This bug was exposed by using nsw/nuw for more aggressive folds in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL284844
The changes mimic the IR demanded bits logic in InstCombiner::SimplifyDemandedUseBits(),
but we can't just flip flag bits in the DAG; we have to create a new node that has the
bits cleared.
This should fix:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30841
llvm-svn: 285656
Currently computeKnownBits returns the common known zero/one bits for all elements of vector data, when we may only be interested in one/some of the elements.
This patch adds a DemandedElts argument that allows us to specify the elements we actually care about. The original computeKnownBits implementation calls with a DemandedElts demanding all elements to match current behaviour. Scalar types set this to 1.
The approach was found to be easier than trying to add a per-element known bits solution, for a similar usefulness given the combines where computeKnownBits is typically used.
I've only added support for a few opcodes so far (the ones that have proven straightforward to test), all others will default to demanding all elements but can be updated in due course.
DemandedElts support could similarly be added to computeKnownBitsForTargetNode in a future commit.
This looked like this had caused compile time regressions on some buildbots (and was reverted in rL285381), but appears to have just been a harmless bystander!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25691
llvm-svn: 285494
Instead of asserting that the shift count is != 0 we just bail out
as it's not profitable trying to optimize a node which will be
removed anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26098
llvm-svn: 285480
Currently computeKnownBits returns the common known zero/one bits for all elements of vector data, when we may only be interested in one/some of the elements.
This patch adds a DemandedElts argument that allows us to specify the elements we actually care about. The original computeKnownBits implementation calls with a DemandedElts demanding all elements to match current behaviour. Scalar types set this to 1.
The approach was found to be easier than trying to add a per-element known bits solution, for a similar usefulness given the combines where computeKnownBits is typically used.
I've only added support for a few opcodes so far (the ones that have proven straightforward to test), all others will default to demanding all elements but can be updated in due course.
DemandedElts support could similarly be added to computeKnownBitsForTargetNode in a future commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25691
llvm-svn: 285296
This patch ensures that if a floating point vector operand is legalized by
expanding, it is legalized through the stack rather than by calling
DAGTypeLegalizer::IntegerToVector which will cause a failure since the operand
is a non-integer type.
This fixes PR 30715.
llvm-svn: 285231
Summary:
AMDGPU will need this one i16 is added as a legal type. This is tested by:
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/sdiv.ll
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/sdivrem24.ll
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/udiv.ll
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/udivrem24.ll
Reviewers: bogner, efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25699
llvm-svn: 285199
When there's a tie between partitionings of jump tables, consider also cases
that result in no jump tables, but in one or a few cases. The motivation is
that many contemporary processors typically perform case switches fairly
quickly.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25212
llvm-svn: 285099
Summary:
Do *not* perform combines such as:
vector_shuffle<4,1,2,3>(build_vector(Ud, C0, C1 C2), scalar_to_vector(X))
->
build_vector(X, C0, C1, C2)
Keeping the shuffle allows lowering the constant build_vector to a materialized
constant vector (such as a vector-load from the constant-pool or some other idiom).
Reviewers: delena, igorb, spatel, mkuper, andreadb, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25524
llvm-svn: 285063
0 - X --> 0, if the sub is NUW
0 - X --> 0, if X is 0 or the minimum signed value and the sub is NSW
0 - X --> X, if X is 0 or the minimum signed value
This is the DAG equivalent of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL284649
plus the fold for the NUW case which already existed in InstSimplify.
Note that we miss a vector fold because of a deficiency in the DAG version of
computeKnownBits().
llvm-svn: 284844
As discussed in D24815, let's start the process of killing off the broken fast-math global
state housed in TargetOptions and eliminate the need for function-level fast-math attributes.
Here we enable two similar folds that are possible when we don't care about signed-zero:
fadd nsz x, 0 --> x
fsub nsz 0, x --> -x
Note that although the test cases include a 'sin' function call, I'm side-stepping the
FMF-on-calls question (and lack of support in the DAG) for now. It's not needed for these
tests - isNegatibleForFree/GetNegatedExpression just look through a ISD::FSIN node.
Also, when we create an FNEG node and propagate the Flags of the FSUB to it, this doesn't
actually do anything today because Flags are silently dropped for any node that is not a
binary operator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25297
llvm-svn: 284824
Summary:
While promoting *_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG nodes whose inputs are already
promoted, perform the appropriate sign extension for the promoted node
before doing the *_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG operation. If not, the undefined
high-order bits of the promoted operand may (a) be garbage inc ase of
zext) or (b) contribute the wrong sign-bit (in case of sext)
Updated the promote-vec3.ll test after this change. The diff shows
explicit zeroing in case of zext and intermediate sign extension in case
of sext.
