This is a revert-of-revert (i.e. this reverts commit 802bec89, which
itself reverted fa4701e1 and 79daafc9) with a fix folded in. The problem
was that call site tags weren't emitted properly when LTO was enabled
along with split-dwarf. This required a minor fix. I've added a reduced
test case in test/DebugInfo/X86/fission-call-site.ll.
Original commit message:
This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.
We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.
This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.
As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.
Update #1:
Reland with a fix to create a declaration DIE when the declaration is
missing from the CU's retainedTypes list. The declaration is left out
of the retainedTypes list in two cases:
1) Re-compiling pre-r266445 bitcode (in which declarations weren't added
to the retainedTypes list), and
2) Doing LTO function importing (which doesn't update the retainedTypes
list).
It's possible to handle (1) and (2) by modifying the retainedTypes list
(in AutoUpgrade, or in the LTO importing logic resp.), but I don't see
an advantage to doing it this way, as it would cause more DWARF to be
emitted compared to creating the declaration DIEs lazily.
Update #2:
Fold in a fix for call site tag emission in the split-dwarf + LTO case.
Tested with a stage2 ThinLTO+RelWithDebInfo build of clang, and with a
ReleaseLTO-g build of the test suite.
rdar://46577651, rdar://57855316, rdar://57840415, rdar://58888440
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350
... as well as:
Revert "[DWARF] Defer creating declaration DIEs until we prepare call site info"
This reverts commit fa4701e1979553c2df61698ac1ac212627630442.
This reverts commit 79daafc90308787b52a5d3a7586e82acd5e374b3.
There have been reports of this assert getting hit:
CalleeDIE && "Could not find DIE for call site entry origin
Summary:
This was reverted in 328e0f3dcac52171b8cdedeaba22c98e7fbb75ea due to
chromium bot failure. This revision addresses that case.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This patch will provide support for auto return type for the C++ member
functions. Before this return type of the member function is deduced and
stored in the DIE.
This patch includes llvm side implementation of this feature.
Patch by: Awanish Pandey <Awanish.Pandey@amd.com>
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, shafik, alok, SouraVX, jini.susan.george
Reviewed by: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70524
[this re-applies c0176916a4824812d25a5a22c4ff7c95857b0cd6
with the correct commit message and phabricator link]
This addresses point 1 of PR44213.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
The DW_AT_LLVM_sysroot attribute is used for Clang module debug info,
to allow LLDB to import a Clang module from source. Currently it is
part of each DW_TAG_module, however, it is the same for all modules in
a compile unit. It is more efficient and less ambiguous to store it
once in the DW_TAG_compile_unit.
This should have no effect on DWARF consumers other than LLDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71732
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
Summary:
This patch will provide support for auto return type for the C++ member
functions. Before this return type of the member function is deduced and
stored in the DIE.
This patch includes llvm side implementation of this feature.
Patch by: Awanish Pandey <Awanish.Pandey@amd.com>
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, shafik, alok, SouraVX, jini.susan.george
Reviewed by: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70524
This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.
We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.
This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.
As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.
Update:
Reland with a fix to create a declaration DIE when the declaration is
missing from the CU's retainedTypes list. The declaration is left out
of the retainedTypes list in two cases:
1) Re-compiling pre-r266445 bitcode (in which declarations weren't added
to the retainedTypes list), and
2) Doing LTO function importing (which doesn't update the retainedTypes
list).
It's possible to handle (1) and (2) by modifying the retainedTypes list
(in AutoUpgrade, or in the LTO importing logic resp.), but I don't see
an advantage to doing it this way, as it would cause more DWARF to be
emitted compared to creating the declaration DIEs lazily.
Tested with a stage2 ThinLTO+RelWithDebInfo build of clang, and with a
ReleaseLTO-g build of the test suite.
rdar://46577651, rdar://57855316, rdar://57840415
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
Summary:
With DWARF5 it is no longer possible to distinguish normal methods and methods with `__attribute__((objc_direct))` by just looking at the debug information
as they are both now children of the of the DW_TAG_structure_type that defines them (before only the `__attribute__((objc_direct))` methods were children).
