So that it has access to getOrCreateGlobalVariableDIE. If we ever support
decsribing using directive in C++ classes (thus requiring support in type
units), it will certainly use another mechanism anyway.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5975
llvm-svn: 220594
(part of refactoring to allow subprogram emission in both the skeleton
and main units to enable -gmlt-like data to be included in the skeleton
for live inlined backtracing purposes)
llvm-svn: 220578
While refactoring this code I was confused by both the name I had
introduced (addNonArgumentVariable... but it has all this logic to
handle argument numbering and keep things in order?) and by the
redundancy. Seems when I fixed the misordered inlined argument handling,
I didn't realize it was mostly redundant with the argument ordering code
(which I may've also written, I'm not sure). So let's just rely on the
more general case.
The only oddity in output this produces is that it means when we emit
all the variables for the current function, we don't track when we've
finished the argument variables and are about to start the local
variables and insert DW_AT_unspecified_parameters (for varargs
functions) there. Instead it ends up after the local variables, scopes,
etc. But this isn't invalid and doesn't cause DWARF consumers problems
that I know of... so we'll just go with that because it makes the code
nice & simple.
(though, let's see what the buildbots have to say about this - *crosses
fingers*)
There will be some cleanup commits to follow to remove the now trivial
wrappers, etc.
llvm-svn: 220527
This fixes a bug (introduced by fixing the IR emitted from Clang where
the definition of a static member would be scoped within the class,
rather than within its lexical decl context) where the definition of a
static variable would be placed inside a class.
It also improves source fidelity by scoping static class member
definitions inside the lexical decl context in which tehy are written
(eg: namespace n { class foo { static int i; } int foo::i; } - the
definition of 'i' will be within the namespace 'n' in the DWARF output
now).
Lastly, and the original goal, this reduces debug info size slightly
(and makes debug info easier to read, etc) by placing the definitions of
non-member global variables within their namespace, rather than using a
separate namespace-scoped declaration along with a definition at global
scope.
Based on patches and discussion with Frédéric.
llvm-svn: 220497
Variable handling will be sunk into DwarfFile so that abstract variables
and the like can be shared across multiple CUs (to handle cross-CU
inlining, for example).
llvm-svn: 220453
Use the DwarfDebug in one function that previously took it as a
parameter, and lay the foundation for use this for other operations
coming soon.
llvm-svn: 220452
Now that we're sure the only root (non-abstract) scope is the current
function scope, there's no need for isCurrentFunctionScope, the property
can be tested directly instead.
llvm-svn: 220451
Every target we support has support for assembly that looks like
a = b - c
.long a
What is special about MachO is that the above combination suppresses the
production of a relocation.
With this change we avoid producing the intermediary labels when they don't
add any value.
llvm-svn: 220256
Broken parent scope pointers in inlined DIVariables can cause
ensureAbstractVariableIsCreated to insert new abstract scopes, thus
invalidating the iterator in this loop and leading to hard-to-debug
crashes. Useful when manually reducing IR for testcases.
llvm-svn: 219628
This introduces access to the AbstractSPDies map from DwarfDebug so
DwarfCompileUnit can access it. Eventually this'll sink down to
DwarfFile, but it'll still be generically accessible - not much
encapsulation to provide it. (constructInlinedScopeDIE could stay
further up, in DwarfFile to avoid exposing this - but I don't think
that's particularly better)
llvm-svn: 219411
(& add a few accessors/make a couple of things public for this - it's a
bit of a toss-up, but I think I prefer it this way, keeping some more of
the meaty code down in DwarfCompileUnit - if only to make for smaller
implementation files, etc)
I think we could simplify range handling a bit if we removed the range
lists from each unit and just put a single range list on DwarfDebug,
similar to address pooling.
llvm-svn: 219370
One of many steps to generalize subprogram emission to both the DWO and
non-DWO sections (to emit -gmlt-like data under fission). Once the
functions are pushed down into DwarfCompileUnit some of the data
structures will be pushed at least into DwarfFile so that they can be
unique per-file, allowing emission to both files independently.
llvm-svn: 219345
It was just calling a bunch of DwarfUnit functions anyway, as can be
seen by the simplification of removing "TheCU" from all the function
calls in the implementation.
llvm-svn: 219103
This requires exposing some of the current function state from
DwarfDebug. I hope there's not too much of that to expose as I go
through all the functions, but it still seems nicer to expose singular
data down to multiple consumers, than have consumers expose raw mapping
data structures up to DwarfDebug for building subprograms.
Part of a series of refactoring to allow subprograms in both the
skeleton and dwo CUs under Fission.
llvm-svn: 219060
