Currently isReallyTriviallyReMaterializableGeneric() implementation
prevents rematerialization on any virtual register use on the grounds
that is not a trivial rematerialization and that we do not want to
extend liveranges.
It appears that LRE logic does not attempt to extend a liverange of
a source register for rematerialization so that is not an issue.
That is checked in the LiveRangeEdit::allUsesAvailableAt().
The only non-trivial aspect of it is accounting for tied-defs which
normally represent a read-modify-write operation and not rematerializable.
The test for a tied-def situation already exists in the
/CodeGen/AMDGPU/remat-vop.mir,
test_no_remat_v_cvt_f32_i32_sdwa_dst_unused_preserve.
The change has affected ARM/Thumb, Mips, RISCV, and x86. For the targets
where I more or less understand the asm it seems to reduce spilling
(as expected) or be neutral. However, it needs a review by all targets'
specialists.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106408
Prefer (self-documenting) return values to output parameters (which are
liable to be used).
While here, rename Noop to Nop which is more widely used and improves
consistency with hasEmitNops/setEmitNops/emitNop/etc.
add a new goal MustReduceRegisterPressure for machine combiner pass.
PowerPC will use this new goal to do some register pressure related optimization.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92068
If a target can encode multiple wait-states into a noop allow emitting such
instructions directly.
Reviewed By: rampitec, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89753
Original D81646 had check for tied regs in foldPatchpoint().
Due to unfortunate miscommunication with review comments and
adressing some comments post commit, it turned into assertion.
We had an offline talk and agreed that with current implementation
this path is possible, so I'm changing it back to check.
Note that this is workaround until ussues described in PR46917 are
resolved.
(Forgot to land this a couple of weeks back.)
In a recent series of changes, I've introduced support for using the respective operand bundle kinds on the statepoint. At the moment, code supports either/or, but there's no need to keep the old support around. For the moment, I am simply changing the specification and verifier to require zero length argument sets in the intrinsic.
The intrinsic itself is experimental. Given that, there's no forward serialization needed. The in tree uses and generation have already been updated to use the new operand bundle based forms, the only folks broken by the change will be those with frontends generating statepoints directly and the updates should be easy.
Why not go ahead and just remove the arguments entirely? Well, I plan to. But while working on this I've found that almost all of the arguments to the statepoint can be expressed via operand bundles or attributes. Given that, I'm planning a radical simplification of the arguments and figured I'd do one update not several small ones.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80892
Implement proper folding of statepoint meta operands (deopt and GC)
when statepoint uses tied registers.
For deopt operands it is just about properly preserving tiedness
in new instruction.
For tied GC operands folding is a little bit more tricky.
We can fold tied GC operands only from InlineSpiller, because it knows
how to properly reload tied def after it was turned into memory operand.
Other users (e.g. peephole) cannot properly fold such operands as they
do not know how (or when) to reload them from memory.
We do this by un-tieing operand we want to fold in InlineSpiller
and allowing to fold only untied operands in foldPatchpoint.
Before this instruction supported output values, it fit fairly
naturally as a terminator. However, being a terminator while also
supporting outputs causes some trouble, as the physreg->vreg COPY
operations cannot be in the same block.
Modeling it as a non-terminator allows it to be handled the same way
as invoke is handled already.
Most of the changes here were created by auditing all the existing
users of MachineBasicBlock::isEHPad() and
MachineBasicBlock::hasEHPadSuccessor(), and adding calls to
isInlineAsmBrIndirectTarget or mayHaveInlineAsmBr, as appropriate.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, void
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79794
The memory folding raplaced the old instruction without copying the symbols assigned. Which will resulted in built fail due to the lost symbols.
Reviewed by craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78471
Summary:
While clustering mem ops, AMDGPU target needs to consider number of clustered bytes
to decide on max number of mem ops that can be clustered. This patch adds support to pass
number of clustered bytes to target mem ops clustering logic.
