When rendezvous structure is not initialized we need to set up
rendezvous breakpoint anyway. In this case the code will locate
dynamic loader (interpreter) and look for known function names.
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25806
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41533
llvm-svn: 322209
unambiguously on one bit of code. On macOS these
lines mapped to two distinct locations, and that
was artificially throwing off the test.
llvm-svn: 319472
When introduced, breakpoint names were just tags that you could
apply to breakpoints that would allow you to refer to a breakpoint
when you couldn't capture the ID, or to refer to a collection of
breakpoints.
This change makes the names independent holders of breakpoint options
that you can then apply to breakpoints when you add the name to the
breakpoint. It adds the "breakpoint name configure" command to set
up or reconfigure breakpoint names. There is also full support for
then in the SB API, including a new SBBreakpointName class.
The connection between the name and the breakpoints
sharing the name remains live, so if you reconfigure the name, all the
breakpoint options all change as well. This allows a quick way
to share complex breakpoint behavior among a bunch of breakpoints, and
a convenient way to iterate on the set.
You can also create a name from a breakpoint, allowing a quick way
to copy options from one breakpoint to another.
I also added the ability to make hidden and delete/disable protected
names. When applied to a breakpoint, you will only be able to list,
delete or disable that breakpoint if you refer to it explicitly by ID.
This feature will allow GUI's that need to use breakpoints for their
own purposes to keep their breakpoints from getting accidentally
disabled or deleted.
<rdar://problem/22094452>
llvm-svn: 313292
The auto-continue test was using the new (better) name
for providing commands (-C) but I haven't checked in that change
yet. Put the test back to the old way for now.
llvm-svn: 313221
You can get a breakpoint to auto-continue by adding "continue"
as a command, but that has the disadvantage that if you hit two
breakpoints simultaneously, the continue will force the process
to continue, and maybe even forstalling the commands on the other.
The auto-continue flag means the breakpoints can negotiate about
whether to stop.
Writing tests, I wanted to supply some commands when I made the
breakpoints, so I also added that ability.
llvm-svn: 309969
When an option was set at on a location, I was just copying the whole option set
to the location, and letting it shadow the breakpoint options. That was wrong since
it meant changes to unrelated options on the breakpoint would no longer take on this
location. I added a mask of set options and use that for option propagation.
I also added a "location" property to breakpoints, and added SBBreakpointLocation.{G,S}etCommandLineCommands
since I wanted to use them to write some more test cases.
<rdar://problem/24397798>
llvm-svn: 309772
Summary:
SBBreakpointLocation exposed the ignore count, but didn't expose
the hit count. Both values were exposed by SBBreakpoint and
SBWatchpoint, so this makes things a bit more consistent.
Reviewers: lldb-commits
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31283
llvm-svn: 308480
It seems that on darwin we are not able to resolve breakpoints in the
test shared library until the process has started. That seems
unfortunate, but it is not the purpose of this test, so work around that
by starting the process before doing the rest of our checks.
llvm-svn: 297830
Summary:
This fixes the case where a user tries to set a breakpoint on a source
line outside of any function (e.g. because that code is #ifdefed out, or
the compiler did not emit code for the function, etc.) and we would
silently move the breakpoint to the next function.
Now we check whether the line range of the resolved symbol context
function matches the original line number. We reject any breakpoint
locations that appear to move the breakpoint into a new function. This
filtering only happens if we have full debug info available (e.g. in
case of -gline-tables-only compilation, we still set the breakpoint on
the nearest source line).
Reviewers: jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30817
llvm-svn: 297817
Summary:
There is nothing we can do with the breakpoint once the associated
target becomes deleted. This will make sure we don't hold on to more
resources than we need in this case. In particular, this fixes the case
TestStepOverBreakpoint on windows, where a lingering SBBreakpoint object
causes us to nor unmap the executable file from memory.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30249
llvm-svn: 296328
Fixed by additional completed plans detection, and applying them on breakpoint condition fail.
Thread::GetStopInfo reworked. New test added.
Review https://reviews.llvm.org/D26497
Many thanks to Jim
llvm-svn: 290168
Summary:
Use os.getcwd() instead of get_process_working_directory() as prefix for
souce file.
Reviewers: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25217
llvm-svn: 283171
CommandData breakpoint commands didn't know whether they were
Python or Command line commands, so they couldn't serialize &
deserialize themselves properly. Fix that.
I also changed the "breakpoint list" command to note in the output
when the commands are Python commands. Fortunately only one test
was relying on this explicit bit of text output.
llvm-svn: 282432
Serialize breakpoint names & the hardware_requested attributes.
Also added a few missing affordances to SBBreakpoint whose absence
writing the tests pointed out.
<rdar://problem/12611863>
llvm-svn: 282036
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
This test was using a condition that would compare a variable against the register that would hold
it. It was failing with clang on arm64 because clang put the variable on the stack.
