So that it has access to getOrCreateGlobalVariableDIE. If we ever support
decsribing using directive in C++ classes (thus requiring support in type
units), it will certainly use another mechanism anyway.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5975
llvm-svn: 220594
It was just calling a bunch of DwarfUnit functions anyway, as can be
seen by the simplification of removing "TheCU" from all the function
calls in the implementation.
llvm-svn: 219103
In preparation for sinking all the subprogram emission code down from
DwarfDebug into DwarfCompileUnit, this will avoid bloating
DwarfUnit.h/cpp greatly and make concerns a bit more clear/isolated.
(sinking this handling down is part of the work to handle emitting
minimal subprograms for -gmlt-like data into the skeleton CU under
fission)
llvm-svn: 219057
Summary:
This will allow to request the creation of a forward delacred variable
at is point of use (for imported declarations, this will be
DwarfDebug::constructImportedEntityDIE) rather than having to put the
forward decl in a retention list.
Note that getOrCreateGlobalVariable returns the actual definition DIE when the
routine creates a declaration and a definition DIE. If you agree this is the
right behavior, then I'll have a followup patch that registers the definition
in the DIE map instead of the declaration as it is today (this 'breaks' only
one test, where we test that the imported entity is the declaration). I'm
not sure what's best here, but it's easy enough for a consumer to follow the
DW_AT_specification link to get to the declaration, whereas it takes more
work to find the actual definition from a declaration DIE.
Reviewers: echristo, dblaikie, aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5381
llvm-svn: 218126
So that the two operations in DwarfDebug couldn't get separated (because
I accidentally separated them in some work in progress), put them
together. While we're here, move DwarfUnit::addRange to
DwarfCompileUnit, since it's not relevant to type units.
llvm-svn: 217468
Add header guards to files that were missing guards. Remove #endif comments
as they don't seem common in LLVM (we can easily add them back if we decide
they're useful)
Changes made by clang-tidy with minor tweaks.
llvm-svn: 215558
variables (for example, by-value struct arguments passed in registers, or
large integer values split across several smaller registers).
On the IR level, this adds a new type of complex address operation OpPiece
to DIVariable that describes size and offset of a variable fragment.
On the DWARF emitter level, all pieces describing the same variable are
collected, sorted and emitted as DWARF expressions using the DW_OP_piece
and DW_OP_bit_piece operators.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3373
rdar://problem/15928306
What this patch doesn't do / Future work:
- This patch only adds the backend machinery to make this work, patches
that change SROA and SelectionDAG's type legalizer to actually create
such debug info will follow. (http://reviews.llvm.org/D2680)
- Making the DIVariable complex expressions into an argument of dbg.value
will reduce the memory footprint of the debug metadata.
- The sorting/uniquing of pieces should be moved into DebugLocEntry,
to facilitate the merging of multi-piece entries.
llvm-svn: 214576
DITypeArray is an array of DITypeRef, at its creation, we will create
DITypeRef (i.e use the identifier if the type node has an identifier).
This is the last patch to unique the type array of a subroutine type.
rdar://17628609
llvm-svn: 214132
This recommits r208930, r208933, and r208975 (by reverting r209338) and
reverts r209529 (the FIXME to readd this functionality once the tools
were fixed) now that DWP has been fixed to cope with a single section
for all fission type units.
Original commit message:
"Since type units in the dwo file are handled by a debug aware tool,
they don't need to leverage the ELF comdat grouping to implement
deduplication. Avoid creating all the .group sections for these as a
space optimization."
llvm-svn: 213956
This doesn't fix the abstract variable handling yet, but it introduces a
similar delay mechanism as was added for subprograms, causing
DW_AT_location to be reordered to the beginning of the attribute list
for local variables, and fixes all the test fallout for that.
A subsequent commit will remove the abstract variable handling in
DbgVariable and just do the abstract variable lookup at module end to
ensure that abstract variables introduced after their concrete
counterparts are appropriately referenced by the concrete variable.
llvm-svn: 210943
This ensures that member functions, for example, are entered into
pubnames with their fully qualified name, rather than inside the global
namespace.
llvm-svn: 210379
This reverts commit r208930, r208933, and r208975.
It seems not all fission consumers are ready to handle this behavior.
Reverting until tools are brought up to spec.
llvm-svn: 209338
Since type units in the dwo file are handled by a debug aware tool, they
don't need to leverage the ELF comdat grouping to implement
deduplication. Avoid creating all the .group sections for these as a
space optimization.
llvm-svn: 208930
And the winner by a nose is isUnsignedDIType, for no particular reason.
