This reverts commit ce4aada6e2135e29839f672a6599db628b53295d and a
follow-up patch 8ef26f1289bf069ccc0d6383f2f4c0116a1206c1.
This new warning can not be fully suppressed by the
`-Wno-missing-dependent-template-keyword` flag, this gives developer no
time to do the cleanup in a large codebase, see https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98547#issuecomment-2228250884
Reapplies #92957, fixing an instance where the `template` keyword was
missing prior to a dependent name in `llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h`. An
_alias-declaration_ is used to work around a bug affecting GCC releases
before 11.1 (see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94799) which
rejects the use of the `template` keyword prior to the
_nested-name-specifier_ in the class member access.
CWG1835 was one of the many core issues resolved by P1787R6: "Declarations and where to
find them" (http://wg21.link/p1787r6). Its resolution changes how
member-qualified names (as defined by [basic.lookup.qual.general] p2) are looked
up. This patch implementation that resolution.
Previously, an _identifier_ following `.` or `->` would be first looked
up in the type of the object expression (i.e. qualified lookup), and
then in the context of the _postfix-expression_ (i.e. unqualified
lookup) if nothing was found; the result of the second lookup was
required to name a class template. Notably, this second lookup would
occur even when the object expression was dependent, and its result
would be used to determine whether a `<` token is the start of a
_template-argument_list_.
The new wording in [basic.lookup.qual.general] p2 states:
> A member-qualified name is the (unique) component name, if any, of
> - an _unqualified-id_ or
> - a _nested-name-specifier_ of the form _`type-name ::`_ or
_`namespace-name ::`_
>
> in the id-expression of a class member access expression. A
***qualified name*** is
> - a member-qualified name or
> - the terminal name of
> - a _qualified-id_,
> - a _using-declarator_,
> - a _typename-specifier_,
> - a _qualified-namespace-specifier_, or
> - a _nested-name-specifier_, _elaborated-type-specifier_, or
_class-or-decltype_ that has a _nested-name-specifier_.
>
> The _lookup context_ of a member-qualified name is the type of its
associated object expression (considered dependent if the object
expression is type-dependent). The lookup context of any other qualified
name is the type, template, or namespace nominated by the preceding
_nested-name-specifier_.
And [basic.lookup.qual.general] p3 now states:
> _Qualified name lookup_ in a class, namespace, or enumeration performs
a search of the scope associated with it except as specified below.
Unless otherwise specified, a qualified name undergoes qualified name
lookup in its lookup context from the point where it appears unless the
lookup context either is dependent and is not the current instantiation
or is not a class or class template. If nothing is found by qualified
lookup for a member-qualified name that is the terminal name of a
_nested-name-specifier_ and is not dependent, it undergoes unqualified
lookup.
In non-standardese terms, these two paragraphs essentially state the
following:
- A name that immediately follows `.` or `->` in a class member access
expression is a member-qualified name
- A member-qualified name will be first looked up in the type of the
object expression `T` unless `T` is a dependent type that is _not_ the
current instantiation, e.g.
```
template<typename T>
struct A
{
void f(T* t)
{
this->x; // type of the object expression is 'A<T>'. although 'A<T>' is dependent, it is the
// current instantiation so we look up 'x' in the template definition context.
t->y; // type of the object expression is 'T' ('->' is transformed to '.' per [expr.ref]).
// 'T' is dependent and is *not* the current instantiation, so we lookup 'y' in the
// template instantiation context.
}
};
```
- If the first lookup finds nothing and:
- the member-qualified name is the first component of a
_nested-name-specifier_ (which could be an _identifier_ or a
_simple-template-id_), and either:
- the type of the object expression is the current instantiation and it
has no dependent base classes, or
- the type of the object expression is not dependent
then we lookup the name again, this time via unqualified lookup.
Although the second (unqualified) lookup is stated not to occur when the
member-qualified name is dependent, a dependent name will _not_ be
dependent once the template is instantiated, so the second lookup must
"occur" during instantiation if qualified lookup does not find anything.
This means that we must perform the second (unqualified) lookup during
parsing even when the type of the object expression is dependent, but
those results are _not_ used to determine whether a `<` token is the
start of a _template-argument_list_; they are stored so we can replicate
the second lookup during instantiation.
