This header isn't used by any public header, so there shouldn't
be any need to install it or treat it as a heder.
Once it's part of the src subdirectory, I guess one could consider
giving it a more traditional name too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147855
When the libcxx test framework is executed within libunwind, there
are no standard C++ headers available (libunwind builds with
-nostdinc++, but doesn't add any libcxx headers to the include path).
Check that a test that includes <iostream> can be compiled before trying
to build and execute a test program that includes it.
Previously, the compile error here would block all libunwind tests from
executing altogether.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147630
The __cpp_lib_format_ranges feature-test macro only depends on P2286R8
and P2585R0. Note since LWG3750 only affects these two C++23 papers
there is nothing to do for older language versions.
(The __cpp_lib_format feature-test macro depends on the incomplete
formatting for chrono. So this part can't be marked as complete yet.)
This completes
- P2286R8 Formatting ranges
- P2585R0 Improving default container formatting
This partly implements
- LWG3750 Too many papers bump __cpp_lib_format
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147880
This is based on the last open review comment in D144331 and is applied
to all occurrences.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147885
D144994 adds modules to libc++. In order to test them some newer and
additional tools are required.
CMake 3.26
This is in combination with Clang 16 or newer makes it possible to
conveniently build modules with CMake. Unfortunately CMake 3.26 in our
setup has an issue with unused linker flags. This causes libunwind not
to compile at all. D145596 contains a quick-fix which is in the module
patch. The patch D142957 and followups will contain a proper fix.
Therefore install CMake 3.26 in a separate location, allowing to test
the module patch in the CI.
Ninja 1.11
Building modules requires dynamic rules, which requires this version.
This is a CMake 3.26 requirement to use modules. Note that without using
modules CMake still accepts older Ninja versions.
clang-scan-deps (in the tools package)
This tool is used by CMake to get the module dependencies. Note
strictly this currently will only be used for Clang 16 and Clang 17.
Clang 15 and Clang 14 are not needed. They are installed to keep
updating to Clang 18 and later easier.
(In the future we might not test modular build with all Clang versions,
however at the moment the feature is still in development in both Clang
and libc++ so it would be good to detect regressions.)
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146822
This file was added before we started granularizing the headers, but is essentially just a granularized header. This moves the header to the correct place.
Reviewed By: #libc, EricWF
Spies: libcxx-commits, arichardson, mikhail.ramalho
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146395
This omission seems to be there for a long time, it's in the initial
libc++ import. This was discovered while working on the std modules.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147850
LWG3720 Restrict the valid types of arg-id for width and precision in
std-format-spec
Depends on D144325
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144326
We changed the `abort` calls when trying to throw exceptions in `-fno-exceptions` mode to `__verbose_abort` calls, which removes the dependency in most files.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: dim, emaste, mikhail.ramalho, smeenai, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146076
This cuts the time it takes to run the test in half.
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147320
Since stacktrace header is WIP and it's not sure that will be done
before LLVM17 update the documentation. When the header is implemented
implementing the formatter is trivial, so that can be done quickly
afterwards.
Implements parts of:
- P2693R1 Formatting thread::id and stacktrace
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144331
This LWG issue is based on the discussion regarding
P2733R3 Fix handling of empty specifiers in std::format
This paper was disussed and changed a few times in LEWG during the
Issaquah meeting. The paper was not voted in, instead LEWG asked for
a DR against C++26.
This LWG issue contains the direction voted by LEWG. This issue has not
been voted in yet. However it fixes some of the defencies on the
container based formatting. Without this fix the range-default-formatter
for strings looks bad when used in containers.
The changes of this issue match the intended changes of P27333.
type fmt before after (if changed)
---------------------------------------------------------------
char {} a
char {:?} 'a'
array<char, 1> {} ['a']
array<char, 1> {::} [a]
array<char, 1> {::c} [a]
array<char, 1> {::?} ['a']
map<char, char> {} {a: a} -> {'a': 'a'}
map<char, char> {::} {'a': 'a'}
set<char> {} {'a'}
set<char> {::} {a}
set<char> {::c} {a}
set<char> {::?} {'a'}
tuple<char> {} ('a')
stack<char> {} ['a']
stack<char> {::} [a]
stack<char> {::c} [a]
stack<char> {::?} ['a']
array<array<char, 1>, 1> {} [[a]] -> {'a': 'a'}
array<array<char, 1>, 1> {::} [['a']]
array<array<char, 1>, 1> {:::} [[a]]
array<array<char, 1>, 1> {:::c} [[a]]
array<array<char, 1>, 1> {:::?} [['a']]
array<tuple<char>, 1> {} [(a)] -> [('a')]
tuple<tuple<char>> {} ((a)) -> (('a'))
tuple<array<char, 1>> {} ([a]) -> (['a'])
Note the optimization text as mentioned in the tuple formatter can't be
done. The call to parse may affect the formatter so its state needs to
be preserved.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145847
This adds a list of attributes which can be pretty to be able to reject attributes which were introduced in a later C++ standard.
Fixes#61196
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc
Spies: mikhail.ramalho, jdoerfert, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145508
These changes make it possible to use __synth_three_way in modules. The
change from a lambda to a function is a Clang issue.
The change is list was needed since the compiler couldn't deduce the
comparison template argument.
Adds a few missing includes too.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146545
LWG3842 Unclear wording for precision in chrono-format-spec
Note there is nothing to do, the issue clarifies the wording in the Standard.