Reviewers: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits, srhines
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25790
llvm-svn: 284752
This is a retry of r284495 which was reverted at r284513 due to use-after-scope bugs
caused by faulty usage of StringRef.
This version also renames a pair of functions:
getRecipEstimateDivEnabled()
getRecipEstimateSqrtEnabled()
as suggested by Eric Christopher.
original commit msg:
[Target] remove TargetRecip class; move reciprocal estimate isel functionality to TargetLowering
This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D24816 - where we changed reciprocal estimates to be function attributes
rather than TargetOptions.
This patch is intended to be a structural, but not functional change. By moving all of the
TargetRecip functionality into TargetLowering, we can remove all of the reciprocal estimate
state, shield the callers from the string format implementation, and simplify/localize the
logic needed for a target to enable this.
If a function has a "reciprocal-estimates" attribute, those settings may override the target's
default reciprocal preferences for whatever operation and data type we're trying to optimize.
If there's no attribute string or specific setting for the op/type pair, just use the target
default settings.
As noted earlier, a better solution would be to move the reciprocal estimate settings to IR
instructions and SDNodes rather than function attributes, but that's a multi-step job that
requires infrastructure improvements. I intend to work on that, but it's not clear how long
it will take to get all the pieces in place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25440
llvm-svn: 284746
Use mask and negate for legalization of i1 source type with SIGN_EXTEND_INREG.
With the mask, this should be no worse than 2 shifts. The mask can be eliminated
in some cases, so that should be better than 2 shifts.
This change exposed some missing folds related to negation:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL284239https://reviews.llvm.org/rL284395
There may be others, so please let me know if you see any regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25485
llvm-svn: 284611
This will get the same ConstantSDNode scalar or vector splat value as the current separate dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode> / isVector() approach.
llvm-svn: 284578
This is a follow-up to D24816 - where we changed reciprocal estimates to be function attributes
rather than TargetOptions.
This patch is intended to be a structural, but not functional change. By moving all of the
TargetRecip functionality into TargetLowering, we can remove all of the reciprocal estimate
state, shield the callers from the string format implementation, and simplify/localize the
logic needed for a target to enable this.
If a function has a "reciprocal-estimates" attribute, those settings may override the target's
default reciprocal preferences for whatever operation and data type we're trying to optimize.
If there's no attribute string or specific setting for the op/type pair, just use the target
default settings.
As noted earlier, a better solution would be to move the reciprocal estimate settings to IR
instructions and SDNodes rather than function attributes, but that's a multi-step job that
requires infrastructure improvements. I intend to work on that, but it's not clear how long
it will take to get all the pieces in place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25440
llvm-svn: 284495
As noted in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25685
This is the next-to-smallest step needed to enable the ComputeNumSignBits fix in that patch.
In a minor attempt to keep some structure, we're pulling the FP helper over along with its
integer sibling, but clearly we can and should do more refactoring of the similar helper
functions in DAGCombiner and SelectionDAG to simplify and not duplicate functionality.
llvm-svn: 284421
This came up as part of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25485
Note that the vector case is missed because ComputeNumSignBits() is deficient for vectors.
llvm-svn: 284395
SelectionDAG::getConstantPool will automatically determine an appropriate alignment if one is not specified. It does this by querying the type's preferred alignment. This can end up creating quite a lot of padding when the preferred alignment for vectors is 128.
In optimize-for-size mode, it makes sense to instead query the ABI type alignment which is often smaller and causes less padding.
llvm-svn: 284381
Eli noted this potential bug in the post-commit thread for:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL284239
...but I'm not sure how to trigger it, so there's no test case yet.
llvm-svn: 284268
Summary:
The main purpose of this new helper is to enable simplifying operations that
have multiple uses. SimplifyDemandedBits does not handle multiple uses
currently, and this new function makes it possible to optimize:
and v1, v0, 0xffffff
mul24 v2, v1, v1 ; Multiply ignoring high 8-bits.
To:
mul24 v2, v0, v0
Where before this would not be optimized, because v1 has multiple uses.
Reviewers: bogner, arsenm
Subscribers: nhaehnle, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24964
llvm-svn: 284266
