]
and w9, w8, #0xffff
and x8, x8, #0xffff
str w9, [x1]
str x8, [x2]
but with this change produces the following aarch64 code:
ldrh w8, [x0]
str w8, [x1]
str x8, [x2]
Reviewers: resistor, mcrosier
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14340
llvm-svn: 252789
1) PR25154. This is basically a repeat of PR18102, which was fixed in
r200201, and broken again by r234430. The latter changed which of the
store nodes was merged into from the first to the last. Thus, we now
also need to prefer merging a later store at a given address into the
target node, instead of an earlier one.
2) While investigating that, I also realized I'd introduced a bug in
r236850. There, I removed a check for alignment -- not realizing that
nothing except the alignment check was ensuring that none of the stores
were overlapping! This is a really bogus way to ensure there's no
aliased stores.
A better solution to both of these issues is likely to always use the
code added in the 'if (UseAA)' branches which rearrange the chain based
on a more principled analysis. I'll look into whether that can be used
always, but in the interest of getting things back to working, I think a
minimal change makes sense.
llvm-svn: 251816
This is a usage of the IR-level fast-math-flags now that they are propagated to SDNodes.
This was originally part of D8900.
Removing the global 'enable-unsafe-fp-math' checks will require auto-upgrade and
possibly other changes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9708
llvm-svn: 251450
When taking the remainder of a value divided by a constant, visitREM()
attempts to convert the REM to a longer but faster sequence of instructions.
This conversion calls combine() on a speculative DIV instruction. Commit
rL250825 may cause this combine() to return a DIVREM, corrupting nearby nodes.
Flow eventually hits unreachable().
This patch adds a test case and a check to prevent visitREM() from trying
to convert the REM instruction in cases where a DIVREM is possible.
See http://reviews.llvm.org/D14035
llvm-svn: 251373
We don't need a mask of a rotation result to be a constant splat - any constant scalar/vector can be usefully folded.
Followup to D13851.
llvm-svn: 251197
This patch adds support for lowering to the XOP VPROT / VPROTI vector bit rotation instructions.
This has required changes to the DAGCombiner rotation pattern matching to support vector types - so far I've only changed it to support splat vectors, but generalising this further is feasible in the future.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13851
llvm-svn: 251188
When we fold "mul ((add x, c1), c1)" -> "add ((mul x, c2), c1*c2)", we bail if (add x, c1) has multiple
users which would result in an extra add instruction.
In such cases, this patch adds a check to see if we can eliminate a multiply instruction in exchange for the extra add.
I also added the capability of doing the existing optimization with non-splatted vectors (splatted also works).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13740
llvm-svn: 251028
Summary:
In addition to moving the code over, this patch amends the DIV,REM -> DIVREM
combining to run on all affected nodes at once: if the nodes are converted
to DIVREM one at a time, then the resulting DIVREM may get legalized by the
backend into something target-specific that we won't be able to recognize
and correlate with the remaining nodes.
The motivation is to "prepare terrain" for D13862: when we set DIV and REM
to be legalized to libcalls, instead of the DIVREM, we otherwise lose the
ability to combine them together. To prevent this, we need to take the
DIV,REM -> DIVREM combining out of the lowering stage.
Reviewers: RKSimon, eli.friedman, rengolin
Subscribers: john.brawn, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13733
llvm-svn: 250825
Summary:
Caching SDLoc(N), instead of recreating it in every single
function call, keeps the code denser, and allows to unwrap long lines.
Reviewers: sunfish, atrick, sdmitrouk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13726
llvm-svn: 250305
Summary: The two implementations had more code in common than not.
Reviewers: sunfish, MatzeB, sdmitrouk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13724
llvm-svn: 250302
The comment says this was stopped because it was unlikely to be
profitable. This is not true if you want to combine vector loads
with multiple components.
For a simple case that looks like
t0 = load t0 ...
t1 = load t0 ...
t2 = load t0 ...
t3 = load t0 ...
t4 = store t0:1, t0:1
t5 = store t4, t1:0
t6 = store t5, t2:0
t7 = store t6, t3:0
We want to get all of these stores onto a chain
that is a TokenFactor of these N loads. This mostly
solves the AMDGPU merge-stores.ll regressions
with -combiner-alias-analysis for merging vector
stores of vector loads.
llvm-svn: 250138
This basic combine was surprisingly missing.
AMDGPU legalizes many operations in terms of 32-bit vector components,
so not doing this results in many extra copies and subregister extracts
that need to be cleaned up later.
