C++ unqualified name lookup searches template parameter scopes
immediately after finishing searching the entity the parameters belong
to. (Eg, for a class template, you search the template parameter scope
after looking in that class template and its base classes and before
looking in the scope containing the class template.) This is complicated
by the fact that scope lookup within a template parameter scope looks in
a different sequence of places prior to reaching the end of the
declarator-id in the template declaration.
We used to approximate the proper lookup rule with a hack in the scope /
decl context walk inside name lookup. Now we instead compute the lookup
parent for each template parameter scope.
In order to get this right, we now make sure to enter a distinct Scope
for each template parameter scope, and make sure to re-enter the
enclosing class scopes properly when handling delay-parsed regions
within a class.
We weren't re-entering template scopes in the right order, causing this
to break self-host with -fdelayed-template-parsing.
This reverts commit 237c2a23b6d4fa953f5ae910dccf492db61bb959.
C++ unqualified name lookup searches template parameter scopes
immediately after finishing searching the entity the parameters belong
to. (Eg, for a class template, you search the template parameter scope
after looking in that class template and its base classes and before
looking in the scope containing the class template.) This is complicated
by the fact that scope lookup within a template parameter scope looks in
a different sequence of places prior to reaching the end of the
declarator-id in the template declaration.
We used to approximate the proper lookup rule with a hack in the scope /
decl context walk inside name lookup. Now we instead compute the lookup
parent for each template parameter scope. This gets the right answer and
as a bonus is substantially simpler and more uniform.
In order to get this right, we now make sure to enter a distinct Scope
for each template parameter scope. (The fact that we didn't before was
already a bug, but not really observable most of the time, since
template parameters can't shadow each other.)
Also invert the sense of the return value.
As pointed out by the FIXME that this change resolves, isHidden() wasn't
a very accurate name for this function.
I haven't yet changed any of the strings that are output in
ASTDumper.cpp / JSONNodeDumper.cpp / TextNodeDumper.cpp in response to
whether isHidden() is set because
a) I'm not sure whether it's actually desired to change these strings
(would appreciate feedback on this), and
b) In any case, I'd like to get this pure rename out of the way first,
without any changes to tests. Changing the strings that are output in
the various ...Dumper.cpp files will require changes to quite a few
tests, and I'd like to make those in a separate change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81392
Reviewed By: rsmith
This patch adds a matrix type to Clang as described in the draft
specification in clang/docs/MatrixSupport.rst. It introduces a new option
-fenable-matrix, which can be used to enable the matrix support.
The patch adds new MatrixType and DependentSizedMatrixType types along
with the plumbing required. Loads of and stores to pointers to matrix
values are lowered to memory operations on 1-D IR arrays. After loading,
the loaded values are cast to a vector. This ensures matrix values use
the alignment of the element type, instead of LLVM's large vector
alignment.
The operators and builtins described in the draft spec will will be added in
follow-up patches.
Reviewers: martong, rsmith, Bigcheese, anemet, dexonsmith, rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72281
Fix a few bugs where we would fail to properly determine header to
module correspondence when determining whether to suggest a #include or
import, and suggest a #include more often in language modes where there
is no import syntax. Generally, if the target is in a header with
include guards or #pragma once, we should suggest either #including or
importing that header, and not importing a module that happens to
textually include it.
In passing, improve the notes we attach to the corresponding
diagnostics: calling an entity that we couldn't see "previous" is
confusing.
This reverts commit 61ba1481e200b5b35baa81ffcff81acb678e8508.
I'm reverting this because it breaks the lldb build with
incomplete switch coverage warnings. I would fix it forward,
but am not familiar enough with lldb to determine the correct
fix.
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:3958:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
^
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:4633:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
^
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:4889:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
Introduction/Motivation:
LLVM-IR supports integers of non-power-of-2 bitwidth, in the iN syntax.
Integers of non-power-of-two aren't particularly interesting or useful
on most hardware, so much so that no language in Clang has been
motivated to expose it before.
