This adds a writable attribute, which in conjunction with
dereferenceable(N) states that a spurious store of N bytes is
introduced on function entry. This implies that this many bytes
are writable without trapping or introducing data races. See
https://llvm.org/docs/Atomics.html#optimization-outside-atomic for
why the second point is important.
This attribute can be added to sret arguments. I believe Rust will
also be able to use it for by-value (moved) arguments. Rust likely
won't be able to use it for &mut arguments (tree borrows does not
appear to allow spurious stores).
In this patch the new attribute is only used by LICM scalar promotion.
However, the actual motivation for this is to fix a correctness issue
in call slot optimization, which needs this attribute to avoid
optimization regressions.
Followup to the discussion on D157499.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158081
In a follow up we will reuse the logic in MemoryEffectsBase to merge
AAMemoryLocation and AAMemoryBehavior without duplicating all the bit
fiddling code already available in MemoryEffectsBase.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153305
Move `AttributeMask` out of `llvm/IR/Attributes.h` to a new file
`llvm/IR/AttributeMask.h`. After doing this we can remove the
`#include <bitset>` and `#include <set>` directives from `Attributes.h`.
Since there are many headers including `Attributes.h`, but not needing
the definition of `AttributeMask`, this causes unnecessary bloating of
the translation units and slows down compilation.
This commit adds in the include directive for `llvm/IR/AttributeMask.h`
to the handful of source files that need to see the definition.
This reduces the total number of preprocessing tokens across the LLVM
source files in lib from (roughly) 1,917,509,187 to 1,902,982,273 - a
reduction of ~0.76%. This should result in a small improvement in
compilation time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153728
This was failing to inline the opencl libraries with daz enabled. As a
modifier to the base mode, denormal-fp-mode-f32 is weird and has no
meaning if it's missing.
This is stricter than the default "ieee", and should probably be the
default. This patch leaves the default alone. I can change this in a
future patch.
There are non-reversible transforms I would like to perform which are
legal under IEEE denormal handling, but illegal with flushing zero
behavior. Namely, conversions between llvm.is.fpclass and fcmp with
zeroes.
Under "ieee" handling, it is legal to translate between
llvm.is.fpclass(x, fcZero) and fcmp x, 0.
Under "preserve-sign" handling, it is legal to translate between
llvm.is.fpclass(x, fcSubnormal|fcZero) and fcmp x, 0.
I would like to compile and distribute some math library functions in
a mode where it's callable from code with and without denormals
enabled, which requires not changing the compares with denormals or
zeroes.
If an IEEE function transforms an llvm.is.fpclass call into an fcmp 0,
it is no longer possible to call the function from code with denormals
enabled, or write an optimization to move the function into a denormal
flushing mode. For the original function, if x was a denormal, the
class would evaluate to false. If the function compiled with denormal
handling was converted to or called from a preserve-sign function, the
fcmp now evaluates to true.
This could also be of use for strictfp handling, where code may be
changing the denormal mode.
Alternative name could be "unknown".
Replaces the old AMDGPU custom inlining logic with more conservative
logic which tries to permit inlining for callees with dynamic handling
and avoids inlining other mismatched modes.
Set this on any source level floating-point type argument,
return value, call return or outgoing parameter which is lowered
to a valid IR type for the attribute. Currently this isn't
applied to emitted intrinsics since those don't go through
ABI code.
This carries a bitmask indicating forbidden floating-point value kinds
in the argument or return value. This will enable interprocedural
-ffinite-math-only optimizations. This is primarily to cover the
no-nans and no-infinities cases, but also covers the other floating
point classes for free. Textually, this provides a number of names
corresponding to bits in FPClassTest, e.g.
call nofpclass(nan inf) @must_be_finite()
call nofpclass(snan) @cannot_be_snan()
This is more expressive than the existing nnan and ninf fast math
flags. As an added bonus, you can represent fun things like nanf:
declare nofpclass(inf zero sub norm) float @only_nans()
Compared to nnan/ninf:
- Can be applied to individual call operands as well as the return value
- Can distinguish signaling and quiet nans
- Distinguishes the sign of infinities
- Can be safely propagated since it doesn't imply anything about
other operands.
- Does not apply to FP instructions; it's not a flag
This is one step closer to being able to retire "no-nans-fp-math" and
"no-infs-fp-math". The one remaining situation where we have no way to
represent no-nans/infs is for loads (if we wanted to solve this we
could introduce !nofpclass metadata, following along with
noundef/!noundef).
