Summary:
Completing inside the expression command now uses the new description API
to also provide additional information to the user. For now this information
are the types of variables/fields and the signatures of completed function calls.
Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52103
llvm-svn: 342385
They're not that common, and falling back is definitely
better than throwing an error instead of the result. If we
feel motivated, we might end up implementing support for these,
but it's unclear whether it's worth the effort/complexity.
Fixes PR38925.
<rdar://problem/44436068>
llvm-svn: 342262
I started from a clean slate to do the checkin, but forgot to svn add the new files.
Do that now.
Also add the one new source file to CMakeLists.txt
llvm-svn: 342190
This change allows you to write a new breakpoint type where the
logic for setting breakpoints is determined by a Python callback
written using the SB API's.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51830
llvm-svn: 342185
Summary:
This patch adds a framework for adding descriptions to the command completions we provide.
It also adds descriptions for completed top-level commands so that we can test this code.
Completions are in general supposed to be displayed alongside the completion itself. The descriptions
can be used to provide additional information about the completion to the user. Examples for descriptions
are function signatures when completing function calls in the expression command or the binary name
when providing completion for a symbol.
There is still some boilerplate code from the old completion API left in LLDB (mostly because the respective
APIs are reused for non-completion related purposes, so the CompletionRequest doesn't make sense to be
used), so that's why I still had to change some function signatures. Also, as the old API only passes around a
list of matches, and the descriptions are for these functions just another list, I had to add some code that
essentially just ensures that both lists are always the same side (e.g. all the manual calls to
`descriptions->AddString(X)` below a `matches->AddString(Y)` call).
The initial command descriptions that come with this patch are just reusing the existing
short help that is already added in LLDB.
An example completion with descriptions looks like this:
```
(lldb) pl
Available completions:
platform -- Commands to manage and create platforms.
plugin -- Commands for managing LLDB plugins.
```
Reviewers: #lldb, jingham
Reviewed By: #lldb, jingham
Subscribers: jingham, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51175
llvm-svn: 342181
This patch improves the support of DWARF5.
Particularly the reporting of source code locations.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51935
llvm-svn: 342153
After landing r341457, we started seeing a failure on the swift-lldb
bots. The change was correct and pretty straightforward, a DW_OP_constu
was replaced with DW_OP_lit23, the value remaining identical.
0x000000f4: DW_TAG_variable
DW_AT_location (0x00000000
[0x0000000100000a51, 0x0000000100000d47): DW_OP_lit23, DW_OP_stack_value)
DW_AT_name ("number")
However, this broke LLDB.
(Int) number = <extracting data from value failed>
The value was read correctly, but apparently the value's type was different.
When reading a constu it was reading a uint64 (m_type = e_ulonglong) while for
the literal, it got a signed int (m_type = e_sint). This change makes sure we
read the value as an unsigned.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51730
llvm-svn: 342142
Summary:
The 'memory region' command is at the moment not tested at all by our test suite.
This patch just adds a basic test that at least provides some basic testing.
Reviewers: #lldb, davide
Reviewed By: #lldb, davide
Subscribers: vsk, davide, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51930
llvm-svn: 342042
Summary: An address breakpoint of the form "b 0x1000" won't resolve if it's created while the process isn't running. This patch deletes Address::SectionWasDeleted, renames Address::SectionWasDeletedPrivate to SectionWasDeleted (and makes it public), and changes the section check in Breakpoint::ModulesChanged back to its original form
Reviewers: jingham, #lldb
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: davide, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51816
llvm-svn: 341849
This patch allows LLDB to print column info in backtraces et al. if
available, which is useful when the backtrace contains a frame like
the following:
f(can_crash(0), can_crash(1));
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51661
llvm-svn: 341506
These happen in a couple of tests when lldb tries to pretty print a
const char * variable in the inferior which points to garbage. Instead,
we have the python replace the invalid sequences with the unicode
replacement character.
llvm-svn: 341274
This applies the same workaround as r321271 to other tests. The root
problem is that lldb finds an internal symbol with the same name in the
debug info of system libraries, and then fails to disambiguate between
the two.
llvm-svn: 341235
Using a listen queue of length 0 caused a deadlock on my machine in the
gdb-client tests while attempting to establish the loopback socket
connection.
I am not sure if this is down to a different python or kernel version,
but in either case, having queue of length zero sounds like a bad idea,
so I'm bumping that to one (which also fixes the deadlock).
llvm-svn: 341096
Summary:
This patch adds initial code completion support for the `expr` command.
We now have a completion handler in the expression CommandObject that
essentially just attempts to parse the given user expression with Clang with
an attached code completion consumer. We filter and prepare the
code completions provided by Clang and send them back to the completion
API.
The current completion is limited to variables that are in the current scope.
This includes local variables and all types used by local variables. We however
don't do any completion of symbols that are not used in the local scope (or
in some other way already in the ASTContext).
This is partly because there is not yet any code that manually searches for additiona
information in the debug information. Another cause is that for some reason the existing
code for loading these additional symbols when requested by Clang doesn't seem to work.
This will be fixed in a future patch.
Reviewers: jingham, teemperor
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: labath, aprantl, JDevlieghere, friss, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48465
llvm-svn: 341086
This patch extends the SBAPI to allow for setting a breakpoint not
only at a specific line, but also at a specific (minimum) column. When
a column is specified, it will try to find an exact match or the
closest match on the same line that comes after the specified
location.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51461
llvm-svn: 341078
Summary:
The syntax highlighting feature so far is mutually exclusive with the lldb feature
that marks the current column in the line by underlining it via an ANSI color code.