This means that in LLDB we are no longer able to create a correct Clang AST of a module by just looking at the debug information. Instead we would
need to call the Objective-C runtime to see which of the methods have a `__attribute__((objc_direct))` and then add the attribute to our own Clang AST
depending on what the runtime returns. This would mean that we either let the module AST be dependent on the Objective-C runtime (which doesn't
seem right) or we retroactively add the missing attribute to the imported AST in our expressions.
A third option is to annotate methods with `__attribute__((objc_direct))` as `DW_AT_APPLE_objc_direct` which is what this patch implements. This way
LLDB doesn't have to call the runtime for any `__attribute__((objc_direct))` method and the AST in our module will already be correct when we create it.
Reviewers: aprantl, SouraVX
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71201
This reverts commit 30038da15b18ac4e34b9ea7a648382ae481e4770. It causes
the stage2 thinLTO bot to fail with:
Assertion failed: (CU.getDIE(CalleeSP) && "Expected declaration subprogram DIE for callee")
rdar://57840415
This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.
We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.
This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.
As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.
rdar://46577651
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350
This revision is revised to update Go-bindings and Release Notes.
The original commit message follows.
This patch, adds support for DW_AT_alignment[DWARF5] attribute, to be emitted with typdef DIE.
When explicit alignment is specified.
Patch by Awanish Pandey <Awanish.Pandey@amd.com>
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, jini.susan.george, SouraVX, alok,
deadalinx
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70111
This patch, adds support for DW_AT_alignment[DWARF5] attribute, to be emitted with typdef DIE.
When explicit alignment is specified.
Patch by Awanish Pandey <Awanish.Pandey@amd.com>
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, jini.susan.george, SouraVX, alok,
deadalinx
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70111
This patch adds support for deleted C++ special member functions in
clang and llvm. Also added Defaulted member encodings for future
support for defaulted member functions.
Patch by Sourabh Singh Tomar!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69215
There's no need to have more than one of these (there can be two
DwarfFiles - one for the .o, one for the .dwo - but only one loc/loclist
section (either in the .o or the .dwo) & certainly one per
DebugLocStream, which is currently singular in DwarfDebug)
llvm-svn: 375183
Summary:
DWARF's DW_OP_entry_value operation has two operands; the first is a
ULEB128 operand that specifies the size of the second operand, which is
a DWARF block. This means that we need to be able to pre-calculate and
emit the size of DWARF expressions before emitting them. There is
currently no interface for doing this in DwarfExpression, so this patch
introduces that.
When implementing this I initially thought about running through
DwarfExpression's emission two times; first with a temporary buffer to
emit the expression, in order to being able to calculate the size of
that emitted data. However, DwarfExpression is a quite complex state
machine, so I decided against that, as it seemed like the two runs could
get out of sync, resulting in incorrect size operands. Therefore I have
implemented this in a way that we only have to run DwarfExpression once.
The idea is to emit DWARF to a temporary buffer, for which it is
possible to query the size. The data in the temporary buffer can then be
emitted to DwarfExpression's main output.
In the case of DIEDwarfExpression, a temporary DIE is used. The values
are all allocated using the same BumpPtrAllocator as for all other DIEs,
and the values are then transferred to the real value list. In the case
of DebugLocDwarfExpression, the temporary buffer is implemented using a
BufferByteStreamer which emits to a buffer in the DwarfExpression
object.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, NikolaPrica, djtodoro
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67768
llvm-svn: 374879
This implements the DWARF 5 feature described in:
http://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=141212.1
To support recognizing anonymous structs:
struct A {
struct { // Anonymous struct
int y;
};
} a
This patch adds support for the new flag in constructTypeDIE(...) and test to verify this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66605
llvm-svn: 369969
Dump the DWARF information about call sites and call site parameters into
debug info sections.
The patch also provides an interface for the interpretation of instructions
that could load values of a call site parameters in order to generate DWARF
about the call site parameters.
([13/13] Introduce the debug entry values.)