However, in the case of FPGA hardware normal integer types where the
full bitwidth isn't used, is extremely wasteful and has severe
performance/space concerns. Because of this, Intel has introduced this
functionality in the High Level Synthesis compiler[0]
under the name "Arbitrary Precision Integer" (ap_int for short). This
has been extremely useful and effective for our users, permitting them
to optimize their storage and operation space on an architecture where
both can be extremely expensive.
We are proposing upstreaming a more palatable version of this to the
community, in the form of this proposal and accompanying patch. We are
proposing the syntax _ExtInt(N). We intend to propose this to the WG14
committee[1], and the underscore-capital seems like the active direction
for a WG14 paper's acceptance. An alternative that Richard Smith
suggested on the initial review was __int(N), however we believe that
is much less acceptable by WG14. We considered _Int, however _Int is
used as an identifier in libstdc++ and there is no good way to fall
back to an identifier (since _Int(5) is indistinguishable from an
unnamed initializer of a template type named _Int).
[0]https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/software/programmable/quartus-prime/hls-compiler.html)
[1]http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2472.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73967
1) Fix a regression in llvmorg-11-init-2485-g0e3a4877840 that would
reject some cases where a class name is shadowed by a typedef-name
causing a destructor declaration to be rejected. Prefer a tag type over
a typedef in destructor name lookup.
2) Convert the "type in destructor declaration is a typedef" error to an
error-by-default ExtWarn to allow codebases to turn it off. GCC and MSVC
do not enforce this rule.
Implement support for C++2a requires-expressions.
Re-commit after compilation failure on some platforms due to alignment issues with PointerIntPair.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50360
Provide a mechanism to attach OpenCL extension information to builtin
functions, so that their use can be restricted according to the
extension(s) the builtin is part of.
Patch by Pierre Gondois and Sven van Haastregt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71476
Commit 9a8d477a0e0 ("[OpenCL] Add builtin function attribute
handling", 2019-11-05) stopped Clang from mangling single-overload
builtins, which is incorrect.
The issue was introduced by D33189 which fixed PR33189.
Fixes PR38671: "destructor cannot be declared as a template" leads to segfault in Sema::LookupSpecialMember
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69225
Add handling for the "pure", "const" and "convergent" function
attributes for OpenCL builtin functions.
Patch by Pierre Gondois and Sven van Haastregt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64319
Support for C++ mode was accidentally lacking due to not checking the
OpenCLCPlusPlus LangOpts version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69233
Summary:
We don't know what context to use until the classification result is
consumed by the parser, which could happen in a different semantic
context. So don't build the expression that results from name
classification until we get to that point and can handle it properly.
This covers everything except C++ implicit class member access, which
is a little awkward to handle properly in the face of the protected
member access check. But it at least fixes all the currently-filed
instances of PR43080.
Reviewers: efriedma
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68896
llvm-svn: 374826
The static analyzer is warning about potential null dereferences, but in these cases we should be able to use castAs<RecordType> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 373584
Allow setting a MinVersion, stating from which OpenCL version a
builtin function is available, and a MaxVersion, stating from which
OpenCL version a builtin function should not be available anymore.
Guard some definitions of the "work-item" builtin functions according
to the OpenCL versions from which they are available.
Add the "vector data load and store" builtin functions (e.g.
vload/vstore), whose signatures differ before and after OpenCL 2.0 in
the pointer argument address spaces.
Patch by Pierre Gondois and Sven van Haastregt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63504
llvm-svn: 372321
Summary:
Otherwise the definition (first found) for ObjCInterfaceDecl's might
precede the module one, which will eventually lead to crash, since
diagnoseMissingImport needs one coming from a module.
This behavior changed after Richard's r342018, which started to look
into the definition of ObjCInterfaceDecls.
rdar://problem/49237144
Reviewers: rsmith, arphaman
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, ributzka, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66982
llvm-svn: 372039
Summary:
We accumulated some configuration parameters for LookupVisibleDecls that
are being passed unchanged to recursive calls, e.g. LoadExternal and
IncludeDependentBases.
