With AVX512 vXi1 types are legal so we shouldn't be extending them.
This change is similar to existing code in the zext(setcc) combine.
llvm-svn: 319120
Since i1 is a legal type, this:
NumBytes = Op1->getMemoryVT().getSizeInBits() >> 3;
is wrong and should be instead
NumBytes = Op0->getMemoryVT().getStoreSize();
There seems to be more places where this should be fixed outside DAGCombiner.
Review: Hal Finkel
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35366
llvm-svn: 318824
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
Change the calculation for the desired ValueType for non-sign
extending loads, as in those cases we don't care about the
higher bits. This creates a smaller ExtVT and allows for such
combinations as:
(srl (zextload i16, [addr]), 8) -> (zextload i8, [addr + 1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40034
llvm-svn: 318390
In function DAGCombiner::visitSIGN_EXTEND_INREG, sext can be combined with extload even if sextload is not supported by target, then
if sext is the only user of extload, there is no big difference, no harm no benefit.
if extload has more than one user, the combined sextload may block extload from combining with other zext, causes extra zext instructions generated. As demonstrated by the attached test case.
This patch add the constraint that when sextload is not supported by target, sext can only be combined with extload if it is the only user of extload.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39108
llvm-svn: 316802
combineShuffleOfScalars is very conservative about shuffled BUILD_VECTORs that can be combined together.
This patch adds one additional case - if both BUILD_VECTORs represent splats of the same scalar value but with different UNDEF elements, then we should create a single splat BUILD_VECTOR, sharing only the UNDEF elements defined by the shuffle mask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38696
llvm-svn: 316331
This is only currently used for mad/fma transforms.
This is the only case where it should be used for AMDGPU,
so add an opcode to be sure.
llvm-svn: 315740
Eg:
insert v4i32 V, (v2i16 X), 2 --> shuffle v8i16 V', X', {0,1,2,3,8,9,6,7}
This is a generalization of the IR fold in D38316 to handle insertion into a non-undef vector.
We may want to abandon that one if we can't find value in squashing the more specific pattern sooner.
We're using the existing legal shuffle target hook to avoid AVX512 horror with vXi1 shuffles.
There may be room for improvement in the shuffle lowering here, but that would be follow-up work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38388
llvm-svn: 315460
Summary:
See https://llvm.org/PR33743 for more details
It seems that for non-power of 2 vector sizes, the algorithm can produce
non-matching sizes for input and result causing an assert.
This usually isn't a problem as the isAnyExtend check will weed these out, but
in some cases (most often with lots of undefined values for the mask indices) it
can pass this check for non power of 2 vectors.
Adding in an extra check that ensures that bit size will match for the result
and input (as required)
Subscribers: nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35241
llvm-svn: 315307
Without this, we could end up trying to get the Nth (0-indexed) element
from a subvector of size N.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37880
llvm-svn: 314380
At least for the 64-bit and less case, we should be able to determine if we even have a mask without counting any bits. This also removes the need to explicitly check for 0 active bits, isMask will return false for 0.
llvm-svn: 313908
If we have an AssertZext of a truncated value that has already been AssertZext'ed,
we can assert on the wider source op to improve the zext-y knowledge:
assert (trunc (assert X, i8) to iN), i1 --> trunc (assert X, i1) to iN
This moves a fold from being Mips-specific to general combining, and x86 shows
improvements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37017
llvm-svn: 313577
rL310710 allowed store merging to occur after legalization to catch stores that are created late,
but this exposes a logic hole seen in PR34217:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34217
We will miss merging stores if the target lowers vector extracts into target-specific operations.
This patch allows store merging to occur both before and after legalization if the target chooses
to get maximum merging.
I don't think the potential regressions in the other tests are relevant. The tests are for
correctness of weird IR constructs rather than perf tests, and I think those are still correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37987
llvm-svn: 313564
We already have a combine for this pattern when the input to shl is add, so we just need to enable the transformation when the input is or.
Original patch by @tstellar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19325
llvm-svn: 313251
Fixes some combine issues for AMDGPU where we weren't
getting the many extract_vector_elt combines expected
in a future patch.
This should really be checking isOperationLegalOrCustom on
the extract. That improves a number of x86 lit tests, but
a few get stuck in an infinite loop from one place
where a similar looking extract is created. I have a
different workaround in the backend for that which
keeps many of those improvements, but also adds a few
regressions.
llvm-svn: 312730
The function combineShuffleToVectorExtend in DAGCombine might generate an illegal typed node after "legalize types" phase, causing assertion on non-simple type to fail afterwards.
Adding a type check in case the combine is running after the type legalize pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37330
llvm-svn: 312438
The loop dependence check looks for dependencies between store merge
candidates not captured by the chain sub-DAG doing a check of
predecessors which may be very large. Conservatively bound number of
nodes checked for compilation time. (Resolves PR34326).