This is to help simplify the GPU builtin math library
distribution. Currently the library code has explicit finite math only
checks, read from global constants the compiler driver needs to set
based on the compiler flags during linking. We end up having to
internalize the library into each translation unit in case different
linked modules have different math flags. By propagating known-not-nan
and known-not-infinity information, we can automatically prune the
edge case handling in most functions if the function is only reached
from fast math uses.
removeAttribute() already performs a hasAttribute() check, so no
need to also do it in the caller. Instead check whether the
attribute set was changed.
This makes the implementations in line with removeAttributesAtIndex().
In setAttributesAtIndex(), remove any trailing empty attribute sets.
Also make sure that all the different attribute removal APIs go
through that method.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59746.
Use deduction guides instead of helper functions.
The only non-automatic changes have been:
1. ArrayRef(some_uint8_pointer, 0) needs to be changed into ArrayRef(some_uint8_pointer, (size_t)0) to avoid an ambiguous call with ArrayRef((uint8_t*), (uint8_t*))
2. CVSymbol sym(makeArrayRef(symStorage)); needed to be rewritten as CVSymbol sym{ArrayRef(symStorage)}; otherwise the compiler is confused and thinks we have a (bad) function prototype. There was a few similar situation across the codebase.
3. ADL doesn't seem to work the same for deduction-guides and functions, so at some point the llvm namespace must be explicitly stated.
4. The "reference mode" of makeArrayRef(ArrayRef<T> &) that acts as no-op is not supported (a constructor cannot achieve that).
Per reviewers' comment, some useless makeArrayRef have been removed in the process.
This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D140896 that introduced
the deduction guides.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140955
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
The TableGen implementation was using a homegrown implementation of
FunctionModRefInfo. This switches it to use MemoryEffects instead.
This makes the code simpler, and will allow exposing the full
representational power of MemoryEffects in the future. Among other
things, this will allow us to map IntrHasSideEffects to an
inaccessiblemem readwrite, rather than just ignoring it entirely
in most cases.
To avoid layering issues, this moves the ModRef.h header from IR
to Support, so that it can be included in the TableGen layer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137641
This implements IR and bitcode support for the memory attribute,
as specified in https://reviews.llvm.org/D135597.
The new attribute is not used for anything yet (and as such, the
old memory attributes are unaffected).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135592
As suggested on D135572, return Optional<> from getAllocSizeArgs()
rather than the peculiar pair(0, 0) sentinel.
The method on Attribute itself does not return Optional, because
the attribute must exist in that case.
This regularly comes up as a stumbling stone when adding int
attributes: They currently need to be encoded in a way to avoids
the zero value.
This adds support for zero-value int attributes by a) making the
ctor determine int/enum attribute based on attribute kind, not
whether the value is non-zero and b) switching getRawIntAttr()
to return an Optional, so that it's possible to distinguish a zero
value from non-existence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135572
These accessors are not used. Generally, nowadays it is preferable
to perform queries on AttributeSets/Lists, rather than the
AttrBuilder, which is optimized towards attribute construction now.
This was the odd one out, with similar methods not existing for
any other attributes. In the places where it is used, it is best
replaced by AttrBuilder::getAttribute(), which allows us to both
test for presence of the attribute and retrieve its value at the
same time. (To just check for presence, contains() could be used.)
I chose to encode the allockind information in a string constant because
otherwise we would get a bit of an explosion of keywords to deal with
the possible permutations of allocation function types.
I'm not sure that CodeGen.h is the correct place for this enum, but it
seemed to kind of match the UWTableKind enum so I put it in the same
place. Constructive suggestions on a better location most certainly
encouraged.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123088
This reverts commit 3988bd13988aad72ec979beb2361e8738584926b.
Did not build on this bot:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot#builders/215/builds/6372
/usr/include/c++/9/bits/predefined_ops.h:177:11: error: no match for call to
‘(llvm::less_first) (std::pair<long unsigned int, llvm::bolt::BinaryBasicBlock*>&, const std::pair<long unsigned int, std::nullptr_t>&)’
177 | { return bool(_M_comp(*__it, __val)); }
One could reuse this functor instead of rolling out your own version.
There were a couple other cases where the code was similar, but not
quite the same, such as it might have an assertion in the lambda or other
constructs. Thus, I've not touched any of those, as it might change the
behavior in some way.
As per https://discourse.llvm.org/t/submitting-simple-nfc-patches/62640/3?u=steakhal
Chris Lattner
> LLVM intentionally has a “yes, you can apply common sense judgement to
> things” policy when it comes to code review. If you are doing mechanical
> patches (e.g. adopting less_first) that apply to the entire monorepo,
> then you don’t need everyone in the monorepo to sign off on it. Having
> some +1 validation from someone is useful, but you don’t need everyone
> whose code you touch to weigh in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126068
X86 codegen uses function attribute `min-legal-vector-width` to select the proper ABI. The intention of the attribute is to reflect user's requirement when they passing or returning vector arguments. So Clang front-end will iterate the vector arguments and set `min-legal-vector-width` to the width of the maximum for both caller and callee.