Reviewers: foad, rampitec, arsenm, vpykhtin, javedabsar
Reviewed By: foad
Subscribers: MatzeB, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, javed.absar, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80545
Summary:
The INLINEASM MIR instructions use immediate operands to encode the values of some operands.
The MachineInstr pretty printer function already handles those operands and prints human readable annotations instead of the immediates. This patch adds similar annotations to the output of the MIRPrinter, however uses the new MIROperandComment feature.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, arsenm, efriedma
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: qcolombet, sdardis, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78088
As a narrow stopgap for the assertion failure described in PR45025, add
a describeLoadedValue override to ARMBaseInstrInfo and use it to detect
copies in which the forwarding reg is a super/sub reg of the copy
destination. For the moment this is unsupported.
Several follow ups are possible:
1) Handle VORRq. At the moment, we do not, because isCopyInstrImpl
returns early when !MI.isMoveReg().
2) In the case where forwarding reg is a super-reg of the copy
destination, we should be able to describe the forwarding reg as a
subreg within the copy destination. I'm not 100% sure about this, but
it looks like that's what's done in AArch64InstrInfo.
3) In the case where the forwarding reg is a sub-reg of the copy
destination, maybe we could describe the forwarding reg using the
copy destinaion and a DW_OP_LLVM_fragment (I guess this should be
possible after D75036).
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45025
rdar://59772698
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75273
The code changes here are hopefully straightforward:
1. Use MachineInstruction flags to decide if FP ops can be reassociated
(use both "reassoc" and "nsz" to be consistent with IR transforms;
we probably don't need "nsz", but that's a safer interpretation of
the FMF).
2. Check that both nodes allow reassociation to change instructions.
This is a stronger requirement than we've usually implemented in
IR/DAG, but this is needed to solve the motivating bug (see below),
and it seems unlikely to impede optimization at this late stage.
3. Intersect/propagate MachineIR flags to enable further reassociation
in MachineCombiner.
We managed to make MachineCombiner flexible enough that no changes are
needed to that pass itself. So this patch should only affect x86
(assuming no other targets have implemented the hooks using MachineIR
flags yet).
The motivating example in PR43609 is another case of fast-math transforms
interacting badly with special FP ops created during lowering:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43609
The special fadd ops used for converting int to FP assume that they will
not be altered, so those are created without FMF.
However, the MachineCombiner pass was being enabled for FP ops using the
global/function-level TargetOption for "UnsafeFPMath". We managed to run
instruction/node-level FMF all the way down to MachineIR sometime in the
last 1-2 years though, so we can do better now.
The test diffs require some explanation:
1. llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/fmf-flags.ll - no target option for unsafe math was
specified here, so MachineCombiner kicks in where it did not previously;
to make it behave consistently, we need to specify a CPU schedule model,
so use the default model, and there are no code diffs.
2. llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/machine-combiner.ll - replace the target option for
unsafe math with the equivalent IR-level flags, and there are no code diffs;
we can't remove the NaN/nsz options because those are still used to drive
x86 fmin/fmax codegen (special SDAG opcodes).
3. llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/pow.ll - similar to #1
4. llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/sqrt-fastmath.ll - similar to #1, but MachineCombiner
does some reassociation of the estimate sequence ops; presumably these are
perf wins based on latency/throughput (and we get some reduction of move
instructions too); I'm not sure how it affects numerical accuracy, but the
test reflects reality better now because we would expect MachineCombiner to
be enabled if the IR was generated via something like "-ffast-math" with clang.
5. llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/vec_int_to_fp.ll - this is the test added to model PR43609;
the fadds are not reassociated now, so we should get the expected results.
6. llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/vector-reduce-fadd-fast.ll - similar to #1
7. llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/vector-reduce-fmul-fast.ll - similar to #1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74851
This will address the issue: P8198 and P8199 (from D73534).
