For builtin logical operators, there is a well-defined ordering of argument
evaluation. For overloaded operator of the same type, there is no argument
evaluation order, similar to other function calls. When both are present,
uninstantiated templates with an operator&& is treated as an unresolved
function call. Unresolved function calls are treated as normal function calls,
and may result in false positives when the builtin logical operator is used.
Have the unsequenced checker ignore dependent expressions to avoid this
false positive. The check also happens in template instantiations to catch
when the overloaded operator is used.
llvm-svn: 277866
Silence the -Wbitfield-constant-conversion warning for when -1 or other
negative values are assigned to unsigned bitfields, provided that the bitfield
is wider than the minimum number of bits needed to encode the negative value.
llvm-svn: 277796
For memset (and others) we can get diagnostics like:
struct stat { int x; };
void foo(struct stat *stamps) {
bzero(stamps, sizeof(stamps));
memset(stamps, 0, sizeof(stamps));
}
t.c:7:28: warning: 'memset' call operates on objects of type 'struct stat' while the size is based on a different type 'struct stat *' [-Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess]
memset(stamps, 0, sizeof(stamps));
~~~~~~ ^~~~~~
t.c:7:28: note: did you mean to dereference the argument to 'sizeof' (and multiply it by the number of elements)?
memset(stamps, 0, sizeof(stamps));
^~~~~~
This patch implements the same class of warnings for bzero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22525
rdar://problem/18963514
llvm-svn: 277787
In atomic builtins, we assumed that the LValue conversion on the first
argument would succeed. So, we would crash given code like:
```
void ovl(char);
void ovl(int);
__atomic_store_n(ovl, 0, 0);
```
This patch makes us not assume that said conversion is successful. :)
llvm-svn: 276232
This patch implements PR#22821.
Taking the address of a packed member is dangerous since the reduced
alignment of the pointee is lost. This can lead to memory alignment
faults in some architectures if the pointer value is dereferenced.
This change adds a new warning to clang emitted when taking the address
of a packed member. A packed member is either a field/data member
declared as attribute((packed)) or belonging to a struct/class
declared as such. The associated flag is -Waddress-of-packed-member.
Conversions (either implicit or via a valid casting) to pointer types
with lower or equal alignment requirements (e.g. void* or char*)
silence the warning.
This change also adds a new error diagnostic when the user attempts to
bind a reference to a packed member, regardless of the alignment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20561
llvm-svn: 275417
- Added new Builtins: enqueue_kernel, get_kernel_work_group_size
and get_kernel_preferred_work_group_size_multiple.
These Builtins use custom check to diagnose parameters of the passed Blocks
i. e. variable number of 'local void*' type params, and check different
overloads specified in Table 6.31 of OpenCL v2.0.
- IR is generated as an internal library call for each OpenCL Builtin,
reusing ObjC Block implementation.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20249
llvm-svn: 274540
Currently we only have OpenCL 2.0 Builtins i.e. pipes or address space conversions.
They have to be added only in the version 2.0 compilation mode to make the identifiers
available for use in the other versions.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20249
llvm-svn: 274509
OpenCL builtin functions to_{global|local|private} accepts argument of pointer type to arbitrary pointee type, and return a pointer to the same pointee type in different addr space, i.e.
global gentype *to_global(gentype *p);
It is not desirable to declare it as
global void *to_global(void *);
in opencl header file since it misses diagnostics.
This patch implements these builtin functions as Clang builtin functions. In the builtin def file they are defined to have signature void*(void*). When handling call expressions, their declarations are re-written to have correct parameter type and return type corresponding to the call argument.
In codegen call to addr void *to_addr(void*) is generated with addrcasts or bitcasts to facilitate implementation in builtin library.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19932
llvm-svn: 270261
I couldn't find any documentation that this form existed either. Nor is there documentation for one of the remaining two forms, but there is a testcase that uses it.
llvm-svn: 269879
Remove the floating point to bool conversion warnings. Some of these
conversions will be caught by -Wliteral-conversion and -Wfloat-conversion
llvm-svn: 267234
Restructure the implict floating point to integer conversions so that
interesting sub-groups are under different flags. Breakdown of warnings:
No warning:
Exact conversions from floating point to integer:
int x = 10.0;
int x = 1e10;
-Wliteral-conversion - Floating point literal to integer with rounding:
int x = 5.5;
int x = -3.4;
-Wfloat-conversion - All conversions not covered by the above two:
int x = GetFloat();
int x = 5.5 + 3.5;
-Wfloat-zero-conversion - The expression converted has a non-zero floating
point value that gets converted to a zero integer value, excluded the cases
falling under -Wliteral-conversion. Subset of -Wfloat-conversion.
int x = 1.0 / 2.0;
-Wfloat-overflow-conversion - The floating point value is outside the range
of the integer type, exluding cases from -Wliteral conversion. Subset of
-Wfloat-conversion.
char x = 500;
char x = -1000;
-Wfloat-bool-conversion - Any conversion of a floating point type to bool.
Subset of -Wfloat-conversion.
if (GetFloat()) {}
bool x = 5.0;
-Wfloat-bool-constant-conversion - Conversion of a compile time evaluatable
floating point value to bool. Subset of -Wfloat-bool-conversion.
bool x = 1.0;
bool x = 4.0 / 20.0;
Also add EvaluateAsFloat to Sema, which is similar to EvaluateAsInt, but for
floating point values.
llvm-svn: 267054
Although all the registers are actually 32-bits, I think we have to assume the
high 32-bits could be RES0 (the ARM ARM is unclear). If so, reading as a 32-bit
register can require extra zero extension operations.
llvm-svn: 266212
This warning sometimes will infinitely recurse on CXXRecordDecl's from
ill-formed recursive classes that have fields of themselves. Skip processing
these classes to prevent this from happening.
Fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27142
llvm-svn: 264991
Summary:
__atomic_load's allows it's first argument to be a pointer to a const type. However the second argument is an output parameter and must be a pointer to non-const.
This patch fixes the signature of __atomic_load generated by clang so that it respects the above requirements.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13420
llvm-svn: 264967
Summary:
1. Diag should be output if types are not the same.
2. Should compare using canonical type.
3. Refine the diag to be more clear.
Reviewers: yaxunl, Anastasia
Subscribers: MatsPetersson, pekka.jaaskelainen, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17955
llvm-svn: 264825
r263299 added a fixit for the -Wformat-security warning, but that runs
into complications with our guideline that error recovery should be done
as-if the fixit had been applied. Putting the fixit on a note avoids that.
llvm-svn: 263584
Summary:
The printf/scanf format checker is a little over-zealous in handling the conditional operator. This patch reduces work by not checking code-paths that are never used and reduces false positives regarding uncovered arguments, for example in the code fragment:
printf(minimal ? "%i\n" : "%i: %s\n", code, msg);
Reviewers: rtrieu
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15636
llvm-svn: 262025
Summary:
OpenCL access qualifiers are now not only used for image types, refine it to avoid misleading,
Add semacheck for OpenCL access qualifier as well as test caees.
Reviewers: pekka.jaaskelainen, Anastasia, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16040
llvm-svn: 261961
In the case that the array indexing itself is within a type dependent context,
bail out of the evaluation. We would previously try to symbolically evaluate
the expression which would then try to evaluate a non-address expression as an
address, triggering an assertion in Asserts builds.
We only need to consider the array subscript expression itself as in the case
that the base itself being type dependent is handled appropriately in EvalAddr.
Resolves PR26599.
llvm-svn: 260867
