I believe the bot failures on linux systems were due to overestimating the
alignment of object-files within archives, which are only guaranteed to be
two-byte aligned. I have reduced the alignment in
RuntimeDyldELF::createObjectImageFromFile accordingly.
llvm-svn: 198737
subsequent changes are easier to review. About to fix some layering
issues, and wanted to separate out the necessary churn.
Also comment and sink the include of "Windows.h" in three .inc files to
match the usage in Memory.inc.
llvm-svn: 198685
Before this patch any program that wanted to know the final symbol name of a
GlobalValue had to link with Target.
This patch implements a compromise solution where the mangler uses DataLayout.
This way, any tool that already links with Target (llc, clang) gets the exact
behavior as before and new IR files can be mangled without linking with Target.
With this patch the mangler is constructed with just a DataLayout and DataLayout
is extended to include the information the Mangler needs.
llvm-svn: 198438
getSymbolWithGlobalValueBase use is to create a name of a new symbol based
on the name of an existing GV. Assert that and then remove the last call
to pass true to isImplicitlyPrivate.
This gives the mangler API a 1:1 mapping from GV to names, which is what we
need to drop the mangler dependency on the target (and use an extended
datalayout instead).
llvm-svn: 196472
Instead of processing relocation for branch to stubs right away, emit a
modified relocation and add it to queue to be resolved later when final load
address is known.
This resolves seven MIPS MCJIT issues that were caused by missing relocation
fixups at the end.
llvm-svn: 195157
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file. The memory leaks in this version have been fixed. Thanks
Alexey for pointing them out.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 195064
This change is incorrect. If you delete virtual destructor of both a base class
and a subclass, then the following code:
Base *foo = new Child();
delete foo;
will not cause the destructor for members of Child class. As a result, I observe
plently of memory leaks. Notable examples I investigated are:
ObjectBuffer and ObjectBufferStream, AttributeImpl and StringSAttributeImpl.
llvm-svn: 194997
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 194865
Without this, customers of the MCJIT were leaking memory like crazy.
It's not really clear what the *right* memory management is here, so I'm
not trying to add lots of tests or other logic, just trying to get us
back to a better baseline. I'll follow up on the original commit to
figure out the right path forward.
llvm-svn: 193323
Some background: One can pass compiled resource files (.res files) directly
to the linker on Windows. If a resource file is given, the linker will run
"cvtres" command in background to convert the resource file to a COFF file
to link it.
What I'm trying to do with this patch is to make the linker to recognize
the resource file by file magic, so that it can run cvtres command.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1943
llvm-svn: 192742
Support for exception handling in the legacy JIT was removed in r181354 and
this code was dead since then.
Thanks to Yaron Keren for noticing it.
llvm-svn: 192101
It's useful for the memory managers that are allocating a section to know what the name of the section is.
At a minimum, this is useful for low-level debugging - it's customary for JITs to be able to tell you what
memory they allocated, and as part of any such dump, they should be able to tell you some meta-data about
what each allocation is for. This allows clients that supply their own memory managers to do this.
Additionally, we also envision the SectionName being useful for passing meta-data from within LLVM to an LLVM
client.
This changes both the C and C++ APIs, and all of the clients of those APIs within LLVM. I'm assuming that
it's safe to change the C++ API because that API is allowed to change. I'm assuming that it's safe to change
the C API because we haven't shipped the API in a release yet (LLVM 3.3 doesn't include the MCJIT memory
management C API).
llvm-svn: 191804
Tests to follow.
PIC with small code model and EH frame handling will not work with multiple modules. There are also some rough edges to be smoothed out for remote target support.
llvm-svn: 191722
