Summary:
The general approach is to add extra paddings after every field
in AST/RecordLayoutBuilder.cpp, then add code to CTORs/DTORs that poisons the paddings
(CodeGen/CGClass.cpp).
Everything is done under the flag -fsanitize-address-field-padding.
The blacklist file (-fsanitize-blacklist) allows to avoid the transformation
for given classes or source files.
See also https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/IntraObjectOverflow
Test Plan: run SPEC2006 and some of the Chromium tests with -fsanitize-address-field-padding
Reviewers: samsonov, rnk, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5687
llvm-svn: 219961
This change adds UBSan check to upcasts. Namely, when we
perform derived-to-base conversion, we:
1) check that the pointer-to-derived has suitable alignment
and underlying storage, if this pointer is non-null.
2) if vptr-sanitizer is enabled, and we perform conversion to
virtual base, we check that pointer-to-derived has a matching vptr.
llvm-svn: 219642
It's possible to construct cases where the first field we are trying to
copy is in the middle of an IR field. In some complicated cases, we
would fail to use an appropriate offset inside the object. Earlier
builds of clang seemed to miscompile the code by copying an insufficient
number of bytes. Up until now, we would assert: the copying offset was
insufficiently aligned.
This fixes PR21232.
llvm-svn: 219524
There are situations when clang knows that the C1 and C2 constructors
or the D1 and D2 destructors are identical. We already optimize some
of these cases, but cannot optimize it when the GlobalValue is
weak_odr.
The problem with weak_odr is that an old TU seeing the same code will
have a C1 and a C2 comdat with the corresponding symbols. We cannot
suddenly start putting the C2 symbol in the C1 comdat as we cannot
guarantee that the linker will not pick a .o with only C1 in it.
The solution implemented by GCC is to expand the ABI to have a comdat
whose name uses a C5/D5 suffix and always has both symbols. That is
what this patch implements.
llvm-svn: 217874
We assumed that the incoming this argument would be the last argument.
However, this is not true under the MS ABI.
This fixes PR20897.
llvm-svn: 217642
Summary:
This patch implements a new UBSan check, which verifies
that function arguments declared to be nonnull with __attribute__((nonnull))
are actually nonnull in runtime.
To implement this check, we pass FunctionDecl to CodeGenFunction::EmitCallArgs
(where applicable) and if function declaration has nonnull attribute specified
for a certain formal parameter, we compare the corresponding RValue to null as
soon as it's calculated.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5082
llvm-svn: 217389
There were code paths that are duplicated for constructors and destructors just
because we have both CXXCtorType and CXXDtorsTypes.
This patch introduces an unified enum and reduces code deplication a bit.
llvm-svn: 217383
Summary:
This is a first small step towards passing generic "Expr" instead of
ArgBeg/ArgEnd pair into EmitCallArgs() family of methods. Having "Expr" will
allow us to get the corresponding FunctionDecl and its ParmVarDecls,
thus allowing us to alter CodeGen depending on the function/parameter
attributes.
No functionality change.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: aemerson, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4915
llvm-svn: 216214
they're somehow missing a body. Looks like this was left behind when the loop
was generalized, and it's not been problematic before because without modules,
a used, implicit special member function declaration must be a definition.
This was resulting in us trying to emit a constructor declaration rather than
a definition, and producing a constructor missing its member initializers.
llvm-svn: 214473
This implements the central part of support for dllimport/dllexport on
classes: allowing the attribute on class declarations, inheriting it
to class members, and forcing emission of exported members. It's based
on Nico Rieck's patch from http://reviews.llvm.org/D1099.
This patch doesn't propagate dllexport to bases that are template
specializations, which is an interesting problem. It also doesn't
look at the rules when redeclaring classes with different attributes,
I'd like to do that separately.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3877
llvm-svn: 209908
When a non-trivial parameter is present, clang now gathers up all the
parameters that lack inreg and puts them into a packed struct. MSVC
always aligns each parameter to 4 bytes and no more, so this is a pretty
simple struct to lay out.
On win64, non-trivial records are passed indirectly. Prior to this
change, clang was incorrectly using byval on win64.
I'm able to self-host a working clang with this change and additional
LLVM patches.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2636
llvm-svn: 200597
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
llvm-svn: 200082
Fix a perennial source of confusion in the clang type system: Declarations and
function prototypes have parameters to which arguments are supplied, so calling
these 'arguments' was a stretch even in C mode, let alone C++ where default
arguments, templates and overloading make the distinction important to get
right.