InstCombine already does this for the hasOneUse case. The target hook
is to fix a handful of tests which break (e.g. ARM/vmov.ll) which turn
from a vector materialize repeated immediate instruction to a constant
vector load with more scalar copies from it.
llvm-svn: 250129
We have a number of functions that implement constant folding of vectors (unary and binary ops) in near identical manners (and the differences don't appear to be critical).
This patch introduces a common implementation (SelectionDAG::FoldConstantVectorArithmetic) and calls this in both the unary and binary op cases.
After this initial patch I intend to begin enabling vector constant folding for a wider number of opcodes in SelectionDAG::getNode().
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13665
llvm-svn: 250118
visitSIGN_EXTEND_INREG calls SelectionDAG::getNode to constant fold scalar constants but handles vector constants itself, despite getNode being capable of dealing with them.
This required a minor change to the getNode implementation to actually deal with cases where the scalars of a BUILD_VECTOR were wider integers than the vector type - which was the only extra ability of the visitSIGN_EXTEND_INREG implementation.
No codegen intended and all existing tests remain the same.
llvm-svn: 249236
When AA is being used, non-aliasing stores are canonicalized to use the same
chain, and DAGCombiner::getStoreMergeAndAliasCandidates can take advantage of
this by looking only as users of a store's chain operand. However, user
iteration is not result-number specific, we need to check that the use is as a
chain operand, and not via some other operand. It is certainly possible to have
another potentially-aliasing store, which shares the first's base pointer, and
uses the first's chain's node via some other operand.
Failure to catch this situation caused, at least in the included test case, an
assert later because the relative sequence-number ordering caused later
replacement to create a cycle in the DAG.
llvm-svn: 248698
This is a redo of D7208 ( r227242 - http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=227242 ).
The patch was reverted because an AArch64 target could infinite loop after the change in DAGCombiner
to merge vector stores. That happened because AArch64's allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses() wasn't telling
the truth. It reported all unaligned memory accesses as fast, but then split some 128-bit unaligned
accesses up in performSTORECombine() because they are slow.
This patch attempts to fix the problem in AArch's allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses() while preserving
existing (perhaps questionable) lowering behavior.
The x86 test shows that store merging is working as intended for a target with fast 32-byte unaligned
stores.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12635
llvm-svn: 248622
If the stores are storing values from loads which partially
alias the stores, we could end up placing the merged loads
and stores on the same chain which has the potential to break.
Each store may have a different chain dependency on only some
of the original loads. Create a new TokenFactor to capture all
of the required dependencies of the stores rather than assuming
all stores can use the same chain.
The testcase is a situation where this happens, although
it does not have an observable change from this. The DAG nodes
just happened to not be reordered before despite this missing
chain dependency.
This is based on an off-list report for an out of tree target
which regressed due to r246307 and I haven't managed to find a case
where the nodes do end up reordered with an in tree target.
llvm-svn: 248468
This patch adds support for combining patterns such as (FMUL(FADD(1.0, x), y)) and (FMUL(FSUB(x, 1.0), y)) to their FMA equivalents.
This is useful in particular for linear interpolation cases such as (FADD(FMUL(x, t), FMUL(y, FSUB(1.0, t))))
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13003
llvm-svn: 248210
If storing multiple FP constants, some subset of the stores
would be replaced with integers due to visit order, so
MergeConsecutiveStores would only partially merge
these.
llvm-svn: 248169
After D10403, we had FMF in the DAG but disabled by default. Nick reported no crashing errors after some stress testing,
so I enabled them at r243687. However, Escha soon notified us of a bug not covered by any in-tree regression tests:
if we don't propagate the flags, we may fail to CSE DAG nodes because differing FMF causes them to not match. There is
one test case in this patch to prove that point.
This patch hopes to fix or leave a 'TODO' for all of the in-tree places where we create nodes that are FMF-capable. I
did this by putting an assert in SelectionDAG.getNode() to find any FMF-capable node that was being created without FMF
( D11807 ). I then ran all regression tests and test-suite and confirmed that everything passes.
This patch exposes remaining work to get DAG FMF to be fully functional: (1) add the flags to non-binary nodes such as
FCMP, FMA and FNEG; (2) add the flags to intrinsics; (3) use the flags as conditions for transforms rather than the
current global settings.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12095
llvm-svn: 247815
Summary:
The BUILD_VECTOR node will truncate its operators to match the
type. We need to take this into account when constant folding -
we need to perform a truncation before constant folding the elements.
