Summary:
We were trying to get a DWARFDIE from a CompileUnit belonging to a DWO file. However, this
function does not understand the die encoding used by the DWO files. Instead use GetDIE on the
SymbolFileDWARF, which is overriden in DWO to do the right thing.
Reviewers: clayborg, tberghammer
Subscribers: lldb-commits, ovyalov
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19927
llvm-svn: 268615
1. Fixed semicolon placement in the lambda in the test itself.
2. Fixed lldbinline tests in general so that we don't attempt tests on platforms that don't use the given type of debug info. (For example, no DWO tests on Windows.) This fixes one of the two failures on Windows. (TestLambdas.py was the only inline test that wasn't XFailed or skipped on Windows.)
3. Set the error string in IRInterpreter::CanInterpret so that the caller doesn't print (null) instead of an explanation. I don't entirely understand the error, so feel free to suggest a better wording.
4. XFailed the test on Windows. The interpreter won't evaluate the lambda because the module has multiple function bodies. I don't exactly understand why that's a problem for the interpreter nor why the problem arises only on Windows.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19606
llvm-svn: 268573
Summary:
As these are really testing separate issues, they should be run as separate
tests.
Reviewers: zturner, granata.enrico, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19690
llvm-svn: 268397
Also added a data formatter that presents them as structs if you use frame
variable to look at their contents. Now the blocks testcase works.
<rdar://problem/15984431>
llvm-svn: 268307
In templated const functions, trying to run an expression would produce the
error
error: out-of-line definition of '$__lldb_expr' does not match any declaration
in 'foo' member declaration does not match because it is const qualified
error: 1 error parsing expression
which is no good. It turned out we don't actually need to worry about "const,"
we just need to be consistent about the declaration of the expression and the
FunctionDecl we inject into the class for "this."
Also added a test case.
<rdar://problem/24985958>
llvm-svn: 268083
This reverts commit r267833 as it breaks the build. It looks like some work in progress got
committed together with the actual fix, but I'm not sure which one is which, so I'll revert the
whole patch and let author resumbit it after fixing the build error.
llvm-svn: 267861
In templated const functions, trying to run an expression would produce the
error
error: out-of-line definition of '$__lldb_expr' does not match any declaration in 'foo'
member declaration does not match because it is const qualified
error: 1 error parsing expression
which is no good. It turned out we don't actually need to worry about "const,"
we just need to be consistent about the declaration of the expression and the
FunctionDecl we inject into the class for "this."
Also added a test case.
<rdar://problem/24985958>
llvm-svn: 267833
There's an open bug with calling functions in the inferior. And Windows doesn't have the POSIX function getpid().
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19626
llvm-svn: 267800
Use __attribute__((regparm(x))) to ensure the compiler enregisters at least some arguments when calling functions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19548
llvm-svn: 267616
Python 3.5 is pickier about the distinction between chars and bytes (and strings and bytearrays) than Python 2.7.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19510
llvm-svn: 267562
Summary:
lldb-server tests are currently being skipped on the
check-lldb target. This is because we get the path of
lldb-server by modifying the path to the lldb executable.
However, by this point, we've changed directories, and a
relative path to the build/bin directory will no longer point
to the location of lldb-server.
Storing an absolute path solves this issue.
Reviewers: vharron, zturner, tfiala, labath
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits, sas
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19082
llvm-svn: 267463
Summary:
"gcc" is equivalent to "ehframe" in ProcessGDBRemote, but
only "ehframe" was a valid response in the test suite.
Reviewers: tfiala, jasonmolenda, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, sas
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18807
llvm-svn: 267459
Test added in r267248 exposed a bug in handling of dwarf produced by clang>=3.9, which causes a
crash during expression evaluation. Skip the test until this is sorted out.
llvm-svn: 267407
This option evaluates an expression and, if the result is of pointer type, treats it as if it was an array of that many elements and displays such elements
This has a couple subtle points but is mostly as straightforward as it sounds
Add a parray N <expr> alias for this new mode
Also, extend the --object-description mode to do the moral equivalent of the above but display each element in --object-description mode
Add a poarray N <expr> alias for this
llvm-svn: 267372
Some older versions of clang emitted bit offsets that were negative and these bitfields would have their bitfield-ness stripped off and it would cause a clang assertion in clang assertions were enabled. I updated the bitfield C test to make sure we don't regress.
<rdar://problem/21082998>
llvm-svn: 267248
This change moves all the test event handling and its related
ResultsFormatter classes out of the packages/Python/lldbsuite/test dir
into a packages/Python/lldbsuite/test_event package. Formatters are
moved into a sub-package under that.
I am limiting the scope of this change to just the motion and a few
minor issues caught by a static Python checker (e.g. removing unused
import statements).
This is a pre-step for adding package-level tests to the test event
system. I also intend to simplify test event results formatter selection
after I make sure this doesn't break anybody.
See:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19288
Reviewed by:
Pavel Labath
llvm-svn: 266885
Also does the following:
* adopts PEP8 naming convention for OptionalWith class (now
optional_with).
* moves test_runner/lldb_utils.py to lldbsuite/support/optional_with.py.
* packages tests in a subpackage of test_runner per recommendations in
http://the-hitchhikers-guide-to-packaging.readthedocs.org/en/latest/creation.html
Tests can be run from within pacakges/Python/lldbsuite/test via this
command:
python -m unittest discover test_runner
The primary cleanup this allows is avoiding the need to muck with the
PYTHONPATH variable from within the source files. This also aids some
of the static code checkers as they don't need to run code to determine
the proper python path.
llvm-svn: 266710
This ensure lldbinline.test_file paths are tracked as .py
files rather than .pyc files.
Also, this change adds an assert to the test infrastructure
if a filename that is not ending in .py is attempted to be
added to the test events infrastructure where we track test
results.
See:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19215
Earlier revision reviewed by:
Pavel Labath
llvm-svn: 266664
The race boiled down to this:
If a test worker queue is able to run the test inferior and
clean up before the dosep.py listener socket is spun up, and
the worker queue is the last one (as would be the case when
there's only one test rerunning in the rerun queue), then
the test suite will exit the main loop before having a chance
to process any test events coming from the test inferior or
the worker queue job control.
I found this race to be far more likely on fast hardware.
Our Linux CI is one such example. While it will show
up primarily during meta test events generated by
a worker thread when a test inferior times out or
exits with an exceptional exit (e.g. seg fault), it only
requires that the OS takes longer to hook up the
listener socket than it takes for the final test inferior
and worker thread to shut down.
See:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19214
reviewed by:
Pavel Labath
llvm-svn: 266624
Summary:
The original breakpoint location test was failing for linux, because the compilers here tend to
merge the full-object and subobject destructors even at -O0 (as a result, we are getting only 2
breakpoint locations, and not 4 as the test expected. The fixup in r266164 substantially weakened
the test, as it now did not check whether both kinds of destructors were being found.
Because of these contraints, I have altered the logic of the test. It sets the
breakpoint by name, and then independently verifies that the breakpoint is set on the correct
demangled symbol name (which is not very meaningful since both kinds of destructors demangle to
the same name) *and* the correct symbol address (which is obtained by looking up the mangled
symbol name).
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: ovyalov, zturner, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19052
llvm-svn: 266416