These two functions were just complements of each other and used in very
related code, so refactor callers to just use one of them.
llvm-svn: 208500
Doesn't seem a good reason to duplicate this code (it was more literally
duplicated prior to r208494, and while the dataN code /does/ actually
fire in this case, it doesn't seem necessary (and the DWARF standard
recommends using udata/sdata pervasively instead of dataN, so as to
indicate signedness of the values))
llvm-svn: 208495
Breaks GDB buildbot
(http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-ubuntu-gdb-75/builds/14517)
GCC emits DW_AT_object_pointer /everywhere/ (declaration, abstract
definition, inlined subroutine), but it looks like GCC relies on it
being somewhere other than the declaration, at least. I'll experiment
further & can hopefully still remove it from the inlined_subroutine.
This reverts commit r207705.
llvm-svn: 207719
They just don't need to be there - they're inherited from the abstract
definition. In theory I would like them to be inherited from the
declaration, but the DWARF standard doesn't quite say that... we can
probably do it anyway but I'm less confident about that so I'll leave it
for a separate commit.
llvm-svn: 207717
This effectively reverts r164326, but adds some comments and
justification and ensures we /don't/ emit the DW_AT_object_pointer on
the (abstract and concrete) definitions. (while still preserving it on
standalone definitions involving ObjC Blocks)
This does increase the size of member function declarations from 7 to 11
bytes, unfortunately, but still seems like the Right Thing to do so that
callers that see only the declaration still have the information about
the object pointer. That said, I don't know what, if any, DWARF
consumers don't have a heuristic to guess this in the case of normal
C++ member functions - perhaps we can remove it entirely.
llvm-svn: 207705
Seems at some point the intent was to emit fission ranges_base as unique
per CU but the code today emits ranges_base as the start of the ranges
section for all CUs being compiled and all the ranges_base relative
addresses are relative to that. So removing this dead code and leaving
the status quo until there's a reason to change it (perhaps something's
faster if it has distinct ranges for each CU).
llvm-svn: 207464
Since all 4 ctor calls in DwarfDebug just pass in a trivially
constructed DIE with the right tag type, sink the tag selection down
into the Dwarf*Unit ctors (removing the argument entirely from callers
in DwarfDebug) and initialize the DIE member in DwarfUnit.
llvm-svn: 207448
Since there's no way to ensure the type unit in the .dwo and the type
unit skeleton in the .o are correlated, this cannot work.
This implementation is a bit inefficient for a few reasons, called out
in comments.
llvm-svn: 207323
This should reduce the chance of memory leaks like those fixed in
r207240.
There's still some unclear ownership of DIEs happening in DwarfDebug.
Pushing unique_ptr and references through more APIs should help expose
the cases where ownership is a bit fuzzy.
llvm-svn: 207263
Since this doesn't return ownership (the DIE has been added to the
specified parent already) nor return null, just return by reference.
llvm-svn: 207259
This'll make changing to unique_ptr ownership of DIEs easier since the
usages will now have '*' on them making them textually compatible
between unique_ptr and raw pointer.
llvm-svn: 207253
This prompted me to push references through most of DwarfDebug. Sorry
for the churn.
Honestly it's a bit silly that we're passing around units all over the
place like that anyway and I think it's mostly due to the DIE attribute
adding utility functions being utilities in DwarfUnit. I should have
another go at moving them out of DwarfUnit...
llvm-svn: 206925
Use the range machinery for DW_AT_ranges and DW_AT_high/lo_pc.
This commit moves us from a single range per subprogram to extending
ranges if we are:
a) In the same section, and
b) In the same enclosing CU.
This means we have more fine grained ranges for compile units, and fewer
ranges overall when we have multiple functions in the same CU
adjacent to each other in the object file.
Also remove all of the earlier hacks around this functionality for
function sections etc. Also update all of the testcases to take into
account the merging functionality.
with a fix for location entries in the debug_loc section:
Make sure that debug loc entries are relative to the low_pc
of the compile unit. This means that when we only have a single
range that the offset should be just relative to the low_pc
of the unit, for multiple ranges for a CU this means that we'll be
relative to 0 which we emit along with DW_AT_ranges.
This mostly shows up with linked binaries, so add a testcase with
multiple CUs so that our location is going to be offset of a CU
with a non-zero low_pc.
llvm-svn: 204377
This commit moves us from a single range per subprogram to extending
ranges if we are:
a) In the same section, and
b) In the same enclosing CU.
This means we have more fine grained ranges for compile units, and fewer
ranges overall when we have multiple functions in the same CU
adjacent to each other in the object file.
Also remove all of the earlier hacks around this functionality for
function sections etc. Also update all of the testcases to take into
account the merging functionality.
llvm-svn: 204277
