remove `Hi` `Lo` argument from `emitDwarfUnitLength`, so we
can make caller of emitDwarfUnitLength easier.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, dblaikie, ikudrin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96409
This allows the option to affect the LTO output. Module::Max helps to
generate debug info for all modules in the same format.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96597
Originally landed in ddc2f1e3fb4 and reverted in d32deaab4d because of
a Generic test objecting. That was fixed up in 013613964fd9. Original
landing commit message follows:
[DWARF] Location-less inlined variables should not have DW_TAG_variable
Discussed in this thread:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-January/148139.html
DwarfDebug::collectEntityInfo accidentally distinguishes between variable
locations that never have a location specified, and variable locations that
have an empty location specified. The latter leads to the creation of an
empty variable referring to the abstract origin.
Fix this by seeking a non-empty location before producing a concrete
entity, to guarantee a DW_AT_location will be produced. Other loops in
collectEntityInfo and endFunctionImpl take care of examining the
retainedNodes collection and ensuring optimised-out variables are created.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95617
Discussed in this thread:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-January/148139.html
DwarfDebug::collectEntityInfo accidentally distinguishes between variable
locations that never have a location specified, and variable locations that
have an empty location specified. The latter leads to the creation of an
empty variable referring to the abstract origin.
Fix this by seeking a non-empty location before producing a concrete
entity, to guarantee a DW_AT_location will be produced. Other loops in
collectEntityInfo and endFunctionImpl take care of examining the
retainedNodes collection and ensuring optimised-out variables are created.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95617
Experimental, using non-existent DWARF support to use an expr for the
location involving an addr_index (to compute address + offset so
addresses can be reused in more places).
The global variable debug info had to be deferred until the end of the
module (so bss variables would all be emitted first - so their labels
would have the relevant section). Non-bss variables seemed to not have
their label assigned to a section even at the end of the module, so I
didn't know what to do there.
Also, the hashing code is broken - doesn't know how to hash these
expressions (& isn't hashing anything inside subprograms, which seems
problematic), so for test purposes this change just skips the hash
computation. (GCC's actually overly sensitive in its hash function, it
seems - I'm forgetting the specific case right now - anyway, we might
want to just use the frontend-known file hash and give up on optimistic
.dwo/.dwp reuse)
A struct in C passed by value did not get debug information. Such values are currently
lowered to a Wasm local even in -O0 (not to an alloca like on other archs), which becomes
a Target Index operand (TI_LOCAL). The DWARF writing code was not emitting locations
in for TI's specifically if the location is a single range (not a list).
In addition, the ExplicitLocals pass which removes the ARGUMENT pseudo instructions did
not update the associated DBG_VALUEs, and couldn't even find these values since the code
assumed such instructions are adjacent, which is not the case here.
Also fixed asm printing of TIs needed by a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94140
Given the ability provided by DWARFv5 rnglists to reuse addresses in the
address pool, it can be advantageous to object file size to use range
encodings even when the range could be described by a direct low/high
pc.
Add a flag to allow enabling this in DWARFv5 for the purpose of
experimentation/data gathering.
It might be that it makes sense to enable this functionality by default
for DWARFv5 + Split DWARF at least, where the tradeoff/desire to
optimize for .o file size is more explicit and .o bytes are higher
priority than .dwo bytes.
Currently using DW_OP_implicit_value in fragments produces invalid DWARF
expressions. (Such a case can occur in complex floats, for example.)
This problem manifests itself as a missing DW_OP_piece operation after
the last fragment. This happens because the function for printing
constant float value skips printing the accompanying DWARF expression,
as that would also print DW_OP_stack_value (which is not desirable in
this case). However, this also results in DW_OP_piece being skipped.
The reason that DW_OP_piece is missing only for the last piece is that
the act of printing the next fragment corrects this. However, it does
that for the wrong reason -- the code emitting this DW_OP_piece thinks
that the previous fragment was missing, and so it thinks that it needs
to skip over it in order to be able to print itself.
