This patch starts small, only detecting sequences of the form
<a, a+n, a+2n, a+3n, ...> where a and n are ConstantSDNodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125194
We still haven't found a solution that correctly handles 'don't care' sub elements properly - given how close it is to the next release branch, I'm making this fail safe change and we can revisit this later if we can't find alternatives.
NOTE: This isn't a reversion of D128570 - it's the removal of undef handling across bitcasts entirely
Fixes#56520
Concat KnownBits from ISD::SHL_PARTS / ISD::SRA_PARTS / ISD::SRL_PARTS lo/hi operands and perform the KnownBits calculation by the shift amount on the extended type, before splitting the KnownBits based on the requested lo/hi result.
Vector fptosi_sat and fptoui_sat were being expanded by unrolling the
vector operation. This doesn't work for scalable vector, so this patch
adds a call to TLI.expandFP_TO_INT_SAT if the vector is scalable.
Scalable tests are added for AArch64 and RISCV. Some of the AArch64
fptoi_sat operations should be legal, but that will be handled in
another patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130028
Similar to what we already do in getNode for basic ADD/SUB nodes, return the X operand directly, but here we know that there will be no/zero overflow as well.
As noted on D127115 - this path is being exercised by llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/dsp-mlal.ll, although I haven't been able to get any codegen without a topological worklist.
This was stored in LiveIntervals, but not actually used for anything
related to LiveIntervals. It was only used in one check for if a load
instruction is rematerializable. I also don't think this was entirely
correct, since it was implicitly assuming constant loads are also
dereferenceable.
Remove this and rely only on the invariant+dereferenceable flags in
the memory operand. Set the flag based on the AA query upfront. This
should have the same net benefit, but has the possible disadvantage of
making this AA query nonlazy.
Preserve the behavior of assuming pointsToConstantMemory implying
dereferenceable for now, but maybe this should be changed.
When doing scalable vectorization, the loop vectorizer uses a urem in the computation of the vector trip count. The RHS of that urem is a (possibly shifted) call to @llvm.vscale.
vscale is effectively the number of "blocks" in the vector register. (That is, types such as <vscale x 8 x i8> and <vscale x 1 x i8> both fill one 64 bit block, and vscale is essentially how many of those blocks there are in a single vector register at runtime.)
We know from the RISCV V extension specification that VLEN must be a power of two between ELEN and 2^16. Since our block size is 64 bits, the must be a power of two numbers of blocks. (For everything other than VLEN<=32, but that's already broken.)
It is worth noting that AArch64 SVE specification explicitly allows non-power-of-two sizes for the vector registers and thus can't claim that vscale is a power of two by this logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129609
(Reapply after revert in e9ce1a588030d8d4004f5d7e443afe46245e9a92 due to
Fuchsia test failures. Removed changes in lib/ExecutionEngine/ other
than error categories, to be checked in more detail and reapplied
separately.)
Bulk remove many of the more trivial uses of ManagedStatic in the llvm
directory, either by defining a new getter function or, in many cases,
moving the static variable directly into the only function that uses it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129120
Bulk remove many of the more trivial uses of ManagedStatic in the llvm
directory, either by defining a new getter function or, in many cases,
moving the static variable directly into the only function that uses it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129120
This patch adds the support for `fmax` and `fmin` operations in `atomicrmw`
instruction. For now (at least in this patch), the instruction will be expanded
to CAS loop. There are already a couple of targets supporting the feature. I'll
create another patch(es) to enable them accordingly.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127041
We're slowly removing SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits and replacing it with SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits, we no longer have any uses for the vector demanded elt variant.
This helps handling a case where the BUILD_VECTOR has i16 element type
and i32 constant operands
t2: v8i16 = setcc t8, t17, setult:ch
t3: v8i16 = BUILD_VECTOR Constant:i32<1>, ...
t4: v8i16 = and t2, t3
t5: v8i16 = add t8, t4
This can be turned into t5: v8i16 = sub t8, t2, and allows us to remove
t3 and t4 from the DAG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127354
In the same spirit as D73543 and in reply to https://reviews.llvm.org/D126768#3549920 this patch is adding support for `__builtin_memset_inline`.
The idea is to get support from the compiler to easily write efficient memory function implementations.