This is because the upper bits can change the result, depending on
the operation type (for example this is the case for min/max).
This change also adds a regression test.
Reviewers: jmolloy
Subscribers: jmolloy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12697
llvm-svn: 247265
Use and check the 'IsFast' optional parameter to TLI.allowsMemoryAccess() any time
we have a merged access candidate. Without this patch, we were generating unaligned
16-byte (SSE) memops for x86 targets where those accesses are slow.
This change was mentioned in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10662 and
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10905
and will help solve PR21711.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12573
llvm-svn: 246771
SETCC is one of those special node types for which operation actions (legality,
etc.) is keyed off of an operand type, not the node's value type. This makes
sense because the value type of a legal SETCC node is determined by its
operands' value type (via the TLI function getSetCCResultType). When the
SDAGBuilder creates SETCC nodes, it either creates them with an MVT::i1 value
type, or directly with the value type provided by TLI.getSetCCResultType.
The first problem being fixed here is that DAGCombine had several places
querying TLI.isOperationLegal on SETCC, but providing the return of
getSetCCResultType, instead of the operand type directly. This does not mean
what the author thought, and "luckily", most in-tree targets have SETCC with
Custom lowering, instead of marking them Legal, so these checks return false
anyway.
The second problem being fixed here is that two of the DAGCombines could create
SETCC nodes with arbitrary (integer) value types; specifically, those that
would simplify:
(setcc a, b, op1) and|or (setcc a, b, op2) -> setcc a, b, op3
(which is possible for some combinations of (op1, op2))
If the operands of the and|or node are actual setcc nodes, then this is not an
issue (because the and|or must share the same type), but, the relevant code in
DAGCombiner::visitANDLike and DAGCombiner::visitORLike actually calls
DAGCombiner::isSetCCEquivalent on each operand, and that function will
recognise setcc-like select_cc nodes with other return types. And, thus, when
creating new SETCC nodes, we need to be careful to respect the value-type
constraint. This is even true before type legalization, because it is quite
possible for the SELECT_CC node to have a legal type that does not happen to
match the corresponding TLI.getSetCCResultType type.
To be explicit, there is nothing that later fixes the value types of SETCC
nodes (if the type is legal, but does not happen to match
TLI.getSetCCResultType). Creating SETCCs with an MVT::i1 value type seems to
work only because, either MVT::i1 is not legal, or it is what
TLI.getSetCCResultType returns if it is legal. Fixing that is a larger change,
however. For the time being, restrict the relevant transformations to produce
only SETCC nodes with a value type matching TLI.getSetCCResultType (or MVT::i1
prior to type legalization).
Fixes PR24636.
llvm-svn: 246507
This was part of D7208 (r227242), but that commit was reverted because it exposed
a bug in AArch64 lowering. I should have that fixed and the rest of the commit
reinstated soon.
llvm-svn: 246493
DAGCombine has a utility wrapper around TLI's getSetCCResultType; use it in the
one place in DAGCombine still directly calling the TLI function. NFC.
llvm-svn: 246482
This code was dead when it was committed in r23665 (Oct 7, 2005), and before it
reaches its 10th anniversary, it really should go. We can always bring it back
if we'd like, but it forms more SETCC nodes, and the way we do legality
checking on SETCC nodes is wrong in a number of places, and removing this means
fewer places to fix. NFC.
llvm-svn: 246466
When combiner AA is enabled, look at stores on the same chain.
Non-aliasing stores are moved to the same chain so the existing
code fails because it expects to find an adajcent store on a consecutive
chain.
Because of how DAGCombiner tries these store combines,
MergeConsecutiveStores doesn't see the correct set of stores on the chain
when it visits the other stores. Each store individually has its chain
fixed before trying to merge consecutive stores, and then tries to merge
stores from that point before the other stores have been processed to
have their chains fixed. To fix this, attempt to use FindBetterChain
on any possibly neighboring stores in visitSTORE.
Suppose you have 4 32-bit stores that should be merged into 1 vector
store. One store would be visited first, fixing the chain. What happens is
because not all of the store chains have yet been fixed, 2 of the stores
are merged. The other 2 stores later have their chains fixed,
but because the other stores were already merged, they have different
memory types and merging the two different sized stores is not
supported and would be more difficult to handle.
llvm-svn: 246307
Fixes PR24602: r245689 introduced an unguarded use of
SelectionDAG::FoldConstantArithmetic, which returns 0 when it fails
because of opaque (hoisted) constants.
llvm-svn: 246217
