the information on to Sema. There's still an incorrectness in the way template instantiation
works now, but that is due to a far larger underlying representational problem.
Also add a test case for various list initialization cases of scalars, which test this
commit as well as the previous one.
llvm-svn: 140460
Previously we would cut off the source file buffer at the code-completion
point; this impeded code-completion inside C++ inline methods and,
recently, with buffering ObjC methods.
Have the code-completion inserted into the source buffer so that it can
be buffered along with a method body. When we actually hit the code-completion
point the cut-off lexing or parsing.
Fixes rdar://10056932&8319466
llvm-svn: 139086
template<typename T> struct S { } f() { return 0; }
This case now produces a missing ';' diagnostic, since that seems like a much more likely error than an attempt to declare a function or variable in addition to the class template.
Treat this
llvm-svn: 135195
declaration, determine whether the declaration will end up declaring a
function using semantic criteria (e.g., it will have function type)
rather than purely syntactic criteria (e.g., it has the form of a
function declarator). Fixes <rdar://problem/9670557>.
llvm-svn: 133854
lifetime is well-known and restricted, cleaning them up manually is easy to miss and cause a leak.
Use it to plug the leaking of TemplateIdAnnotation objects. rdar://9634138.
llvm-svn: 133610
struct {
typedef int A = 0;
};
According to the C++11 standard, this is not ill-formed, but does not have any ascribed meaning. We can't reasonably accept it, so treat it as ill-formed.
Also switch C++ from an incorrect 'fields can only be initialized in constructors' diagnostic for this case to C's 'illegal initializer (only variables can be initialized)'
llvm-svn: 132890
type that turns one type into another. This is used as the basis to
implement __underlying_type properly - with TypeSourceInfo and proper
behavior in the face of templates.
llvm-svn: 132017
They are actually grammatically considered definitions and parsed
accordingly.
This fixes the outstanding bugs regarding defaulting functions after
their declarations.
We now really nicely diagnose the following construct (try it!)
int foo() = delete, bar;
Still todo: Defaulted functions other than default constructors
Test cases (including for the above construct)
llvm-svn: 131228
Explictly defaultedness is correctly reflected on the AST, but there are
no changes to how that affects the definition of functions or much else
really.
llvm-svn: 130974
parameters on the floor in certain cases:
class X {
template <typename T> friend typename A<T>::Foo;
};
This was parsed as a *non* template friend declaration some how, and
received an ExtWarn. Fixing the parser to actually provide the template
parameters to the freestanding declaration parse triggers the code which
specifically looks for such constructs and hard errors on them.
Along the way, this prevents us from trying to instantiate constructs
like the above inside of a outer template. This is important as loosing
the template parameters means we don't have a well formed declaration
and template instantiation will be unable to rebuild the AST. That fixes
a crash in the GCC test suite.
llvm-svn: 130772