The new wording matches my interpretation of the previous wording and this has
already been implemented in libc++.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144328
This has been done using the following command
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)(?<!::u)u?intmax_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
The std module doesn't export declarations in the global namespaace.
This is a preparation for that module.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146821
Previously, we inconsistently defined whether a feature was unavailable
on a given deployment target. We would have availability attributes for
all features, but only some features had the equivalent of a _HAS_NO_FOO
macro in the form of the DISABLE_FTM___foo macros. Instead, systematically
define a _HAS_NO_FOO macro, which makes it easier to understand how to
add availability markup for a new platform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147226
The use_system_cxx_lib Lit feature was only used for back-deployment
testing. However, one immense hole in that setup was that we didn't
have a proper way to test Apple's own libc++ outside of back-deployment,
which was embodied by the fact that we needed to define _LIBCPP_DISABLE_AVAILABILITY
when testing (see change in libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/params.py).
This led to the apple-system testing configuration not checking for
availability markup, which is obviously quite bad since the library
we ship actually has availability markup.
Using stdlib=<VENDOR>-libc++ instead to encode back-deployment restrictions
on tests is simpler and it makes it possible to naturally support tests
such as availability markup checking even in the tip-of-trunk Apple-libc++
configuration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146366
The __insertion_sort_move helper function is only used in partial_sort.h,
so it makes sense to define it there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147080
The helper is mis-named, since it won't work as-is on ordered containers
like set and map, because they rely on being able to store keys that are
partial_ordering::unordered, and that's UB for an ordered container.
This was most likely a typo or an unintended naming mistake, since
the function is only used with sequence containers anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146991
AppleClang 1403 has some bugs that prevent std::source_location from
working properly on it. Consequently, we XFAILed the unit test for
source_location with that compiler. However, we should also avoid
advertising that the feature is supported on that compiler, otherwise
our feature-test macros lie. This was noticed to break Boost.Asio
when building with a recent libc++ and AppleClang 14.0.3.
rdar://106863087
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146837
Sometimes, a target can look like `<arch>-apple-macosx10.15.0` instead
of `<arch>-apple-macosx10.15`. This ensures that the test suite handles
those target triples properly as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146365
Instead of writing something like `XFAIL: use_system_cxx_lib && target=...`
to XFAIL back-deployment tests, introduce named Lit features like
`availability-shared_mutex-missing` to represent those. This makes the
XFAIL annotations leaner, and solves the problem of XFAIL comments
potentially getting out of sync. This would also make it easier for
another vendor to add their own annotations to the test suite by simply
changing how the feature is defined for their OS releases, instead
of having to modify hundreds of tests to add repetitive annotations.
This doesn't touch *all* annotations -- only annotations that were widely
duplicated are given named features (e.g. when filesystem or shared_mutex
were introduced). I still think it probably doesn't make sense to have a
named feature for every single fix we make to the dylib.
This is in essence a revert of 2659663, but since then the test suite
has changed significantly. Back when I did 2659663, the configuration
files we have for the test suite right now were being bootstrapped and
it wasn't clear how to provide these features for back-deployment in
that context. Since then, we have a streamlined way of defining these
features in `features.py` and that doesn't impact the ability for a
configuration file to stay minimal.
The original motivation for this change was that I am about to propose
a change that would touch essentially all XFAIL annotations for back-deployment
in the test suite, and this greatly reduces the number of lines changed
by that upcoming change, in addition to making the test suite generally
better.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146359
Those seem to have been failing for a while but we might not have noticed
because of the recent CI instability issues. I'm marking them as unsupported
to try to get the CI functional again, especially since the majority of
<format> tests are already not working on GCC 12.
Building with -DLIBCXX_ENABLE_THREADS=OFF -DLIBCXXABI_ENABLE_THREADS=OFF
(like e.g. for wasm) fails after D146228 because of a misplaced std
namespace begin/end.
Reviewed By: philnik, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146682
This has been done using the following command
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)(?<!::u)u?intptr_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
The std module doesn't export declarations in the global namespaace.
This is a preparation for that module.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146643
std::format is currently experimental, so there is technically no
deployment target requirement for it (since the only symbols required
for it are in `libc++experimental.a`).
However, some parts of std::format depend indirectly on the floating
point std::to_chars implementation, which does have deployment target
requirements.
This patch removes all the availability format for std::format and
updates the XFAILs in the tests to properly explain why they fail
on old deployment targets, when they do. It also changes a couple
of tests to avoid depending on floating-point std::to_chars when
it isn't fundamental to the test.
Finally, some tests are marked as XFAIL but I added a comment saying
TODO FMT This test should not require std::to_chars(floating-point)
These tests do not fundamentally depend on floating-point std::to_chars,
however they end up failing because calling std::format even without a
floating-point argument to format will end up requiring floating-point
std::to_chars. I believe this is an implementation artifact that could
be avoided in all cases where we know the format string at compile-time.
In the tests, I added the TODO comment only to the places where we could
do better and actually avoid relying on floating-point std::to_chars
because we know the format string at compile-time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134598
This also updates the moved code to the current style. (i.e. `_VSTD` -> `std`, `_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY` -> `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI`, clang-format).
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc, EricWF
Spies: arichardson, libcxx-commits, mikhail.ramalho
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146228
This has been done using the following commands
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)ptrdiff_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)max_align_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
The std module doesn't export declarations in the global namespaace.,
This is a preparation for that module.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146550
