Summary: They fail similarly to some of the other breakpoint tests on Windows, so I suspect the cause is the same. I've linked to the same bug.
Reviewers: asmith, zturner, jingham
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53331
llvm-svn: 344744
This reverts commit r344647.
This causes build failures with [-Werror, -Wswitch]. Some cases where the newly
introduced enum value is not handled in particular are in:
lldb/source/Expression/REPL.cpp:350
lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:1529
(maybe there could be more)
As I don't understand lldb to make sure the likely trivial fixes are
correct and also as they might need additional tests, leaving to the
author to resolve.
llvm-svn: 344722
Before we returned an error that was not exposed in the SB API and no useful
error message. This change returns eExpressionProducedNoResult and an
appropriate error string.
<rdar://problem/44539514>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53309
llvm-svn: 344647
tests when targetting a device. Add an include to
safe-to-call-func to work around a modules issue with
a certain combination of header files. Add rules for
Darwin systems to ad-hoc codesign binaries that the
testsuite builds.
llvm-svn: 344635
The TestTailCallFrameSBAPI.py test checks that function names in a
backtrace are equal to an expected value.
Use a relaxed substring check because function dislpay names are
platform-dependent. E.g we see "void sink(void)" on Windows, but "sink()" on
Darwin. This seems like a bug -- just work around it for now.
llvm-svn: 344634
Summary: On non-mac platforms, mac_ver returns an empty string which when converted to LooseVersion has no "version" property. This causes a failure when the decorator executes. Instead, check whether the value returned from mac_ver is an empty string and avoid the LooseVersion comparison.
Reviewers: labath, davide, asmith, shafik, jingham
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: jingham, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53208
llvm-svn: 344623
Some tests in test/functionalities/tail_call_frames are failing on
non-Darwin platforms. Use assertEqual to improve logging on failure.
llvm-svn: 344581
Summary:
If the names are not unique, the tests overwrite each other's results and logs. This also causes failures on platforms where the files are locked for writing.
The names of the class/test pairs *have to* always be unique. The easiest way to achieve that is to name each class differently (usually the same as the file name).
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, asmith
Subscribers: clayborg, nemanjai, kbarton, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53297
llvm-svn: 344547
Summary: This test is failing on Windows because lldb does not support JIT on Windows.
Reviewers: davide, asmith
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53226
llvm-svn: 344543
If the path was not specified (and it's None), lexists throws an exception rather than returning False. get_filecheck_path now checks whether filecheck is set before calling lexists
llvm-svn: 344410
This allows bots which haven't updated to pass in --filecheck to
dotest.py to run more tests. FileCheck-dependent tests will continue to
fail.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53175
llvm-svn: 344401
Summary: This is another string/byte conversion issue between Python 2 and 3. In Python 2, the subprocess communication expects a byte string, but in Python 3, it expects bytes. Since both versions are capable of using strings when universal_newlines is set to True AND filecheck operates on strings, force the use of strings.
Reviewers: zturner, asmith, vsk
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53166
llvm-svn: 344386
This patch teaches lldb to detect when there are missing frames in a
backtrace due to a sequence of tail calls, and to fill in the backtrace
with artificial tail call frames when this happens. This is only done
when the execution history can be determined from the call graph and
from the return PC addresses of calls on the stack. Ambiguous sequences
of tail calls (e.g anything involving tail calls and recursion) are
detected and ignored.
Depends on D49887.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50478
llvm-svn: 343900
Before inspecting the contents of a list, make sure that we've stepped
past the push_back() that inserts the element we're interested in.
llvm-svn: 343899
Summary:
When LLDB successfully parses a command (like "expression" in this case) and determines incomplete input, the user can continue typing on multiple lines (in this case "2+3"). This should provide the correct result.
Note that LLDB reverts input from the additional lines, so they are not present in the output.
Reviewers: vsk, davide, aprantl
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52270
llvm-svn: 343860
With buildbot slave under test - I get after rL339929:
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/builders/lldb-x86_64-fedora-28-cmake/builds/243/steps/test1/logs/stdio
File "/home/buildbot/lldbroot/lldb-x86_64-fedora-28-cmake/scripts/../llvm/tools/lldb/test/dotest.py", line 7, in <module>
lldbsuite.test.run_suite()
File "/quad/home/buildbot/lldbroot/lldb-x86_64-fedora-28-cmake/llvm/tools/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/dotest.py", line 1177, in run_suite
configuration.results_formatter_object)
File "/quad/home/buildbot/lldbroot/lldb-x86_64-fedora-28-cmake/llvm/tools/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/dosep.py", line 1692, in main
dst = core.replace(test_directory, "")[1:]
NameError: global name 'test_directory' is not defined
Patch by Vedant Kumar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51874
llvm-svn: 343726
This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D46362.