This patch could be split in two:
- one for the LLVM part adding the `llvm.memset.inline.*` intrinsics.
- and another one for the Clang part providing the instrinsic as a builtin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126903
This matches what we do in IR. For the RISC-V test case, this allows
us to use -8 for the AND mask instead of materializing a constant in a register.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127335
As noticed on D127115 - we were missing this fold, instead just having the shuffle(shuffle(x,undef,splatmask),undef) fold. We should be able to merge these into one using SelectionDAG::isSplatValue, but we'll need to match the shuffle's undef handling first.
This also exposed an issue in SelectionDAG::isSplatValue which was incorrectly propagating the undef mask across a bitcast (it was trying to just bail with a APInt::isSubsetOf if it found any undefs but that was actually the wrong way around so didn't fire for partial undef cases).
Move the code that was added for D126896 after the normal recursive calls
to computeKnownBits. This allows us to calculate trailing zeros.
Previously we would break out of the switch before the recursive calls.
If C is non-negative, the result of the smax must also be
non-negative, so all sign bits of the result are 0.
This allows DAGCombiner to remove a zext_inreg in the modified test.
This zext_inreg started as a sext that became zext before type
legalization then was promoted to a zext_inreg.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126896
abs should only produce a positive value or the signed minimum
value. This means we can't fold abs(undef) to undef as that would
allow more values. Fold to 0 instead to match InstSimplify.
Fixes test mentioned in comment on pr55271.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126174
Most clients only used these methods because they wanted to be able to
extend or truncate to the same bit width (which is a no-op). Now that
the standard zext, sext and trunc allow this, there is no reason to use
the OrSelf versions.
The OrSelf versions additionally have the strange behaviour of allowing
extending to a *smaller* width, or truncating to a *larger* width, which
are also treated as no-ops. A small amount of client code relied on this
(ConstantRange::castOp and MicrosoftCXXNameMangler::mangleNumber) and
needed rewriting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125557
This patch uses VP_REDUCE_AND and VP_REDUCE_OR to replace VP_REDUCE_SMAX,VP_REDUCE_SMIN,VP_REDUCE_UMAX and VP_REDUCE_UMIN for mask vector type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125002
During early gather/scatter enablement two different approaches
were taken to represent scaled indices:
* A Scale operand whereby byte_offsets = Index * Scale
* An IndexType whereby byte_offsets = Index * sizeof(MemVT.ElementType)
Having multiple representations is bad as shown by this patch which
fixes instances where the two are out of sync. The dedicated scale
operand is more flexible and pervasive so this patch removes the
UNSCALED values from IndexType. This means all indices are scaled
but the scale can be one, hence unscaled. SDNodes now use the scale
operand to answer the "isScaledIndex" question.
I toyed with the idea of keeping the UNSCALED enums and helper
functions but because they will have no uses and force SDNodes to
validate the set of supported values I figured it's best to remove
them. We can re-add them if there's a real need. For similar
reasons I've kept the IndexType enum when a bool could be used as I
think being explicitly looks better.
Depends On D123347
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123381
The patch make users not need to know getNode with SDNodeFlags argument may not
pass its flags.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125659
The result of sign_extend_inreg needs to have as many sign bits
as requested by the VT argument. The easiest way to guarantee this
is to fold it to 0.
SystemZ test was modified to avoid using undef.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55178
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124696
This extends the (X & ~Y) | Y to X | Y fold to also work if ~Y is
a truncated not (when taking into account the mask X). This is
done by exporting the infrastructure added in D124856 and reusing
it here.
I've retained the old value of AllowUndefs=false, though probably
this can be switched to true with extra test coverage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124930
Demanded bits analysis may replace a full-width not with a
any_extend (not (truncate X)) pattern. This patch looks through
this kind of pattern in haveNoCommonBitsSet(). Of course, we can
only do this if we only need negated bits in the non-extended part,
as the other bits may now be arbitrary. For example, if we have
haveNoCommonBitsSet(~X & Y, X) then ~X only needs to actually
negate bits set in Y.
This is only a partial solution to the problem in that it allows
add -> or conversion, but the resulting or doesn't get folded yet.
(I guess that will involve exposing getBitwiseNotOperand() as a
more general helper and using that in the relevant transform.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124856