Meaning that if you enable one, the other is automatically disabled by LLDB.
This was caused by the fact that both features inserted color codes into the the
source code and were likely to interfere with each other (which would result
in a broken source code printout to the user).
This patch moves the cursor code into the highlighting framework, which provides
the same feature to the user in normal non-C source code. For any source code
that is highlighted by Clang, we now also have cursor marking for the whole token
that is under the current source location. E.g., before we underlined only the '!' in the
expression '1 != 2', but now the whole token '!=' is underlined. The same for function
calls and so on. Below you can see two examples where we before only underlined
the first character of the token, but now underline the whole token.
{F7075400}
{F7075414}
It also simplifies the DisplaySourceLines method in the SourceManager as most of
the code in there was essentially just for getting this column marker to work as
a FormatEntity.
Reviewers: aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51466
llvm-svn: 341003
Summary:
For some bitfield patterns (like the one added by this commit), Clang will
generate non-regular data types like i24 or i48. This patch follows a
pretty naive approach of just bumping the type size to the next power of 2.
DataExtractor know how to deal with weird sizes. The operations on Scalar
do not know how to deal with those types though, so we have to legalize the
size when creating a Scalar.
Reviewers: jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51245
llvm-svn: 340880
On macOS, some of the <optional> APIs used by the test are available only
starting on macOS 10.14 when using exceptions. Build the test with
-fno-exceptions so that the test builds on older systems too.
rdar://problem/43700544
llvm-svn: 340676
Summary: These are already skipped on Darwin because they cause build bot failures. Both on the build bots as well as in our testing we have seen a number of these tests fail and hang. This change skips the failing/hanging tests on Linux and also fixes one of the test - the test needs the thread library to build.
Reviewers: asmith, clayborg, aprantl
Subscribers: teemperor, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51227
llvm-svn: 340658
Summary:
Calling any non-libc builtin function in the expression command currently just causes Clang
to state that the function is not known. The reason for this is that we actually never
initialize the list of builtin functions in the Builtin::Context.
This patch just calls the initializer for the builtins in the preprocessor. Also adds some tests
for the new builtins.
It also gets rid of the extra list of builtins in the ClangExpressionParser, as we can just reuse
the existing list in the Preprocessor for the ASTContext. Having just one list of builtins around
is also closer to the standard Clang behavior.
Reviewers: #lldb, vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: sgraenitz, clayborg, vsk, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50481
llvm-svn: 340571
- Added LibcxxFunctionSummaryProvider
- Removed LibcxxFunctionFrontEnd
- Modified data formatter tests to test new summary functionality
Patch by Shafik Yaghmour!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50864
llvm-svn: 340543
The single-process test runner is invoked in a number of different
scenarios, including when multiple test dirs are specified or (afaict)
when lit is used to drive the test suite.
Unfortunately the --test-subdir option did not work with the single
process test runner, breaking an important use case (using lit to run
swift-lldb Linux tests):
Failure URL: https://ci.swift.org/job/swift-PR-Linux/6841
We won't be able to run lldb tests within swift PR testing without
filtering down the set of tests.
This change makes --test-subdir work with the single-process runner.
llvm-svn: 339929
This patch adds a new lldb-vscode tool that speaks the Microsoft Visual Studio Code debug adaptor protocol. It has full unit tests that test all packets.
This tool can be easily packaged up into a native extension and used with Visual Studio Code, and it can also be used by Nuclide
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50365
llvm-svn: 339911
when we have only an in-memory copy of the binary.
Also added a test for the generation of these symbols in the
in-memory and regular cases.
<rdar://problem/43160401>
llvm-svn: 339833
Patch by Shafik Yaghmour!
This reapplies an earlier version after addressing some post-commit feedback.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49271
llvm-svn: 339828
Summary:
Instead of just printing the current "False is not True, ..." message when we
fail to run a certain command, this patch also adds the actual command output or
error output that we received to the assertion message.
Reviewers: davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50492
llvm-svn: 339351
clang doesn't use line number 0 (to mean artifically generated code) very often, but swift does it
quite often. We were rejecting all by line breakpoints in functions that started at line 0. But that's
a special marker so we can just not do this test in that case.
llvm-svn: 339182
In this patch I add support for ARM and ARM64 break pad files. There are two flavors of ARM: Apple where FP is R7, and non Apple where FP is R11. Added minimal tests that load up ARM64 and the two flavors or ARM core files with a single thread and known register values in each register. Each register is checked for the exact value.
This is a fixed version of: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49750
The changes from D49750 are:
Don't init the m_arch in the Initialize call as a system info isn't required. This keeps the thread list, module list and other tests from failing
Added -Wextended-offsetof to Xcode project so we catch use extended usages of offsetof before submission
Fixed any extended offset of warnings
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50336
llvm-svn: 339032
This reverts commit r338734 (and subsequent fixups in r338772 and
r338746), because it breaks some minidump unit tests and introduces a
lot of compiler warnings.
llvm-svn: 338828
Summary:
1) Several tests that are flakey on windows fail the run even if they are marked as expected to be flakey. This is because they fail frequently enough that even a retry won't help
2) Skip several tests on Windows that will occasionally hang rather than failing or exiting. This is causing the entire test suite to hang
Reviewers: asmith, labath, zturner
Reviewed By: zturner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50198
llvm-svn: 338769
In this patch I add support for ARM and ARM64 break pad files. There are two flavors of ARM: Apple where FP is R7, and non Apple where FP is R11. Added minimal tests that load up ARM64 and the two flavors or ARM core files with a single thread and known register values in each register. Each register is checked for the exact value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49750
llvm-svn: 338734