In even simpler terms (paraphrasing the meeting minutes from the review of P1787; see https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21summer2020/P1787%28Lookup%29Review2020-06-15Through2020-06-18):
- Unqualified lookup always happens for the first name in a
_nested-name-specifier_ that follows `.` or `->`
- The result of that lookup is only used to determine whether `<` is the
start of a _template-argument-list_ if the first (qualified) lookup
found nothing and the lookup context:
- is not dependent, or
- is the current instantiation and has no dependent base classes.
An example:
```
struct A
{
void f();
};
template<typename T>
using B = A;
template<typename T>
struct C : A
{
template<typename U>
void g();
void h(T* t)
{
this->g<int>(); // ok, '<' is the start of a template-argument-list ('g' was found via qualified lookup in the current instantiation)
this->B<void>::f(); // ok, '<' is the start of a template-argument-list (current instantiation has no dependent bases, 'B' was found via unqualified lookup)
t->g<int>(); // error: '<' means less than (unqualified lookup does not occur for a member-qualified name that isn't the first component of a nested-name-specifier)
t->B<void>::f(); // error: '<' means less than (unqualified lookup does not occur if the name is dependent)
t->template B<void>::f(); // ok: '<' is the start of a template-argument-list ('template' keyword used)
}
};
```
Some additional notes:
- Per [basic.lookup.qual.general] p1, lookup for a
member-qualified name only considers namespaces, types, and templates
whose specializations are types if it's an _identifier_ followed by
`::`; lookup for the component name of a _simple-template-id_ followed
by `::` is _not_ subject to this rule.
- The wording which specifies when the second unqualified lookup occurs
appears to be paradoxical. We are supposed to do it only for the first
component name of a _nested-name-specifier_ that follows `.` or `->`
when qualified lookup finds nothing. However, when that name is followed
by `<` (potentially starting a _simple-template-id_) we don't _know_
whether it will be the start of a _nested-name-specifier_ until we do
the lookup -- but we aren't supposed to do the lookup until we know it's
part of a _nested-name-specifier_! ***However***, since we only do the
second lookup when the first lookup finds nothing (and the name isn't
dependent), ***and*** since neither lookup is type-only, the only valid
option is for the name to be the _template-name_ in a
_simple-template-id_ that is followed by `::` (it can't be an
_unqualified-id_ naming a member because we already determined that the
lookup context doesn't have a member with that name). Thus, we can lock
into the _nested-name-specifier_ interpretation and do the second lookup
without having to know whether the _simple-template-id_ will be followed
by `::` yet.
As time went by, a few files have become mis-formatted w.r.t.
clang-format. This was made worse by the fact that formatting was not
being enforced in extensionless headers. This commit simply brings all
of libcxx/include in-line with clang-format again.
We might have to do this from time to time as we update our clang-format
version, but frankly this is really low effort now that we've formatted
everything once.
This changes the `is_swappable` implementation to use variable templates
first and basing the class templates on that. This avoids instantiating
them when the `_v` versions are used, which are generally less resource
intensive.
For regex patterns that produce zero-length matches, there is one
(imaginary) match in-between every character in the sequence being
searched (as well as before the first character and after the last
character). It's easiest to demonstrate using replacement:
`std::regex_replace("abc"s, "!", "")` should produce `!a!b!c!`, where
each exclamation mark makes a zero-length match visible.
Currently our implementation doesn't correctly set the prefix of each
zero-length match, "swallowing" the characters separating the imaginary
matches -- e.g. when going through zero-length matches within `abc`, the
corresponding prefixes should be `{'', 'a', 'b', 'c'}`, but before this
patch they will all be empty (`{'', '', '', ''}`). This happens in the
implementation of `regex_iterator::operator++`. Note that the Standard
spells out quite explicitly that the prefix might need to be adjusted
when dealing with zero-length matches in
[`re.regiter.incr`](http://eel.is/c++draft/re.regiter.incr):
> In all cases in which the call to `regex_search` returns `true`,
`match.prefix().first` shall be equal to the previous value of
`match[0].second`... It is unspecified how the implementation makes
these adjustments.
