Use the elementtype attribute introduced in D105407 for the
llvm.preserve.array/struct.index intrinsics. It carries the
element type of the GEP these intrinsics effectively encode.
This patch:
* Adds a verifier check that the attribute is required.
* Adds it in the IRBuilder methods for these intrinsics.
* Autoupgrades old bitcode without the attribute.
* Updates the lowering code to use the attribute rather than
the pointer element type.
* Updates lots of tests to specify the attribute.
* Adds -force-opaque-pointers to the intrinsic-array.ll test
to demonstrate they work now.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D106184
This implements the elementtype attribute specified in D105407. It
just adds the attribute and the specified verifier rules, but
doesn't yet make use of it anywhere.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106008
While it is nice to have separate methods in the public AttributeSet
API, we can fetch the type from the internal AttributeSetNode
using a generic API for all type attribute kinds.
A couple of attributes had explicit checks for incompatibility
with pointer types. However, this is already handled generically
by the typeIncompatible() check. We can drop these after adding
SwiftError to typeIncompatible().
However, the previous implementation of the check prints out all
attributes that are incompatible with a given type, even though
those attributes aren't actually used. This has the annoying
result that the error message changes every time a new attribute
is added to the list. Improve this by explicitly finding which
attribute isn't compatible and printing just that.
Continuing from D105763, this allows placing certain properties
about attributes in the TableGen definition. In particular, we
store whether an attribute applies to fn/param/ret (or a combination
thereof). This information is used by the Verifier, as well as the
ForceFunctionAttrs pass. I also plan to use this in LLParser,
which also duplicates info on which attributes are valid where.
This keeps metadata about attributes in one place, and makes it
more likely that it stays in sync, rather than in various
functions spread across the codebase.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105780
This is now the same as isIntAttrKind(), so use that instead, as
it does not require manual maintenance. The naming is also more
accurate in that both int and type attributes have an argument,
but this method was only targeting int attributes.
I initially wanted to tighten the AttrBuilder assertion, but we
have some in-tree uses that would violate it.
Assert that enum/int/type attributes go through the constructor
they are supposed to use.
To make sure this can't happen via invalid bitcode, explicitly
verify that the attribute kind if correct there.
Followup to D105658 to make AttrBuilder automatically work with
new type attributes. TableGen is tweaked to emit First/LastTypeAttr
markers, based on which we can handle type attributes
programmatically.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105763
While working on the elementtype attribute, I felt that the type
attribute handling in AttrBuilder is overly repetitive. This patch
converts the separate Type* members into an std::array<Type*>, so
that all type attribute kinds can be handled generically.
There's more room for improvement here (especially when it comes to
converting the AttrBuilder to an Attribute), but this seems like a
good starting point.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105658
Avoid enumerating all attributes here and instead use
getNameFromAttrKind(), which is based on the tablegen data.
This only leaves us with custom handling for int attributes,
which don't have uniform printing.
I added an assertion in D91816 (documenting behavior added in D93422)
that callers and callees with mismatched fn attr's related to stack
protectors should not occur unless the callee was attributed
always_inline.
This falls apart when a call, invoke, or callbr (any instruction
inheriting from CallBase) itself has an always_inline attribute. Clang
will emit such attributes on Instructions when __attribute__((flatten))
is used to recursively force inlining from a caller.
Since these assertions only had the caller and callee Functions, and not
the call site (CallBase derived classes), we would have to search the
caller for such instructions to reconstruct the call site information.
But at that point, inlining has already occurred; the call site has
already been removed from the caller.
Remove the assertions, add a unit test for always_inline call sites, and
update the LangRef.
Another curiosity is that the always_inline Attribute on Instructions is
only expanded by the inline pass, not the always_inline pass.
Thanks to @pcc on this report when building Android's RunTime (ART)
interpreter.
Reviewed By: pcc, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104944
We really ought to support no_sanitize("coverage") in line with other
sanitizers. This came up again in discussions on the Linux-kernel
mailing lists, because we currently do workarounds using objtool to
remove coverage instrumentation. Since that support is only on x86, to
continue support coverage instrumentation on other architectures, we
must support selectively disabling coverage instrumentation via function
attributes.
Unfortunately, for SanitizeCoverage, it has not been implemented as a
sanitizer via fsanitize= and associated options in Sanitizers.def, but
rolls its own option fsanitize-coverage. This meant that we never got
"automatic" no_sanitize attribute support.
