PowerPC hits an assertion due to somewhat the same reason as https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975.
Though there are already some hack, it still failed with some case, when the operand 0 is NOT
a const fp, it is another fma that with const fp. And that const fp is negated which result in multi-uses.
A better fix is to check the uses of the negated const fp. If there are already use of its negated
value, we will have benefit as no extra Node is added.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75501
I expect that the isCondCodeLegal checks should match that CC of
the node that we're going to create.
Rewriting to a switch to minimize repeated mentions of the same
constants.
We can only report the knownbits for a SCALAR_TO_VECTOR node if we only demand the 0'th element - the upper elements are undefined and shouldn't be trusted.
This is causing a number of regressions that need addressing but we need to get the bugfix in first.
Summary:
This patch adds intrinsics and ISelDAG nodes for signed
and unsigned fixed-point division:
```
llvm.sdiv.fix.sat.*
llvm.udiv.fix.sat.*
```
These intrinsics perform scaled, saturating division
on two integers or vectors of integers. They are
required for the implementation of the Embedded-C
fixed-point arithmetic in Clang.
Reviewers: bjope, leonardchan, craig.topper
Subscribers: hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71550
Use the SelectionDAG::getValidShiftAmountConstant helper to get const/constsplat shift amounts, which allows us to drop the out of range shift amount early-out.
First step towards better non-uniform shift amount support in SimplifyDemandedBits.
Summary:
This was a very odd API, where you had to pass a flag into a zext
function to say whether the extended bits really were zero or not. All
callers passed in a literal true or false.
I think it's much clearer to make the function name reflect the
operation being performed on the value we're tracking (rather than on
the KnownBits Zero and One fields), so zext means the value is being
zero extended and new function anyext means the value is being extended
with unknown bits.
NFC.
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74482
The isNegatibleForFree/getNegatedExpression methods currently rely on a raw char value to indicate whether a negation is beneficial or not.
This patch replaces the char return value with an NegatibleCost enum to more clearly demonstrate what is implied.
It also renames isNegatibleForFree to getNegatibleCost to more accurately reflect whats going on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74221
Summary: This patch introduces an API for MemOp in order to simplify and tighten the client code.
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jsji, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73964
We have to be careful in SimplifyDemandedBits with loads in case we attempt to combine back to a constant (which then gets turned into a constant pool load again), but we can at least set the upper KnownBits for a ZEXTLoad to zero.
This allows SimplifyDemandedBits to call SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits to create a simpler ISD::INSERT_SUBVECTOR, which is particularly useful for cases where we're splitting into subvectors anyhow.
Summary: This is a first step before changing the types to llvm::Align and introduce functions to ease client code.
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73785
This allows SimplifyDemandedBits to call SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits to create a simpler ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, which is particularly useful for cases where we're splitting into subvectors anyhow.
Differential Revision: This allows SimplifyDemandedBits to call SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits to create a simpler ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, which is particularly useful for cases where we're splitting into subvectors anyhow.
This was moved in October 2018, but we don't appear to be using
this for vectors on any in tree target.
Moving it back simplifies D72794 so we can share the code for i32->f32.
Summary:
This always just used the same libcall as unordered, but the comparison predicate was different. This change appears to have been made when targets were given the ability to override the predicates. Before that they were hardcoded into the type legalizer. At that time we never inverted predicates and we handled ugt/ult/uge/ule compares by emitting an unordered check ORed with a ogt/olt/oge/ole checks. So only ordered needed an inverted predicate. Later ugt/ult/uge/ule were optimized to only call a single libcall and invert the compare.
This patch removes the ordered entries and just uses the inverting logic that is now present. This removes some odd things in both the Mips and WebAssembly code.
Reviewers: efriedma, ABataev, uweigand, cameron.mcinally, kpn
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: dschuff, sdardis, sbc100, arichardson, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, sunfish, atanasyan, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72536
ONE is currently softened to OGT | OLT. But the libcalls for OGT and OLT libcalls will trigger an exception for QNAN. At least for X86 with libgcc. UEQ on the other hand uses UO | OEQ. The UO and OEQ libcalls will not trigger an exception for QNAN.
This patch changes ONE to use the inverse of the UEQ lowering. So we now produce O & UNE. Technically the existing behavior was correct for a signalling ONE, but since I don't know how to generate one of those from clang that seemed like something we can deal with later as we would need to fix other predicates as well. Also removing spurious exceptions seemed better than missing an exception.
There are also problems with quiet OGT/OLT/OLE/OGE, but those are harder to fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72477
If we're doing a compare that only tests the sign bit and only the sign bit is demanded, we can just bypass the node. This removes one of the blend dependencies in our v2i64->v2f32 uint_to_fp codegen on pre-sse4.2 targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72356
Summary:
This patch adds intrinsics and ISelDAG nodes for
signed and unsigned fixed-point division:
llvm.sdiv.fix.*
llvm.udiv.fix.*
These intrinsics perform scaled division on two
integers or vectors of integers. They are required
for the implementation of the Embedded-C fixed-point
arithmetic in Clang.
Patch by: ebevhan
Reviewers: bjope, leonardchan, efriedma, craig.topper
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: Ka-Ka, ilya, hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70007
This isn't a functonal change since we also check the bit width is the
same and the input type is integer. This guarantees the input and
output type are the same. But passing the input type makes the code
more readable.