[Reproduction example](https://godbolt.org/z/8ve6G3dav)
```cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <regex>
#include <string>
int main() {
std::string str = "abc";
std::regex empty_matching_pattern("");
{ // The underlying problem is that `regex_iterator::operator++` doesn't update
// the prefix correctly.
std::sregex_iterator i(str.begin(), str.end(), empty_matching_pattern), e;
std::cout << "\"";
for (; i != e; ++i) {
const std::ssub_match& prefix = i->prefix();
std::cout << prefix.str();
}
std::cout << "\"\n";
// Before the patch: ""
// After the patch: "abc"
}
{ // `regex_replace` makes the problem very visible.
std::string replaced = std::regex_replace(str, empty_matching_pattern, "!");
std::cout << "\"" << replaced << "\"\n";
// Before the patch: "!!!!"
// After the patch: "!a!b!c!"
}
}
```
Fixes#64451
rdar://119912002
In essence, this header has always been related to configuration of
the library but we didn't want to put it inside <__config> due to
complexity reasons. Now that we have sub-headers in <__config>, we
can move <__availability> to it and stop including it everywhere since
we already obtain the required macros via <__config>.
Originally, we used __libcpp_verbose_abort to handle assertion failures.
That function was declared from all public headers. Since we don't use
that mechanism anymore, we don't need to declare __libcpp_verbose_abort
from all public headers, and we can clean up a lot of unnecessary
includes.
This patch also moves the definition of the various assertion categories
to the <__assert> header, since we now rely on regular IWYU for these
assertion macros.
rdar://105510916
Using std::regex_search with the regex_constant match_default and a
simple regex pattern `$` is expected to match general strings such as
_"a", "ab", "abc"..._ at `[last, last)` positions. But, the current
implementation fails to do so.
Fixes#75042
The behavior of `std::regex_search` for patterns anchored both to the
start and to the end of the input went wrong after merging #77256 .
Patterns like `"^b*$"` started matching the strings such as `"a"`, which
is not expected.
Reverts the PR: #77256
Using `regex_search` with the regex_constant `match_default` and a
simple regex pattern `$` is expected to match general strings such as
_"a", "ab", "abc"..._ at `[last, last)` positions. But, the current
implementation fails to do so.
Fixes#75042
Also introduce `_LIBCPP_ASSERT_PEDANTIC` for assertions violating which
results in a no-op or other benign behavior, but which may nevertheless
indicate a bug in the invoking code.
This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
In preparation for running clang-format on the whole code base, we are
also removing mentions of the legacy _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY macro in
favor of the newer _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI.
We're still leaving the definition of _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to avoid
creating needless breakage in case some older patches are checked-in
with mentions of the old macro. After we branch for LLVM 18, we can do
another pass to clean up remaining uses of the macro that might have
gotten introduced by mistake (if any) and remove the macro itself at the
same time. This is just a minor convenience to smooth out the transition
as much as possible.
See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
for the clang-format proposal.
This brings most of the enable_ifs in libc++ to the same style.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Spies: ldionne, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157753
This is to prevent a GCC warning (
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/65132). It looks like
`__at_first` is always assigned before it's used, but all other member
variables of this struct are initialized in the constructor, so there is
no reason not to initialize `__at_first` as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159249
This allows including once_flag directly from <__locale> instead of
depending on all of <mutex>, which requires threading. In turn, this
makes it easier to support locales on platforms without threading.
Drive-by change: clang-format once_flag.h and use _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155487
This brings most of the enable_ifs in libc++ to the same style. It also has the nice side-effect of reducing the size of names of these symbols, since the depedent return type is shorter.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Spies: ldionne, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157736
Those were found while trying to enable configurations like no-threads
and no-localization with Clang modules enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153977
Replace most uses of `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` with
`_LIBCPP_ASSERT_UNCATEGORIZED`.
This is done as a prerequisite to introducing hardened mode to libc++.
The idea is to make enabling assertions an opt-in with (somewhat)
fine-grained controls over which categories of assertions are enabled.
The vast majority of assertions are currently uncategorized; the new
macro will allow turning on `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` (the underlying mechanism
for all kinds of assertions) without enabling all the uncategorized
assertions (in the future; this patch preserves the current behavior).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153816
This fixes rdar://110330781, which asked for the feature-test macro
for std::pmr to take into account the deployment target. It doesn't
fix https://llvm.org/PR62212, though, because the availability markup
itself must be disabled until some Clang bugs have been fixed.