When evaluating a complex expression in DWARFExpression::Evaluate,
file addresses must be resolved to load addresses before we can
perform operations such as DW_OP_deref on them.
For this the address goes through three steps
1. Read the file address as stored in the DWARF
2. Link/relocate the file address (when reading from a .dSYM, this is a no-op)
3. Convert the file address to a load address.
D46362 implemented step (3) by resolving the file address using the
Module that the original DWARF came from. In the case of a dSYM that
is correct, but when reading from .o files, we need to look up
relocated/linked addresses, so the right place to look them up is the
current frame's module. This patch fixes that by setting the
expression's Module to point to the linked debugmap object.
A word a bout the unorthodox testcase: The motivating testcase for
this fix is in Swift, but I managed to hand-modify LLVM-IR for a
trivial C program to exhibit the same problem, so we can fix this in
llvm.org.
rdar://problem/44689915
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52678
llvm-svn: 343612
max number of stack frames to backtrace, make it a setting,
target.process.thread.max-backtrace-depth.
Add a test case for the setting.
<rdar://problem/28759559>
llvm-svn: 343029
Set the "mydir" attribute of an inline test on the test-specific class,
instead of on the base InlineTest class.
This makes it possible to run dotest.py on a directory containing inline
tests. This wasn't really possible prior to this patch, because what
would happen is that one test would just run over and over again, even
though the test infrastructure would claim that different tests were
being run.
Example:
The test infrastructure claimed that all of these different tests were passing,
which couldn't be true --
$ ./bin/lldb-dotest /Users/vsk/src/tailcall/lldb/test/testcases/functionalities/tail_call_frames/ -G dwarf -t 2>&1 | grep PASS
PASS: LLDB (/Users/vsk/src/builds/tailcall-RA/bin/clang-8-x86_64) :: test_dwarf (lldbsuite.test.lldbtest.TestDisambiguateTailCallSeq)
PASS: LLDB (/Users/vsk/src/builds/tailcall-RA/bin/clang-8-x86_64) :: test_dwarf (lldbsuite.test.lldbtest.TestArtificialFrameStepOutMessage)
PASS: LLDB (/Users/vsk/src/builds/tailcall-RA/bin/clang-8-x86_64) :: test_dwarf (lldbsuite.test.lldbtest.TestAmbiguousTailCallSeq1)
PASS: LLDB (/Users/vsk/src/builds/tailcall-RA/bin/clang-8-x86_64) :: test_dwarf (lldbsuite.test.lldbtest.TestDisambiguatePathsToCommonSink)
PASS: LLDB (/Users/vsk/src/builds/tailcall-RA/bin/clang-8-x86_64) :: test_dwarf (lldbsuite.test.lldbtest.TestDisambiguateCallSite)
PASS: LLDB (/Users/vsk/src/builds/tailcall-RA/bin/clang-8-x86_64) :: test_dwarf (lldbsuite.test.lldbtest.TestUnambiguousTailCalls)
PASS: LLDB (/Users/vsk/src/builds/tailcall-RA/bin/clang-8-x86_64) :: test_dwarf (lldbsuite.test.lldbtest.TestAmbiguousTailCallSeq2)
RESULT: PASSED (7 passes, 0 failures, 0 errors, 24 skipped, 0 expected failures, 0 unexpected successes)
... because it wasn't even looking at some of these tests:
$ ./bin/lldb-dotest /Users/vsk/src/tailcall/lldb/test/testcases/functionalities/tail_call_frames/ -G dwarf -t 2>&1 | grep "Change dir"
Change dir to: /Users/vsk/src/tailcall/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/tail_call_frames/ambiguous_tail_call_seq2
Change dir to: /Users/vsk/src/tailcall/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/tail_call_frames/ambiguous_tail_call_seq2
Change dir to: /Users/vsk/src/tailcall/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/tail_call_frames/ambiguous_tail_call_seq2
Change dir to: /Users/vsk/src/tailcall/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/tail_call_frames/sbapi_support
Change dir to: /Users/vsk/src/tailcall/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/tail_call_frames/ambiguous_tail_call_seq2
Change dir to: /Users/vsk/src/tailcall/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/tail_call_frames/thread_step_out_or_return
Change dir to: /Users/vsk/src/tailcall/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/tail_call_frames/ambiguous_tail_call_seq2
Change dir to: /Users/vsk/src/tailcall/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/tail_call_frames/ambiguous_tail_call_seq2
Change dir to: /Users/vsk/src/tailcall/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/tail_call_frames/ambiguous_tail_call_seq2
E.g it was only building one of them:
$ ls lldb-test-build.noindex/functionalities/tail_call_frames/
ambiguous_tail_call_seq2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52516
llvm-svn: 343023
On linux, we do not support automatic loading of dependent modules, so
the module list will always contain just one module (until the target is
launched).
llvm-svn: 343016
The 'test_filename' property in TestBase changes over time, so
attempting to find a check file relative to the directory containing
'test_filename' is flaky.