Landing on behalf of Nirav Dave to unblock the 5.0.0 release.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37220
llvm-svn: 312022
Only do this before operations are legalized of BUILD_VECTOR is Legal for the target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37186
llvm-svn: 311892
Summary:
If all the operands of a BUILD_VECTOR extract elements from same vector then split the
vector efficiently based on the maximum vector access index.
This will also fix PR 33784
Reviewers: zvi, delena, RKSimon, thakis
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: chandlerc, eladcohen, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35788
llvm-svn: 311833
This goes back to a discussion about IR canonicalization. We'd like to preserve and convert
more IR to 'select' than we currently do because that's likely the best choice in IR:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-September/105335.html
...but that's often not true for codegen, so we need to account for this pattern coming in
to the backend and transform it to better DAG ops.
Steps in this patch:
1. Add an EVT param to the existing convertSelectOfConstantsToMath() TLI hook to more finely
enable this transform. Other targets will probably want that anyway to distinguish scalars
from vectors. We're using that here to exclude AVX512 targets, but it may not be necessary.
2. Convert a vselect to ext+add. This eliminates a constant load/materialization, and the
vector ext is often free.
Implementing a more general fold using xor+and can be a follow-up for targets that don't have
a legal vselect. It's also possible that we can remove the TLI hook for the special case fold
implemented here because we're eliminating a constant, but it needs to be tested on other
targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36840
llvm-svn: 311731
When one operand is a user of another in a promoted binary operation
we may replace and delete the returned value before returning
triggering an assertion. Reorder node replacements to prevent this.
Fixes PR34137.
Landing on behalf of Nirav.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36581
llvm-svn: 311623
This partially reverts r311429 in favor of making ISD::isConstantSplatVector do something not confusing. Turns out the only other user of it was also having to deal with the weird property of it returning a smaller size.
So rather than continue to deal with this quirk everywhere, just make the interface do something sane.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37039
llvm-svn: 311510
Summary:
If all the operands of a BUILD_VECTOR extract elements from same vector then split the
vector efficiently based on the maximum vector access index.
Reviewers: zvi, delena, RKSimon, thakis
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: chandlerc, eladcohen, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35788
llvm-svn: 311255
Summary: It is creating useless work as the commuted nodes is the same as the node we are working on in that case.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33840
llvm-svn: 310832
Summary:
Without the SrcVT its hard to know what is really being asked for. For example if your target has 128, 256, and 512 bit vectors. Maybe extracting 128 from 256 is cheap, but maybe extracting 128 from 512 is not.
For x86 we do support extracting a quarter of a 512-bit register. But for i1 vectors we don't have isel patterns for extracting arbitrary pieces. So we need this to have a correct implementation of isExtractSubvectorCheap for mask vectors.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, efriedma
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36649
llvm-svn: 310793
If all the operands of a BUILD_VECTOR extract elements from same vector then split the vector efficiently based on the maximum vector access index.
Reapplied with fix to only work with simple value types.
Committed on behalf of @jbhateja (Jatin Bhateja)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35788
llvm-svn: 310782
The previous rev (r310208) failed to account for overflow when subtracting the
constants to see if they're suitable for shift/lea. This version add a check
for that and more test were added in r310490.
We can convert any select-of-constants to math ops:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/d7d
For this patch, I'm enhancing an existing x86 transform that uses fake multiplies
(they always become shl/lea) to avoid cmov or branching. The current code misses
cases where we have a negative constant and a positive constant, so this is just
trying to plug that hole.
The DAGCombiner diff prevents us from hitting a terrible inefficiency: we can start
with a select in IR, create a select DAG node, convert it into a sext, convert it
back into a select, and then lower it to sext machine code.
Some notes about the test diffs:
1. 2010-08-04-MaskedSignedCompare.ll - We were creating control flow that didn't exist in the IR.
2. memcmp.ll - Choose -1 or 1 is the case that got me looking at this again. We could avoid the
push/pop in some cases if we used 'movzbl %al' instead of an xor on a different reg? That's a
post-DAG problem though.
3. mul-constant-result.ll - The trade-off between sbb+not vs. setne+neg could be addressed if
that's a regression, but those would always be nearly equivalent.
4. pr22338.ll and sext-i1.ll - These tests have undef operands, so we don't actually care about these diffs.
5. sbb.ll - This shows a win for what is likely a common case: choose -1 or 0.
6. select.ll - There's another borderline case here: cmp+sbb+or vs. test+set+lea? Also, sbb+not vs. setae+neg shows up again.
7. select_const.ll - These are motivating cases for the enhancement; replace cmov with cheaper ops.
Assembly differences between movzbl and xor to avoid a partial reg stall are caused later by the X86 Fixup SetCC pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35340
llvm-svn: 310717