This is not a supportable way to write tests.
llvm-svn: 279345
It's always hard to remember when to include this file, and
when you do include it it's hard to remember what preprocessor
check it needs to be behind, and then you further have to remember
whether it's windows.h or win32.h which you need to include.
This patch changes the name to PosixApi.h, which is more appropriately
named, and makes it independent of any preprocessor setting.
There's still the issue of people not knowing when to include this,
because there's not a well-defined set of things it exposes other
than "whatever is missing on Windows", but at least this should
make it less painful to fix when problems arise.
This patch depends on LLVM revision r278170.
llvm-svn: 278177
This was a shadowed variable error from the big Expression Parser plugin-ification. I also
added a test case for this.
<rdar://problem/27682376>
llvm-svn: 277662
review it for consistency, accuracy, and clarity. These changes attempt to
address all of the above while keeping the text relatively terse.
<rdar://problem/24868841>
llvm-svn: 275485
This enables a couple of tests which have been shown to run reliably on the
linux x86 buildbot. If you see a failure after this commit, feel free to add
the xfail back, but please make it as specific as possible (i.e., try to make
it not cover i386/x86_64 with clang-3.5, clang-3.9 or gcc-4.9).
llvm-svn: 272326
The error was not getting propagated to the caller, so the higher layers thought the breakpoint
was successfully set & resolved.
I added a testcase, but it assumes 0x0 is not a valid place to set a breakpoint. On most systems
that is true, but if it isn't true of your system, either find another good place and add it to the
test, or x-fail the test.
<rdar://problem/26345962>
llvm-svn: 270014
Test uses x1 in breakpoint expression while objdump shows that x1 is never used in the code and may have random values.
Using x0 make sure that we are using a registe that will have a positive value and breakpoint expression will evaluate true atleast once.
llvm-svn: 269164
This tests both that we set the breakpoint on the right line, and that restricting by file
and/or the function, we get the right breakpoints.
llvm-svn: 269004
Summary:
The original breakpoint location test was failing for linux, because the compilers here tend to
merge the full-object and subobject destructors even at -O0 (as a result, we are getting only 2
breakpoint locations, and not 4 as the test expected. The fixup in r266164 substantially weakened
the test, as it now did not check whether both kinds of destructors were being found.
Because of these contraints, I have altered the logic of the test. It sets the
breakpoint by name, and then independently verifies that the breakpoint is set on the correct
demangled symbol name (which is not very meaningful since both kinds of destructors demangle to
the same name) *and* the correct symbol address (which is obtained by looking up the mangled
symbol name).
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: ovyalov, zturner, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19052
llvm-svn: 266416
This patch adds support for Linux on SystemZ:
- A new ArchSpec value of eCore_s390x_generic
- A new directory Plugins/ABI/SysV-s390x providing an ABI implementation
- Register context support
- Native Linux support including watchpoint support
- ELF core file support
- Misc. support throughout the code base (e.g. breakpoint opcodes)
- Test case updates to support the platform
This should provide complete support for debugging the SystemZ platform.
Not yet supported are optional features like transaction support (zEC12)
or SIMD vector support (z13).
There is no instruction emulation, since our ABI requires that all code
provide correct DWARF CFI at all PC locations in .eh_frame to support
unwinding (i.e. -fasynchronous-unwind-tables is on by default).
The implementation follows existing platforms in a mostly straightforward
manner. A couple of things that are different:
- We do not use PTRACE_PEEKUSER / PTRACE_POKEUSER to access single registers,
since some registers (access register) reside at offsets in the user area
that are multiples of 4, but the PTRACE_PEEKUSER interface only allows
accessing aligned 8-byte blocks in the user area. Instead, we use a s390
specific ptrace interface PTRACE_PEEKUSR_AREA / PTRACE_POKEUSR_AREA that
allows accessing a whole block of the user area in one go, so in effect
allowing to treat parts of the user area as register sets.
- SystemZ hardware does not provide any means to implement read watchpoints,
only write watchpoints. In fact, we can only support a *single* write
watchpoint (but this can span a range of arbitrary size). In LLDB this
means we support only a single watchpoint. I've set all test cases that
require read watchpoints (or multiple watchpoints) to expected failure
on the platform. [ Note that there were two test cases that install
a read/write watchpoint even though they nowhere rely on the "read"
property. I've changed those to simply use plain write watchpoints. ]
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18978
llvm-svn: 266308
When run with the multiprocess test runner, the getchar() trick doesn't work, so ninja check-lldb would fail on this test, but running the test directly worked fine.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19035
llvm-svn: 266145
(lldb) b ~Foo
(lldb) b Foo::~Foo
(lldb) b Bar::Foo::~Foo
Improved out C++ breakpoint locations tests as well to cover this issue.
<rdar://problem/25577252>
llvm-svn: 266139