Use the absolute path of the check file as that's always correct (and
simpler). This relies on the test driver changing into the test
directory, which it seems we can safely assume.
As a drive-by, make self.filecheck respect the trace (-t) option.
llvm-svn: 342699
When creating a target, lldb loads all dependent files (i.e. libs in
LC_LOAD_DYLIB for Mach-O). This can be confusing, especially when two
versions of the same library end up in the shared cache. It's possible
to change this behavior, by specifying target create -d <target> these
dependents are not loaded.
This patch changes the default behavior to only load dependent files
only when the target is an executable. When creating a target for a
library, it is now no longer necessary to pass -d. The user can still
override this behavior by specifying the -d option to change this
behavior.
rdar://problem/43721382
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51934
llvm-svn: 342634
Add a "filecheck" method to the LLDB test base. This allows test authors
to pattern match command output using FileCheck, making it possible to
write stricter tests than what `self.expect` allows.
For context (motivation, examples of stricter checking, etc), see the
lldb-dev thread: "Using FileCheck in lldb inline tests".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50751
llvm-svn: 342508
Summary:
Completing inside the expression command now uses the new description API
to also provide additional information to the user. For now this information
are the types of variables/fields and the signatures of completed function calls.
Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52103
llvm-svn: 342385
They're not that common, and falling back is definitely
better than throwing an error instead of the result. If we
feel motivated, we might end up implementing support for these,
but it's unclear whether it's worth the effort/complexity.
Fixes PR38925.
<rdar://problem/44436068>
llvm-svn: 342262
I started from a clean slate to do the checkin, but forgot to svn add the new files.
Do that now.
Also add the one new source file to CMakeLists.txt
llvm-svn: 342190
This change allows you to write a new breakpoint type where the
logic for setting breakpoints is determined by a Python callback
written using the SB API's.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51830
llvm-svn: 342185
Summary:
This patch adds a framework for adding descriptions to the command completions we provide.
It also adds descriptions for completed top-level commands so that we can test this code.
Completions are in general supposed to be displayed alongside the completion itself. The descriptions
can be used to provide additional information about the completion to the user. Examples for descriptions
are function signatures when completing function calls in the expression command or the binary name
when providing completion for a symbol.
There is still some boilerplate code from the old completion API left in LLDB (mostly because the respective
APIs are reused for non-completion related purposes, so the CompletionRequest doesn't make sense to be
used), so that's why I still had to change some function signatures. Also, as the old API only passes around a
list of matches, and the descriptions are for these functions just another list, I had to add some code that
essentially just ensures that both lists are always the same side (e.g. all the manual calls to
`descriptions->AddString(X)` below a `matches->AddString(Y)` call).
The initial command descriptions that come with this patch are just reusing the existing
short help that is already added in LLDB.
An example completion with descriptions looks like this:
```
(lldb) pl
Available completions:
platform -- Commands to manage and create platforms.
plugin -- Commands for managing LLDB plugins.
```
Reviewers: #lldb, jingham
Reviewed By: #lldb, jingham
Subscribers: jingham, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51175
llvm-svn: 342181
This patch improves the support of DWARF5.
Particularly the reporting of source code locations.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51935
llvm-svn: 342153
After landing r341457, we started seeing a failure on the swift-lldb
bots. The change was correct and pretty straightforward, a DW_OP_constu
was replaced with DW_OP_lit23, the value remaining identical.
0x000000f4: DW_TAG_variable
DW_AT_location (0x00000000
[0x0000000100000a51, 0x0000000100000d47): DW_OP_lit23, DW_OP_stack_value)
DW_AT_name ("number")
However, this broke LLDB.
(Int) number = <extracting data from value failed>
The value was read correctly, but apparently the value's type was different.
When reading a constu it was reading a uint64 (m_type = e_ulonglong) while for
the literal, it got a signed int (m_type = e_sint). This change makes sure we
read the value as an unsigned.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51730
llvm-svn: 342142
Summary:
The 'memory region' command is at the moment not tested at all by our test suite.
This patch just adds a basic test that at least provides some basic testing.
Reviewers: #lldb, davide
Reviewed By: #lldb, davide
Subscribers: vsk, davide, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51930
llvm-svn: 342042
Summary: An address breakpoint of the form "b 0x1000" won't resolve if it's created while the process isn't running. This patch deletes Address::SectionWasDeleted, renames Address::SectionWasDeletedPrivate to SectionWasDeleted (and makes it public), and changes the section check in Breakpoint::ModulesChanged back to its original form
Reviewers: jingham, #lldb
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: davide, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51816
llvm-svn: 341849
This patch allows LLDB to print column info in backtraces et al. if
available, which is useful when the backtrace contains a frame like
the following:
f(can_crash(0), can_crash(1));
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51661
llvm-svn: 341506