This is pretty vexing, however at least everything should work once
those Clang bugs have been fixed. In the meantime, this patch at least
adds the required markup (as disabled) and ensures that the feature-test
macro for std::pmr is aware of the deployment target requirement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135813
These macros are always defined identically, so we can simplify the code a bit by merging them.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, krytarowski, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152652
To make sure all member functions that require it are marked `_LIBCPP_EXCLUDE_FROM_EXPLICIT_INSTANTIATION` I compared the output of `objdump --syms lib/libc++.1.0.dylib` before and after, ignoring addresses.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Spies: Mordante, libcxx-commits, ldionne, arichardson, mstorsjo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150896
We plan to add concepts for checking that iterators actually provide what they claim to. This is to avoid people thinking that these type traits actually check the iterator requirements in more detail.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: Mordante, libcxx-commits, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150801
The removal of operator!= in this header will be done in a separate
commit.
Note in the synopsis of P1614R2 there is a constexpr
template<class BiIter>
constexpr auto operator<=>(const sub_match<BiIter>& lhs, const sub_match<BiIter>& rhs);
In the implementation of P1614R2 there isn't a constexpr
template<class BiIter>
auto operator<=>(const sub_match<BiIter>& lhs, const sub_match<BiIter>& rhs);
There doesn't seem to be an LWG-issue, but it was fixed in the Standard
by removing the constexpr in b050fd474f11441942c88ef69b8622c8036656ac.
Implements part of:
- P1614R2 The Mothership has Landed
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132310
We already have a clang-tidy check for making sure that `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` is on free functions. This patch extends this to class members. The places where we don't check for `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` are classes for which we have an instantiation in the library.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: jplehr, mikhail.ramalho, sstefan1, libcxx-commits, krytarowski, miyuki, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142332
We changed the `abort` calls when trying to throw exceptions in `-fno-exceptions` mode to `__verbose_abort` calls, which removes the dependency in most files.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: dim, emaste, mikhail.ramalho, smeenai, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146076
This results in proper error messages instead of just an abort.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: #libc_vendors, smeenai, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141222
Other macros that disable parts of the library are named `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_WHATEVER`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143163
This change is almost fully mechanical. The only interesting change is in `generate_feature_test_macro_components.py` to generate `_LIBCPP_STD_VER >=` instead. To avoid churn in the git-blame this commit should be added to the `.git-blame-ignore-revs` once committed.
Reviewed By: ldionne, var-const, #libc
Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits, arichardson, arphaman, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143962
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI (which is what _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY is) uses
ABI tags to avoid ODR violations when linking together object files
compiled against different versions of libc++. However, pointer
authentication uses the mangled name of the function to sign the
function pointer in the vtable, which means that the ABI tag effectively
changes how the pointers are signed.
This leads to PAC failures when passing an object that holds one of these
pointers in its vtable across an ABI boundary: one side will sign the
pointer using one function mangling (with one ABI tag), and the other
side will authenticate the pointer expecting it to have a different
mangled name, which won't work.
To make sure this does not regress in the future, this patch also adds
a clang-query test to detect incorrect applications of _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140453
The ctype mask for newlib/picolibc is fully saturated, so __regex_word
has to overlap with one of the values. This commit uses the same workaround
as bionic did (uint16_t for char_class_type inside regex_traits). It
should be possible to have libc++ provide the default rune table instead,
but that will require a new mechanism to detect newlib inside __config
since the header defining the newlib/picolibc macros has not been included
yet inside __config. Doing it this way also avoids duplicating the ctype
table for newlib, reducing the global data size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138195
We currently define the preferred names in multiple places. `basic_string` and `basic_string_view` also have a lot of aliases, which makes the declarations quite long. So let's only add the preferred names in forward-declaring headers to make the implementation more readable and have all the preferred names in one place.
Reviewed By: ldionne
Spies: EricWF, krytarowski, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135824
This patch is the rebase and squash of three earlier patches.
It supersedes all three of them.
- D47111: experimental monotonic_buffer_resource.
- D47358: experimental pool resources.
- D47360: Copy std::experimental::pmr to std::pmr.
The significant difference between this patch and the-sum-of-those-three
is that this patch does not add `std::experimental::pmr::monotonic_buffer_resource`
and so on. This patch simply adds the C++17 standard facilities, and
leaves the `std::experimental` namespace entirely alone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89057
