DeleteDeadBlock was called indiscriminately, leading to cleanuprets with
undef cleanuppad references.
Instead, try to drain the BB of most of it's instructions if it is
unreachable. We can then remove the BB if it solely consists of a
terminator (and maybe some phis).
llvm-svn: 261731
Note: The 'and' case in foldCastedBitwiseLogic() is inheriting one extra
check from the nearly identical 'or' case:
if ((!isa<ICmpInst>(Cast0Src) || !isa<ICmpInst>(Cast1Src))
But I'm not sure how to expose that difference in a regression test.
Without that check, the 'or' path will infinite loop on:
test/Transforms/InstCombine/zext-or-icmp.ll
because the zext-or-icmp fold is attempting a reverse transform.
The refactoring should extend to the 'xor' case next to solve part of
PR26702.
llvm-svn: 261707
It is problematic if the inlinee has a cleanupret which unwinds to
caller and we inline it into a call site which doesn't unwind.
If the funclet unwinds anywhere other than to the caller,
then we will give the funclet two unwind destinations.
This will result in a verifier failure.
Seeing as how the caller wasn't an invoke (which would locally unwind)
and that the funclet cannot unwind to caller, we must conclude that an
'unwind to caller' cleanupret is dynamically unreachable.
This fixes PR26698.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17536
llvm-svn: 261656
This is a straight cut and paste of the existing code and is intended to
be the first step in solving part of PR26702:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
We should be able to reuse most of this and delete the nearly identical
existing code in visitOr(). Then, we can enhance visitXor() to use the
same code too.
llvm-svn: 261649
Summary:
When we completely unroll a loop, it's pretty easy to update DT in-place and
thus avoid rebuilding it. DT recalculation is one of the most time-consuming
tasks in loop-unroll, so avoiding it at least in case of full unroll should be
beneficial.
On some extreme (but still real-world) tests this patch improves compile time by
~2x.
Reviewers: escha, jmolloy, hfinkel, sanjoy, chandlerc
Subscribers: joker.eph, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17473
llvm-svn: 261595
Summary:
Since this is an IR pass it's nice to be able to write tests without
llc. This is the counterpart of the llc test under
CodeGen/PowerPC/loop-data-prefetch.ll.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17464
llvm-svn: 261578
The issue was that we only required LCSSA rebuilding if the immediate
parent-loop had values used outside of it. The fix is to enaable the
same logic for all outer loops, not only immediate parent.
llvm-svn: 261575
This flag was part of a migration to a new means of handling vectors-of-points which was described in the llvm-dev thread "FYI: Relocating vector of pointers". The old code path has been off by default for a while without complaints, so time to cleanup.
llvm-svn: 261569
This change reverts "246133 [RewriteStatepointsForGC] Reduce the number of new instructions for base pointers" and a follow on bugfix 12575.
As pointed out in pr25846, this code suffers from a memory corruption bug. Since I'm (empirically) not going to get back to this any time soon, simply reverting the problematic change is the right answer.
llvm-svn: 261565
Summary:
Previously we had a notion of convergent functions but not of convergent
calls. This is insufficient to correctly analyze calls where the target
is unknown, e.g. indirect calls.
Now a call is convergent if it targets a known-convergent function, or
if it's explicitly marked as convergent. As usual, we can remove
convergent where we can prove that no convergent operations are
performed in the call.
Reviewers: chandlerc, jingyue
Subscribers: hfinkel, jhen, tra, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17317
llvm-svn: 261544
I missed == and != when I removed implicit conversions between iterators
and pointers in r252380 since they were defined outside ilist_iterator.
Since they depend on getNodePtrUnchecked(), they indirectly rely on UB.
This commit removes all uses of these operators. (I'll delete the
operators themselves in a separate commit so that it can be easily
reverted if necessary.)