The methods was not handle bundles properly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74904
Summary:
Making `Scale` a `TypeSize` in AArch64InstrInfo::getMemOpInfo,
has the effect that all places where this information is used
(notably, TargetInstrInfo::getMemOperandWithOffset) will need
to consider Scale - and derived, Offset - possibly being scalable.
This patch adds a new operand `bool &OffsetIsScalable` to
TargetInstrInfo::getMemOperandWithOffset and fixes up all
the places where this function is used, to consider the
offset possibly being scalable.
In most cases, this means bailing out because the algorithm does not
(or cannot) support scalable offsets in places where it does some
form of alias checking for example.
Reviewers: rovka, efriedma, kristof.beyls
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: wuzish, kerbowa, MatzeB, arsenm, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72758
Use the isCandidateForCallSiteEntry().
This should mostly be an NFC, but there are some parts ensuring
the moveCallSiteInfo() and copyCallSiteInfo() operate with call site
entry candidates (both Src and Dest should be the call site entry
candidates).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74122
We currently only handle mem instructions with a single define.
Avoid the call site parameter debug info when we find the case with
multiple defs, rather than throwing an assert.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73954
The generic BaseMemOpClusterMutation calls into TargetInstrInfo to
analyze the address of each load/store instruction, and again to decide
whether two instructions should be clustered. Previously this had to
represent each address as a single base operand plus a constant byte
offset. This patch extends it to support any number of base operands.
The old target hook getMemOperandWithOffset is now a convenience
function for callers that are only prepared to handle a single base
operand. It calls the new more general target hook
getMemOperandsWithOffset.
The only requirements for the base operands returned by
getMemOperandsWithOffset are:
- they can be sorted by MemOpInfo::Compare, such that clusterable ops
get sorted next to each other, and
- shouldClusterMemOps knows what they mean.
One simple follow-on is to enable clustering of AMDGPU FLAT instructions
with both vaddr and saddr (base register + offset register). I've left
a FIXME in the code for this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71655
All the callers of this function will be ScheduleDAGMI from the
MachineScheduler. This allows us to use the extra info available in
ScheduleDAGMI without resorting to awkward casts.
Summary:
Currently the describeLoadedValue() hook is assumed to describe the
value of the instruction's first explicit define. The hook will not be
called for instructions with more than one explicit define.
This commit adds a register parameter to the describeLoadedValue() hook,
and invokes the hook for all registers in the worklist.
This will allow us to for example describe instructions which produce
more than two parameters' values; e.g. Hexagon's various combine
instructions.
This also fixes situations in our downstream target where we may pass
smaller parameters in the high part of a register. If such a parameter's
value is produced by a larger copy instruction, we can't describe the
call site value using the super-register, and we instead need to know
which sub-register that should be used.
This also allows us to handle cases like this:
$ebx = [...]
$rdi = MOVSX64rr32 $ebx
$esi = MOV32rr $edi
CALL64pcrel32 @call
The hook will first be invoked for the MOV32rr instruction, which will
say that @call's second parameter (passed in $esi) is described by $edi.
As $edi is not preserved it will be added to the worklist. When we get
to the MOVSX64rr32 instruction, we need to describe two values; the
sign-extended value of $ebx -> $rdi for the first parameter, and $ebx ->
$edi for the second parameter, which is now possible.
This commit modifies the dbgcall-site-lea-interpretation.mir test case.
In the test case, the values of some 32-bit parameters were produced
with LEA64r. Perhaps we can in general cases handle such by emitting
expressions that AND out the lower 32-bits, but I have not been able to
land in a case where a LEA64r is used for a 32-bit parameter instead of
LEA64_32 from C code.
I have not found a case where it would be useful to describe parameters
using implicit defines, so in this patch the hook is still only invoked
for explicit defines of forwarding registers.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: ormris, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70431
Currently the describeLoadedValue() hook is assumed to describe the
value of the instruction's first explicit define. The hook will not be
called for instructions with more than one explicit define.