Implement no_sanitize attribute support by special-casing the string
"coverage" in the NoSanitizeAttr implementation. To keep the feature as
unintrusive to existing IR generation as possible, define a new negative
function attribute NoSanitizeCoverage to propagate the information
through to the instrumentation pass.
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49035
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, morehouse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102772
When removing an AttrBuilder from an AttributeSet, first check
whether there is any overlap. If nothing is being removed, we can
directly return the original set.
This extends any frame record created in the function to include that
parameter, passed in X22.
The new record looks like [X22, FP, LR] in memory, and FP is stored with 0b0001
in bits 63:60 (CodeGen assumes they are 0b0000 in normal operation). The effect
of this is that tools walking the stack should expect to see one of three
values there:
* 0b0000 => a normal, non-extended record with just [FP, LR]
* 0b0001 => the extended record [X22, FP, LR]
* 0b1111 => kernel space, and a non-extended record.
All other values are currently reserved.
If compiling for arm64e this context pointer is address-discriminated with the
discriminator 0xc31a and the DB (process-specific) key.
There is also an "i8** @llvm.swift.async.context.addr()" intrinsic providing
front-ends access to this slot (and forcing its creation initialized to nullptr
if necessary).
verifyFunctionAttrs has a comment that the value V is printed in error messages. The recently added errors for attributes didn't print V. Make them print V.
Change the stringification of AttributeList. Firstly they started with 'PAL[' which stood for ParamAttrsList. Change that to 'AttributeList[' matching its current name AttributeList. Print out semantic meaning of the index instead of the raw index value (i.e. 'return', 'function' or 'arg(n)').
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101484
Such attributes can either be unset, or set to "true" or "false" (as string).
throughout the codebase, this led to inelegant checks ranging from
if (Fn->getFnAttribute("no-jump-tables").getValueAsString() == "true")
to
if (Fn->hasAttribute("no-jump-tables") && Fn->getFnAttribute("no-jump-tables").getValueAsString() == "true")
Introduce a getValueAsBool that normalize the check, with the following
behavior:
no attributes or attribute set to "false" => return false
attribute set to "true" => return true
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99299
Attributes don't know their parent Context, adding this would make Attribute larger. Instead, we add hasParentContext that answers whether this Attribute belongs to a particular LLVMContext by checking for itself inside the context's FoldingSet. Same with AttributeSet and AttributeList. The Verifier checks them with the Module context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99362
When we pass a AArch64 Homogeneous Floating-Point
Aggregate (HFA) argument with increased alignment
requirements, for example
struct S {
__attribute__ ((__aligned__(16))) double v[4];
};
Clang uses `[4 x double]` for the parameter, which is passed
on the stack at alignment 8, whereas it should be at
alignment 16, following Rule C.4 in
AAPCS (https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/master/aapcs64/aapcs64.rst#642parameter-passing-rules)
Currently we don't have a way to express in LLVM IR the
alignment requirements of the function arguments. The align
attribute is applicable to pointers only, and only for some
special ways of passing arguments (e..g byval). When
implementing AAPCS32/AAPCS64, clang resorts to dubious hacks
of coercing to types, which naturally have the needed
alignment. We don't have enough types to cover all the
cases, though.
This patch introduces a new use of the stackalign attribute
to control stack slot alignment, when and if an argument is
passed in memory.
The attribute align is left as an optimizer hint - it still
applies to pointer types only and pertains to the content of
the pointer, whereas the alignment of the pointer itself is
determined by the stackalign attribute.
For byval arguments, the stackalign attribute assumes the
role, previously perfomed by align, falling back to align if
stackalign` is absent.
On the clang side, when passing arguments using the "direct"
style (cf. `ABIArgInfo::Kind`), now we can optionally
specify an alignment, which is emitted as the new
`stackalign` attribute.
Patch by Momchil Velikov and Lucas Prates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98794
I think byval/sret and the others are close to being able to rip out
the code to support the missing type case. A lot of this code is
shared with inalloca, so catch this up to the others so that can
happen.
In DeadArgumentElimination pass, if a function's argument is never used, corresponding caller's parameter can be changed to undef. If the param/arg has attribute noundef or other related attributes, LLVM LangRef(https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#parameter-attributes) says its behavior is undefined. SimplifyCFG(D97244) takes advantage of this behavior and does bad transformation on valid code.