At the same time, there is a bunch of parameters that can change in the
recursive invocations.
It is hard to tell the difference between those groups, making the code
hard to follow.
This change introduces a helper struct and factors out the non-changing
bits into fields, making recursive calls in the implementation code easier
to read.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: riccibruno, doug.gregor, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65752
llvm-svn: 371032
Summary:
Clang performs various recursive operations (such as template instantiation),
and may use non-trivial amounts of stack space in each recursive step (for
instance, due to recursive AST walks). While we try to keep the stack space
used by such steps to a minimum and we have explicit limits on the number of
such steps we perform, it's impractical to guarantee that we won't blow out the
stack on deeply recursive template instantiations on complex ASTs, even with
only a moderately high instantiation depth limit.
The user experience in these cases is generally terrible: we crash with
no hint of what went wrong. Under this patch, we attempt to do better:
* Detect when the stack is nearly exhausted, and produce a warning with a
nice template instantiation backtrace, telling the user that we might
run slowly or crash.
* For cases where we're forced to trigger recursive template
instantiation in arbitrarily-deeply-nested contexts, check whether
we're nearly out of stack space and allocate a new stack (by spawning
a new thread) after producing the warning.
Reviewers: rnk, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66361
llvm-svn: 369940
Summary:
As Typo Resolution can create new TypoExprs while resolving typos,
it is necessary to recurse through the expression to search for more
typos.
This should fix the assertion failure in `clang::Sema::~Sema()`:
`DelayedTypos.empty() && "Uncorrected typos!"`
Notes:
- In case some TypoExprs are created but thrown away, Sema
now has a Vector that is used to keep track of newly created
typos.
- For expressions with multiple typos, we only give suggestions
if we are able to resolve all typos in the expression
- This patch is similar to D37521 except that it does not eagerly
commit to a correction for the first typo in the expression.
Instead, it will search for corrections which fix all of the
typos in the expression.
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62648
llvm-svn: 369427
Generic types are an abstraction of type sets. It mimics the way
functions are defined in the OpenCL specification. For example,
floatN can abstract all the vector sizes of the float type.
This allows to
* stick more closely to the specification, which uses generic types;
* factorize definitions of functions with numerous prototypes in the
tablegen file; and
* reduce the memory impact of functions with many overloads.
Patch by Pierre Gondois and Sven van Haastregt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65456
llvm-svn: 369253
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
Summary:
Currently HeaderSearch only looks at SearchDir's passed into it, but in
addition to those paths headers can be relative to including file's directory.
This patch makes sure that is taken into account.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63295
llvm-svn: 365005
Reland r363242 after fixing an issue with the tablegen dependence.
Patch by Pierre Gondois and Sven van Haastregt.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62849
llvm-svn: 363541
This reverts commit r363242 as it broke some builds with
make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'ClangOpenCLBuiltinsImpl', needed by
'tools/clang/lib/Sema/CMakeFiles/obj.clangSema.dir/SemaLookup.cpp.o'.
llvm-svn: 363376
This patch adds a `-fdeclare-opencl-builtins` command line option to
the clang frontend. This enables clang to verify OpenCL C builtin
function declarations using a fast StringMatcher lookup, instead of
including the opencl-c.h file with the `-finclude-default-header`
option. This avoids the large parse time penalty of the header file.
This commit only adds the basic infrastructure and some of the OpenCL
builtins. It does not cover all builtins defined by the various OpenCL
specifications. As such, it is not a replacement for
`-finclude-default-header` yet.
RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-November/060041.html
Co-authored-by: Pierre Gondois
Co-authored-by: Joey Gouly
Co-authored-by: Sven van Haastregt
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60763
llvm-svn: 362371
This caused Clang to start erroring on the following:
struct S {
template <typename = int> explicit S();
};
struct T : S {};
struct U : T {
U();
};
U::U() {}
$ clang -c /tmp/x.cc
/tmp/x.cc:10:4: error: call to implicitly-deleted default constructor of 'T'
U::U() {}
^
/tmp/x.cc:5:12: note: default constructor of 'T' is implicitly deleted
because base class 'S' has no default constructor
struct T : S {};
^
1 error generated.