This commit adds a register parameter to the describeLoadedValue() hook,
and invokes the hook for all registers in the worklist.
This will allow us to for example describe instructions which produce
more than two parameters' values; e.g. Hexagon's various combine
instructions.
This also fixes a case in our downstream target where we may pass
smaller parameters in the high part of a register. If such a parameter's
value is produced by a larger copy instruction, we can't describe the
call site value using the super-register, and we instead need to know
which sub-register that should be used.
This also allows us to handle cases like this:
$ebx = [...]
$rdi = MOVSX64rr32 $ebx
$esi = MOV32rr $edi
CALL64pcrel32 @call
The hook will first be invoked for the MOV32rr instruction, which will
say that @call's second parameter (passed in $esi) is described by $edi.
As $edi is not preserved it will be added to the worklist. When we get
to the MOVSX64rr32 instruction, we need to describe two values; the
sign-extended value of $ebx -> $rdi for the first parameter, and $ebx ->
$edi for the second parameter, which is now possible.
This commit modifies the dbgcall-site-lea-interpretation.mir test case.
In the test case, the values of some 32-bit parameters were produced
with LEA64r. Perhaps we can in general cases handle such by emitting
expressions that AND out the lower 32-bits, but I have not been able to
land in a case where a LEA64r is used for a 32-bit parameter instead of
LEA64_32 from C code.
I have not found a case where it would be useful to describe parameters
using implicit defines, so in this patch the hook is still only invoked
for explicit defines of forwarding registers.
A call site parameter description of a memory operand needs to
unambiguously convey the size of the operand to prevent incorrect entry
value evaluation.
Thanks for David Stenberg for pointing this issue out!
Allow call site paramter descriptions to reference spill slots. Spill
slots are not visible to high-level LLVM IR, so they can safely be
referenced during entry value evaluation (as they cannot be clobbered by
some other function).
This gives a 5% increase in the number of call site parameter DIEs in an
LTO x86_64 build of the xnu kernel.
This reverts commit eb4c98ca3d2590bad9f6542afbf3a7824d2b53fa (
[DebugInfo] Exclude memory location values as parameter entry values),
effectively reintroducing the portion of D60716 which dealt with memory
locations (authored by Djordje, Nikola, Ananth, and Ivan).
This partially addresses llvm.org/PR43343. However, not all memory
operands forwarded to callees live in spill slots. In the xnu build, it
may be possible to use an escape analysis to increase the number of call
site parameter by another 15% (more details in PR43343).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70254
Refactor usage of isCopyInstrImpl, isCopyInstr and isAddImmediate methods
to return optional machine operand pair of destination and source
registers.
Patch by Nikola Prica
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69622
Refactor usage of isCopyInstrImpl, isCopyInstr and isAddImmediate methods
to return optional machine operand pair of destination and source
registers.
Patch by Nikola Prica
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69622
Extend the describeLoadedValue() with support for target specific ARM and
AArch64 instructions interpretation. The patch provides specialization for
ADD and SUB operations that include a register and an immediate/offset
operand. Some of the instructions can operate with global string addresses
or constant pool indexes but such cases are omitted since we currently lack
flexible support for processing such operands at DWARF production stage.
Patch by Nikola Prica
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67556
Summary:
The default implementation of the describeLoadedValue() hook uses the
MoveImm property to determine if an instruction moves an immediate. If
an instruction has that property the function returns the second
operand, assuming that that is the immediate value the instruction
moves. As far as I can tell, the MoveImm property does not imply that
the second operand is the immediate value, nor that any other operand
necessarily holds the immediate value; it just means that the
instruction moves some immediate value.
One example where the second operand is not the immediate is SystemZ's
LZER instruction, which moves a zero immediate implicitly: $f0S = LZER.
That case triggered an out-of-bound assertion when getting the operand.
I have added a test case for that instruction.