It is assumed any middle end optimizations won't care of the attribute expect inlining and argument promotion.
- For inlining, we will propagate the attribute of inlined functions because the inlining functions become the newer caller.
- For argument promotion, we check the `min-legal-vector-width` of the caller and callee and refuse to promote when they don't match.
The problem comes from the optimizations' combination, as shown by https://godbolt.org/z/zo3hba8xW. The caller `foo` has two callees `bar` and `baz`. When doing argument promotion, both `foo` and `bar` has the same `min-legal-vector-width`. So the argument was promoted to vector. Then the inlining inlines `baz` to `foo` and updates `min-legal-vector-width`, which results in ABI mismatch between `foo` and `bar`.
This patch fixes the problem by expanding the concept of `min-legal-vector-width` to indicator of functions arguments. That says, any passes touch functions arguments have to set `min-legal-vector-width` to the value reflects the width of vector arguments. It makes sense to me because any arguments modifications are ABI related and should response for the ABI compatibility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123284
This continues the push away from hard-coded knowledge about functions
towards attributes. We'll use this to annotate free(), realloc() and
cousins and obviate the hard-coded list of free functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123083
Before we gave up if a call through bitcast had parameter attributes.
Interestingly, we allowed attributes for the return value already. We
now handle both the same way, namely, we drop the ones that are
incompatible with the new type and keep the rest. This cannot cause
"more UB" than initially present.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119967
This will let us start moving away from hard-coded attributes in
MemoryBuiltins.cpp and put the knowledge about various attribute
functions in the compilers that emit those calls where it probably
belongs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117921
We have the `clang -cc1` command-line option `-funwind-tables=1|2` and
the codegen option `VALUE_CODEGENOPT(UnwindTables, 2, 0) ///< Unwind
tables (1) or asynchronous unwind tables (2)`. However, this is
encoded in LLVM IR by the presence or the absence of the `uwtable`
attribute, i.e. we lose the information whether to generate want just
some unwind tables or asynchronous unwind tables.
Asynchronous unwind tables take more space in the runtime image, I'd
estimate something like 80-90% more, as the difference is adding
roughly the same number of CFI directives as for prologues, only a bit
simpler (e.g. `.cfi_offset reg, off` vs. `.cfi_restore reg`). Or even
more, if you consider tail duplication of epilogue blocks.
Asynchronous unwind tables could also restrict code generation to
having only a finite number of frame pointer adjustments (an example
of *not* having a finite number of `SP` adjustments is on AArch64 when
untagging the stack (MTE) in some cases the compiler can modify `SP`
in a loop).
Having the CFI precise up to an instruction generally also means one
cannot bundle together CFI instructions once the prologue is done,
they need to be interspersed with ordinary instructions, which means
extra `DW_CFA_advance_loc` commands, further increasing the unwind
tables size.
That is to say, async unwind tables impose a non-negligible overhead,
yet for the most common use cases (like C++ exceptions), they are not
even needed.
This patch extends the `uwtable` attribute with an optional
value:
- `uwtable` (default to `async`)
- `uwtable(sync)`, synchronous unwind tables
- `uwtable(async)`, asynchronous (instruction precise) unwind tables
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114543
Based on the output of include-what-you-use.
This is a big chunk of changes. It is very likely to break downstream code
unless they took a lot of care in avoiding hidden ehader dependencies, something
the LLVM codebase doesn't do that well :-/
I've tried to summarize the biggest change below:
- llvm/include/llvm-c/Core.h: no longer includes llvm-c/ErrorHandling.h
- llvm/IR/DIBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/IR/DebugInfo.h
- llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h
- llvm/IR/LLVMRemarkStreamer.h no longer includes llvm/Support/ToolOutputFile.h
- llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h no longer include llvm/Pass.h
- llvm/IR/Type.h no longer includes llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h
- llvm/IR/PassManager.h no longer includes llvm/Pass.h nor llvm/Support/Debug.h
And the usual count of preprocessed lines:
$ clang++ -E -Iinclude -I../llvm/include ../llvm/lib/IR/*.cpp -std=c++14 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions | wc -l
before: 6400831
after: 6189948
200k lines less to process is no that bad ;-)
Discourse thread on the topic: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118652
This follows up on the work in D116599, which changed AttrBuilder
to store string attributes as SmallVector<Attribute>. This patch
changes the implementation to store *all* attributes as a sorted
vector.