To avoid this undefined behavior when change caller's parameter to undef, this patch removes noundef attribute and other attributes imply noundef on param/arg.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98899
This attribute represents the minimum and maximum values vscale can
take. For now this attribute is not hooked up to anything during
codegen, this will be added in the future when such codegen is
considered stable.
Additionally hook up the -msve-vector-bits=<x> clang option to emit this
attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98030
This avoids a few unnecessary conversion from StringRef to std::string, and a
bunch of extra allocation thanks to the SmallString.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98190
This change implements support for applying profile instrumentation
only to selected files or functions. The implementation uses the
sanitizer special case list format to select which files and functions
to instrument, and relies on the new noprofile IR attribute to exclude
functions from instrumentation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94820
This change implements support for applying profile instrumentation
only to selected files or functions. The implementation uses the
sanitizer special case list format to select which files and functions
to instrument, and relies on the new noprofile IR attribute to exclude
functions from instrumentation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94820
When adding an enum attribute to an AttributeList, avoid going
through an AttrBuilder and instead directly add the attribute to
the correct set. Going through AttrBuilder is expensive, because
it requires all string attributes to be reconstructed.
This can be further improved by inserting the attribute at the
right position and using the AttributeSetNode::getSorted() API.
This recovers the small compile-time regression from D94633.
When combining extracted functions, they may have different function
attributes. We want to make sure that we do not make any assumptions,
or lose any information. This attempts to make sure that we consolidate
function attributes to their most general case.
Tests:
llvm/test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-compatible-and-attribute-transfer.ll
llvm/test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-compatible-or-attribute-transfer.ll
Reviewers: jdoefert, paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87301
Clang FE currently has hot/cold function attribute. But we only have
cold function attribute in LLVM IR.
This patch adds support of hot function attribute to LLVM IR. This
attribute will be used in setting function section prefix/suffix.
Currently .hot and .unlikely suffix only are added in PGO (Sample PGO)
compilation (through isFunctionHotInCallGraph and
isFunctionColdInCallGraph).
This patch changes the behavior. The new behavior is:
(1) If the user annotates a function as hot or isFunctionHotInCallGraph
is true, this function will be marked as hot. Otherwise,
(2) If the user annotates a function as cold or
isFunctionColdInCallGraph is true, this function will be marked as
cold.
The changes are:
(1) user annotated function attribute will used in setting function
section prefix/suffix.
(2) hot attribute overwrites profile count based hotness.
(3) profile count based hotness overwrite user annotated cold attribute.
The intention for these changes is to provide the user a way to mark
certain function as hot in cases where training input is hard to cover
all the hot functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92493
Part of the <=> changes in C++20 make certain patterns of writing equality
operators ambiguous with themselves (sorry!).
This patch goes through and adjusts all the comparison operators such that
they should work in both C++17 and C++20 modes. It also makes two other small
C++20-specific changes (adding a constructor to a type that cases to be an
aggregate, and adding casts from u8 literals which no longer have type
const char*).
There were four categories of errors that this review fixes.
Here are canonical examples of them, ordered from most to least common:
// 1) Missing const
namespace missing_const {
struct A {
#ifndef FIXED
bool operator==(A const&);
#else
bool operator==(A const&) const;
#endif
};
bool a = A{} == A{}; // error
}
// 2) Type mismatch on CRTP
namespace crtp_mismatch {
template <typename Derived>
struct Base {
#ifndef FIXED
bool operator==(Derived const&) const;
#else
// in one case changed to taking Base const&
friend bool operator==(Derived const&, Derived const&);
#endif
};
struct D : Base<D> { };
bool b = D{} == D{}; // error
}
// 3) iterator/const_iterator with only mixed comparison
namespace iter_const_iter {
template <bool Const>
struct iterator {
using const_iterator = iterator<true>;
iterator();
template <bool B, std::enable_if_t<(Const && !B), int> = 0>
iterator(iterator<B> const&);
#ifndef FIXED
bool operator==(const_iterator const&) const;
#else
friend bool operator==(iterator const&, iterator const&);
#endif
};
bool c = iterator<false>{} == iterator<false>{} // error
|| iterator<false>{} == iterator<true>{}
|| iterator<true>{} == iterator<false>{}
|| iterator<true>{} == iterator<true>{};
}
// 4) Same-type comparison but only have mixed-type operator
namespace ambiguous_choice {
enum Color { Red };
struct C {
C();
C(Color);
operator Color() const;
bool operator==(Color) const;
friend bool operator==(C, C);
};
bool c = C{} == C{}; // error
bool d = C{} == Red;
}
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78938
It's common for code that manipulates the stack via inline assembly or
that has to set up its own stack canary (such as the Linux kernel) would
like to avoid stack protectors in certain functions. In this case, we've
been bitten by numerous bugs where a callee with a stack protector is
inlined into an attribute((no_stack_protector)) caller, which
generally breaks the caller's assumptions about not having a stack
protector. LTO exacerbates the issue.
