This patch should not introduce any behavior changes. It consists of
mostly one of two changes:
1. Replacing fall through comments with the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro
2. Inserting 'break' before falling through into a case block consisting
of only 'break'.
We were already using this warning with GCC, but its warning behaves
slightly differently. In this patch, the following differences are
relevant:
1. GCC recognizes comments that say "fall through" as annotations, clang
doesn't
2. GCC doesn't warn on "case N: foo(); default: break;", clang does
3. GCC doesn't warn when the case contains a switch, but falls through
the outer case.
I will enable the warning separately in a follow-up patch so that it can
be cleanly reverted if necessary.
Reviewers: alexfh, rsmith, lattner, rtrieu, EricWF, bollu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53950
llvm-svn: 345882
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
Summary:
Current generation of lifetime intrinsics does not handle cases like:
```
{
char x;
l1:
bar(&x, 1);
}
goto l1;
```
We will get code like this:
```
%x = alloca i8, align 1
call void @llvm.lifetime.start(i64 1, i8* nonnull %x)
br label %l1
l1:
%call = call i32 @bar(i8* nonnull %x, i32 1)
call void @llvm.lifetime.end(i64 1, i8* nonnull %x)
br label %l1
```
So the second time bar was called for x which is marked as dead.
Lifetime markers here are misleading so it's better to remove them at all.
This type of bypasses are rare, e.g. code detects just 8 functions building
clang (2329 targets).
PR28267
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: beanz, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24693
llvm-svn: 285176