Another example is ARM's MVN instruction, which holds the logical
bitwise NOT'd value of the immediate that is moved. For the following
reproducer:
extern void foo(int);
int main() { foo(-11); }
an incorrect call site value would be emitted:
$ clang --target=arm foo.c -O1 -g -Xclang -femit-debug-entry-values \
-c -o - | ./build/bin/llvm-dwarfdump - | \
grep -A2 call_site_parameter
0x00000058: DW_TAG_GNU_call_site_parameter
DW_AT_location (DW_OP_reg0 R0)
DW_AT_GNU_call_site_value (DW_OP_lit10)
Another example is the A2_combineii instruction on Hexagon which moves
two immediates to a super-register: $d0 = A2_combineii 20, 10.
Perhaps these are rare exceptions, and most MoveImm instructions hold
the immediate in the second operand, but in my opinion the default
implementation of the hook should only describe values that it can, by
some contract, guarantee are safe to describe, rather than leaving it up
to the targets to override the exceptions, as that can silently result
in incorrect call site values.
This patch adds X86's relevant move immediate instructions to the
target's hook implementation, so this commit should be a NFC for that
target. We need to do the same for ARM and AArch64.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69109
During the If-Converter optimization pay attention when copying or
deleting call instructions in order to keep call site information in
valid state.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, efriedma
Reviewed By: vsk, efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66955
llvm-svn: 374068
Abandon describing of loaded values due to safety concerns. Loaded
values are described as derefed memory location at caller point.
At callee we can unintentionally change that memory location which
would lead to different entry being printed value before and after
the memory location clobbering. This problem is described in
llvm.org/PR43343.
Patch by Nikola Prica
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67717
llvm-svn: 373089
Neither the base implementation of findCommutedOpIndices nor any in-tree target modifies the instruction passed in and there is no reason why they would in the future.
Committed on behalf of @hvdijk (Harald van Dijk)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66138
llvm-svn: 372882
Recommit: fix asan errors.
The way MachinePipeliner uses these target hooks is stateful - we reduce trip
count by one per call to reduceLoopCount. It's a little overfit for hardware
loops, where we don't have to worry about stitching a loop induction variable
across prologs and epilogs (the induction variable is implicit).
This patch introduces a new API:
/// Analyze loop L, which must be a single-basic-block loop, and if the
/// conditions can be understood enough produce a PipelinerLoopInfo object.
virtual std::unique_ptr<PipelinerLoopInfo>
analyzeLoopForPipelining(MachineBasicBlock *LoopBB) const;
The return value is expected to be an implementation of the abstract class:
/// Object returned by analyzeLoopForPipelining. Allows software pipelining
/// implementations to query attributes of the loop being pipelined.
class PipelinerLoopInfo {
public:
virtual ~PipelinerLoopInfo();
/// Return true if the given instruction should not be pipelined and should
/// be ignored. An example could be a loop comparison, or induction variable
/// update with no users being pipelined.
virtual bool shouldIgnoreForPipelining(const MachineInstr *MI) const = 0;
/// Create a condition to determine if the trip count of the loop is greater
/// than TC.
///
/// If the trip count is statically known to be greater than TC, return
/// true. If the trip count is statically known to be not greater than TC,
/// return false. Otherwise return nullopt and fill out Cond with the test
/// condition.
virtual Optional<bool>
createTripCountGreaterCondition(int TC, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
SmallVectorImpl<MachineOperand> &Cond) = 0;
/// Modify the loop such that the trip count is
/// OriginalTC + TripCountAdjust.
virtual void adjustTripCount(int TripCountAdjust) = 0;
/// Called when the loop's preheader has been modified to NewPreheader.
virtual void setPreheader(MachineBasicBlock *NewPreheader) = 0;
/// Called when the loop is being removed.
virtual void disposed() = 0;
};
The Pipeliner (ModuloSchedule.cpp) can use this object to modify the loop while
allowing the target to hold its own state across all calls. This API, in
particular the disjunction of creating a trip count check condition and
adjusting the loop, improves the code quality in ModuloSchedule.cpp.
llvm-svn: 372463
This commit broke the ASan buildbot. See comments in rL372376 for more
information.