There should be NFC here.
llvm-svn: 261498
Stop relying on `getNodePtrUnchecked()` being useful on invalid
iterators. This function is documented to be for internal use only, and
the pointer type will eventually have to change to remove UB from
ilist_iterator. Instead, check the iterator before it has been
invalidated.
llvm-svn: 261497
Cleanuppads may be merged together if one is the only predecessor of the
other in which case a simple transform can be performed: replace the
a cleanupret with a branch and remove an unnecessary cleanuppad.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17459
llvm-svn: 261390
This patch enables the vectorization of first-order recurrences. A first-order
recurrence is a non-reduction recurrence relation in which the value of the
recurrence in the current loop iteration equals a value defined in the previous
iteration. The load PRE of the GVN pass often creates these recurrences by
hoisting loads from within loops.
In this patch, we add a new recurrence kind for first-order phi nodes and
attempt to vectorize them if possible. Vectorization is performed by shuffling
the values for the current and previous iterations. The vectorization cost
estimate is updated to account for the added shuffle instruction.
Contributed-by: Matthew Simpson and Chad Rosier <mcrosier@codeaurora.org>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16197
llvm-svn: 261346
Summary:
If we don't have the first and last access of an interleaved load group,
the first and last wide load in the loop can do an out of bounds
access. Even though we discard results from speculative loads,
this can cause problems, since it can technically generate page faults
(or worse).
We now discard interleaved load groups that don't have the first and
load in the group.
Reviewers: hfinkel, rengolin
Subscribers: rengolin, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin, anemet
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17332
llvm-svn: 261331
routine.
We were getting this wrong in small ways and generally being very
inconsistent about it across loop passes. Instead, let's have a common
place where we do this. One minor downside is that this will require
some analyses like SCEV in more places than they are strictly needed.
However, this seems benign as these analyses are complete no-ops, and
without this consistency we can in many cases end up with the legacy
pass manager scheduling deciding to split up a loop pass pipeline in
order to run the function analysis half-way through. It is very, very
annoying to fix these without just being very pedantic across the board.
The only loop passes I've not updated here are ones that use
AU.setPreservesAll() such as IVUsers (an analysis) and the pass printer.
They seemed less relevant.
With this patch, almost all of the problems in PR24804 around loop pass
pipelines are fixed. The one remaining issue is that we run simplify-cfg
and instcombine in the middle of the loop pass pipeline. We've recently
added some loop variants of these passes that would seem substantially
cleaner to use, but this at least gets us much closer to the previous
state. Notably, the seven loop pass managers is down to three.
I've not updated the loop passes using LoopAccessAnalysis because that
analysis hasn't been fully wired into LoopSimplify/LCSSA, and it isn't
clear that those transforms want to support those forms anyways. They
all run late anyways, so this is harmless. Similarly, LSR is left alone
because it already carefully manages its forms and doesn't need to get
fused into a single loop pass manager with a bunch of other loop passes.
LoopReroll didn't use loop simplified form previously, and I've updated
the test case to match the trivially different output.
Finally, I've also factored all the pass initialization for the passes
that use this technique as well, so that should be done regularly and
reliably.
Thanks to James for the help reviewing and thinking about this stuff,
and Ben for help thinking about it as well!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17435
llvm-svn: 261316
more places to prevent gratuitous re-"runs" of these passes.
The passes themselves don't do any work when run, but we keep spending
time scheduling and running these needlessly when we really don't need
to do so.
This is the first patch towards fixing the really horrible loop pass
pipeline fragmentation pointed out by Sanjoy in PR24804.
llvm-svn: 261302
This patch is part of the work to make PPCLoopDataPrefetch
target-independent
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/92758).
Obviously the pass still only used from PPC at this point. Subsequent
patches will start driving this from ARM64 as well.
Due to the previous patch most lines should show up as moved lines.
llvm-svn: 261265
Commit r259357 was reverted because it caused PR26629. We were assuming all
roots of a vectorizable tree could be truncated to the same width, which is not
the case in general. This commit reapplies the patch along with a fix and a new
test case to ensure we don't regress because of this issue again. This should
fix PR26629.
llvm-svn: 261212
convert one test to use this.