Co-authored-by: Ananth Sowda <asowda@cisco.com>
Co-authored-by: Nikola Prica <nikola.prica@rt-rk.com>
Co-authored-by: Ivan Baev <ibaev@cisco.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60716
llvm-svn: 365467
This is consistent with GCC's behavior (which is the defacto standard
for pubnames). Though I find the presence of enumerators from enum
classes to be a bit confusing, possibly a bug on GCC's end (since they
can't be named unqualified, unlike the other names - and names nested in
classes don't go in pubnames, for instance - presumably because one must
name the class first & that's enough to limit the scope of the search)
llvm-svn: 363349
Variable's stack location can stretch longer than it should. If a
variable is placed at the stack in a some nested basic block its range
can be calculated to be up to the next occurrence of the variable's
DBG_VALUE, or up to the end of the function, thus covering a basic
blocks that should not be included in the variable’s location range.
This happens because the DbgEntityHistoryCalculator ends register
locations at the end of a basic block only if the variable’s location
register has been changed throughout the function, which is not the
case for the register used to reference stack objects.
This patch also tries to produce a single value location if the location
list builder managed to merge all the locations into one.
Reviewers: aprantl, dstenb, jmorse
Reviewed By: aprantl, dstenb, jmorse
Subscribers: djtodoro, ivanbaev, asowda
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61600
llvm-svn: 362923
Follow up to r359122, after a bug was reported in it - the original
change too aggressively tried to move related types out of type units,
which included unnamed types (like array types) which can't reasonably
be declared-but-not-defined.
A step beyond that is that some types in type units can be anonymous, if
they are types with a name for linkage purposes (eg: "typedef struct { }
x;"). So ensure those don't get turned into plain declarations (without
signatures) because, lacking names, they can't be resolved to the
definition.
[Also include a fix for llvm-dwarfdump/libDebugInfoDWARF to pretty print
types in type units]
llvm-svn: 360458
DWARF5, 2.12 20ff says that
Any debugging information entry representing a pointer or reference
type [may have a DW_AT_address_class attribute].
The existing code (https://reviews.llvm.org/D29670) seems to take a
quite literal interpretation of that wording. I don't see a reason why
an rvalue reference isn't a reference type in the spirit of that
paragraph. This patch allows rvalue references to also have address
spaces.
rdar://problem/50511483
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61625
llvm-svn: 360176
TypedDINodeRef<T> is a redundant wrapper of Metadata * that is actually a T *.
Accordingly, change DI{Node,Scope,Type}Ref uses to DI{Node,Scope,Type} * or their const variants.
This allows us to delete many resolve() calls that clutter the code.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61369
llvm-svn: 360108
The PrologEpilogInserter need to insert a DW_OP_deref_size before
prepending a memory location expression to an already implicit
expression to avoid having the existing expression act on the memory
address instead of the value behind it.
The reason for using DW_OP_deref_size and not plain DW_OP_deref is that
big-endian targets need to read the right size as simply truncating a
larger read would yield the wrong result (LSB bytes are not at the lower
address).
This re-commit fixes issues reported in the first one. Namely deref was
inserted under wrong conditions and additionally the deref_size argument
was incorrectly encoded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59687
llvm-svn: 359535
While this doesn't come up in reasonable cases currently (the only user
defined types not in type units are ones without linkage - which makes
for near-ODR violations, because it'd be a type with linkage referencing
a type without linkage - such a type can't be validly defined in more
than one TU, so arguably it shouldn't be in a type unit to begin with -
but it's a convenient way to demonstrate an issue that will become more
revalent with homed modular debug info type definitions - which also
don't need to be in type units but more legitimately so).
Precursor to the Clang change to de-type-unit (by omitting the
'identifier') types homed due to strong linkage vtables. (making that
change without this one would lead to major type duplication in type
units)
llvm-svn: 359122
Another attempt to land the changes in debug line header to prevent duplicate
files in Dwarf 5. I rolled back my previous commit because of a mistake in
generating the object file in a test. Meanwhile, I addressed some offline
comments and changed the implementation; the largest difference is that
MCDwarfLineTableHeader does not keep DwarfVersion but gets it as a parameter. I
also merged the patch to fix two lld tests that will strt to fail into this
patch.