See discussion on the cfe-commits email thread.
This also reverts the follow-ups r359966 and r359968.
> this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
>
> Changes:
> - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
> - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
> - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
> - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
> - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
> - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
>
> This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
> Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
>
> Patch by Tyker
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 360024
this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
Changes:
- The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
- The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
- Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
- Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
- The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
- Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
Patch by Tyker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 359949
CWG 1691 changed the definition of the namespaces associated with a class
type or enumeration type.
For a class type, the associated namespaces are the innermost enclosing
namespaces of the associated classes. For an enumeration type, the associated
namespace is the innermost enclosing namespace of its declaration.
This also fixes CWG 1690 and CWG 1692.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60573
Reviewed By: rjmccall, rsmith
llvm-svn: 358882
The code is/was already correct for the case where a parameter is a
parameter of its enclosing lexical DeclContext (functions and classes).
But for other templates (alias and variable templates) they don't create
their own scope to be members of - in those cases, they parameter should
be considered visible if any definition of the lexical decl context is
visible.
[this should cleanup the failure on the libstdc++ modules buildbot]
[this doesn't actually fix the variable template case for a
secondary/compounding reason (its lexical decl context is incorrectly
considered to be the translation unit)]
Test covers all 4 kinds of templates with default args, including a
regression test for the still broken variable template case.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60892
llvm-svn: 358795
global module fragment.
We know that the declaration in question should have been introduced by
a '#include', so try to figure out which one and suggest it. Don't
suggest importing the global module fragment itself!
llvm-svn: 358631
The various CorrectionCandidateCallbacks are currently heap-allocated
unconditionally. This was needed because of delayed typo correction.
However these allocations represent currently 15.4% of all allocations
(number of allocations) when parsing all of Boost (!), mostly because
of ParseCastExpression, ParseStatementOrDeclarationAfterAttrtibutes
and isCXXDeclarationSpecifier. Note that all of these callback objects
are small. Let's not do this.
Instead initially allocate the callback on the stack, and only do a
heap allocation if we are going to do some typo correction. Do this by:
1. Adding a clone function to each callback, which will do a polymorphic
clone of the callback. This clone function is required to be implemented
by every callback (of which there is a fair amount). Make sure this is
the case by making it pure virtual.
2. Use this clone function when we are going to try to correct a typo.
This additionally cut the time of -fsyntax-only on all of Boost by 0.5%
(not that much, but still something). No functional changes intended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58827
Reviewed By: rnk
llvm-svn: 356925
When a template-name is looked up, we need to give injected-class-name
declarations of class templates special treatment, as they denote a
template rather than a type.
Previously we achieved this by applying a filter to the lookup results
after completing name lookup, but that is incorrect in various ways, not
least of which is that it lost all information about access and how
members were named, and the filtering caused us to generally lose
all ambiguity errors between templates and non-templates.
We now preserve the lookup results exactly, and the few places that need
to map from a declaration found by name lookup into a declaration of a
template do so explicitly. Deduplication of repeated lookup results of
the same injected-class-name declaration is done by name lookup instead
of after the fact.
This reinstates r354091, which was previously reverted in r354097
because it exposed bugs in lldb and compiler-rt. Those bugs were fixed
in r354173 and r354174 respectively.
llvm-svn: 354176
When a template-name is looked up, we need to give injected-class-name
declarations of class templates special treatment, as they denote a
template rather than a type.
Previously we achieved this by applying a filter to the lookup results
after completing name lookup, but that is incorrect in various ways, not
least of which is that it lost all information about access and how
members were named, and the filtering caused us to generally lose
all ambiguity errors between templates and non-templates.
We now preserve the lookup results exactly, and the few places that need
to map from a declaration found by name lookup into a declaration of a
template do so explicitly. Deduplication of repeated lookup results of
the same injected-class-name declaration is done by name lookup instead
of after the fact.
llvm-svn: 354091