Readability win across the board, especially in the casting, ADL and
overloading implementations which make a lot more sense at a glance now.
Will keep an eye on the builders and update dependent projects shortly.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 199686
Fixes PR18435, where we generated a base ctor instead of a complete
ctor, and so failed to construct virtual bases when constructing the
complete object.
llvm-svn: 199160
encodes the canonical rules for LLVM's style. I noticed this had drifted
quite a bit when cleaning up LLVM, so wanted to clean up Clang as well.
llvm-svn: 198686
Unlike Itanium's VTTs, the 'most derived' boolean or bitfield is the
last parameter for non-variadic constructors, rather than the second.
For variadic constructors, the 'most derived' parameter comes after the
'this' parameter. This affects constructor calls and constructor decls
in a variety of places.
Reviewers: timurrrr
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2405
llvm-svn: 197518
Summary:
MSVC destroys arguments in the callee from left to right. Because C++
objects have to be destroyed in the reverse order of construction, Clang
has to construct arguments from right to left and destroy arguments from
left to right.
This patch fixes the ordering by reversing the order of evaluation of
all call arguments under the MS C++ ABI.
Fixes PR18035.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2275
llvm-svn: 196402
deallocation function (and the corresponding unsized deallocation function has
been declared), emit a weak discardable definition of the function that
forwards to the corresponding unsized deallocation.
This allows a C++ standard library implementation to provide both a sized and
an unsized deallocation function, where the unsized one does not just call the
sized one, for instance by putting both in the same object file within an
archive.
llvm-svn: 194055
CodeGenABITypes is a wrapper built on top of CodeGenModule that exposes
some of the functionality of CodeGenTypes (held by CodeGenModule),
specifically methods that determine the LLVM types appropriate for
function argument and return values.
I addition to CodeGenABITypes.h, CGFunctionInfo.h is introduced, and the
definitions of ABIArgInfo, RequiredArgs, and CGFunctionInfo are moved
into this new header from the private headers ABIInfo.h and CGCall.h.
Exposing this functionality is one part of making it possible for LLDB
to determine the actual ABI locations of function arguments and return
values, making it possible for it to determine this for any supported
target without hard-coding ABI knowledge in the LLDB code.
llvm-svn: 193717
The general strategy is to create template versions of the conversion function and static invoker and then during template argument deduction of the conversion function, create the corresponding call-operator and static invoker specializations, and when the conversion function is marked referenced generate the body of the conversion function using the corresponding static-invoker specialization. Similarly, Codegen does something similar - when asked to emit the IR for a specialized static invoker of a generic lambda, it forwards emission to the corresponding call operator.
This patch has been reviewed in person both by Doug and Richard. Richard gave me the LGTM.
A few minor changes:
- per Richard's request i added a simple check to gracefully inform that captures (init, explicit or default) have not been added to generic lambdas just yet (instead of the assertion violation).
- I removed a few lines of code that added the call operators instantiated parameters to the currentinstantiationscope. Not only did it not handle parameter packs, but it is more relevant in the patch for nested lambdas which will follow this one, and fix that problem more comprehensively.
- Doug had commented that the original implementation strategy of using the TypeSourceInfo of the call operator to create the static-invoker was flawed and allowed const as a member qualifier to creep into the type of the static-invoker. I currently kludge around it - but after my initial discussion with Doug, with a follow up session with Richard, I have added a FIXME so that a more elegant solution that involves the use of TrivialTypeSourceInfo call followed by the correct wiring of the template parameters to the functionprototypeloc is forthcoming.
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 191634
They were mostly copy&paste of each other, move it to CodeGenFunction. Of course
the two implementations have diverged over time; the one in CGExprCXX seems to
be the more modern one so I picked that one and moved it to CGClass which feels
like a better home for it. No intended functionality change.
llvm-svn: 189203
This field is just IsDefaulted && !IsDeleted; in all places it's used,
a simple check for isDefaulted() is superior anyway, and we were forgetting
to set it in a few cases.
Also eliminate CXXDestructorDecl::IsImplicitlyDefined, for the same reasons.
No intended functionality change.
llvm-svn: 187891
