stack slots and giving them different PseudoSourceValue's did not fix the
problem of post-alloc scheduling miscompiling llvm itself.
- Apply Dan's conservative workaround by assuming any non fixed stack slots can
alias other memory locations. This means a load from spill slot #1 cannot
move above a store of spill slot #2.
- Enable post-alloc scheduling for x86 at optimization leverl Default and above.
llvm-svn: 84424
so get rid of eh.selector.i64 and rename eh.selector.i32 to eh.selector.
Likewise for eh.typeid.for. This aligns us with gcc, which always uses a
32 bit value for the selector on all platforms. My understanding is that
the register allocator used to assert if the selector intrinsic size didn't
match the pointer size, and this was the reason for introducing the two
variants. However my testing shows that this is no longer the case (I
fixed some bugs in selector lowering yesterday, and some more today in the
fastisel path; these might have caused the original problems).
llvm-svn: 84106
truncating an SDValue (depending on whether the target
type is bigger or smaller than the value's type); or zero
extending or truncating it. Use it in a few places (this
seems to be a popular operation, but I only modified cases
of it in SelectionDAGBuild). In particular, the eh_selector
lowering was doing this wrong due to a repeated rather than
inverted test, fixed with this change.
llvm-svn: 84027
While recording beginning of a function, use scope info from the first location entry instead of just relying on first location entry itself.
llvm-svn: 83684
allows appropriate backends to generate a sqrt instruction.
On x86, this isn't done at -O0 because we go through
FastISel instead. This is a behavior change from before
this series of sqrt patches started. I think this is OK
considering that compile speed is most important at -O0, but
could be convinced otherwise.
llvm-svn: 82778
and short. Well, it's kinda short. Definitely nasty and brutish.
The front-end generates the register/unregister calls into the SjLj runtime,
call-site indices and landing pad dispatch. The back end fills in the LSDA
with the call-site information provided by the front end. Catch blocks are
not yet implemented.
Built on Darwin and verified no llvm-core "make check" regressions.
llvm-svn: 78625
Instead of awkwardly encoding calling-convention information with ISD::CALL,
ISD::FORMAL_ARGUMENTS, ISD::RET, and ISD::ARG_FLAGS nodes, TargetLowering
provides three virtual functions for targets to override:
LowerFormalArguments, LowerCall, and LowerRet, which replace the custom
lowering done on the special nodes. They provide the same information, but
in a more immediately usable format.
This also reworks much of the target-independent tail call logic. The
decision of whether or not to perform a tail call is now cleanly split
between target-independent portions, and the target dependent portion
in IsEligibleForTailCallOptimization.
This also synchronizes all in-tree targets, to help enable future
refactoring and feature work.
llvm-svn: 78142
in SelectionDAGLowering::visitTargetIntrinsic.
This removes a bit of special-case code for vector types. After staring
at it for a while, I managed to convince myself that it is not necessary.
The only case where TLI.getValueType() differs from MVT::getMVT is for iPTR,
so this code could potentially make a difference for a vector of pointers.
But, it looks like that is not supported. Calling TLI.getValueType() on
a vector of pointers leads to the following sequence of calls:
TargetLowering::getValueType
MVT::getMVT
MVT::getVectorVT(iPTR, num elements)
MVT::getExtendedVectorVT
MVT::getTypeForMVT for iPTR
assertion fails "Type is not extended!"
So, unless I'm really missing something, this bit of code is irrelevant to
the current version of LLVM, which is consistent with the fact that I don't
see this code in other similar places.
llvm-svn: 77747
