new InitializationSequence. This fixes some bugs (e.g., PR5808),
changed some diagnostics, and caused more churn than expected. What's
new:
- InitializationSequence now has a "C conversion sequence" category
and step kind, which falls back to
- Changed the diagnostics for returns to always have the result type
of the function first and the type of the expression second.
CheckSingleAssignmentConstraints to peform checking in C.
- Improved ASTs for initialization of return values. The ASTs now
capture all of the temporaries we need to create, but
intentionally do not bind the tempoary that is actually returned,
so that it won't get destroyed twice.
- Make sure to perform an (elidable!) copy of the class object that
is returned from a class.
- Fix copy elision in CodeGen to properly see through the
subexpressions that occur with elidable copies.
- Give "new" its own entity kind; as with return values and thrown
objects, we don't bind the expression so we don't call a
destructor for it.
Note that, with this patch, I've broken returning move-only types in
C++0x. We'll fix it later, when we tackle NRVO.
llvm-svn: 91669
than using its own partial implementation of initialization.
Switched CheckInitializerTypes over to
InitializedEntity/InitializationKind, to help move us closer to
InitializationSequence.
Added InitializedEntity::getName() to retrieve the name of the entity,
for diagnostics that care about such things.
Implemented support for default initialization in
InitializationSequence.
Clean up the determination of the "source expressions" for an
initialization sequence in InitializationSequence::Perform.
Taught CXXConstructExpr to store more location information.
llvm-svn: 91492
is difficult because they're so terribly, terribly ambiguous.
We implement access declarations in terms of using declarations, which is
quite reasonable. However, we should really persist the access/using
distinction in the AST and use the appropriate name in diagnostics. This
isn't a priority, so I'll just file a PR and hope someone else does it. :)
llvm-svn: 91095
declaration. Rename note_using_decl to note_using, which is possibly less confusing.
Add a test for non-class-scope using decl collisions and be sure to note the case
we can't diagnose yet.
llvm-svn: 91057
are a couple of O(n^2) operations in this, some analogous to the usual O(n^2)
redeclaration problem and some not. In particular, retroactively removing
shadow declarations when they're hidden by later decls is pretty unfortunate.
I'm not yet convinced it's worse than the alternative, though.
llvm-svn: 91045
new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the
computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic
information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an
expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit
callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow.
Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the
diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit
better than before. Some examples:
p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Derived'
cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base'
Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to
a value of
type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers
Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}}
^ ~~
p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class
'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base':
struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base
struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base
Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from
...
^~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long'
cannot bind to
a value of unrelated type 'int'
long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Base' cannot
bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base'
Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field
'i'
int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here
int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}}
^
llvm-svn: 90992
instantiation, to ensure that we mark class template specilizations as
abstract when we need to and perform checking of abstract classes.
Also, move the checking that determines whether we are creating a
variable of abstract class type *after* we check whether the type is
complete. Otherwise, we won't see when we have an abstract class
template specialization that is implicitly instantiated by this
declaration. This is the "something else" that Sebastian had noted
earlier.
llvm-svn: 90467
overloaded-operator resolution is wildly untested, but the parallel code for
methods seems to satisfy some trivial tests.
Also change some overload-resolution APIs to take a type instead of an expression,
which lets us avoid creating a spurious CXXThisExpr when resolving implicit
member accesses.
llvm-svn: 90410
common to both parsing and template instantiation, so that we'll find
overridden virtuals for member functions of class templates when they
are instantiated.
Additionally, factor out the checking for pure virtual functions, so
that it will be executed both at parsing time and at template
instantiation time.
These changes fix PR5656 (for real), although one more tweak
w.r.t. member function templates will be coming along shortly.
llvm-svn: 90241
ValueDecl, because that isn't always the case in ill-formed
code. Diagnose a common mistake (forgetting to provide a template
argument list for a class template, PR5655) and dyn_cast so that we
handle the general problem of referring to a non-value declaration
gracefully.
llvm-svn: 90239
function templates (in C++98), friend function templates, and
out-of-line definitions of members of class templates.
Also handles merging of default template arguments from previous
declarations of function templates, for C++0x. However, we don't yet
make use of those default template arguments.
llvm-svn: 89872
All statements that involve conditions can now hold on to a separate
condition declaration (a VarDecl), and will use a DeclRefExpr
referring to that VarDecl for the condition expression. ForStmts now
have such a VarDecl (I'd missed those in previous commits).
Also, since this change reworks the Action interface for
if/while/switch/for, use FullExprArg for the full expressions in those
expressions, to ensure that we're emitting
Note that we are (still) not generating the right cleanups for
condition variables in for statements. That will be a follow-on
commit.
llvm-svn: 89817
