This test sets the compiler optimization level to -O1 and
makes some assumptions about how local frame vars will be
stored (i.e. in registers). These assumptions are not always
true.
I did a first-pass set of improvements that:
(1) no longer assumes that every one of the target locations has
every variable in a register. Sometimes the compiler
is even smarter and skips the register entirely.
(2) simply expects one of the 5 or so variables it checks
to be in a register.
This test probably passes on a whole lot more systems than it
used to now. This is certainly true on OS X.
llvm-svn: 265498
Summary:
The '-p' option for dotest.py was ignored in multiprocess mode,
as the -p argument to the inferior would overwrite the -p argument
passed on the command line.
Reviewers: zturner, tfiala
Subscribers: lldb-commits, sas
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18779
Change by Francis Ricci <fjricci@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 265422
Previously we had 3 different method to run shell commands on the
target and 4 copy of code waiting until a given file appears on the
target device (used for syncronization). This CL merges these methods
to 1 run_platform_command and 1 wait_for_file_on_target functions
located in some utility classes.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18789
llvm-svn: 265398
Summary:
There was a bug in linux core file handling, where if there was a running process with the same
process id as the id in the core file, the core file debugging would fail, as we would pull some
pieces of information (ProcessInfo structure) from the running process instead of the core file.
I fix this by routing the ProcessInfo requests through the Process class and overriding it in
ProcessElfCore to return correct data.
A (slightly convoluted) test is included.
Reviewers: clayborg, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18697
llvm-svn: 265391
Teach LLDB that different shells have different characters they are sensitive to, and use that knowledge to do shell-aware escaping
This helps solve a class of problems on OS X where LLDB would try to launch via sh, and run into problems if the command line being passed to the inferior contained such special markers (hint: the shell would error out and we'd fail to launch)
This makes those launch scenarios work transparently via shell expansion
Slightly improve the error message when this kind of failure occurs to at least suggest that the user try going through 'process launch' directly
Fixes rdar://problem/22749408
llvm-svn: 265357
This addresses the same problem as r264846 (the test not expecting the situation when two thread
hit the watchpoint simultaneously), but for a different test.
llvm-svn: 265294
Enrico has a bug on him to make this work across older libcxx list
and newer libcxx list simultaneously. Needed in preparation of
getting the OS X public CI to run the TSAN tests.
tracked by:
rdar://25499635
llvm-svn: 265188
Summary:
Debug info is used only by the client and lldb-server tests do not even have the client component
running, as they communicate with the server directly. Therefore, running the tests for each
debug info type is unnecessarry.
This adds general ability to mark a test class as not dependent on debug info, and marks all
lldb-server tests as such.
Reviewers: tberghammer, tfiala
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18598
llvm-svn: 265017
Summary:
the inferior in the test deliberately does not lock a mutex when accessing the watched variable.
The reason for that is unclear as, based on the logs, the original intention of the test was to
check whether watchpoints get propagated to newly created threads, which should work fine even
with a mutex. Furthermore, in the unlikely event (which I have still observed happening from time
to time) that two threads do manage the execute the "critical section" simultaneously, the test
will fail, as it is expecting the watchpoint "hit count" to be 1, but in this case it will be 2.
Given this, I have simply chose to lock the mutex always, so that we have more predictible
behavior. Watchpoints being hit simultaneously is still (and correctly!) tested by
TestConcurrentEvents.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18558
llvm-svn: 264846
1 - If you plan on looking for the "(lldb) " prompt as a regular expression, look for "\(lldb\) " so you don't just find "lldb".
2 - Make sure to not use colors (specify --no-use-colors as an option to lldb when launching it) as our editline will print:
"(lldb) <color junk>(lldb) "
where "<color junk>" is a work around that is used to allow us to colorize our prompts. The bad thing is this will make pexepct code like this not execute as you would expect:
prompt = "\(lldb\) "
self.child.sendline("breakpoint set ...", prompt)
self.child.sendline("breakpoint clear ...", prompt)
The problem is the first "sendline" will create two lldb prompts and will match both the first and second prompts and you output will get off. So be sure to disable colors if you need to.
Fixed a case where "TestCommandScriptImmediateOutput.py" would fail if you have spaces in your directory names. I modified custom_command.py to use shlex to parse arguments and I quoted the file path we sent down to the custom_command.write_file function.
llvm-svn: 264810
quietly apply fixits for those who really trust clang's fixits.
Also, moved the retry into ClangUserExpression::Evaluate, where I can make a whole new ClangUserExpression
to do the work. Reusing any of the parts of a UserExpression in situ isn't supported at present.
<rdar://problem/25351938>
llvm-svn: 264793
Top-level Clang expressions are expressions that act as new translation units,
and define their own symbols. They do not have function wrappers like regular
expressions do, and declarations are persistent regardless of use of the dollar
sign in identifiers. Names defined by these are given priority over all other
symbol lookups.
