We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.
This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
The diagnostic system for Clang can already handle many AST nodes. Instead
of converting them to strings first, just hand the AST node directly to
the diagnostic system and let it handle the output. Minor changes in some
diagnostic output.
llvm-svn: 328688
This was removed with -Wunique-enum, which is still removed. The
corresponding thread on cfe-comments for that warning is here:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2012-September/024224.html
If we get specific user feedback for -Wduplicate-enum we can evaluate
whether or not to keep it.
llvm-svn: 170974
is no compelling argument that this is a generally useful warning,
and imposes a strong stylistic argument on code beyond what it was
intended to find warnings in.
llvm-svn: 164083
initiated enum constant has the same value as another enum constant.
For instance:
enum test { A, B, C = -1, D, E = 1 };
Clang will warn that:
A and D both have value 0
B and E both have value 1
A few exceptions are made to keep the noise down. Enum constants which are
initialized to another enum constant, or an enum constant plus or minus 1 will
not trigger this warning. Also, anonymous enums are not checked.
llvm-svn: 162938