While developers can avoid this by putting all no_stack_protector
functions in one translation unit together and compiling those with
-fno-stack-protector, it's generally not very ergonomic or as
ergonomic as a function attribute, and still doesn't work for LTO. See also:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20200915172658.1432732-1-rkir@google.com/https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200918201436.2932360-30-samitolvanen@google.com/T/#u
SSP attributes can be ordered by strength. Weakest to strongest, they
are: ssp, sspstrong, sspreq. Callees with differing SSP attributes may be
inlined into each other, and the strongest attribute will be applied to the
caller. (No change)
After this change:
* A callee with no SSP attributes will no longer be inlined into a
caller with SSP attributes.
* The reverse is also true: a callee with an SSP attribute will not be
inlined into a caller with no SSP attributes.
* The alwaysinline attribute overrides these rules.
Functions that get synthesized by the compiler may not get inlined as a
result if they are not created with the same stack protector function
attribute as their callers.
Alternative approach to https://reviews.llvm.org/D87956.
Fixes pr/47479.
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed By: rnk, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91816
It's currently ambiguous in IR whether the source language explicitly
did not want a stack a stack protector (in C, via function attribute
no_stack_protector) or doesn't care for any given function.
It's common for code that manipulates the stack via inline assembly or
that has to set up its own stack canary (such as the Linux kernel) would
like to avoid stack protectors in certain functions. In this case, we've
been bitten by numerous bugs where a callee with a stack protector is
inlined into an __attribute__((__no_stack_protector__)) caller, which
generally breaks the caller's assumptions about not having a stack
protector. LTO exacerbates the issue.
While developers can avoid this by putting all no_stack_protector
functions in one translation unit together and compiling those with
-fno-stack-protector, it's generally not very ergonomic or as
ergonomic as a function attribute, and still doesn't work for LTO. See also:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20200915172658.1432732-1-rkir@google.com/https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200918201436.2932360-30-samitolvanen@google.com/T/#u
Typically, when inlining a callee into a caller, the caller will be
upgraded in its level of stack protection (see adjustCallerSSPLevel()).
By adding an explicit attribute in the IR when the function attribute is
used in the source language, we can now identify such cases and prevent
inlining. Block inlining when the callee and caller differ in the case that one
contains `nossp` when the other has `ssp`, `sspstrong`, or `sspreq`.
Fixes pr/47479.
Reviewed By: void
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87956
This adds the LLVM IR attribute `mustprogress` as defined in LangRef through D86233. This attribute will be applied to functions with in languages like C++ where forward progress is guaranteed. Functions without this attribute are not required to make progress.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85393
This reverts commit eb9f7c28e5fe6d75fed3587023e17f2997c8024b.
Previously this was incorrectly handling linking of the contained
type, so this merges the fixes from D88973.
Drop `noundef` for return values that are replaced by void and make it
illegal to put `noundef` on a void value.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87306
Alignment attributes need to be dropped for non-pointer values.
This also introduces a check into the verifier to ensure you don't use
`align` on anything but a pointer. Test needed to be adjusted
accordingly.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87304
This reverts commit 55c4ff91bd820d72014f63dcf7f3d5a0d3397986.
Issues were introduced as discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D88241
where this change made previous bugs in the linker and BitCodeWriter
visible.
Make the corresponding change that was made for byval in
b7141207a483d39b99c2b4da4eb3bb591eca9e1a. Like byval, this requires a
bulk update of the test IR tests to include the type before this can
be mandatory.
Rather than calling hasFnAttribute and then calling getFnAttribute
if the attribute exists, its better to just call getFnAttribute and
then check if we got a valid attribute back.