In a simple scenario this works out, but it's likely that in a more
complex setup (where some pieces are in fact missing), this logic would
go badly wrong. In a simple setup gdb also seems to not mind the fact
that the DW_OP_piece is missing, but it would also likely not handle
more complex use cases.
For this reason, this patch disables the usage of DW_OP_implicit_value
in the frament scenario (we will use DW_OP_const*** instead), until we
figure out the right way to deal with this. This guarantees that we
produce valid expressions, and gdb can handle both kinds of inputs
anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92013
If a function parameter is marked as "undef", prevent creation
of CallSiteInfo for that parameter.
Without this patch, the parameter's call_site_value would be incorrect.
The incorrect call_value case reported in PR39716,
addressed in D85111.
Patch by Nikola Tesic
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92471
This patch moves the selection of the style used to emit the numbers
(DW_OP_implicit_value vs. DW_OP_const+DW_OP_stack_value) into
DwarfExpression::addUnsignedConstant. This logic is not FP-specific, and
it will be needed for large integers too.
The refactor also makes DW_OP_implicit_value (DW_OP_stack_value worked
already) be used for floating point constants other than float and
double, so I've added a _Float16 test for it.
Split off from D90916.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91058
The test fails on Mac, see comment on the code review.
> This option was in a rather convoluted place, causing global parameters
> to be set in awkward and undesirable ways to try to account for it
> indirectly. Add tests for the -disable-debug-info option and ensure we
> don't print unintended markers from unintended places.
>
> Reviewed By: dstenb
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91083
This reverts commit 9606ef03f03904cec213db031b5ea6fd6052dc5d.
This option was in a rather convoluted place, causing global parameters
to be set in awkward and undesirable ways to try to account for it
indirectly. Add tests for the -disable-debug-info option and ensure we
don't print unintended markers from unintended places.
Reviewed By: dstenb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91083
This lets external consumers customize the output, similar to how
AssemblyAnnotationWriter lets the caller define callbacks when printing
IR. The array of handlers already existed, this just cleans up the code
so that it can be exposed publically.
Replaces https://reviews.llvm.org/D74158
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89613
Since Wasm comdat sections work similarly to ELF, we can use that mechanism
to eliminate duplicate dwarf type information in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88603
Since Wasm comdat sections work similarly to ELF, we can use that mechanism
to eliminate duplicate dwarf type information in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88603
This patch enables emitting DWARF `DW_OP_implicit_value` opcode when
tuning debug information for LLDB (`-debugger-tune=lldb`).
This will also propagate to Darwin platforms, since they use LLDB tuning
as a default.
rdar://67406059
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90001
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Testing reveals that lldb and gdb have some problems with supporting
DW_OP_convert - gdb with Split DWARF tries to resolve the CU-relative
DIE offset relative to the skeleton DIE. lldb tries to treat the offset
as absolute, which judging by the llvm-dsymutil support for
DW_OP_convert, I guess works OK in MachO? (though probably llvm-dsymutil
is producing invalid DWARF by resolving the relative reference to an
absolute one?).
Specifically this disables DW_OP_convert usage in DWARFv5 if:
* Tuning for GDB and using Split DWARF
* Tuning for LLDB and not targeting MachO
This lets external consumers customize the output, similar to how
AssemblyAnnotationWriter lets the caller define callbacks when printing
IR. The array of handlers already existed, this just cleans up the code
so that it can be exposed publically.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74158
The patch fixes emitting flags and the debug_line_offset field in
the header, as well as the reference to the macro string for
a pre-standard GNU .debug_macro extension.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87024
The transition is done by using methods of AsmPrinter which
automatically emit values in compliance with the selected DWARF format.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87013
The patch fixes calculating the size of the table and emitting
the fields which depend on the DWARF format by using methods that
choose appropriate sizes automatically.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87012
The patch also adds a method to choose an appropriate DWARF form
to represent section offsets according to the version and the format
of producing debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87014
The patch adds a switch to enable emitting debug info in the 64-bit
DWARF format. Most emitter for sections will be updated in the subsequent
patches, whereas for .debug_line and .debug_frame the emitters are in
the MC library, which is already updated.