This patch adds a new expression option, '-p' or '--top-level,' which controls
whether the expression is treated this way. It also adds a flag controlling
this to SBExpressionOptions so that this API is usable externally. It also adds
a test that validates that this works. (The test requires a fix to the Clang
AST importer which I will be committing shortly.)
<rdar://problem/22864976>
llvm-svn: 264662
This feature is controlled by an expression command option, a target property and the
SBExpressionOptions setting. FixIt's are only applied to UserExpressions, not UtilityFunctions,
those you have to get right when you make them.
This is just a first stage. At present the fixits are applied silently. The next step
is to tell the user about the applied fixit.
<rdar://problem/25351938>
llvm-svn: 264379
Summary:
Fixes SBCommandReturnObject::SetImmediateOutputFile() and
SBCommandReturnObject::SetImmediateOutputFile() for files opened
with "a" or "a+" by resolving inconsistencies between File and
our Python parsing of file objects.
Reviewers: granata.enrico, Eugene.Zelenko, jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, sas
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18228
Change by Francis Ricci <fjricci@fb.com>
llvm-svn: 264351
It would be fun to make it provide suggestions (e.g. 'can't find NString, did you mean NSString instead?'), but this worries me a little bit on the account of just how thorough of a type system scan it would have to do
llvm-svn: 264343
This patch adds ThreadSanitizer support into LLDB:
- Adding a new InstrumentationRuntime plugin, ThreadSanitizerRuntime, in the same way ASan is implemented.
- A breakpoint stops in `__tsan_on_report`, then we extract all sorts of information by evaluating an expression. We then populate this into StopReasonExtendedInfo.
- SBThread gets a new API, SBThread::GetStopReasonExtendedBacktraces(), which returns TSan’s backtraces in the form of regular SBThreads. Non-TSan stop reasons return an empty collection.
- Added some test cases.
Reviewed by Greg Clayton.
llvm-svn: 264162
This solves issues such as 'apropos foo' returning valid matches just because syntax examples happen to use 'foo' as a placeholder token
Fixes rdar://9043025
llvm-svn: 264123
Win32 API calls that are Unicode aware require wide character
strings, but LLDB uses UTF8 everywhere. This patch does conversions
wherever necessary when passing strings into and out of Win32 API
calls.
Patch by Cameron
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17107
Reviewed By: zturner, amccarth
llvm-svn: 264074
We want to do a better job presenting errors that occur when evaluating
expressions. Key to this effort is getting away from a model where all
errors are spat out onto a stream where the client has to take or leave
all of them.
To this end, this patch adds a new class, DiagnosticManager, which
contains errors produced by the compiler or by LLDB as an expression
is created. The DiagnosticManager can dump itself to a log as well as
to a string. Clients will (in the future) be able to filter out the
errors they're interested in by ID or present subsets of these errors
to the user.
This patch is not intended to change the *users* of errors - only to
thread DiagnosticManagers to all the places where streams are used. I
also attempt to standardize our use of errors a bit, removing trailing
newlines and making clients omit 'error:', 'warning:' etc. and instead
pass the Severity flag.
The patch is testsuite-neutral, with modifications to one part of the
MI tests because it relied on "error: error:" being erroneously
printed. This patch fixes the MI variable handling and the testcase.
<rdar://problem/22864976>
llvm-svn: 263859
the main reason is that our decorator contains extra fluff to "expect" crashes (which seem to
happen occasionaly on the android buildbot).
llvm-svn: 263633
Summary:
Some tests (Hc_then_Csignal_signals_correct_thread, at least) were sending a "continue" packet in
one expect_gdbremote_sequence invocation, and "expecting" the stop-reply in another call. This
posed a problem, because the were packets were not persisted between the two invocations, and if
the stub was exceptionally fast to respond, the packet would be received in the first invocation
(where it would be ignored) and then the second invocation would fail because it could not find
the packet.
Since doing matching in two invocations seems like a reasonable use of the packet pump, instead
of fixing the test, I make sure the packet_pump supports this usage by making the list of
captured packets persistent.
Reviewers: tfiala
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18140
llvm-svn: 263629
Summary:
This also adds a basic smoke test for linux core file reading. I'm checking in the core files as
well, so that the tests can run on all platforms. With some tricks I was able to produce
reasonably-sized core files (~40K).
This fixes the first part of pr26322.
Reviewers: zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18176
llvm-svn: 263628
This can cause differences in which bit patterns end up meaning YES or NO. In general, however, 0 == NO and 1 == YES.
To keep it simple, LLDB will now show "YES" and "NO" only for 1 and 0 respectively, and format other values as the plain numeric value instead.
Fixes rdar://24809994
llvm-svn: 263604
In r262970 this was changed from xfail Clang < 3.5 to > 3.5, but it
still fails on FreeBSD 10's system Clang 3.4.1 so assume it fails on
all versions.
llvm.org/pr26937
llvm-svn: 263467
