We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.
This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
C89 had a questionable feature where the compiler would implicitly
declare a function that the user called but was never previously
declared. The resulting function would be globally declared as
extern int func(); -- a function without a prototype which accepts zero
or more arguments.
C99 removed support for this questionable feature due to severe
security concerns. However, there was no deprecation period; C89 had
the feature, C99 didn't. So Clang (and GCC) both supported the
functionality as an extension in C99 and later modes.
C2x no longer supports that function signature as it now requires all
functions to have a prototype, and given the known security issues with
the feature, continuing to support it as an extension is not tenable.
This patch changes the diagnostic behavior for the
-Wimplicit-function-declaration warning group depending on the language
mode in effect. We continue to warn by default in C89 mode (due to the
feature being dangerous to use). However, because this feature will not
be supported in C2x mode, we've diagnosed it as being invalid for so
long, the security concerns with the feature, and the trivial
workaround for users (declare the function), we now default the
extension warning to an error in C99-C17 mode. This still gives users
an easy workaround if they are extensively using the extension in those
modes (they can disable the warning or use -Wno-error to downgrade the
error), but the new diagnostic makes it more clear that this feature is
not supported and should be avoided. In C2x mode, we no longer allow an
implicit function to be defined and treat the situation the same as any
other lookup failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983
The anonymous and non-anonymous bit-field diagnostics are easily
combined into one diagnostic. However, the diagnostic was missing a
"the" that is present in the almost-identically worded
warn_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_width diagnostic, hence the changes to
test cases.
DeclContext rather than injecting it wherever we happen to be.
This avoids creating functions whose DeclContext is a struct or similar.
llvm-svn: 323998
Silence the -Wbitfield-constant-conversion warning for when -1 or other
negative values are assigned to unsigned bitfields, provided that the bitfield
is wider than the minimum number of bits needed to encode the negative value.
llvm-svn: 277796
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Typeof.html
Differences from the GCC extension:
* __auto_type is also permitted in C++ (but only in places where
it could appear in C), allowing its use in headers that might
be shared across C and C++, or used from C++98
* __auto_type can be combined with a declarator, as with C++ auto
(for instance, "__auto_type *p")
* multiple variables can be declared in a single __auto_type
declaration, with the C++ semantics (the deduced type must be
the same in each case)
This patch also adds a missing restriction on applying typeof to
a bit-field, which GCC has historically rejected in C (due to
lack of clarity as to whether the operand should be promoted).
The same restriction also applies to __auto_type in C (in both
GCC and Clang).
This also fixes PR25449.
Patch by Nicholas Allegra!
llvm-svn: 252690
consider the following:
enum E *p;
enum E { e };
The above snippet is not ANSI C because 'enum E' has not bee defined
when we are processing the declaration of 'p'; however, it is a popular
extension to make the above work. This would fail using the Microsoft
enum semantics because the definition of 'E' would implicitly have a
fixed underlying type of 'int' which would trigger diagnostic messages
about a mismatch between the declaration and the definition.
Instead, treat fixed underlying types as not fixed for the purposes of
the diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 249674
These test updates almost exclusively around the change in behavior
around enum: enums without a definition are considered incomplete except
when targeting MSVC ABIs. Since these tests are interested in the
'incomplete-enum' behavior, restrict them to %itanium_abi_triple.
llvm-svn: 249660
VerifyBitField must be called if we are to form a bitfield FieldDecl.
We will not verify the bitfield if the decl is known to be malformed in
other ways; pretend that we don't have a bitfield if this happens.
llvm-svn: 235816
we were failing to find that bit-field when performing integer promotions. This
brings us closer to following the standard, and closer to GCC.
In C, this change is technically a regression: we get bit-field promotions
completely wrong in C, promoting cases that are categorically not bit-field
designators. This change makes us do so slightly more consistently, though.
llvm-svn: 218428
- References to ObjC bit-field ivars are bit-field lvalues;
fixes rdar://13794269, which got me started down this.
- Introduce Expr::refersToBitField, switch a couple users to
it where semantically important, and comment the difference
between this and the existing API.
- Discourage Expr::getBitField by making it a bit longer and
less general-sounding.
- Lock down on const_casts of bit-field gl-values until we
hear back from the committee as to whether they're allowed.
llvm-svn: 181252
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
into the left-hand side of an assignment expression. This completes
most of PR3500; the only remaining part is to deal with the
GCC-specific implementation-defined behavior for "unsigned long" (and
other) bit-fields.
llvm-svn: 70623
definitions. We were rejecting tentative definitions of incomplete
(which is bad), and now we don't.
This fix is partial because we don't do the end-of-translation-unit
initialization for tentative definitions that don't ever have any
initializers specified.
llvm-svn: 66584