Original Commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59515
Original Message:
Motivation: In previous dwarf versions, file name indexes started from 1, and
the primary source file was not explicit. Dwarf 5 standard (6.2.4) prescribes
the primary source file to be explicitly given an entry with an index number 0.
The current implementation honors the specification by just duplicating the
main source file, once with index number 0, and later maybe with another
index number. While this is compliant with the letter of the standard, the
duplication causes problems for consumers of this information such as lldb.
(Some files are duplicated, where only some of them have a line table although
all refer to the same file)
With this change, dwarf 5 debug line section files always start from 0, and
the zeroth entry is not duplicated whenever possible. This requires different
handling of dwarf 4 and dwarf 5 during generation (e.g. when a function returns
an index zero for a file name, it signals an error in dwarf 4, but not in dwarf
5) However, I think the minor complication is worth it, because it enables all
consumers (lldb, gdb, dwarfdump, objdump, and so on) to treat all files in the
file name list homogenously.
llvm-svn: 358732
COMMON blocks are a feature of Fortran that has no direct analog in C languages, but they are similar to data sections in assembly language programming. A COMMON block is a named area of memory that holds a collection of variables. Fortran subprograms may map the COMMON block memory area to their own, possibly distinct, non-empty list of variables. A Fortran COMMON block might look like the following example.
COMMON /ALPHA/ I, J
For this construct, the compiler generates a new scope-like DI construct (!DICommonBlock) into which variables (see I, J above) can be placed. As the common block implies a range of storage with global lifetime, the !DICommonBlock refers to a !DIGlobalVariable. The Fortran variable that comprise the COMMON block are also linked via metadata to offsets within the global variable that stands for the entire common block.
@alpha_ = common global %alphabytes_ zeroinitializer, align 64, !dbg !27, !dbg !30, !dbg !33!14 = distinct !DISubprogram(…)
!20 = distinct !DICommonBlock(scope: !14, declaration: !25, name: "alpha")
!25 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "common alpha", type: !24)
!27 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !25, expr: !DIExpression())
!29 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "i", file: !3, type: !28)
!30 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !29, expr: !DIExpression())
!31 = distinct !DIGlobalVariable(scope: !20, name: "j", file: !3, type: !28)
!32 = !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4)
!33 = !DIGlobalVariableExpression(var: !31, expr: !32)
The DWARF generated for this is as follows.
DW_TAG_common_block:
DW_AT_name: alpha
DW_AT_location: @alpha_+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: common alpha
DW_AT_type: array of 8 bytes
DW_AT_location: @alpha_+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: i
DW_AT_type: integer*4
DW_AT_location: @Alpha+0
DW_TAG_variable:
DW_AT_name: j
DW_AT_type: integer*4
DW_AT_location: @Alpha+4
Patch by Eric Schweitz!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54327
llvm-svn: 357934
This reverts commit rL357020.
The commit broke the test llvm/test/tools/llvm-objdump/embedded-source.test
on some builds including clang-ppc64be-linux-multistage,
clang-s390x-linux, clang-with-lto-ubuntu, clang-x64-windows-msvc,
llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-windows10pro-fast (and others).
llvm-svn: 357026
Reapply rL356941 after regenerating the object file in the failing test
llvm/test/tools/llvm-objdump/embedded-source.test from source.
Original commit message:
[llvm] Prevent duplicate files in debug line header in dwarf 5.
Motivation: In previous dwarf versions, file name indexes started from 1, and
the primary source file was not explicit. Dwarf 5 standard (6.2.4) prescribes
the primary source file to be explicitly given an entry with an index number 0.
The current implementation honors the specification by just duplicating the
main source file, once with index number 0, and later maybe with another
index number. While this is compliant with the letter of the standard, the
duplication causes problems for consumers of this information such as lldb.
(Some files are duplicated, where only some of them have a line table although
all refer to the same file)
With this change, dwarf 5 debug line section files always start from 0, and
the zeroth entry is not duplicated whenever possible. This requires different
handling of dwarf 4 and dwarf 5 during generation (e.g. when a function returns
an index zero for a file name, it signals an error in dwarf 4, but not in dwarf 5)
However, I think the minor complication is worth it, because it enables all
consumers (lldb, gdb, dwarfdump, objdump, and so on) to treat all files in the
file name list homogenously.