For now, the switch is enabled only for 64-bit ELF targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87011
This reverts commit b9d977b0ca60c54f11615ca9d144c9f08b29fd85.
This cutoff is no longer required. The commit 34ffa7fc501 (D86153) introduces a
performance improvement which was tested against the motivating case for this
patch.
Discussed in differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86153
Almost NFC (see end).
The backwards scan in validThroughout significantly contributed to compile time
for a pathological case, causing the 'X86 Assembly Printer' pass to account for
roughly 70% of the run time. This patch guards the loop against running
unnecessarily, bringing the pass contribution down to 4%.
Almost NFC: There is a hack in validThroughout which promotes single constant
value DBG_VALUEs in the prologue to be live throughout the function. We're more
likely to hit this code path with this patch applied. Similarly to the parent
patches there is a small coverage change reported in the order of 10s of bytes.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86153
With the changes introduced in D86151 we can now check for single locations
which span multiple blocks for inlined scopes and blocks.
D86151 introduced the InstructionOrdering parameter, replacing a scan through
MBB instructions. The functionality to compare instruction positions across
blocks was add there, and this patch just removes the exit checks that were
previously (but no longer) required.
CTMark shows a geomean binary size reduction of 2.2% for RelWithDebInfo builds.
llvm-locstats (using D85636) shows a very small variable location coverage
change in 5 of 10 binaries, but just like in D86151 it is only in the order of
10s of bytes.
Reviewed By: djtodoro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86152
With this patch we're now accounting for two more cases which should be
considered 'valid throughout': First, where RangeEnd is ScopeEnd. Second, where
RangeEnd comes before ScopeEnd when including meta instructions, but are both
preceded by the same non-meta instruction.
CTMark shows a geomean binary size reduction of 1.5% for RelWithDebInfo builds.
`llvm-locstats` (using D85636) shows a very small variable location coverage
change in 2 of 10 binaries, but it is in the order of 10s of bytes which lines
up with my expectations.
I've added a test which checks both of these new cases. The first check in the
test isn't strictly necessary for this patch. But I'm not sure that it is
explicitly tested anywhere else, and is useful for the final patch in the
series.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86151
This patch was reverted in 7c182663a857fc87 due to some failures
observed on PCC based machines. Failures were due to Endianness issue and
long double representation issues.
Patch is revised to address Endianness issue. Furthermore, support
for emission of `DW_OP_implicit_value` for `long double` has been removed
(since it was unclean at the moment). Planning to handle this in
a clean way soon!
For more context, please refer to following review link.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83560
llvm is missing support for DW_OP_implicit_value operation.
DW_OP_implicit_value op is indispensable for cases such as
optimized out long double variables.
For intro refer: DWARFv5 Spec Pg: 40 2.6.1.1.4 Implicit Location Descriptions
Consider the following example:
```
int main() {
long double ld = 3.14;
printf("dummy\n");
ld *= ld;
return 0;
}
```
when compiled with tunk `clang` as
`clang test.c -g -O1` produces following location description
of variable `ld`:
```
DW_AT_location (0x00000000:
[0x0000000000201691, 0x000000000020169b): DW_OP_constu 0xc8f5c28f5c28f800, DW_OP_stack_value, DW_OP_piece 0x8, DW_OP_constu 0x4000, DW_OP_stack_value, DW_OP_bit_piece 0x10 0x40, DW_OP_stack_value)
DW_AT_name ("ld")
```
Here one may notice that this representation is incorrect(DWARF4
stack could only hold integers(and only up to the size of address)).
Here the variable size itself is `128` bit.
GDB and LLDB confirms this:
```
(gdb) p ld
$1 = <invalid float value>
(lldb) frame variable ld
(long double) ld = <extracting data from value failed>
```
GCC represents/uses DW_OP_implicit_value in these sort of situations.
Based on the discussion with Jakub Jelinek regarding GCC's motivation
for using this, I concluded that DW_OP_implicit_value is most appropriate
in this case.
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-July/233057.html
GDB seems happy after this patch:(LLDB doesn't have support
for DW_OP_implicit_value)
```
(gdb) p ld
p ld
$1 = 3.14000000000000012434
```
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83560
