clang converts keywords to identifiers for compatibility with various system
headers such as GNU libc.
Implement a -Wkeyword-compat extension warning to diagnose those cases. The
warning is on by default but will generally be ignored in system headers. It
can however be enabled globally to aid standards conformance testing.
This also changes the __uptr keyword avoidance from r195710 to no longer
special-case system headers, bringing it in line with other similar workarounds
in clang.
Implementation returns bool for symmetry with token annotation functions.
Some examples:
warning: keyword '__is_pod' will be treated as an identifier for the remainder of the translation unit [-Wkeyword-compat]
struct __is_pod
warning: keyword '__uptr' will be treated as an identifier here [-Wkeyword-compat]
union w *__uptr;
llvm-svn: 196212
MSVC applies these to the following declaration only if present, otherwise
silently ignores them whereas we'll issue a warning.
Handling differs from ordinary attributes appearing in the same place, so add a
Sema test to make sure we get it right.
llvm-svn: 195577
module. Use the marker to diagnose cases where we try to transition between
submodules when not at the top level (most likely because a closing brace was
missing at the end of a header file, but is also possible if submodule headers
attempt to do something fundamentally non-modular, like our .def files).
llvm-svn: 195543
and we see an ill-formed declarator that would probably be well-formed if the
tag definition were just missing a semicolon, use that as the diagnostic
instead of producing some other mysterious error.
llvm-svn: 195163
definition. If we see something that looks like a namespace definition inside a
class, that strongly indicates that a close brace was missing somewhere.
llvm-svn: 194319
Summary: Some MS headers use these features.
Reviewers: rnk, rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1948
llvm-svn: 192936
ParseCXXClassMemberDeclaration was trying to use the result of
ActOnCXXMemberDeclarator to attach it to some late parsed attributes.
However when failures arise, we have no decl to attach to which
eventually leads us to a NULL pointer dereference.
While we are here, clean up the code a bit.
Fixes PR16765
llvm-svn: 187557
No functionality change.
In Sema helper functions:
* renamed isTypeName as HasTypenameKeyword
In UsingDecl:
* renamed get/setUsingLocation to get/setUsingLoc
* renamed is/setTypeName as has/setTypename
llvm-svn: 186816
- 'register' storage class
- dynamic exception specifications
Only the former check is enabled by default for now (the latter might be quite noisy).
llvm-svn: 183881
attributes yet, so just issue the appropriate diagnostics. Also generalize the
fixit for attributes-in-the-wrong-place code and reuse it here, if attributes
are placed after the access-specifier or 'virtual' in a base specifier.
llvm-svn: 175575
If the member has an initializer, assume it was probably intended to be static
and suggest/recover with that.
If the member doesn't have an initializer, assume it was probably intended to
be const instead of constexpr and suggest that.
(if the attempt to apply these changes fails, don't make any suggestion &
produce the same diagnostic experience as before. The only case where this can
come up that I know of is with a mutable constexpr with an initializer, since
mutable is incompatible with static (but it's already incompatible with
const anyway))
llvm-svn: 173873
the diagnostic's warn_ name. Switch some places (notably C++11 attributes)
which really wanted an error over to a different diagnostic. Finally, suppress
the diagnostic entirely for __ptr32, __ptr64 and __w64, to avoid producing
diagnostics in important system headers.
llvm-svn: 173788
It turns out that there's no correctness bug here (because we can't have a type
definition in this location), but there was a diagnostic bug.
llvm-svn: 173766
r159549 / r159164 regressed clang to reject
struct s {};
struct s
operator++(struct s a)
{ return a; }
This fixes the regression. Richard, pleas check if this looks right.
llvm-svn: 172834
it apart from [[gnu::noreturn]] / __attribute__((noreturn)), since their
semantics are not equivalent (for instance, we treat [[gnu::noreturn]] as
affecting the function type, whereas [[noreturn]] does not).
llvm-svn: 172691
Following r168626, in class declaration or definition, there are a combination of syntactic locations
where C++11 attributes could appear, and among those the only valid location permitted by standard is
between class-key and class-name. So for those attributes appear at wrong locations, fixit is used to
move them to expected location and we recover by applying them to the class specifier.
llvm-svn: 171757