Tags: #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59515
llvm-svn: 357018
Summary:
Motivation: In previous dwarf versions, file name indexes started from 1, and
the primary source file was not explicit. Dwarf 5 standard (6.2.4) prescribes
the primary source file to be explicitly given an entry with an index number 0.
The current implementation honors the specification by just duplicating the
main source file, once with index number 0, and later maybe with another
index number. While this is compliant with the letter of the standard, the
duplication causes problems for consumers of this information such as lldb.
(Some files are duplicated, where only some of them have a line table although
all refer to the same file)
With this change, dwarf 5 debug line section files always start from 0, and
the zeroth entry is not duplicated whenever possible. This requires different
handling of dwarf 4 and dwarf 5 during generation (e.g. when a function returns
an index zero for a file name, it signals an error in dwarf 4, but not in dwarf 5)
However, I think the minor complication is worth it, because it enables all
consumers (lldb, gdb, dwarfdump, objdump, and so on) to treat all files in the
file name list homogenously.
Reviewers: dblaikie, probinson, aprantl, espindola
Reviewed By: probinson
Subscribers: emaste, jvesely, nhaehnle, aprantl, javed.absar, arichardson, hiraditya, MaskRay, rupprecht, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59515
llvm-svn: 356941
Introduce a DW_OP_LLVM_convert Dwarf expression pseudo op that allows
for a convenient way to perform type conversions on the Dwarf expression
stack. As an additional bonus it paves the way for using other Dwarf
v5 ops that need to reference a base_type.
The new DW_OP_LLVM_convert is used from lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
to perform sext/zext on debug values but mainly the patch is about
preparing terrain for adding other Dwarf v5 ops that need to reference a
base_type.
For Dwarf v5 the op maps to DW_OP_convert and for earlier versions a
complex shift & mask pattern is generated to emulate sext/zext.
This is a recommit of r356442 with trivial fixes for the failing tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56587
llvm-svn: 356451
Introduce a DW_OP_LLVM_convert Dwarf expression pseudo op that allows
for a convenient way to perform type conversions on the Dwarf expression
stack. As an additional bonus it paves the way for using other Dwarf
v5 ops that need to reference a base_type.
The new DW_OP_LLVM_convert is used from lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
to perform sext/zext on debug values but mainly the patch is about
preparing terrain for adding other Dwarf v5 ops that need to reference a
base_type.
For Dwarf v5 the op maps to DW_OP_convert and for earlier versions a
complex shift & mask pattern is generated to emulate sext/zext.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56587
llvm-svn: 356442
When using full LTO it is possible that template function definition DIE
is bound to one compilation unit and it's declaration to another. We should
add function declaration attributes on behalf of its owner CU otherwise
we may end up with malformed file identifier in function declaration
DW_AT_decl_file attribute.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58538
llvm-svn: 354978
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Mucking about simplifying a test case ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D55261 ) I stumbled across something I've hit before - that LLVM's (GCC's does too, FWIW) assembly output includes a hardcode length for a DWARF unit in its header. Instead we could emit a label difference - making the assembly easier to read/edit (though potentially at a slight (I haven't tried to observe it) performance cost of delaying/sinking the length computation into the MC layer).
Fix: Predicated all the changes (including creating the labels, even if they aren't used/needed) behind the NVPTX useSectionsAsReferences, avoiding emitting labels in NVPTX where ptxas can't parse them.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, probinson, ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55281
llvm-svn: 349430
Temporarily reverts commit r348806 due to strange asm compilation issues in certain modes (combination of asan+cuda+other things). Will provide repro soon.
llvm-svn: 348898
Mucking about simplifying a test case ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D55261 ) I stumbled across something I've hit before - that LLVM's (GCC's does too, FWIW) assembly output includes a hardcode length for a DWARF unit in its header. Instead we could emit a label difference - making the assembly easier to read/edit (though potentially at a slight (I haven't tried to observe it) performance cost of delaying/sinking the length computation into the MC layer).
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, probinson, ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55281
llvm-svn: 348806