This is a particularly significant milestone because it required
a working per-function AA framework which can be queried over each
function from within a CGSCC transform pass (and additionally a module
analysis to be accessible). This is essentially *the* point of the
entire pass manager rewrite. A CGSCC transform is able to query for
multiple different function's analysis results. It works. The whole
thing appears to actually work and accomplish the original goal. While
we were able to hack function attrs and basic-aa to "work" in the old
pass manager, this port doesn't use any of that, it directly leverages
the new fundamental functionality.
For this to work, the CGSCC framework also has to support SCC-based
behavior analysis, etc. The only part of the CGSCC pass infrastructure
not sorted out at this point are the updates in the face of inlining and
running function passes that mutate the call graph.
The changes are pretty boring and boiler-plate. Most of the work was
factored into more focused preperatory patches. But this is what wires
it all together.
llvm-svn: 261203
This function is used to check whether a dbg.value intrinsic has already
been inserted, but without comparing the DIExpression, it would erroneously
fire on split aggregates and only the first scalar would survive.
Found via http://reviews.llvm.org/D16867.
<rdar://problem/24456528>
llvm-svn: 261145
Loop vectorizer now knows to vectorize GEP and create masked gather and scatter intrinsics for random memory access.
The feature is enabled on AVX-512 target.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15690
llvm-svn: 261140
Summary: Store and loads unpacked by instcombine do not always have the right alignement. This explicitely compute the alignement and set it.
Reviewers: dblaikie, majnemer, reames, hfinkel, joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17326
llvm-svn: 261139
When support for objc_unsafeClaimAutoreleasedReturnValue has been added to the
ARC optimizer in r258970, one case was missed which would lead the optimizer
to execute an llvm_unreachable. In this case, just handle ClaimRV in the same
way we handle RetainRV.
llvm-svn: 261134
Summary:
On the contrary to Full LTO, ThinLTO can afford to shift compile time
from the frontend to the linker: both phases are parallel (even if
it is not totally "free": projects like clang are reusing product
from the "compile phase" for multiple link, think about
libLLVMSupport reused for opt, llc, etc.).
This pipeline is based on the proposal in D13443 for full LTO. We
didn't move forward on this proposal because the LTO link was far too
long after that. We believe that we can afford it with ThinLTO.
The ThinLTO pipeline integrates in the regular O2/O3 flow:
- The compile phase perform the inliner with a somehow lighter
function simplification. (TODO: tune the inliner thresholds here)
This is intendend to simplify the IR and get rid of obvious things
like linkonce_odr that will be inlined.
- The link phase will run the pipeline from the start, extended with
some specific passes that leverage the augmented knowledge we have
during LTO. Especially after the inliner is done, a sequence of
globalDCE/globalOpt is performed, followed by another run of the
"function simplification" passes. It is not clear if this part
of the pipeline will stay as is, as the split model of ThinLTO
does not allow the same benefit as FullLTO without added tricks.
The measurements on the public test suite as well as on our internal
suite show an overall net improvement. The binary size for the clang
executable is reduced by 5%. We're still tuning it with the bringup
of ThinLTO and it will evolve, but this should provide a good starting
point.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17115
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 261029
It is intended to contains the passes run over a function after the
inliner is done with a function and before it moves to its callers.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 261028
Summary:
Extending findExistingExpansion can use existing value in ExprValueMap.
This patch gives 0.3~0.5% performance improvements on
benchmarks(test-suite, spec2000, spec2006, commercial benchmark)
Reviewers: mzolotukhin, sanjoy, zzheng
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15559
llvm-svn: 260938
Summary:
While shrinking types according to the required bits, we can
encounter insert/extract element instructions. This will cause us to
reach an llvm_unreachable statement.
This change adds support for truncating insert/extract element
operations, and adds a regression test.
Reviewers: jmolloy
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17078
llvm-svn: 260893
LICM starts with an *empty* AST, and then merges in each sub-loop. While the
add code is appropriate for sub-loop 2 and up, it's utterly unnecessary for
sub-loop 1. If the AST starts off empty, we can just clone/move the contents
of the subloop into the containing AST.
Reviewed-by: Philip Reames <listmail@philipreames.com>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16753
llvm-svn: 260892
