Summary: Currently we only enable the use of __is_final(...) with Clang. GCC also provides __is_final(...) since 4.7 in all standard modes. This patch creates the macro _LIBCPP_HAS_IS_FINAL to note the availability of `__is_final`.
Reviewers: danalbert, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8795
llvm-svn: 239664
Summary:
In certain cases vector can use memcpy to construct a range of elements at the back of the vector. We currently don't do this resulting in terrible code gen in non-optimized mode and a
very large slowdown compared to libstdc++.
This patch adds a `__construct_forward_range(Allocator, Iter, Iter, _Ptr&)` and `__construct_forward_range(Allocator, Tp*, Tp*, Tp*&)` functions to `allocator_traits` which act similarly to the existing `__construct_forward(...)` functions.
This patch also changes vectors `__construct_at_end(Iter, Iter)` to be `__construct_at_end(Iter, Iter, SizeType)` where SizeType is the size of the range. `__construct_at_end(Iter, Iter, SizeType)` now calls `allocator_traits<Tp>::__construct_forward_range(...)`.
This patch is based off the design of `__swap_out_circular_buffer(...)` which uses `allocator_traits<Tp>::__construct_forward(...)`.
On my machine this code performs 4x better than the current implementation when tested against `std::vector<int>`.
Reviewers: howard.hinnant, titus, kcc, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8109
llvm-svn: 233711
Visual Studio's SAL extension uses a macro named __deallocate. This macro is
used pervasively, and gets included through various different ways. This
conflicts with the similarly named interfaces in libc++. Introduce a undef
header similar to __undef_min_max to handle this. This fixes a number of errors
due to the macro replacing the function name.
llvm-svn: 229162
Summary:
This patch add support for "fancy pointers/allocators" as well as fixing support for shared_pointer and "minimal" allocators.
Fancy pointers are class types that meet the NullablePointer requirements. In our case they are created by fancy allocators. `support/min_allocator.h` is an archetype for these types.
There are three types of changes made in this patch:
1. `_Alloc::template rebind<T>::other` -> `__allocator_traits_rebind<_Alloc, T>::type`. This change was made because allocators don't need a rebind template. `__allocator_traits_rebind` is used instead of `allocator_traits::rebind` because use of `allocator_traits::rebind` requires a workaround for when template aliases are unavailable.
2. `a.deallocate(this, 1)` -> `a.deallocate(pointer_traits<self>::pointer_to(*this), 1)`. This change change is made because fancy pointers aren't always constructible from raw pointers.
3. `p.get()` -> `addressof(*p.get())`. Fancy pointers aren't actually a pointer. When we need a "real" pointer we take the address of dereferencing the fancy pointer. This should give us the actual raw pointer.
Test Plan: Tests were added using `support/min_allocator.h` to each affected shared_ptr overload and creation function. These tests can only be executed in C++11 or greater since min_allocator is only available then. A extra test was added for the non-variadic versions of allocate_shared.
Reviewers: danalbert, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4859
llvm-svn: 220469
If you're crazy enough to want this sort of thing, then add
-D_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_THREADS to your CXXFLAGS and
--param=additiona_features=libcpp-has-no-threads to your lit commnad line.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3969
llvm-svn: 217271
GCC will treat the default function template arguments as a
compilation error if C++0x is not enabled.
This commit workaround the compilation error by moving the
SFINAE check to function argument instead of the template
argument.
llvm-svn: 200523
pair, and a couple of pair-like implementation detail types. The
C++98/03 and 11 standards all specify that the copy constructor of
pair<int, int> is trivial. However as libc++ tracked the draft C++11
standard over the years, this copy constructor became non-trivial, and
then just recently was corrected back to trivial for C++11.
Unfortunately (for libc++1) the Itanium ABI specifies different calling
conventions for trivial and non-trivial copy constructors. Therefore
currently the C++03 libc++ copy constructor for pair<int, int> is ABI
incompatible with the C++11 libc++ copy constructor for pair<int, int>.
This is Bad(tm). This patch corrects the situation by making this copy
constructor trivial in C++03 mode as well.
Just in case it is needed for an incomplete C++11 compiler, libc++
retains the ability to support pair with rvalue references, but without
defaulted special members. However the pair needs non-trivial special
members to implement this special case, (as it did when clang was in
this place a couple of years ago).
During this work a bug was also found and fixed in
is_trivially_constructible.
And there is a minor drive-by fix in <__config> regarding
__type_visibility__.
A test is updated to ensure that the copy constructor of pair<int, int>
is trivial in both C++03 and C++11. This test will necessarily fail for
a compiler that implements rvalue references but not defaulted special
members.
llvm-svn: 194536