This both makes the implementation simpler and improves compile-time.
We get a -0.5% geomean compile-time improvement on CTMark at O0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117558
Currently, the behavior when adding an attribute with the same key
as an existing attribute is inconsistent, depending on the type of
the attribute and the method used to add it. When going through
AttrBuilder::addAttribute(), the new attribute always overwrites
the old one. When going through AttrBuilder::merge() the new
attribute overwrites the existing one if it is a string attribute,
but keeps the existing one for int and type attributes. One
particular API also asserts that you can't overwrite an align
attribute, but does not handle any of the other int, type or string
attributes.
This patch makes the behavior consistent by always overwriting with
the new attribute, which is the behavior I would intuitively expect.
Two tests are affected, which now make a different (but equally
valid) choice. Those tests could be improved by taking the maximum
deref bytes, but I haven't bothered with that, since this is testing
a degenerate case -- the important bit is that it doesn't crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117552
This is unused, and doesn't make a lot of sense as an API. The
usual pattern would be to combine the AttrBuilder(AttributeSet)
constructor with the overlaps() method.
Use the AttributeSet constructor instead. There's no good reason
why AttrBuilder itself should exact the AttributeSet from the
AttributeList. Moving this out of the AttrBuilder generally results
in cleaner code.
Since 26c6a3e736d3, LLVM's inliner will "upgrade" the caller's stack protector
attribute based on the callee. This lead to surprising results with Clang's
no_stack_protector attribute added in 4fbf84c1732f (D46300). Consider the
following code compiled with clang -fstack-protector-strong -Os
(https://godbolt.org/z/7s3rW7a1q).
extern void h(int* p);
inline __attribute__((always_inline)) int g() {
return 0;
}
int __attribute__((__no_stack_protector__)) f() {
int a[1];
h(a);
return g();
}
LLVM will inline g() into f(), and f() would get a stack protector, against the
users explicit wishes, potentially breaking the program e.g. if h() changes the
value of the stack cookie. That's a miscompile.
More recently, bc044a88ee3c (D91816) addressed this problem by preventing
inlining when the stack protector is disabled in the caller and enabled in the
callee or vice versa. However, the problem remained if the callee is marked
always_inline as in the example above. This affected users, see e.g.
http://crbug.com/1274129 and http://llvm.org/pr52886.
One way to fix this would be to prevent inlining also in the always_inline
case. Despite the name, always_inline does not guarantee inlining, so this
would be legal but potentially surprising to users.
However, I think the better fix is to not enable the stack protector in a
caller based on the callee. The motivation for the old behaviour is unclear, it
seems counter-intuitive, and causes real problems as we've seen.
This commit implements that fix, which means in the example above, g() gets
inlined into f() (also without always_inline), and f() is emitted without stack
protector. I think that matches most developers' expectations, and that's also
what GCC does.
Another effect of this change is that a no_stack_protector function can now be
inlined into a stack protected function, e.g. (https://godbolt.org/z/hafP6W856):
extern void h(int* p);
inline int __attribute__((__no_stack_protector__)) __attribute__((always_inline)) g() {
return 0;
}
int f() {
int a[1];
h(a);
return g();
}
I think that's fine. Such code would be unusual since no_stack_protector is
normally applied to a program entry point which sets up the stack canary. And
even if such code exists, inlining doesn't change the semantics: there is still
no stack cookie setup/check around entry/exit of the g() code region, but there
may be in the surrounding context, as there was before inlining. This also
matches GCC.
See also the discussion at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116589
This class is solely used as a lightweight and clean way to build a set of
attributes to be removed from an AttrBuilder. Previously AttrBuilder was used
both for building and removing, which introduced odd situation like creation of
Attribute with dummy value because the only relevant part was the attribute
kind.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116110
This patch extends the available uses of the 'align' parameter attribute
to include vectors of pointers. The attribute specifies pointer
alignment element-wise.
This change was previously requested and discussed in D87304.
The vector predication (VP) intrinsics intend to use this for scatter
and gather operations, as they lack the explicit alignment parameter
that the masked versions use.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115161
It was already possible to create an AttributeList from an Index
and an AttributeSet. However, this would actually end up using
the implicit constructor on AttrBuilder, thus doing an unnecessary
conversion from AttributeSet to AttrBuilder to AttributeSet.
Instead we can accept the AttributeSet directly, as that is what
we need anyway.
The default for min is changed to 1. The behaviour of -mvscale-{min,max}
in Clang is also changed such that 16 is the max vscale when targeting
SVE and no max is specified.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen, paulwalker-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113294