Previously, for vectors we created a vselect with a condition that
didn't match what the target wanted according to getSetCCResultType.
To make up for this, X86 had a special DAG combine to detect if
the condition was all sign bits and then insert its own truncate
or extend. By adding the extend/truncate here explicitly we can
avoid that.
This patch attempts to peek through vectors based on the demanded bits/elt of a particular ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT node, allowing us to avoid dependencies on ops that have no impact on the extract.
In particular this helps remove some unnecessary scalar->vector->scalar patterns.
The wasm shift patterns are annoying - @tlively has indicated that the wasm vector shift codegen are to be refactored in the near-term and isn't considered a major issue.
Reapplied after reversion at rL368660 due to PR42982 which was fixed at rGca7fdd41bda0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65887
When the "disable-tail-calls" attribute was added, checks were added for
it in various backends. Now this code has proliferated, and it is
something the target is responsible for checking. Move that
responsibility back to the ISels (fast, global, and SD).
There's no major functionality change, except for targets that never
implemented this check.
This LLVM attribute was originally added in
d9699bc7bdf0362173fcd256690f61a4d47429c2 (2015).
Reviewers: echristo, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72118
The NoFPExcept bit in SDNodeFlags currently defaults to true, unlike all
other such flags. This is a problem, because it implies that all code that
transforms SDNodes without copying flags can introduce a correctness bug,
not just a missed optimization.
This patch changes the default to false. This makes it necessary to move
setting the (No)FPExcept flag for constrained intrinsics from the
visitConstrainedIntrinsic routine to the generic visit routine at the
place where the other flags are set, or else the intersectFlagsWith
call would erase the NoFPExcept flag again.
In order to avoid making non-strict FP code worse, whenever
SelectionDAGISel::SelectCodeCommon matches on a set of orignal nodes
none of which can raise FP exceptions, it will preserve this property
on all results nodes generated, by setting the NoFPExcept flag on
those result nodes that would otherwise be considered as raising
an FP exception.
To check whether or not an SD node should be considered as raising
an FP exception, the following logic applies:
- For machine nodes, check the mayRaiseFPException property of
the underlying MI instruction
- For regular nodes, check isStrictFPOpcode
- For target nodes, check a newly introduced isTargetStrictFPOpcode
The latter is implemented by reserving a range of target opcodes,
similarly to how memory opcodes are identified. (Note that there a
bit of a quirk in identifying target nodes that are both memory nodes
and strict FP nodes. To simplify the logic, right now all target memory
nodes are automatically also considered strict FP nodes -- this could
be fixed by adding one more range.)
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71841
This allows us to clean up some places that were peeking through
the MERGE_VALUES node after the call. By returning the SDValues
directly, we can clean that up.
Unfortunately, there are several call sites in AMDGPU that wanted
the MERGE_VALUES and now need to create their own.
This allows us to delete InlineAsm::Constraint_i workarounds in
SelectionDAGISel::SelectInlineAsmMemoryOperand overrides and
TargetLowering::getInlineAsmMemConstraint overrides.
They were introduced to X86 in r237517 to prevent crashes for
constraints like "=*imr". They were later copied to other targets.
Fix several several additional problems with the int <-> FP conversion
logic both in common code and in the X86 target. In particular:
- The STRICT_FP_TO_UINT expansion emits a floating-point compare. This
compare can raise exceptions and therefore needs to be a strict compare.
I've made it signaling (even though quiet would also be correct) as
signaling is the more usual default for an LT. This code exists both
in common code and in the X86 target.
- The STRICT_UINT_TO_FP expansion algorithm was incorrect for strict mode:
it emitted two STRICT_SINT_TO_FP nodes and then used a select to choose one
of the results. This can cause spurious exceptions by the STRICT_SINT_TO_FP
that ends up not chosen. I've fixed the algorithm to use only a single
STRICT_SINT_TO_FP instead.
- The !isStrictFPEnabled logic in DoInstructionSelection would sometimes do
the wrong thing because it calls getOperationAction using the result VT.
But for some opcodes, incuding [SU]INT_TO_FP, getOperationAction needs to
be called using the operand VT.
- Remove some (obsolete) code in X86DAGToDAGISel::Select that would mutate
STRICT_FP_TO_[SU]INT to non-strict versions unnecessarily.
Reviewed by: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71840
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets to show the problem more
generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some value is free to negate,
but that use count can change as we rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression().
So something that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation phase becomes
not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or the inverse - something that was not
free becomes free). This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that everything
in an expression that is negatible to be handled in the corresponding code within
getNegatedExpression().
This patch adds a hack to work-around the case where we probably no longer detect
that either multiply operand of an FMA isNegatibleForFree which is assumed to be
true when we started rewriting the expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets to show the problem more
generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some value is free to negate,
but that use count can change as we rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression().
So something that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation phase becomes
not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or the inverse - something that was not
free becomes free). This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that everything
in an expression that is negatible to be handled in the corresponding code within
getNegatedExpression().
This patch adds a hack to work-around the case where we probably no longer detect
that either multiply operand of an FMA isNegatibleForFree which is assumed to be
true when we started rewriting the expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
of integers to floating point.
This includes some of Craig Topper's changes for promotion support from
D71130.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69275