This reverts commit 15e27b0b6d9d51362fad85dbe95ac5b3fadf0a06.
llvm-svn: 372425
The way MachinePipeliner uses these target hooks is stateful - we reduce trip
count by one per call to reduceLoopCount. It's a little overfit for hardware
loops, where we don't have to worry about stitching a loop induction variable
across prologs and epilogs (the induction variable is implicit).
This patch introduces a new API:
/// Analyze loop L, which must be a single-basic-block loop, and if the
/// conditions can be understood enough produce a PipelinerLoopInfo object.
virtual std::unique_ptr<PipelinerLoopInfo>
analyzeLoopForPipelining(MachineBasicBlock *LoopBB) const;
The return value is expected to be an implementation of the abstract class:
/// Object returned by analyzeLoopForPipelining. Allows software pipelining
/// implementations to query attributes of the loop being pipelined.
class PipelinerLoopInfo {
public:
virtual ~PipelinerLoopInfo();
/// Return true if the given instruction should not be pipelined and should
/// be ignored. An example could be a loop comparison, or induction variable
/// update with no users being pipelined.
virtual bool shouldIgnoreForPipelining(const MachineInstr *MI) const = 0;
/// Create a condition to determine if the trip count of the loop is greater
/// than TC.
///
/// If the trip count is statically known to be greater than TC, return
/// true. If the trip count is statically known to be not greater than TC,
/// return false. Otherwise return nullopt and fill out Cond with the test
/// condition.
virtual Optional<bool>
createTripCountGreaterCondition(int TC, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
SmallVectorImpl<MachineOperand> &Cond) = 0;
/// Modify the loop such that the trip count is
/// OriginalTC + TripCountAdjust.
virtual void adjustTripCount(int TripCountAdjust) = 0;
/// Called when the loop's preheader has been modified to NewPreheader.
virtual void setPreheader(MachineBasicBlock *NewPreheader) = 0;
/// Called when the loop is being removed.
virtual void disposed() = 0;
};
The Pipeliner (ModuloSchedule.cpp) can use this object to modify the loop while
allowing the target to hold its own state across all calls. This API, in
particular the disjunction of creating a trip count check condition and
adjusting the loop, improves the code quality in ModuloSchedule.cpp.
llvm-svn: 372376
Summary:
This changes the ParamLoadedValue pair which the describeLoadedValue()
hook returns so that MachineOperand objects are returned instead of
pointers.
When describing call site values we may need to describe operands which
are not part of the instruction. One such example is zero-materializing
XORs on x86, which I have implemented support for in a child revision.
Instead of having to return a pointer to an operand stored somewhere
outside the instruction, start returning objects directly instead, as
that simplifies the code.
The MachineOperand class only holds POD members, and on x86-64 it is 32
bytes large. That combined with copy elision means that the overhead of
returning a machine operand object from the hook does not become very
large.
I benchmarked this on a 8-thread i7-8650U machine with 32 GB RAM. The
benchmark consisted of building a clang 8.0 binary configured with:
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo \
-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86 \
-DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Address \
-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-Xclang -femit-debug-entry-values -stdlib=libc++"
The average wall clock time increased by 4 seconds, from 62:05 to
62:09, which is an 0.1% increase.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, djtodoro, NikolaPrica
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, ychen, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67261
llvm-svn: 371332
Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).
Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor
Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
Depends on D65919
Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962
llvm-svn: 369041
Dump the DWARF information about call sites and call site parameters into
debug info sections.
The patch also provides an interface for the interpretation of instructions
that could load values of a call site parameters in order to generate DWARF
about the call site parameters.
([13/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60716
llvm-svn: 365467
